2nd Amendment

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed

INNOCENTS BETRAYED

(THIS IS WHY WE HAVE GUNS!)

Warning: Graphic Violence. This disturbing video clearly demonstrates the consequences of centralizing government power and disarming citizens. Genocide always follows, leaving millions of
innocent victims dead.

Innocents Betrayed - The History of Gun Control - FULL LENGTH

INNOCENTS BETRAYED -- JPFO Production -- 58 minutes - DVD 2003.... This has to be the greatest professional production of the effects of gun control. This production shows actual footage of gun confiscation and its effects. This is a must video for gun shows..... "Something is out there. Finding it will change your life. Stopping it will change the world." History's worst serial killer roams the earth - calculating, methodical, and brutal. The victims - men, women, and children - numbered 170,000,000 in the 20th century. And the toll is still rising. Tragically, these victims actually depend upon their killer, they trust the kiler to protect them. But in the end, using laws, edicts, propoganda, and finally sheer force, the killer renders millions powerless. And destroys them... Horriffic persecution, slavery, and mass murder engulf nation after nation... Germany, China, Cambodia, Soviet Union, Guatemala, Uganda, Turkey, Rwanda. No country is safe. Not even the U.S.A. But who is this killer whose victims incomprehensebly outnumber those of every Bundy, Manson, or Dahmer? And what can you do to help stop the slaughter? Watch "Innocents Betrayed" and you'll have the lifesaving answers to both questions...... (2003 documentary by Jews For The Preservation of Firearms Ownership, Inc.) Directed by Aaron Zelman -- Produced by Aaron Zelman & Dr. Ignallus Plazza -- Screen Play by Claire Wolfe -- Creative Consultant, Richard W. Stevens.

THE UN AGENDA : CIVILIAN DISARMAMENT

WATCH THE FULL PRESENTATION HERE:

The United Nations

Trump's Speech After Shootings Paves Way
For A Dramatic Loss Of Rights, Censorship & PreCrime

 

An Open Letter To Our Legislators, Judges And Lawmen

LibertyFellowshipMT
Published on Mar 17, 2019

These letter was written by Dr. Chuck Baldwin and read live prior to the message preached by
Pastor Chuck Baldwin on Sunday, March 17, 2019 during the service at Liberty Fellowship.
 

Donald Trump promised the American people that he would protect our 2nd Amendment. No promise Trump made was more emphatic than his promise to protect the 2nd Amendment.

But now President Trump has joined anti-gun Democrats by becoming the loudest proponent for more draconian gun control laws, including universal background checks and "red flag" gun confiscation laws.

Donald Trump's betrayal of the 2nd Amendment is inexcusable--and unforgivable.

The NRA is compromised and in complete disarray and will be no help. It is up to the people who voted for Donald Trump to stop this. If they do not rise up en masse NOW and let Trump know in no uncertain terms that he has lost their vote FOREVER if he enacts these egregious gun control and gun confiscation laws, Trump will go down in history as having enacted more communistic gun control laws than any president since Lyndon Baines Johnson in the 1960s.

In this video, Pastor Baldwin presents the clarion call for everyone in America who cherishes their right to keep and bear arms to rally en masse against these police-state gun control laws before it's too late.

This is not about Republicans or Democrats, right or left or who wins an election. The right to keep and bear arms is more important than any election and any political party. The right to keep and bear arms is about FREEDOM.

Please share this video with as many friends and loved ones as you can. We only have a short time to stop these Orwellian gun control laws from coming into existence. We only have a short time to make Donald Trump accountable to his promise to protect the 2nd Amendment.

"We are not talking about gun control. We are talking about
GUN CONFISCATION."
- Chuck Baldwin, This Is Deadly Serious! March 14, 2019 -

This Is Deadly Serious!
https://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Articles/tabid/109/ID/3852/This-Is-Deadly-Serious.aspx

An Open Letter To Our Legislators, Judges And Lawmen
https://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Articles/tabid/109/ID/3838/An-Open-Letter-To-Our-Legislators-Judges-And-Lawmen.aspx

Links:2nd Amendment , F.B.I. , FALSE LEFT/RIGHT PARADIGM , General Summary/Crash Course

Make The CALL:

https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative

Call White House now 202-456-1111 or 202-456-1414

Call any Congressman via 202-225-3121 or 202-224-3121 

Did You Know a Law Is On The Books to Disarm All Americans?

Law provides impetus for "ultimate world disarmament"
and U.N. control over military

Public law 87-297, the Arms Control and Disarmament Act signed by President Kennedy in 1961, provides an impetus to not only ban civilian firearm ownership but to also transfer control of the U.S. military to the United Nations.

“It is the purpose of this Act to provide impetus toward this goal by creating a new agency of peace to deal with the problem of reduction and control of armaments looking toward ultimate world disarmament,” the law states.

Public Law 87-297

The law was based primarily on State Department Publication 7277, The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World, which advocates the complete disarmament of every country in favor of a permanent U.N. military force:

DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES

The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.

In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:

• The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;
• The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;
• The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations;
• The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.

Department of State Publication 7277 Dtd 1961 by SFCWizard77 

Since public law 87-297 was enacted, just about every president has worked to enact its provisions, including President Obama who signed a U.N. arms trade treaty which was rejected by the Senate.

“The right to own, buy, sell, trade, or transfer all means of armed resistance, including handguns, is denied to civilians by [Article 2] of the Arms Trade Treaty,” wrote Joe Wolverton II of the New American. “Article 3 places the ‘ammunition/munitions fired, launched or delivered by the conventional arms covered under Article 2′ within the scope of the treaty’s prohibitions, as well.”

Follow on Twitter:
@RealAlexJones | @KitDaniels1776 

LINKS :

UN Arms Transfer Treaty (ATT) on Small Arms: Gun Grab Gradualism

DHS Preparing For 7-Year War Against American People

Federal Government Moves to Disarm Veterans

Founding Fathers Battle Gun Grabbers From the Grave

DOJ MEMO TO OUTLAW AND CONFISCATE ALL GUNS

Gun Control Leads To Genocide

Gun Control Hypocrisy!

2nd Amendment

Now It’s William Barr: When Will Christians And Conservatives Stop Making Excuses For Donald Trump?
https://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Articles/tabid/109/ID/3833/Now-Its-William-Barr-When-Will-Christians-And-Conservatives-Stop-Making-Excuses-For-Donald-Trump.aspx

Published: Thursday, January 24, 2019

Okay, we all know how awful Hillary Clinton is. We all know that Donald Trump said all the right things (well, many of the right things) on the campaign trail. We all know—at least believed—that Trump was not an establishment insider. We all know that Trump promised to “drain the swamp,” dramatically reduce America’s out-of-control deficit spending, protect the Second Amendment, get America out of its endless foreign wars, terminate taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood, overturn Roe v Wade and build a wall on our southern border—that Mexico would pay for—in order to stop the flow of illegal immigration into America.

Now, after two full years of a Donald Trump administration in which he enjoyed both houses of Congress being held by fellow Republicans, we all know (and if we don’t, it’s because we don’t WANT to know) that none of the above has happened. Yet, Christians and conservatives by the millions continue to make excuses for this faker.

First, a brief comment about the border wall: All of the drama regarding a partial government shutdown and incessant public theater by actors from both political parties is quite nauseating. Republicans had control of both houses of Congress and the White House for two years. Why wasn’t money appropriated for the wall then? Why was there no government shutdown over the lack of funding for the border wall then? Why wait until Democrats take over the House to shut down (partially) the federal government and threaten to declare a State of National Emergency?

Forgive me, but this stinks to high heaven. This is nothing but smoke and mirrors. All of the high profile theatrics over the border wall is the biggest distraction to envelop our country in quite a spell. While everyone is fighting over the wall, some very serious attacks against our liberties are being waged almost without notice. And all of the hullabaloo over the wall is completely covering up Trump’s failure to carry out the rest of his campaign promises—and the fact that Trump himself has often worked in direct opposition to many of his campaign promises.

Secondly, his rhetoric notwithstanding, President Trump has NOT drawn down America’s involvement in endless foreign wars. Trump’s promise to bring U.S. forces home from Syria is so much hot air. Trump’s “immediate” withdrawal order is now mired in an indefinite time schedule. In other words, there is no time schedule. Our troops that are still fighting in Syria are not only still based in Syria, but they are also still using bases in Iraq as launching pads for military excursions into Syria. Of course, Trump promised that the U.S. bases in Iraq were not going anywhere—and that’s one promise he will keep.

Our troops are still fighting endless wars in Afghanistan and Somalia. In fact, Trump has shoved record military spending through Congress and has done nothing to reduce America’s global military presence (U.S. troops are stationed in over 160 countries, which equates to 95% of the world’s foreign military bases). America is as much the global cop as it was when Trump was elected. No, that’s not quite true: We are MUCH MORE the global cop than when Trump was elected, as Trump has expanded our military presence in Eastern Europe to unprecedented levels—levels not even seen during the Cold War.

Thirdly, as we have just passed the 46th anniversary of the ignoble Roe v Wade Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion-on-demand nationwide, unborn children continue to be legally murdered—in spite of the fact that Donald Trump was President and Republicans controlled both houses of Congress during the past two years. All of Trump’s “pro-life” rhetoric hasn’t saved the life of a single unborn baby. Since Trump was elected, over 2 million unborn children have been mercilessly murdered in the wombs of their mothers—with the complete approbation of a Republican-led federal government.

The GOP controlled the entire federal government for 4.6 years of G.W. Bush's eight years in office—and they controlled the entire federal government for the past two years of Donald Trump’s presidency. They did NOTHING about Roe v Wade under Bush, and they have done NOTHING about Roe v Wade under Trump. These phony pro-life GOP congressmen and senators haven't even defunded America's largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood.

Fourthly, as to ending the federal government’s extravagant spending habits, what a crock! During 8 years of a Republican majority in the House of Representatives, the federal debt INCREASED $7.9 trillion. And a Trump presidency did nothing to reduce Washington’s out-of-control spending—even with Republicans in control of both houses of Congress.

Fifthly, what about Trump’s promise to “drain the swamp”? This is one of Trump’s biggest lies of all. Trump never intended to drain the swamp. From the outset of his presidency, he began appointing mostly CFR globalists, neocons, warmongers, Zionists, corporate elitists and corrupt government insiders to his administration. And he hasn’t stopped.

I am absolutely sick and tired of hearing my conservative Christian brethren say things like, “Trump is trying his best, but he’s getting no help from his cabinet and staff.” Well, DUH! Who picked his cabinet and staff? Trump did.

Then they say things like, “Trump doesn’t really understand these issues; he really wants to do right, but he’s getting bad advice.” BARF! If he didn’t understand the issues, he’s had two full years as President of the United States to get caught up. But he continues to make the same unconstitutional, big-government, warmongering decisions over and over again. The excuse that “he wants to do right, but is getting bad advice” just doesn’t wash anymore. It’s time for Trump’s supporters to wake up and realize that Donald Trump is a great big boy, not a little kid, and is fully capable of thinking for himself.

Donald Trump knows exactly what he’s doing. He’s known exactly what he’s been doing from day number one. He is the consummate con man. He is a charlatan. He is a double-tongued pretender. He has filled the executive branch of the federal government with the same crooks as presidents before him.

And now Trump’s selection of William Barr as America’s next attorney general is the final straw. There can be NO MORE DOUBT.

William Barr is the swamp creature’s Swamp Creature. He is the personification of all of the evil and wickedness that has gone on in Washington, D.C., during the past 30 years. Name the act of criminality, cover-up or act of chicanery that has taken place in Washington D.C., over the last 30 years, and William Barr is probably neck deep in it.

Here is a summary of Barr’s career:

*Barr was a full-time CIA operative, recruited by Langley out of high school, starting in 1971. Barr’s youth career goal was to head the CIA.

*CIA operative assigned to the China directorate, where he became close to powerful CIA operative George H.W. Bush, whose accomplishments already included the CIA/Cuba Bay of Pigs, Asia CIA operations (Vietnam War, Golden Triangle narcotics), Nixon foreign policy (Henry Kissinger), and the Watergate operation.

*When George H.W. Bush became CIA Director in 1976, Barr joined the CIA’s “legal office” and Bush’s inner circle, and worked alongside Bush’s longtime CIA enforcers Theodore “Ted” Shackley, Felix Rodriguez, Thomas Clines, and others, several of whom were likely involved with the Bay of Pigs/John F. Kennedy assassination, and numerous southeast Asian operations, from the Phoenix Program to Golden Triangle narco-trafficking.

*Barr stonewalled and destroyed the Church Committee investigations into CIA abuses.

*Barr stonewalled and stopped inquiries in the CIA bombing assassination of Chilean opposition leader Orlando Letelier.

*Barr joined George H.W. Bush’s legal/intelligence team during Bush’s vice presidency (under President Ronald Reagan). Rose from assistant attorney general to Chief Legal Counsel to attorney general (1991) during the Bush 41 presidency.

*Barr was a key player in the Iran-Contra operation, if not the most important member of the apparatus, simultaneously managing the operation while also “fixing” the legal end, ensuring that all of the operatives could do their jobs without fear of exposure or arrest.

*In his attorney general confirmation, Barr vowed to “attack criminal organizations,” drug smugglers and money launderers. It was all hot air: as AG, Barr would preserve, protect, cover up, and nurture the apparatus that he helped create, and use Justice Department power to escape punishment.

*Barr stonewalled and stopped investigations into all Bush/Clinton and CIA crimes, including BCCI and BNL CIA drug banking, the theft of Inslaw/PROMIS software, and all crimes of state committed by Bush.

*Barr provided legal cover for Bush’s illegal foreign policy and war crimes.

*Barr left Washington, and went through the “rotating door” to the corporate world, where he took on numerous directorships and counsel positions for major companies. In 2007 and again from 2017, Barr was counsel for politically connected international law firm Kirkland & Ellis. Among its other notable attorneys and alumni are Kenneth Starr, John Bolton, Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and numerous Trump administration attorneys. K&E’s clients include sex trafficker/pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital.

If all of this isn’t bad enough, William Bar is a co-conspirator in the murders of Vicki and Sammy Weaver at Ruby Ridge, Idaho. James Bovard tells the story:

The Senate Judiciary Committee hearings for Attorney General nominee William Barr have focused heavily on Barr’s views on Special Counsel Robert Mueller. But nobody is asking about Barr’s legal crusade for blanket immunity for federal agents who killed American citizens.

Barr received a routine questionnaire from the Judiciary Committee asking him to disclose his past work including pro bono activities “serving the disadvantaged.” The “disadvantaged” that Barr spent the most time helping was an FBI agent who slayed an Idaho mother holding her baby in 1992. Barr spent two weeks organizing former Attorneys General and others to support “an FBI sniper in defending against criminal charges in connection with the Ruby Ridge incident.” Barr also “assisted in framing legal arguments advanced… in the district court and the subsequent appeal to the Ninth Circuit,” he told the committee.

That charitable work (for an FBI agent who already had a federally paid law firm defending him) helped tamp down one of the biggest scandals during Barr’s time as Attorney General from 1991 to early 1993. Barr was responsible for both the U.S. Marshals Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, two federal agencies whose misconduct at Ruby Ridge “helped to weaken the bond of trust that must exist between ordinary Americans and our law enforcement agencies,” according to a 1995 Senate Judiciary Committee report.

After Randy Weaver, an outspoken white separatist living on a mountaintop in northern Idaho, was entrapped by an undercover federal agent, U.S. marshals trespassed on Weaver’s land and killed his 14-year-old son, Sammy [by shooting him in the back]. The following day, FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi killed his wife, Vicki, as she was standing in the cabin doorway [holding her baby in her arms]. Horiuchi had previously shot Randy Weaver in the back after he stepped out of the cabin. The suspects were never given a warning or a chance to surrender and had taken no action against FBI agents. Weaver survived.

After an Idaho jury found Weaver not guilty on almost all charges, federal judge Edward Lodge slammed the Justice Department and FBI for concealing evidence and showing “a callous disregard for the rights of the defendants and the interests of justice.” A Justice Department internal investigation compiled a 542-page report detailing federal misconduct and coverups in the case and suggested criminal charges against FBI officials involved in Ruby Ridge.

Barr told the New York Times in 1993 that he was not directly involved in the Ruby Ridge operation. Two years later, the Washington Post revealed that “top officials of the Bush Justice Department had at least 20 [phone] contacts concerning Ruby Ridge in the 24 hours before Vicki Weaver was shot,” including two calls involving Barr.

In January 1995, FBI director Louis Freeh announced wrist slaps for the FBI officials involved, including his friend Larry Potts, who supervised the operation from headquarters and who approved the shoot-without-provocation orders that “contravened the constitution of the United States,” according to the Justice Department internal report.

When Attorney General Janet Reno later nominated Potts for deputy director of the FBI, top newspapers and members of Congress protested, but Barr told the New York Times that his friend Potts “was deliberate and careful, and I developed a great deal of confidence in his judgment… I can’t think of enough good things to say about him.” A few months later, the FBI suspended Potts after suspected perjury regarding Ruby Ridge. (Potts was not charged and retired two years later.)

The Justice Department paid $3 million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit from the Weaver family. But when Boundary County, Idaho filed criminal charges against Horiuchi, Barr sprang to action seeking immunity for FBI snipers. He spearheaded efforts to sway the court to dismiss all charges because holding a sniper liable would “severely undermine, if not cripple, the ability of future attorneys general to rely on such specialized units in moments of crisis such as hostage taking and terrorist acts.”

When the Justice Department won an initial appeals court victory in the case in 2000, federal judge Alex Kozinski warned in a dissent of a new James Bond “007 standard for the use of deadly force” against American citizens. The same court reversed that decision the following year. Kozinski, writing for the majority, declared: “A group of FBI agents formulated rules of engagement that permitted their colleagues to hide in the bushes and gun down men who posed no immediate threat. Such wartime rules are patently unconstitutional for a police action.”

Does William Barr still endorse “wartime rules” and a “007 standard” that absolve federal agents for questionable shootings of Americans?  Does Barr consider “illegal government killings” to be an oxymoron? Best of all, can Barr explain to us his understanding of the phrase “government under the law”?

See also this report in The American Conservative.

In addition, as far as William Barr is concerned, the Fourth Amendment does not even exist. Senator Rand Paul notes that Barr "has been a big supporter of the PATRIOT Act, which lowered the standard for spying on Americans, and he even went so far as to say the PATRIOT Act was pretty good — we should go much further."

Rand also said that Barr is a “big fan” of seizing people’s property through civil asset forfeiture. Rand continued by saying that “the first things I’ve learned about him [Barr] being for more surveillance of Americans is very, very troubling.”

Furthermore (yes, there is more), William Barr told liberal gun grabber Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) in his senate confirmation hearing for becoming America’s next attorney general that he fully intends to push forward with Donald Trump’s Hitlerian “take the guns first, go through due process second” gun confiscation laws, also known as “red flag” laws. And remember: It was Donald Trump, not Barack Obama, who gave us more gun control by outlawing “bump stocks.”

Yep! The promise to protect the Second Amendment is another promise Trump has broken (that’s Number Six).

I have written previously about these Stalinesque “red flag” gun confiscation laws. And I will continue to warn people about these unconstitutional, draconian “red flag” laws as long as they continue to pose a threat to our liberties.

Of course, not only are most of the individual states currently in the process of considering “red flag” gun confiscation laws (13 states have already passed them), Republican Senator Marco Rubio (FL) has also introduced a national “red flag” law.

“Red flag” gun confiscation laws are the same kind of laws that were used to confiscate the weapons of undesirables (meaning anyone the state doesn’t like) in Hitler’s Germany, Stalin’s Russia, Mao’s China—and in every despotic nation of the world.

Here is a warning about “red flag” laws (and the NRA) from TheFireArmGuy.

And here is William Barr’s statement that “red flag” gun confiscation laws are the “single most important thing” government can do regarding gun control.

Internet blogger and longtime supporter of Donald Trump, Carl F. Worden, recently wrote this:

Now I can understand how Trump fell for the wrongful nominations of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray.  That was early-on in Trump's presidency and Trump had no way of knowing those he trusted for advice were in fact Deep State maggots intent on destroying his presidency.  But this is a solid two years into Trump's first term, and it is more than obvious that Barr will not be a team player for Trump -- or us! In fact, Barr has a very troubling record on Second Amendment issues.

At this time, I have no confidence left in Donald J. Trump.  He is either a complete fool, or he knows exactly what he's doing, and either way he's not fit to represent me anymore.

No more excuses, Mr. Trump!

Bravo, Carl!

Sadly, a host of Trump’s supporters continue to be bamboozled by the elaborate psyops misinformation (translated: propaganda) entity known as QAnon, which keeps reassuring the Trump faithful that he is covertly waging war against the globalist insiders and that any day now the curtain is going to collapse on the swamp creatures. It’s all a hoax to give Trump cover—and more time.

If the nomination of William Barr as America’s next “Top Cop” doesn’t awaken the “Always Trumpers,” there is absolutely no hope for them. Even worse is the fact that the longer Christians and conservatives continue to make excuses for Trump’s lies and deceptions, there is less and less hope for America.

© Chuck Baldwin

*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:

Chuck Baldwin Live Donate Form

I also have many books and DVDs available for purchase online. Go here:

Chuck Baldwin Live Store

To subscribe to my weekly columns, click here:

Subscribe to Chuck's Column

Must-Read Articles :

News You Won’t Hear Christians And Conservatives Talk About
Published: Thursday, November 29, 2018

More News You Won’t Hear Christians And Conservatives Talk About
Published: Thursday, December 6, 2018

Still More News You Won’t Hear Christians And Conservatives Talk About
Published: Thursday, December 13, 2018

Rand Paul Urges Supporters To Stop Obama Ammo Ban
"The President is not a king and the Constitution means what it"

by Steve Watson | Infowars.com | March 9, 2015

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul has called on his supporters to flood the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms with complaints and comments in order to prevent Obama’s executive move to ban so called green tip ammunition.

In a letter published via Paul’s political action committee, RANDPAC, the Senator stated “President Obama is determined to cement his anti-gun agenda into law.”

“I’m counting on your immediate action to help RANDPAC flood the agency with a message from America’s pro-gun majority,” Paul adds.

Paul also notes that previous action by his supporters was instrumental in preventing an attempt by the President to expand background checks via executive action.

“Your grassroots muscle played a vital role in defeating President Obama’s national gun registration scheme in 2013,” Paul writes. “And your support is needed again to defend our Second Amendment rights in 2015.”

The proposed ammo ban has caused consternation among hundreds of lawmakers who wrote to the BATF last week, urging it to “abandon” the plan.

“Under no circumstances should ATF adopt a standard that will ban ammunition that is overwhelmingly used by law-abiding Americans for legitimate purposes,” the lawmakers wrote.

Meanwhile, top police representatives have said that there is no real need to implement a 5.56 ammo ban, because it isn’t a threat faced by law enforcement.

Senator Paul’s letter is accompanied by a petition which states “Despite how Obama tries to impose his agenda through executive fiat, the President is not a king and the Constitution means what it says.”

“Democrats up-and-down the ballot were flushed out of office in the 2014 elections as a result of pushing Obama’s radical anti-gun agenda,” the petition also states, adding that “[The] ammo ban is a backdoor route to imposing President Obama’s gun control.”

“As a member of America’s pro-gun majority, I proudly stand for the Second Amendment and oppose ANY and ALL efforts to subvert our Constitutional rights.” The petition concludes.

—————————————————————-

Steve Watson is a London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from Nottingham Trent University.

50 of Bloomberg’s Mayors Bail Over Gun Confiscation Agenda

NYC mayor warns that group promotes
“confiscation of guns from law-abiding citizens”

Adan Salazar
Infowars.com
February 10, 2014

Nearly 50 mayors have jumped ship on former NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s “Mayors Against Illegal Guns” campaign over allegations that the group’s ultimate goal is outright gun confiscation, according to one former member.

As reported, Poughkeepsie Mayor John Tkazyik published a statement in last week’s Poughkeepsie Journal coming clean about the group’s true intentions, total disarmament of law-abiding gun owners.

“Under the guise of helping mayors facing a crime and drug epidemic, MAIG intended to promote confiscation of guns from law-abiding citizens,” Tkazyik said, confirming what many already suspected about the group.

“Nearly 50 pro-Second Amendment mayors have left the organization. They left for the same reason I did,” he also added.

The fact that 50 mayors bailed in response to a concerted effort to undermine the Bill of Rights is certainly headline-worthy, but so far, unsurprisingly, few other media outlets have picked the story up.

And Tkazyik isn’t the first to cast these allegations. In 2007, the mayor of Williamsport, Pa., also said she left after witnessing “dubious” attempts to subvert the Second Amendment. “I have learned that the coalition may be working on issues which conflict with legal gun ownership, and that some actions on your behalf are dubious,” then-Williamsport Mayor Mary Wolf wrote in a letter to Bloomberg himself.

And just last year, during a Mothers Demand Action rally (a gun control coalition which merged with MAIG in December 2013), Austin, Texas City Councilman Mike Martinez singled out a protestor carrying a “Stop the Gun Ban” sign and told him, “…there is no gun ban currently, but because of the work we’re doing here today, we will make your sign legitimate shortly, so you hang on to that.”

News of the group’s traitorous crusade comes at a time when American gun owners are already wary of continual attempts to curtail firearm ownership. Since the Sandy Hook school shooting, the Obama administration has proposed legislation aimed at combating “gun violence,” including proposals that would require background checks for all gun sales; in effect, registration.

American gun owners who know the history behind gun control are fearful that a federal gun registry will eventually lead to confiscation. Indeed, numerous articles have been published showing how, since 2007, roving law enforcement teams have been disarming Californians deemed “illegal” using a list of owners.

However, in the face of blatant evidence, the director of MAIG, Mark Glaze, has boldly gone on to publicly deny that “nobody in California has come to take anyone’s guns.”

Bloomberg Caught In Secret Gun Confiscation Plan

[vid]

This is Huge Inside info that shows the subversive plan behind Bloomberg's nation wide movement to destroy the right of self defense. Full report with video proof at Infowars.com

The fact that groups like MAIG are to the point of openly bragging about their intentions doesn’t bode well for gun owners. It signifies the establishment is preparing to take grand strides to convince the American public of the “dangers” posed by guns. That means more contrived scenes of violence with guns at their center.

The fact that Obama has repeatedly asserted his willingness to work around Congress to make things happen is also worrying. In his 2014 State of the Union speech he also mentioned that his administration would continue to address “gun violence,” and that he intends to “keep trying, with or without Congress, to help stop more tragedies from visiting innocent Americans in our movie theaters and our shopping malls, or schools like Sandy Hook.”

It should now be abundantly clear that any reassurances, given by known liars such as Obama or any of his anti-Second Amendment teams, are merely to placate gun owners into a state of pacification and complacency. However, the jig is now up and the curtain has been lifted.

Overall, 50 mayors bailing on the group over its future plans shows a definite sea change in the way public servants are regarding citizens’ rights and the Second Amendment. However, it is simply incredible that more mayors, knowing the treasonous goals of the organization, have not abandoned ship.

Here’s a list of mayors that are members of Bloomberg’s initiative.

H/T Newsbusters

This article was posted: Monday, February 10, 2014 at 1:20 pm

Mayor: Nationwide Gun Confiscation Is Goal of Mayors Against Illegal Guns

Poughkeepsie, N.Y. mayor says he left the group over confiscation plans

Kit Daniels
Infowars.com
February 7, 2014

A current New York mayor has publicly announced his decision to leave Mayors Against Illegal Guns because the gun control group demands an all-out “confiscation of guns from law-abiding citizens.”

In an announcement published by his city’s newspaper, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. Mayor John C. Tkazyik said he quit the group after realizing it was simply a vehicle for Michael Bloomberg to “promote his personal gun-control agenda.”

“It did not take long to realize that MAIG’s agenda was much more than ridding felons of illegal guns,” he stated. “Under the guise of helping mayors facing a crime and drug epidemic, MAIG intended to promote confiscation of guns from law-abiding citizens.”

“I don’t believe, never have believed and never will believe that public safety is enhanced by encroaching on our right to bear arms and I will not be a part of any organization that does.”

Tkazyik also pointed out that Chicago’s extremely high crime rates are undeterred by the city’s highly restrictive gun laws.

“Depriving law-abiding citizens of their right to own firearms only makes them more vulnerable,” he added.

Tkazyik’s announcement is a stark contrast to the rhetoric of other politicians who want to grossly violate human rights.

At a gun control event earlier this year, Austin, Texas City Council Member Mike Martinez admitted that gun control is simply a step-by-step process to completely eliminate the Second Amendment.

While pointing at a sign held by a protestor which read “Stop Gun Ban,” Martinez said that “someone needs to inform him that there is no gun ban currently, but because of the work we’re doing today, we will make [his] sign legitimate shortly.”

“So you hang on to that [sign],” he said to a cheering crowd of gun control advocates.

[vid]

And in a flashback to 1995, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Ca.) told 60 Minutes that she wanted to outright ban all firearms owned by Americans.

“If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them … ‘Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in,’ I would have done it,” she said.

This is the true intent of gun control, even though many of its advocates whitewash the truth with a variety of propaganda techniques or by just simply being ignorant.

For example, the organizers for the event at which Martinez spoke told reporters that they didn’t want to ban guns even though that is exactly what Martinez demanded in his speech.

Gun control advocates constantly parrot deceptive phrases such as “common sense solutions” and “we don’t want to ban guns” when selling their agenda which will only lead to the complete disarmament of the population by authoritarians.

Fortunately, on the other hand, Mayor Tkazyik is joining an ever-increasing list of public officials who have denounced gun control.

Last month, Detroit’s Police Chief James Craig told reporters that legal gun owners deter crime.

“Coming from California, where it takes an act of Congress to get a concealed weapon permit, I got to Maine, where they give out lots of Carrying Concealed Weapon [permits], and I had a stack of CCW permits I was denying; that was my orientation,” he said. “I changed my orientation real quick; Maine is one of the safest places in America.”

“Clearly, suspects knew that good Americans were armed.”

And last year, Erie Co., N.Y. Sheriff Timothy B. Howard publicly announced that his department would not enforce New York’s latest gun control law, the SAFE Act.

“It’s an unenforceable law and I believe it will ultimately be declared unconstitutional,” he said to reporters. “Do you want law enforcement people that will say ‘I will do this because I’m told to do this, even if I know it’s wrong?’”

It is refreshing to see elected officials serving their constituents while also respecting the Bill of Rights.

This article was posted: Sunday, February 9, 2014 at 11:40 am

THE 2ND AMENDMENT IS TO FIGHT TYRANNY AND GENOCIDE!!

170,000,000 KILLED BY GOVERNMENT IN THE 20TH CENTURY

_56 Million Exterminated Under the Guise of Gun Control!!_

DHS Has Now Acquired Enough Bullets
To Wage 30 Year War!! 

LINK: DHS ARMING AGAINST AMERICANS

 http://www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/6.1/gun_facts_6_1_screen.pdf

Founders Enshrined 2nd Amendment to Restrain Government!

Unbelievable Reactions From Anti-Gunners 

Alex Jones talks about the transition that is happening where liberal trendies from
all over the planet are waking up that guns are not scary and instead empowering.

 

Despite launching a gun control agenda that threatens to disarm the American people, President Obama
has signed a bill that would afford him armed Secret Service protection for life.

-- One rule for you, another rule for them --

LINK: Gun Control Hypocrisy!

The Fight for RTKBA in Public Opinion & in Missouri Legislature

Eric Holder wants the media to propagandize the public about gun control. Bloomberg wants Facebook to censor gun posts. And 3 gun control groups strategized at SXSW on how to fight the right to keep and bear arms using social media.

But in a short time, and on a weekday, gun owners rallied to publicly show what responsible gun owners and guns are not to be feared. And it appears the Missouri legislature will use its 10th Amendment powers to protect individuals' right to keep and bear arms from federal encroachment.

http://www.infowars.com/unbelievable-...

http://www.infowars.com/armed-march-1...

http://kxan.com/2014/03/13/two-killed...

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-cana...

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/gun-parts... 

Gun Parts Manufacturer Files Restraining Order Against ATF

Ares Armor, a California gun parts manufacturer, has filed a temporary restraining order against
the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for fears the federal agency
could soon bust down its doors. The report also details Operation Fast And Furious.

http://www.infowars.com/gun-parts-man...

 

Explosive Gun Control Documentary ‘Disarmed’ by Anthony Gucciardi Released For Free Online

Anthony Gucciardi
Infowars.com
May 1, 2013

 Disarmed: A History of Gun Control

The explosive gun control documentary Disarmed: A History of Gun Control, which examines
the true statistics behind firearm use and gun control legislation, has released for free online.

Disarmed breaks down research that amounts to hundreds of pages and dozens of hours into a high energy blast of information that is catered towards both hardened firearm activists and gun control advocates alike. As the statistics and data come together, the key points in the film are backed by reality that goes beyond the media manipulation and emotional hype surrounding the entire issue of gun control and gun freedom

The film, available for free on Youtube in full, features intense discussions with highly influential and knowledgeable individuals like Mike Adams of NaturalNews, Texas Representative Steven Toth, Representative Joe Carr, and many others.

‘A 31 MINUTE RED PILL OF INFORMATION’

You’ll discover hard-hitting information, such as the real numbers behind firearm deaths verses what the media would like you to believe, how ‘gun free zones’ are actually fueling crime, how mass shooting ‘epidemics’ actually tie into gun control zoning, how to protect yourself from looming gun bans, how to beat back insane legislation that is attempting to trample the Second Amendment, self-defense tips, and much more.

Disarmed is designed to be the ultimate ‘reality check’ to share with anyone and everyone who still clings to the purported effectiveness of gun free zones and gun control legislation. As Mike Adams puts it:

“Disarmed is totally hard hitting, it is a 31 minute red pill for those who still cling to the concept of gun free zones and mass disarmament.” – Mike Adams of NaturalNews

In addition, Disarmed is created in such a way that it details the blatant failures behind attempts by control freak politicians to seize weapons through complete and utter gun bans. Politicians that are physically protected via firearm-wielding security forces or actually carry their own hand gun for self-defense purposes

*****POWERFUL, A-MUST-SEE!!*****

Man Who Fled Communism Blasts Oregon Lawmakers For Gun Control Attempt 

“This is Marxism, plain and clear.”

A man who fled Cuba’s communist regime in the 1960s blasted Oregon lawmakers Thursday during a public hearing on proposed gun control legislation.

Manuel Martinez, who narrowly escaped Cuba in 1962 after being imprisoned for opposing Fidel Castro, passionately defended the Second Amendment in front of Oregon’s Senate Judiciary Committee, comparing the state’s attempts to pass gun control to moves made by his former government.

“Don’t sell me this. A very powerful man tried to sell me this 50-something years ago, I didn’t buy it,” Martinez said. “This is Marxism, plain and clear.”

The legislation, Senate Bill 1551, proposes massively expanding background checks to almost every private sale, somehow expected to force criminals to voluntarily submit to a records check.

“They put this dog and pony show saying hey, we are going to protect you. No, what they did was enslave a country,” Martinez said. “They destroyed a country the same way that this country is going to be destroyed if we continue in this fashion. This is what you’re selling here!” Martinez said, holding up old communist magazines from Cuba.

Martinez was joined by others opposed to the legislation, as well as several supporters including national gun control advocate Capt. Mark Kelly. A vocal critic of “assault rifles,” Kelly was caught purchasing an AR-15 last March in Arizona. After investigators contacted Kelly’s gun control group to question the purchase, Kelly suddenly announced he never intended to keep the firearm, but instead bought the rifle in order to hand it over to police.

Others such as Oregon Firearm Federation Director Kevin Starrett attacked the state’s obvious attempt at gun registration, which has already been used to implement confiscation in several states.

“We all know what this bill is about. This is a gun registration and confiscation bill,” Starrett said. “Let’s not tell the same lies we told in New York and California.”

Despite the obvious move towards registration, the bill’s author, Democratic Sen. Floyd Prozanski, claimed no records would be kept past 10 days, calling Starrett a “conspiracist” for not blindly trusting the government’s claims.

Following the passage of the New York SAFE act in 2013, registered gun owners began receiving letters demanding they hand over their firearms. Recent legislation in California produced similar results, with Justice Department agents confiscating firearms from law-abiding citizens all across the state.

Martinez made national news after confronting lawmakers last year as well, helping end similar attempts by Oregon legislators to restrict gun rights.

Although gun homicide has fallen 49 percent since 1993, a recent poll found that a majority of American’s believe it has risen, a clear indication of the establishment’s attempt to push a false narrative.

Outside of Oregon, President Obama has continued to threaten gun rights through executive action, pushing to chip away at patient privacy laws. Despite reassurances, the medical system continues to be fraudulently used for backdoor gun confiscation.

"Don't Sell Me This!"

Communism Escapee Blasts Gun Control

"Don't sell me this. A very powerful man tried to sell me this 50-something years ago, I didn't buy it"
Manuel Martinez, who narrowly escaped Cuba in 1962 after being imprisoned for opposing Fidel Castro, passionately defended the Second Amendment in front of Oregon lawmakers Thursday during a public hearing on proposed gun control legislation.

http://www.infowars.com/man-who-fled-...

A current New York mayor has publicly announced his decision to leave Mayors Against Illegal Guns because the gun control group demands an all-out "confiscation of guns from law-abiding citizens."

http://www.infowars.com/mayor-nationw...

Colonel Who Vowed to Disarm Americans Works With Homeland Security

Oath-violating Bateman also made veiled death threats against blogger

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
December 6, 2013

Lt. Col. Robert Bateman, the second amendment-hating Army Officer who caused controversy after vowing to “pry your gun from your cold, dead, fingers,” works closely with the Department of Homeland Security.

Earlier this week, Bateman, an active military commander, penned a piece for Esquire magazine in which he promised to push for a total ban on all firearms besides muskets, shotguns and rifles, and shut down all gun manufacturers except for those who produced weapons for the federal government and the armed forces (you will be disarmed, the state will have a monopoly on firepower).

Bateman is president and founder of Alliance Defense Marketing Associates LLC, a “global premier risk management” firm that does work for the DHS.

According to the company’s website, part of the services offered by the firm include, “Homeland Security operational initiatives.”

According to Bateman’s official LinkedIn page, he also personally specializes in “Defense/Homeland Security/Law Enforcement operational initiatives.”

That’s ironic given that while Bateman is lecturing the American people about their gun rights, the DHS is simultaneously buying assault rifles and acquiring billions of rounds of ammunition.

Critics contend that Bateman’s revulsion for the second amendment (which he woefully misinterprets) “proves he knows nothing about the Constitution he swore an oath to defend.”

Bateman’s promise to “pry your gun from your cold, dead, fingers” was an inflammatory reference to his advocacy for making it illegal for guns on his imaginary blacklist to be inherited. “I am willing to wait until you die, hopefully of natural causes,” wrote Bateman.

Later in the article, Bateman says disarming the American people is all about encouraging “less violence and death,” although such sentiments weren’t evident when he became embroiled in an argument with a blogger which ended up with the Colonel making a thinly veiled death threat.

The argument concerned a former senior female Human Terrain Team (HTT) member who was allegedly subjected to a death threat by an active duty lieutenant at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan.

After Bateman engaged in “ad hominem attacks” against Maximilian Forte, the blogger who posted the story, and was subsequently banned, he resorted to a veiled death threat of his own.

“And I apologize for the future. Not really my fault. But I am sorry nonetheless,” wrote Bateman.

“You apologize for the future. It was worth approving your message just so that others can see the veiled threat,” responded Forte.

Bateman repeated the threat in a subsequent post when he remarked, “And again, Max, truly, I am sorry for your future.”

Bateman’s thinly veiled death threats reveal him to be a wolf in sheep’s clothing, someone who claims to be all about reducing violence yet resorts to barely disguised rhetorical threats of violence against his ideological adversaries.

It seems abundantly clear that it is Bateman who has a problem with violence and is most likely a danger to himself and those around him. It is therefore Bateman, and not the American people, who should be disarmed.

Feel free to politely email Col. Bateman and let him know what you think about his views on the second amendment.

Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

This article was posted: Friday, December 6, 2013 at 1:09 pm

Esquire Contributor Tries to Sell Gun Confiscation

Lt. Col. Robert Bateman, the second amendment-hating Army Officer who caused controversy after vowing to "pry your gun from your cold, dead, fingers," works closely with the Department of Homeland Security.
http://www.infowars.com/colonel-who-v...
 

National Firearms Act
is Fast Approaching

The ATF's National Firearms Act is fast approaching. The act would include:

* the agency's definition of a "responsible person"
* require persons in trusts to submit photographs and fingerprints
* and require all applications to be forwarded to law enforcement 

NFL Declares War on 2nd Amendment for Obama

PSYOPS

-- Psychological Operations --

“People in general just will NOT, take their heads out of the sand!”

Psyops, or psychological operations, is a term used to describe the techniques of psychological manipulation used in warfare. These operations are used to deceive, confuse, disrupt and demoralize the enemy, with an aim toward weakening enemy resistance or even causing enemy forces to surrender and enemy populations to capitulate.

NOTES :

http://www.corbettreport.com/psyops-101-an-introduction-to-psychological-operations/
http://www.corbettreport.com/psyops-101-a-brief-history-of-fake-news/
http://www.corbettreport.com/psyops-101-psyops-on-the-homefront/
http://www.corbettreport.com/psyops-101-the-technology-of-psych-warfare/
http://www.corbettreport.com/new-world-next-week-2012111/

LINKS: Police State 1 | Police State 2 | Police State 3 | Police State 4 | Military Illegally on American Streets | Military Training to Take on Americans | DHS Preparing For 7-Year War Against American People | Foreign Troops Training To Confiscate Guns of Americans | Subverting The Public | Propaganda History | Bread and Circus

Justice Dept. Launches Covert Sanctions Against Gun Owners

Media denial is part of disinformation campaign

Kit Daniels
Infowars.com
May 1, 2014

The U.S. Department of Justice is currently attacking the Second Amendment by fiat while constantly denying its abuses despite clear evidence to the contrary.

Yesterday we revealed that the Justice Dept. is causing banks to fear doing business with legal gun dealers due to Operation Choke Point, a joint program between the DOJ, FDIC and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau targeting “high-risk activities,” of which firearm sales is also listed.

“Federal law enforcers are targeting merchant categories like payday lenders, ammunition and tobacco sales, and telemarketers – but not merely by pursuing those merchants directly,” Jason Oxman, the CEO of the Electronic Transactions Association, wrote on the subject. “Rather, Operation Choke Point is flooding payments companies that provide processing service to those industries with subpoenas, civil investigative demands, and other burdensome and costly legal demands.”

Oxman explained the superficial logic behind Operation Choke Point: by increasing the legal and compliance costs of serving “disfavored merchant categories,” financial institutions will “simply stop providing service to such merchants.”

“And it’s working – payments companies across the country are cutting off service to categories of merchants that – although providing a legal service – are creating the potential for significant financial and reputational harm as law enforcement publicizes its activities,” he added.

Last month, BitPay, a U.S.-based bitcoin processor, refused to do business with gun dealer Michael Cargill of Central Texas Gunworks due to its Terms of Service which excludes merchants involved in firearm sales, ponzi schemes, “get rich quick” programs, “money service businesses” (such as payday loans), gambling and others which are all listed in the FDIC document.

Prominent financial experts have, however, come out and opposed the program, such as Frank Keating, the CEO of the American Banker Associated, who explained his opposition to the program in the Wall Street Journal.

“Unfortunately, the strategy is legally dubious,” he wrote. “[The] Justice [Dept.] is pressuring banks to shut down accounts without pressing charges against a merchant or even establishing that the merchant broke the law.”

Last August, 31 members of Congress became aware of Operation Choke Point and sent a letter to the Justice Dept. asking for information on the program, stating that it “has come to our attention that the DOJ and the FDIC are leading a joint effort that according to a DOJ official is intended to ‘change the structures within the financial system … choking [online short-term lenders] off from the very air they need to survive,’” in reference to payday lenders listed as a “high-risk activity” alongside firearm sales in the FDIC document.

They also warned that the agencies were acting outside of their congressional mandate and without statutory authority.

The DOJ, however, refused to answer any questions about the program.

But Justice Dept. trial attorney Joel M. Sweet provided specific details on the program during a FDIC-sponsored presentation to bank examiners, which clearly indicates that both the DOJ and FDIC are scrutinizing firearm sales so severely that banks will shy away from the burdensome demands as Oxman indicated.

It’s no surprise that Operation Choke Point came into existence during Eric Holder’s reign as Attorney General, who famously said in 1995 that he wanted to “brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.”

Holder has only increased such rhetoric since then and is undoubtedly one of the most anti-gun politicians inside the beltway.

Only a few weeks ago, for example, he suggested that gun owners should be forced to wear “smart gun” bracelets, which would render firearms much less reliable in defensive use.

Holder is also one of the most corrupt bureaucrats as well. When his unconstitutional abuses are exposed, it is common for Holder to deny that they are taking place, even if the evidence is in plain view.

For one, Holder denied the cover-up behind Operation Fast and Furious, the DOJ program in which the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms purposely allowed firearms to end up in the hands of Mexican drug cartels in a failed effort to catch them.

But he was later held in contempt of Congress for refusing to release thousands of internal Justice Dept. documents in response to a subpoena. Even President Obama invoked executive privilege to prevent the documents from being released.

Holder also denied knowing that a top Obama supporter, DOJ trial attorney Barbara Bosserman, was leading the investigation into the IRS targeting of conservative groups despite the fact that Bosserman visited the White House for over seven hours.

An anonymous Justice Dept. source told Fox News that it was “extraordinary” for the White House to specifically invite a career employee to come visit the president and that her attendance had to be cleared by higher-ups at the DOJ.

And in the DOJ’s persecution of journalist James Rosen, Holder said that he wasn’t involved in the “potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material,” even though his own department confirmed that Holder approved the search warrant for Rosen’s emails.

It is a common tactic for the corrupt to keep repeating lies and denying their abuses over and over again until they appear to be honest, especially to the mainstream media.

“If you tell a lie that’s big enough, and you tell it often enough, people will believe you are telling the truth, even when what you are saying is total crap,” author and actor Richard Belzer wrote.

This article was posted: Thursday, May 1, 2014 at 11:38 am

Fast & Furious Staged To Pass UN Gun Treaty

LINK: American Border Debacle

Proof: UN Plans To Ban American Guns

 LINK: UNITED NATIONS SMALL ARMS TREATY

America:

Your Guns Are Being Taken And You Don't Even Know It

Rude State Senator tells
2nd Amendment Supporters "Go f**k yourself" 

Pro-gun control State Senator Josh Miller has a message for second amendment advocates who are
concerned the legislation he is backing would turn them into criminals. Dan Bidondi responds.

The Untold Story of Gun Confiscation After Katrina

http://www.amazon.com/More-Guns-Less-Crime-Understanding/dp/0226493636

Does allowing people to own or carry guns deter violent crime? Or does it simply cause more citizens to harm each other? Directly challenging common perceptions about gun control, legal scholar John Lott presents the most rigorously comprehensive data analysis ever done on crime statistics and right-to-carry laws. This timely and provocative work comes to the startling conclusion: more guns mean less crime. In this paperback edition, Lott has expanded the research through 1996, incorporating new data available from states that passed right-to-carry and other gun laws since the book's publication as well as new city-level statistics.

"Lott's pro-gun argument has to be examined on the merits, and its chief merit is lots of data. . . . If you still disagree with Lott, at least you will know what will be required to rebut a case that looks pretty near bulletproof."--Peter Coy, Business Week

"By providing strong empirical evidence that yet another liberal policy is a cause of the very evil it purports to cure, he has permanently changed the terms of debate on gun control. . . . Lott's book could hardly be more timely. . . . A model of the meticulous application of economics and statistics to law and policy."--John O. McGinnis, National Review

"His empirical analysis sets a standard that will be difficult to match. . . . This has got to be the most extensive empirical study of crime deterrence that has been done to date."--Public Choice

"For anyone with an open mind on either side of this subject this book will provide a thorough grounding. It is also likely to be the standard reference on the subject for years to come."--Stan Liebowitz, Dallas Morning News

"A compelling book with enough hard evidence that even politicians may have to stop and pay attention. More Guns, Less Crime is an exhaustive analysis of the effect of gun possession on crime rates."--James Bovard, Wall Street Journal

"John Lott documents how far 'politically correct' vested interests are willing to go to denigrate anyone who dares disagree with them. Lott has done us all a service by his thorough, thoughtful, scholarly approach to a highly controversial issue." --Milton Friedman

Is Owning Guns Racist?

[vid]

The push to brainwash the public on gun confiscation i.e. Eric Holder is rearing its ugly head once again. But fact is stronger than fiction. The spin on the NRA and bogus research studies can't stop the liberty of the American people.

Laws Designed to Disarm
Slaves, Freedmen, and African-Americans

Overview

Before the Civil War ended, State “Slave Codes” prohibited slaves from owning guns. After President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, and after the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution abolishing slavery was adopted and the Civil War ended in 1865, States persisted in prohibiting blacks, now freemen, from owning guns under laws renamed “Black Codes.” They did so on the basis that blacks were not citizens, and thus did not have the same rights, including the right to keep and bear arms protected in the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as whites. This view was specifically articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in its infamous 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford to uphold slavery.

The United States Congress overrode most portions of the Black Codes by passing the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The legislative histories of both the Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment, as well as The Special Report of the Anti-Slavery Conference of 1867, are replete with denunciations of those particular statutes that denied blacks equal access to firearms. [Kates, Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment, 82 Mich. L. Rev. 204, 256 (1983)] However, facially neutral disarming through economic means laws remain in effect.

After the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1878, most States turned to “facially neutral” business or transaction taxes on handgun purchases. However, the intention of these laws was not neutral. An article in Virginia’s official university law review called for a “prohibitive tax … on the privilege” of selling handguns as a way of disarming “the son of Ham”, whose “cowardly practice of ‘toting’ guns has been one of the most fruitful sources of crime … .Let a negro board a railroad train with a quart of mean whiskey and a pistol in his grip and the chances are that there will be a murder, or at least a row, before he alights.” [Comment, Carrying Concealed Weapons, 15 Va L. Reg. 391, 391-92 (1909); George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, “Gun Control and Racism,” Stefan Tahmassebi, 1991, p. 75] Thus, many Southern States imposed high taxes or banned inexpensive guns so as to price blacks and poor whites out of the gun market.

In the 1990s, “gun control” laws continue to be enacted so as to have a racist effect if not intent:

• Police-issued license and permit laws, unless drafted to require issuance to those not prohibited by law from owning guns, are routinely used to prevent lawful gun ownership among “unpopular” populations. 
• Public housing residents, approximately 3 million Americans, are singled out for gun bans. 
• “Gun sweeps” by police in “high crime neighborhoods” whereby vehicles and “pedestrians who meet a specific profile that might indicate they are carrying a weapon” are searched are becoming popular, and are being studied by the U.S. Department of Justice as “Operation Ceasefire.” 

Sample Slave Codes, Black Codes, Economic-Based Gun Bans Used To Prevent The Arming Of African Americans, 1640-1995

147 people dead

Why Mass Shooters Target Gun Free Zones

Published on Apr 3, 2015

The Al-Shabaab terror attack which left 147 people dead at a college in Kenya Thursday may have been averted if citizens had been permitted to carry firearms, as previously outlined by the chief of
the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL).

The Following Historical Events Are Included as
Context for Passage of the Gun Control Act of 1968:

Baby's Got A Gun

From the producers that brought you the 30-minute animated short film “The American Dream,” Shock and Awe Short’s latest work, Baby’s Got a Gun, explores the media manipulation and fanning of the gun control flames, and highlights the fact that people are 47,000 times more likely to die in a car crash than in a mass shooting. “One of the most highly charged issues in America is guns, and gun control, so there’s no one better to break it all down than Bad Ass Baby. He’s going to expose the Lying Liars and get to the truth of the gun debate: that it isn’t about guns at all!”

Mexican President Wants to Disarm Americans

U.S. to Surrender Military Control to UN
While Disarming Americans!

New Phone App Helps Tattle on Neighbors with Guns

A new Smart Phone app describing itself as “tattle ware” allows users to upload information regarding locations where they have “gun related concerns,” allowing people to anonymously report their neighbors and others if issue
is taken with their ownership of firearms.

LINK:  Tattle-Tale Squads and Surveillance

Adaptation and Conformity
The Selling Out of Alex Jones/Infowars

Link: Psywars

The Road to Social Credit Scoring for Americans Blessed by Trump?

HighImpactFlix | First published at 19:03 UTC on May 4th, 2020

Article: https://www.infowars.com/trump-administration-considering-social-credit-score-system-to-determine-who-can-buy-a-gun/

ALERT! This channel is in jeopardy and may soon be terminated by the powers-that-shouldn't be. To resist the tyranny of censorship & stay connected...subscribe to my private newsletter. http://bit.ly/HighImpactFlixOfficial (don't forget to CONFIRM)

GUN GEO MARKER!

Snoop Society Has A New Gun Grabbing Tool

1. State Dept. Nominee Says “Guns Kill Civil Society” 
2. NRA official: Obama wants to outlaw guns in 2nd term 
3. Forbes Op-ed Voices Opposition to Gun-grabbing U.N. Treaty 
4. U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban 
5. Obama Administration Participates in Finalizing UN Gun Grabbing Treaty 
6. Attorney General grilled about running guns to Mexico 
7. Feds Trafficked Guns To Suspected Criminals Under Bush 
8. Federal Court Says States Can Regulate Guns 
9. ‘Flying Humvee’ gets off the ground as U.S. military plans all-terrain, bullet-proof warcraft 
10. This Christmas Season, Give (Up) Your Guns, Get a Giftcard 
11. Los Zetas Kingpin: We Bought Guns Directly From U.S. Government 
12. 57 Senators Sign Letter To Protect Second Amendment Rights From UN 

LINK: The United Nations

United Nations’ Office for Disarmament Affairs
http://www.un.org/disarmament/

United Nations Disarmament Treaties Timeline

GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT: SMALL ARMS – 12 December 1995 United Nations report on small arms (Published 1997)

Secretary-General’s report on small arms (2011) [PDF]

Secretary-General’s report on small arms (2008) [PDF]

Death by “Gun Control”: The Genocide Chart

Controlling Guns, Controlling People: A new history shows how gun control goes hand in hand with fear of black people—and The People.

Obama Administration Participates in Finalizing UN Gun Grabbing Treaty

Soros Promotes UN Control Over Gun Ownership

Obama Seeks US Congressional Ratification of UN Global Gun Control Treaty

UN Arms Treaty Would Impact Second Amendment Rights

U.N. Agreement Should Have All Gun Owners Up In Arms

UN arms treaty could put U.S. gun owners in foreign sights, say critics

U.N. Arms Trade Treaty Negotiations Underway

France, UK, Germany and Sweden call for binding UN arms trade treaty

NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre Stands Up for American Gun Owners at United Nations

UN Dispatch: No, the Arms Trade Treaty STILL is Not a “UN Gun Grab”

The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty: Are Our 2nd Amendment Rights Part Of The Deal?

Global gun control? Critics warn U.N. treaty would undermine U.S. gun rights

Mexican President Wants to Disarm Americans

Fast and Furious Scandal Gives Rise to Gun Regulation Debate

“If the American people learn that the motivations for all of this was to make a case to deprive them of their Second Amendment rights or to make a case to further the (Justice) department’s ability to further regulate gun rights within the United States, that would make them very angry,” said Rep. Trent Franks.

“We have an administration that has said ‘don’t let a good crisis go to waste’ and you wonder if this was actually a manufactured crisis,” Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-TX) said on Fox News back in the summer.

Bill Clinton speech at the 1995 United Nations 50th anniversary

Fast and Furious, Beyond Gun Control

House Dems focus on gun control in Fast and Furious hearing

THE GOVT HASN'T LIED ABOUT
AMMO PURCHASES AND HOW THEY'LL BE USED...

LINK: DHS Preparing For 7-Year War Against American People

...GOVERNMENTS DON'T LIE, RIGHT?

Robert Gibbs Lied to America about The Drone Program!

_Drone Denial by Lame Stream Media_

Robert Gibbs Lied to America about The Drone Prgm.

The lies are getting too ridiculous.

Former Obama Press Secretary Was Ordered To Act As If Drone Program Did Not Exist

The first rule of the drone program is
that you do not talk about the drone program

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
Feb 25, 2013

In a rare admission, Robert Gibbs, the former White House Press Secretary under Obama, told reporters Sunday that he was ordered to act as if there was no such thing as an active US drone program.

“When I went through the process of becoming press secretary, one of the first things they told me was, you’re not even to acknowledge the drone program,” Gibbs said on MSNBC’s “Up With Chris Hayes” this past weekend.

Gibbs said that he was told “You’re not even to discuss that it exists.”

Noting that the notion was “inherently crazy”, Gibbs said “You’re being asked a question based on reporting of a program that exists.”

“So you’re the official government spokesperson acting as if the entire program—pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.” Gibbs, who was Press Secretary between 2009 and 2011, said.

As we have tirelessly noted, the Obama administration has been heavily criticized for blocking the release of information relating to its overseas drone assassination programme, and will not even officially acknowledge that it exists, despite countless public references to the programme and the proven existence of an official “kill list”.

Gibbs stated that he expects the drone program to remain secret for the most part, despite moves in Congress to force more transparency.

“I have not talked to him about this, so I want to be careful,” Gibbs said, “but I think what the president has seen is, our denial of the existence of the program when it’s obviously happening undermines people’s confidence overall in the decisions that their government makes.”

While the program itself remains classified, it is no secret that Obama has vastly expanded the US drone war since entering office in 2009. Daily drone strikes are raining down on Yemen, Pakistan and Afghanistan, as well as Somalia.

A recent report released by Washington based think tank, The New America Foundation revealed that the number of secret US drone strikes in Yemen almost tripled in 2012, compared to 2011.

The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, has found that at least 171 civilians, including 35 children, have been slaughtered in Yemen by secret US drone strikes over the past ten years.

Communications released by WikiLeaks in 2010 revealed that the US and Yemen have repeatedly attempted to cover up the use of US warplanes to bombard Yemen.

Last week it was announced that despite the fact that drone strikes have killed thousands of innocent civilians in Yemen and Pakistan, the Pentagon is to reward drone operators with medals.

The DoD is creating a new ribbon, called the Distinguished Warfare Medal that will be awarded for “extra achievement” related to a military operation. This will encompass sitting at a computer console and pressing a button to release Hellfire missiles from Predator drones hundreds and thousands of miles away.

The medal will become the fourth-highest ranking combat decoration, placing above the Bronze Star.

Despite the official secrecy, the president has referred to the drone program several times in public, as have officials such as counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan.

Last year, the New York Times ran a major piece on the program revealing that the White House has asserted the right to carry out state-sponsored assassination anywhere in the world without having to provide any evidence or go through any legal process.

The administration merely has to state that the target is a terrorist and it doesn’t matter whether they are an American citizen or not, as we saw in the case of American-born Anwar al-Awlaki and his son, who were both killed last year.

In December of last year, Obama administration lawyers reaffirmed their backing for state sponsored assassination, claiming that “U.S. citizens are legitimate military targets” and do not have the right to any legal protection against being marked for summary execution.

During a CBS 60 Minutes interview in January, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta revealed that Obama himself personally approves the policy to kill American citizens suspected of terrorism without trial on a case by case basis.

Perhaps the real reason that the administration wants the details of the programme kept under wraps is that, as reported by Propublica recently, the programme is potentially much bigger in scope than anyone had previously thought.

The administration’s figures do not add up, they are chock full of contradictions and discrepancies, and there can be little doubt that there have been many many more civilian deaths as a result of drone attacks than have been publicly acknowledged.

Experts, including UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions Christof Heyns, as well as Pakistan’s UN ambassador in Geneva, Zamir Akram, have described the drone assassination programme as a violation of the international legal system, saying that some attacks may constitute war crimes.

Akram, who noted that US drone strikes had killed more than 1,000 civilians in Pakistan, also said “We find the use of drones to be totally counterproductive in terms of succeeding in the ‘war against terror’. It leads to greater levels of terror rather than reducing them.

Many also contend that the attacks infringe the national sovereignty of Pakistan and constitute an act of war.

In 2010, a report by Washington think tank The New America Foundation found that 32% of the more than 1,200 people killed since 2004 in Pakistan, or around 1 in 3, were innocent bystanders rather than dangerous terrorists.

—————————————————————-

Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from Nottingham Trent University.

This article was posted: Monday, February 25, 2013 at 11:00 am

Tags: drones

LINKS: DRONES | Yes Your Government Can Use Armed Drones Against You | Assassination Program | OBAMA Lied About Healthcare

LINKS: Subverting The Public | DIVIDE AND CONQUER 

THE U.N. DECEPTION

Support The Film Makers

https://www.jbs.org/shop-jbs/the-un-deception

Learn how top United Nations proponents exploit small arms, the environment, and justice to pressure Capitol Hill into quietly surrendering America's heritage of freedom. Should these UN plans remain unopposed, the consequences are ultimately grim. There is, however, a way to avert this danger. (2001, 60 min., DVD)

REACH OUT TO OTHERS

[Help Educate Family And Friends With This Page And The Links Below]

Related Links On Site: Founding Fathers Battle Gun Grabbers From the Grave | Turn In Your Guns At Church! | Gun Control Leads To Genocide | Gun Control Hypocrisy! | Mass Murder Pills | UN Arms Transfer Treaty (ATT) on Small Arms: Gun Grab Gradualism | Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns | DHS Preparing For 7-Year War Against American People | Police Trained That Informed Americans Are Terrorists | Law Enforcement Requested Shooting Targets of Pregnant Women | Federal Government Moves to Disarm Veterans | Prisons for American Veterans | Assassination Program | NDAA | Police State 1 | Police State 2 | Police State 3 | Police State 4 movie

Psywars - The Selling Out of Alex Jones/Infowars