" Look Into It - AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example









Cliven Bundy CaseAGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment. When you start doing deep research into Agenda 21, you will find that describing it as a "comprehensive plan" is an understatement. Virtually all forms of human activity impact the environment. The rabid "environmentalists" behind the green agenda intend to take all human activity and put it into a box called "sustainable development". One of the key elements of "sustainable development" is population control. The United Nations (along with radical "environmental" leaders such as Al Gore) actually believes that there are far too many people on earth.

"These guys think they have the right to drop a damn tripod in the ground and put a sniper rifle on it so if you cross a line they can put a bullet in you? Who the hell is the man behind the trigger? When he pulls the trigger, which one of us is he gonna shoot? Good God didn't he grow up in this country? Are we gonna give it up? "

"This is a helluva lot bigger than Cliven Bundy.  They are setting a precedent."

- Nevada Rancher Town Board Meeting -







Agenda 21 explained very well. Including implications it will have on humanity. Opinions within the video come in some cases from those that were in on the negotiations. Truly an interesting watch.


The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America

Subverting The Public






AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example





"This is a helluva lot bigger than Cliven Bundy"






AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

Agenda 21: The BLM Land Grabbing Endgame

Michael Snyder
The Truth Wins
April 23, 2014


Why is the federal government so obsessed with grabbing more land? After all, the federal government already owns more than 40 percent of the land in 9 different U.S. states. Why are federal bureaucrats so determined to grab even more? Well, the truth is that this all becomes much clearer once you understand that there is a very twisted philosophy behind what they are doing. It is commonly known as “Agenda 21″, although many names and labels are used for this particular philosophy. Basically, those that hold to this form of radical environmentalism believe that humanity is utterly destroying the planet, and therefore the goal should be to create a world where literally everything that we do is tightly monitored and controlled by control freak bureaucrats in the name of “sustainable development”. In their vision of the future, the human population will be greatly reduced and human activity will be limited to strictly regulated urban areas and travel corridors. The rest of the planet will be left to nature. To achieve this goal, a massive transfer of land from private landowners to the federal government will be necessary.

So the conflict between Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and the BLM is really just the tip of the iceberg. The reality is that the BLM has their eyes on much bigger prizes.

For example, Breitbart is reporting that the BLM is looking at grabbing 90,000 privately-held acres along the Texas/Oklahoma border…

After the recent Bundy Ranch episode by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Texans are becoming more concerned about the BLM’s focus on 90,000 acres along a 116 mile stretch of the Texas/Oklahoma boundary. The BLM is reviewing the possible federal takeover and ownership of privately-held lands which have been deeded property for generations of Texas landowners.

Sid Miller, former Texas State Representative and Republican candidate for Texas Agriculture Commissioner, has since made the matter a campaign issue to Breitbart Texas.

“In Texas,” Miller says, “the BLM is attempting a repeat of an action taken over 30 years ago along the Red River when Tommy Henderson lost a federal lawsuit. The Bureau of Land Management took 140 acres of his property and didn’t pay him one cent.”

Needless to say, officials down in Texas are not pleased about this. In fact, just check out what the attorney general of Texas is saying

Gen. Abbott sent a strongly-worded letter to BLM Director Neil Kornze, asking for answers to a series of questions related to the potential land grab.

“I am deeply concerned about the notion that the Bureau of Land Management believes the federal government has the authority to swoop in and take land that has been owned and cultivated by Texas landowners for generations,” General Abbott wrote. “The BLM’s newly asserted claims to land along the Red River threaten to upset long-settled private property rights and undermine fundamental principles—including the rule of law—that form the foundation of our democracy. Yet, the BLM has failed to disclose either its full intentions or the legal justification for its proposed actions. Decisions of this magnitude must not be made inside a bureaucratic black box.”

In an exclusive interview with Breitbart Texas, General Abbott said, “This is the latest line of attack by the Obama Administration where it seems like they have a complete disregard for the rule of law in this country …And now they’ve crossed the line quite literally by coming into the State of Texas and trying to claim Texas land as federal land. And, as the Attorney General of Texas I am not going to allow this.”

Does the federal government actually need more land?

As I mentioned above, the feds already own more than 40 percent of the land in 9 different U.S. states

Nevada: 84.5 percent
Alaska: 69.1 percent
Utah: 57.4 percent
Oregon: 53.1 percent
Idaho: 50.2 percent
Arizona: 48.1 percent
California: 45.3 percent
Wyoming: 42.4 percent
New Mexico: 41.8 percent

The federal government does not need more land. But there is an obsession to grab more so that the dictates of Agenda 21 can be implemented.

The map that I have posted below is a simulation of what the endgame of Agenda 21 might look like. If these radical environmentalists get their way, the only areas that will be allocated for normal human use will be the areas in green…



AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example


If you do not go along with the “sustainable development” agenda, you risk being labeled a “threat” to be dealt with.

For example, Senator Harry Reid has used the label “domestic terrorists” to describe those that showed up to support Cliven Bundy at his ranch.

Reid could have used lots of other labels. But he specifically chose to call them terrorists. And considering what the law allows the feds to do to “terrorists”, that is quite chilling.

And don’t think that if you just stay quiet that you won’t get labeled as a “terrorist”. In fact, there is a very good chance that you already fit several government criteria for being a terrorist. Just check out the list below. It comes from my previous article entitled “ 72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered ‘Potential Terrorists’ In Official Government Documents“…

1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”

2. Those that advocate for states’ rights

3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”

4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”

5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”

6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation areseparate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”

7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”

8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”

9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of theenvironment and/or animals”

10. “Anti-Gay”

11. “Anti-Immigrant”

12. “Anti-Muslim”

13. “The Patriot Movement”

14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”

15. Members of the Family Research Council

16. Members of the American Family Association

17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”

18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol

19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform

20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition

21. Members of the Christian Action Network

22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”

23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”

24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21

25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps

26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”

27. The militia movement

28. The sovereign citizen movement

29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”

30. Anyone that “complains about bias”

31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”

32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”

33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”

34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”

35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”

36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”

37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”

38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”

39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”

40. “Militia or unorganized militia”

41. “General right-wing extremist”

42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.

43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”

44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”

45. Those that are “anti-global”

46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”

47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”

48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”

49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”

50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”

51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”

52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”

53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”

54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”

55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”

56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”

57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”

58. “Rightwing extremists”

59. “Returning veterans”

60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”

61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”

62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”

63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”

64. “Anti-abortion activists”

65. Those that are against illegal immigration

66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner

67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations

68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”

69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr

70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)

71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies

72. Evangelical Christians

Do any of those criteria apply to you?

If so, then you are a “potential terrorist” according to the U.S. government.

We live at a time when the federal government is becoming increasingly oppressive. Just consider the following excerpt from a recent article by John W. Whitehead

It’s not just the Cliven Bundys of the world who are being dealt with in this manner. Don Miller, a 91-year-old antiques collector, recently had his Indiana home raided by the FBI, ostensibly because it might be in the nation’s best interest if the rare and valuable antiques and artifacts Miller had collected over the course of 80 years were cared for by the government. Such tactics carried out by anyone other than the government would be considered grand larceny, and yet the government gets a free pass.

In the same way, the government insists it can carry out all manner of surveillance on us—listen in on our phone calls, read our emails and text messages, track our movements, photograph our license plates, even enter our biometric information into DNA databases—but those who dare to return the favor, even a little, by filming potential police misconduct, get roughed up by the police, arrested, charged with violating various and sundry crimes.

This was not what our founders intended.

Our liberties and freedoms are being eroded a little bit more with each passing day, and most Americans don’t even seem to care.

In the end, we will pay a great price for our apathy.

This article was posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 at 5:32 am

Tags: , ,







If Feds Take Your Cattle & Property, YOU Become Cattle

April 10, 2014

Government is using environmentalism to confuse the public and the Left/Right paradigm to divide the public so they can enslave us in an Agenda 21 future where we have no property and no rights. The last rancher — “the last man standing” — across the Mojave Desert to the Pacific Ocean, Cliven Bundy, is in a fight for his rights and your rights against a federal bureaucracy that’s out of control.



This article was posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 at 5:03 am






Infowars reporter David Knight confronts the Clark County Sheriff’s Office about this land grab

– WARNING some strong language:






AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example


Martial Law Rise of The Police State

Police State 1

Police State 2

Police State 3

Police State 4




This takeover through environmentalism has been planned and scripted for years by institutions like The United Nations, and The Club of Rome




“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse?  Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?”

- Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme
Opening speech, Rio Earth Summit. 1992


Economy Destroyed By Design!



Road to World Government





William F. Jasper on Maurice Strong

William F. Jasper covers Maurice Strong, former Secretary General of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Jeneiro. Strong has stated multiple times that the United States is the biggest threat to the Earth's future and that the lifestyles of the middle class need to change. While Strong talks about changing lifestyles, he exempts his own and others that are deciding our future. Video produced by http://www.libertynewsnetwork.tv

Links to news articles exposing the agenda behind the Rio+20 conference and on the drive for a UN-administered socialist world government:

The Real Agenda Behind UN "Sustainability" Unmasked

Despite Setbacks, UN "Sustainability" Agenda Marches on After Rio+20

UN Sustainability Summit Exposed: Big Business, Dictators, and NGOs

Sustainable Freedom: Surging Opposition to Agenda 21, "Sustainable Development"

"Climate Science" in Shambles: Real Scientists Battle UN Agenda

UN Report Pushes Global Taxes to Fight Poverty

At UN Rio+20, World Governments Agree on "The Future We Want"

Communist UN Rio+20 Summit Boss Announces Global Deals, Press Applauds

Critics of Sustainability Hysteria Slam UN's Anti-liberty Rio+20 Agenda

Report: UN Classifies Climate Change Agenda

Dodging Another UN Bullet

Biodiversity Bureaucrats Bullying the World's Poor

Sustainable Development: The Latest UN Scare

ICLEI Members Admit "Bait and Switch" to Boost Climate Agenda

Copacabana's Hungry Power Grab

UN Official: Western Nations 'Don't Need More Cars, More TV, Whatever'

Rio+20 Is Greatest Threat to Biodiversity

Before Rio+20, Ted Turner Says Ban Plastic, Use UN to Slash Population

Media Hypes UN Fear-mongering Before Rio+20 Sustainability Summit

Science Group: UN Rio+20 Summit Must Reduce Global Population

UN Bosses Secretly Plot Global Govt Through "Green Economy" for Rio+20

UN Report for Rio+20 Outlines Top-down "Green" World Order

"Sustainable Justice" = Redistribution of Scarcity

Ambitious UN Sustainability Conference in Rio to Avoid Climate Talk

UN Ready to Lead Environmental World Government

UN Plans to Expand Its Environmental Agency

UN Demands $76 Trillion for "Green Technology"

UN's Environmental "Solution": More Government

UN Pushes Population Control Agenda

UN Slammed for Its Forced Abortions in China Using U.S. Funds

Global ObamaCare and World Population Control

UN Attack on World Population

Environmental Genocide

Science, Politics and Death

Eco-Agenda for Planetary Control

Your Hometown & the United Nations' Agenda 21

EPA's Plans for Implementing UN's Agenda 21

What are the UN's Agenda 21 and ICLEI?

From Rio to Copenhagen: The Earth Summit's Legacy

Socialist International in Copenhagen: "Birth of Global Governance"

Cancun: Global Hysteria, Wealth Redistribution

Reheating the "Global Warming" Myth

IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud

Maurice Strong: The Most Dangerous Man In The World

ECO '92: Launching Pad for International Global Governance

The UN Attack on Property

The UN Is NOT Your Friend

World Government by Design

Tendrils of Tyranny

Hijacking "Spaceship Earth"

Sink the Law of the Sea Treaty!

Eco-socialist Shell Game

The "Re-Wilded" West

High and Dry in the Klamath Basin

The Fruits of Eco-Extremism

The High Cost of Cap and Trade

The New World Religion

Behind the Environmental Lobby

Rethinking Green

Environmental Stewardship




'The Planet Will Boil Over' If Africans Are Allowed Cars and Air Conditioning






AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example 

Maurice Strong Interview (BBC, 1972)


You Tube
June 29, 2009

COMMENT: With Al Gore & Co. on the verge of making law of Cap & Trade policies, it is important to recognize the power propaganda that has paved the way for phony environmentalism and depopulation eugenics.

“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?”
- Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme
Opening speech, Rio Earth Summit. 1992

Today, Maurice Strong sits atop the global environmental movement headed by the United Nations and its interlocking NGO’s and tax-exempt foundations.


1972 BBC interview with Maurice Strong about sustainability, over-population and other issues where the United Nations would convince us that humanity itself is the problem.

Strong is considered to be the person behind the globalization of the foundation-funded environmental movement, and was the Secretary-General of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment held in 1972, in Stockholm, Sweden.

He co-authored the ‘Earth Charter’ with Mikhail Gorbachev in 1992. It was Gorbachev who stated in 1996 that the "threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order."

Strong was recruited by David Rockefeller at the age of 17 and groomed for the role he serves today. Despite not having a college education, he was a millionaire by his early 20′s and wielded enormous power and influence.

Already in 1972, at the time of this interview, there is talk of doomsday scenarios if people don’t give up their rights and drastically alter the way they live. Also mentioned in the interview is zero growth, put forward by the Club of Rome in the late 60′s/early 70′s, which called for the control of population and economic growth, and was the precursor to what we see happening today with the US economy and infrastructure being gutted and sent overseas.

[efoods]In this interview clip Strong discusses his proposal of licenses in order for women to give birth, which has been of much talk among the elite for the past several decades. In the 70′s, David Rockefeller extended his praise to communist dictator of China, Mao Zedong, in an article published in the New York Times, for his country’s one-child policy, which will be the model for the Western nations to follow in the future — hence China’s "Most Favored Nation" status granted by the UN.

For more information on Strong, see my article titled ‘Eco-economic Warfare and the Planned Collapse of Western Civilization’:


See also:





The Club of Rome

 AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example





We Are Doomed! Says the Club of Rome


Friday, May 11, 2012

The elitists at The Club Of Rome call for lowering living standards to combat climate change.


This article was posted: Friday, May 11, 2012 at 5:10 am



Paul Ehrlich The Population Bomb

Climate Change

Climategate Is Still the Issue

Climate Change Hate Crimes

Religious Leaders Politicians Sellout to Rockefeller Foundation




In 1991, the Club published The First Global Revolution. It analyses the problems of humanity, calling these collectively or in essence the 'problematique'. It notes (laments) that, historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by enemies in common: "The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome domestic failure and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself - when things become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so used to classifying its neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new weapons devised." "In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself."



The First Global Revolution follows up the earlier 1972 work-product from the Club of Rome titled The Limits to Growth.

AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example



AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example


In the 1970s, the Club of Rome launched the book "The Limits to Growth". Essential reading for all those concerned about the future of the planet, the book was translated into 37 languages. Now, President Emeritus Alexander King and Secretary General Bertrand Schneider review global problems 20 years on, offering both a warning and an approach to a possible solution to world problems. Topics covered by this book include the need for the world to convert from a military to a civil economy, the recognition of the disastrous short-term effects of exploitation by First World countries of Third World poverty and need, and the containment of global warming: the need to reduce global emissions of carbon dioxide, to encourage reforestation, to conserve traditional forms of energy and develop alternatives.




AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example


Sacred chest where the ancient Hebrews kept the two tablets containing the Ten Commandments



Earth Worship And The Blasphemous Ark of Hope

"The real goal of the Earth Charter is that it will in fact become like the Ten Commandments."
  - Maurice Strong -


"Do not do unto the environment of others what you do not want done to your own environment... My hope is that this charter will be a kind of Ten Commandments, a 'Sermon on the Mount', that provides a guide for human behavior toward the environment in the next century."
  - Mikhail Gorbachev, The Los Angeles Times, May 8, 1997 -


AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example


AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example


AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example




Published on Jun 15, 2012

Investigative journalist and senior editor of The New American magazine, William F. Jasper exposes the dangers posed by the "Earth Charter".

Links to informative news articles by The New American magazine and other sources further exposing the Earth Charter and the drive for a UN-controlled world government:

The New World Religion
Presented to the world as a mystical revelation, the UN Earth Charter is actually a diabolical blueprint for global government.

Rebutting Rockefeller
The chairman of the Earth Charter Drafting Committee takes issue with this magazine's exposé, "The New World Religion." The facts show that his objections are not sustainable.

Read the "Earth Charter" document online: http://tinyurl.com/7nlacpc

"Ark of Hope" Comes to Rockford

The Potemkin Global Villages
Far from representing "global civil society," the Earth Charter Community Summits were tiny gatherings of ultra-left activists financed by wealthy, one-world elitists.

The Global School Board
By rejoining UNESCO, the U.S. government is aiding the UN's grab for power and boosting the Earth Charter crusade to paganize our children.

Will You Live Under "The Earth Charter"?

Maurice Strong: The Most Dangerous Man In The World

Gorbachev Charm Offensive
The former Soviet dictator once again brings his ongoing socialist, world government campaign to America's heartland.


New Age Roots
New Age paganism provides the global elitists with a ready tool for enchaining individuals in spiritual bondage — making them prime candidates for citizenship in the New World Order.

Pagans of the World Unite!

UN Takes Aim at Children

Your Child, the Global Citizen

Earth Day or Green Indoctrination Day?

The New Religious Order

Shaping the New World Civilization

The Environmental Agenda

The UN Plan for Your "Sustainable" Community

The UN Plan for Your Mental Health

The UN is NOT Your Friend
Behind the mask of peace, brotherhood, and universal understanding, the United Nations promotes terror and tyranny in order to achieve its real objective: world government.

Tendrils of Tyranny
The United Nations has long sought to control all aspects of human endeavor. Its vast bureaucracy is now closer to that goal than ever before.

World Government, Take Three

Eco-agenda for Planetary Control
The Earth Summit's Agenda 21 and other radical proposals ? supposedly intended to save "Mother Earth" ? will bring untold human suffering and ecological damage.

Global Master Plan
Agenda 21, the Biodiversity Treaty, the Wildlands Project, and other United Nations schemes for global control are the basis for local environmental assaults on property rights.

The Global Green Regime

The UN Attack on Property

Law of the Sea Treaty: Through Rose-colored Goggles?

The Road to Eco-Serfdom

Endangered Property Rights

Battle for Sustainable Freedom

Hijacking "Spaceship Earth"
Claiming that Earth is a spaceship with limited resources requiring central control, globalists are steering humanity into the black hole of UN-dominated world government.

Shaping Things To Come
Seeking to impose their global vision of a tyrannical "utopia," powerful elitists have effectively used science fiction to evangelize for their cause.

UN Attack on World Population

A Covenant With Death

Environmental Stewardship
The evidence is in that free-market principles and private ownership of natural resources provide better stewardship of the environment than government controls ever could.

Behind the Environmental Lobby
It may seem stranger than fiction, but it's a documentable fact: the eco-socialist movement is financed by the super-rich as part of a comprehensive agenda for global control.

Rethinking Green

Religious Neutralism
Some Christians see the decay of the world as predestined and inevitable, so they withdraw from society. Such a retreat, however, only contributes to the growth of evil.




AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

Evangelicals Are Selling Out To The New World Order



Religious Leaders Politicians Sellout to Rockefeller Foundation

Rockefeller Brother Fund: We’re Buying Off Evangelicals, Mayors, Governors… For The Earth

"From the least to the greatest, all are greedy for gain; prophets and priests alike, all practice deceit. They dress the wound of my people as though it were not serious. 'Peace, peace,' they say, when there is no peace. Are they ashamed of their loathsome conduct? No, they have no shame at all; they do not even know how to blush. So they will fall among the fallen; they will be brought down when I punish them," says THE LORD.

In its 2010 review of grants extended from 2005 to 2010, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund admits to buying off (quite literally) so-called “non-green voices”- meaning people outside the environmental community- to sell man-made climate change doctrine to their respective communities. “(…) foundation dollars extended to support these non-green voices have grown dramatically (…). The RBF has supported “allied voices for climate action” that include businesses, investors, evangelicals, farmers, sportsmen, labor, military leaders, national security hawks, veterans, youth, and governors and mayors.”


LINK : Asleep at the Switch : An Open Letter to America's Pastors 






Enforcement of The Agenda21 Scheme Through Bureaucracy, Balkanization, and Intimidation




“Crucify Them!”

"It was kind of like how the Romans used to conquer little villages in the Mediterranean. They'd go into a little Turkish town somewhere, they'd find the first five guys they saw and they would crucify them. And then you know that town was really easy to manage for the next few years."



AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

Report: Bundy Family Unearths BLM Mass Cattle Grave

“I feel that this needs to be put out for the public to see”


Mikael Thalen
April 20, 2014

New photos released by the Bundy family Sunday provided more evidence to the claim that the Bureau of Land Management was illegally killing and burying confiscated cattle.


AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example


Posted to the official Bundy Ranch Facebook page, the gruesome image shows several dead cattle being removed from a makeshift grave discovered just this weekend.

“Digging up 1 of the HUGE holes where they threw the cows that they had ran to death or shot,” the picture’s description reads. “I feel that this NEEDS to be put out for the public to see.”

The picture backs up reports by several people including Nevada assemblywoman Michele Fiore, who commented on the BLM’s cattle graves last Tuesday.

“Near their compound, right off the highway, they were digging holes,” Fiore said. “They tried to bury some cows on the compound, but I guess they didn’t dig the hole deep enough, so they throw a cow in and they put dirt over him and you have cows’ legs sticking up out of the dirt.”


Fiore also displayed several photos on her Twitter account Sunday, labeling the incident the “BLM Massacre.”

AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example


Although the BLM’s court order only permitted the agency to seize Bundy’s cattle, federal agents have thus far already admitted to shooting and killing two prized bulls, claiming the animals were a “safety hazard.”


AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example


Video from the area also revealed holes in water tanks, a smashed tortoise burrow, as well as destroyed fences and water lines.

“They had total control of this land for one week, and look at the destruction they did in one week,” Corey Houston, family friend of Cliven Bundy, told Fox News last week. “Nowhere in the court order that I saw does it say that they can destroy infrastructure, destroy corrals, tanks … desert environment, shoot cattle.”

Separate images taken from an airplane also uncovered hundreds of cattle stuffed into small pens on a BLM compound, prompting the FAA to order a no-fly zone over the area.





Despite a clear and violent overreach by the BLM, Nevada Senator Harry Reid has responded to the incident by calling Bundy and his supporters “domestic terrorists.”

“There were hundreds, hundreds of people from around the country that came there,” Reid said at an event in Las Vegas. “They had sniper rifles in the freeway. They had weapons, automatic weapons. They had children lined up. They wanted to make sure they got hurt first … What if others tried the same thing?”

Unsurprisingly, proof of automatic weapons being present during the stand off between peaceful protesters and the BLM was not provided by Reid. Video of the incident also clearly shows only men and woman, most of whom were unarmed, lined up peacefully.

Whether it be assaulting a cancer survivor, attacking a pregnant woman, tasereing protesters, killing animals or unleashing an attack dog, all extreme behavior has exclusively come from the BLM.

This article was posted: Sunday, April 20, 2014 at 5:48 am







Ron Paul Warned Of BLM Evil In 97'

There are many important aspects of the Bundy Ranch standoff but what brought the story to the attention of InfoWars and then the nation's attention was the iron-fisted tyranny of an army of bureaucrats. Ron Paul warned of this in 1997. His warnings have now come true.








 AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

Bundy Ranch Family vs. Big Gov., Big Green, Big Media

Written by 

“Hoofed locusts.” That’s how Sierra Cub founder John Muir saw domestic sheep and cattle. It is a term later adopted by Earth First! anarchist and “EcoWarrior” Edward Abbey and other radical enviro-actvists.

AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case ExampleMuir, Abbey, and their ilk harbor equal (or, perhaps, greater) contempt for the farmers and ranchers who inflict the “hoofed locusts” on Mother Earth. The “locust” farmers/ranchers, like the “destructive” critters they produce, must be eradicated (humanely, of course), say the activists. That is why Cliven Bundy (shown) and his family’s ranch in Clark County, Nevada, are now in the headlines.

In the 1980s, a broad coalition of the major enviro-actvist groups targeted cattle ranching for extinction. Specifically, they initiated a multi-pronged, long-term plan to evict livestock from the vast “public lands” of the Western states. They planned to drive out all the ranchers by 1993, thus their slogan at the time: “Cattle Free by ’93.”

Some of that plan was detailed at a “Public Interest Law Conference” held March 7-10, 1991 at the University of Oregon School of Law in Eugene, Oregon.

A key presenter at the conference was Roy Elicker, counsel for the National Wildlife Federation. Central to Elicker’s message was the point that ranchers could be driven off range, the “public lands," by simply driving them out of business with costly fees and regulations.

“In other words,” he told the conferees, “if you start making them pay their true cost of what they're doing, they're going to fold up. They can't — if they got to go out and move that cow around six times, by the time they're done, they've lost their shirt.”

So, the activists must work closely with the politicians and the federal and state agencies to make it too expensive for the ranchers to stay in business — force them into bankruptcy.

Elicker warned the attendees that they would not be able to accomplish this overnight; it was a plan that would take years, but would gradually yield big, permanent results.

Elicker stated:

So one of the keys is, when I talk about opportunities to make a difference, is not only the fact — you know, what everyone likes is the big victory. You load up them cattle trucks for the last time and it goes riding off into the sunset and they never come back.

That comment and vision for the future drew laughter and applause from the audience. Elicker continued:

But you can win a lot more victories than that ultimate one. You can win a lot more victories by making him pay for what he does out there and by making it so expensive in his operation and making all these changes for him to continue to run the cattle on the public lands, he goes broke.

The plan outlined by Elicker (and others) was implemented by the National Public Lands Grazing Campaign (NPLGC) and other Big Green allies. A key component of that campaign has been to falsely portray ranchers such as the Bundys as “welfare ranchers.” Over the past couple of decades, the overall campaign has been very successful in driving many ranchers off the land.

“Crucify Them!”

Of course, this is the same strategy that was publicly announced by then-Senator Barack Obama, as he campaigned for the White House in 2008, when he assured his “green” backers that he would escalate the “war on coal.” Candidate Obama promised:

So, if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can — it’s just that it will bankrupt them, because they are going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.

Obama’s Region Six EPA Administrator Al Armendariz carried this philosophy to its logical conclusion, advocating that EPA officials use their “authority” with brutal efficiency. Armendariz said that his philosophy of enforcement “was kind of like how the Romans used to conquer little villages in the Mediterranean. They’d go into a little Turkish town somewhere, they’d find the first five guys they saw, and they would crucify them. And then you know that town was really easy to manage for the next few years.”

According to Armendariz, you find folks who are not in compliance with the EPA’s constantly changing, draconian edicts, and “you hit them as hard as you can, make examples of them. There’s a deterrent there.”

The problem for Armendariz was that his comments were videotaped and went viral on the Internet, forcing him to tender a hasty resignation, in order to spare his boss political blowback. (To see a YouTube video of his remarks, click here.)

So it goes against all of the natural resource industries that are essential to sustaining a large, modern, industrialized society: farming, ranching, mining, logging, energy, fishing — all of these are under concerted, coordinated attack.

In the case of the current Bundy ranch/BLM conflict, one of the main hired guns of the Big Government/Big Green combine is the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD). As one would expect, the wealthy urban green militants at CBD claim to be watching out for all of the furry, fluffy, feathery, scaley creatures whose habitats are threatened by the big, bad invasive species, Homo Ranchero.

KREM News, the CBS affiliate in Spokane, Washington, provide this short news item on the CBD connection:

Environmentalists accused the bureau of capitulating to threats of violence from armed Bundy supporters and urged them to pursue action against the rancher. "The BLM has a sacred duty to manage our public lands in the public interest, to treat all users equally and fairly," said Rob Mrowka, senior scientist with the Center for Biological Diversity. "Instead it is allowing a freeloading rancher and armed thugs to seize hundreds of thousands of acres of the people's land as their own fiefdom." "The BLM is setting a dangerous precedent in announcing that it will pick and choose who has to follow federal laws and who it will reward for violating them," he added. [Bureau of Land Management spokesman Craig] Leff declined to comment, reiterating that the bureau's top concern was the safety of its employees and the public. In April 2012, the Center for Biological Diversity filed a notice of intent to sue the bureau for canceling a planned roundup of Bundy's cattle at the last minute.


Related articles:

War on the West: Why More Bundy Standoffs Are Coming

Questions Raised About Senator Reid’s Connection to Bundy Ranch Dispute

Last Man Standing: Nevada Ranch Family in Fedgov Face-off

Bundy's Case: Feds Do Not Own the Land Where His Cattle Graze

BLM's Seizure of Nevada Rancher's Land Rights Unconstitutional

Harry Reid Bolsters Son’s Interests in Chinese Solar Plant Deal

Federal Judge Rules for Property Rights, Smacks Down Abusive Feds







AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example


"This Is A Problem For All Of America"

David Knight in Nevada talks to a two different Utah County Commissioners about the federal crackdown in Nevada and what it means for the rest of America.








AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

BLM Action in Nevada is Unconstitutional, Here’s Why

A direct violation of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution

Kurt Nimmo
April 11, 2014

The establishment media is now paying attention to Cliven Bundy and his struggle with the Bureau of Land Management. Most of this coverage assumes Bundy is engaged in illegal cattle grazing on federal land.

AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example“The U.S. government is rounding up Bundy’s cattle that it says have been grazing illegally on public lands in Clark County for more than 20 years, according to the land-management bureau and the National Park Service,” CNN reports today.

The BLM insists “Mr. Bundy has… failed to comply with multiple court orders to remove his cattle from the federal lands and to end the illegal trespass.”

It is the BLM, not Cliven Bundy, who is in violation of the law and the Constitution, specifically Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution.

The clause, known as the Enclave Clause, authorizes Congress to purchase, own and control land in a state under specific and limited conditions, namely “for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings,” and not, as the feds now insist, to protect an endangered tortoise.

The Founders were opposed to providing a centralized federal government with unlimited authority to purchase and, as is routinely the case today, seize state and private land.

During the federal convention debates in September, 1787, Elbridge Gerry, who later went on to serve as vice president under James Madison, contended federal purchase of land “might be made use of to enslave any particular State by buying up its territory, and that the strongholds proposed would be a means of awing the State into an undue obedience.”

In order to make certain the federal government did not abuse the Enclave Clause, the words “Consent of the Legislature of the State” were added.

Madison, Jefferson and the Founders were primarily interested in limited government and the diffusion of federal authority over the states for the protection of individual liberty. In 1992, the Supreme Court issued an opinion on the framers’ reasoning behind the state consent requirement (New York v. U.S):

“The Constitution does not protect the sovereignty of States for the benefit of the States or state governments as abstract political entities, or even for the benefit of the public officials governing the States. To the contrary, the Constitution divides authority between federal and state governments for the protection of individuals. State sovereignty is not just an end in itself: rather, federalism secures to citizens the liberties that derive from the diffusion of sovereign power.” (Emphasis added.)

Madison knew unlimited federal power inevitably results in unbridled tyranny. “I venture to declare it as my opinion that, were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited government established by the people of America,” he wrote.

Despite the desire of the founders and the originating principles of the nation, conceived as a constitutional republic, the federal government has repeatedly and habitually exacted dictatorial authority in Nevada and throughout much of the West.

“The United States government owns and has broad authority to regulate federal lands in Nevada,” the BLM arrogantly insists. “In response to challenges of federal ownership of the lands in Nevada, the 9th circuit held that the federal government owned all federal lands in Nevada, and that those lands did not pass to the state upon statehood.”

This is in direct conflict with Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution.

Cliven Bundy’s struggle with the BLM in Nevada is exactly the situation Madison and the founders tried to prevent. The federal government does not have the constitutional authority to own land, beyond what is stipulated in the Enclave Clause, and its seizure of land, under the obviously fallacious pretense of protecting a tortoise, is a serious violation of the Constitution.

Madison made if perfectly clear in Federalist Paper 45:

“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined… The [federal powers] will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce… the powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.”

“It’s really about our constitutional rights and statehood,” Bundy has said. “And whether this area known as the state of Nevada is owned by the United States government or is owned by the sovereign state of Nevada.”

Mr. Bundy, despite a propaganda campaign to the contrary launched by the federal government and its subservient media, is absolutely correct – the war shaping up between the Nevada rancher and the federal government is about states’ rights and, ultimately, the rights of sovereign individuals.

This article was posted: Friday, April 11, 2014 at 10:31 am







AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

Federal Judge: BLM Engaged In A Criminal Conspiracy Against Ranchers

Court opinion exposes BLM’s true intent against Cliven Bundy

Kit Daniels
April 17, 2014

For over 20 years, the Bureau of Land Management engaged in a “literal, intentional conspiracy” against Nevada ranchers to force them out of business, according to a federal judge whose court opinion exposes the BLM’s true intent against rancher Cliven Bundy.


AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

BLM agents who impounded Cliven Bundy’s cattle.


In his opinion of United States v. Estate of Hage, U.S. District Court Judge Robert C. Jones reveals that after late Nevada rancher E. Wayne Hage indicated on his 1993 grazing permit renewal that by signing the permit, he was not surrendering his family’s long-standing water and forage rights on the land, the BLM not only rejected the permit but also conspired for decades to both deny his family’s property rights and to destroy their cattle business.

“Based upon E. Wayne Hage’s declaration that he refused to waive his rights — a declaration that did not purport to change the substance of the grazing permit renewal for which he was applying, and which had no plausible legal effect other than to superfluously assert non-waiver of rights — the Government denied him a renewal grazing permit based upon its frankly nonsensical position that such an assertion of rights meant that the application had not been properly completed,” Judge Jones wrote. “After the BLM denied his renewal grazing permit for this reason by letter, the Hages indicated that they would take the issue to court, and they sued the Government in the CFC [Court of Federal Claims.]”

And at that point, Jones explained, the BLM refused to consider any further applications from Hage.

“The entire chain of events is the result of the Government’s arbitrary denial of E. Wayne Hage’s renewal permit for 1993–2003, and the effects of this due process violation are continuing,” he stated.

Judge Jones continued:

In 2007, unsatisfied with the outcome thus far in the CFC, the Government brought the present civil trespass action against Hage and the Estate. The Government did not bring criminal misdemeanor trespass claims, perhaps because it believed it could not satisfy the burden of proof in a criminal trespass action, as a previous criminal action against E. Wayne Hage had been reversed by the Court of Appeals. During the course of the present trial, the Government has: (1)invited others, including Mr. Gary Snow, to apply for grazing permits on allotments where the Hages previously had permits, indicating that Mr. Snow could use water sources on such land in which Hage had water rights, or at least knowing that he would use such sources; (2) applied with the Nevada State Engineer for its own stock watering rights in waters on the land despite that fact that the Government owns no cattle nearby and has never intended to obtain any, but rather for the purpose of obtaining rights for third parties other than Hage in order to interfere with Hage’s rights; and (3) issued trespass notices and demands for payment against persons who had cattle pastured with Hage, despite having been notified by these persons and Hage himself that Hage was responsible for these cattle and even issuing such demands for payment to witnesses soon after they testified in this case.

By filing for a public water reserve, the Government in this case sought specifically to transfer to others water rights belonging to the Hages. The Government also explicitly solicited and granted temporary grazing rights to parties who had no preferences under the TGA [Taylor Grazing Act of 1934], such as Mr. Snow, in areas where the Hages had preferences under the TGA.

It is necessary to note that under the TGA, according to Red Canyon Sheep Co. v. Ickes (1938), a rancher whose cattle had previously grazed in the area based upon adjacent land, water rights on the land, etc., has a right to a grazing permit over others who apply for a permit to graze the area without having previously grazed there.

So in this instance, Hage would have priority over Snow for a grazing permit, but the BLM willfully ignored this court ruling.

And after the agency filed for a public water reserve, according to Judge Jones, the BLM “sent trespass notices to people who leased or sold cattle to the Hages, notwithstanding the Hages’ admitted and known control over that cattle, in order to pressure other parties not to do business with the Hages, and even to discourage or punish testimony in the present case.”

“For this reason, the Court has held certain government officials in contempt and referred the matter to the U.S. Attorney’s Office,” he wrote. “In summary, government officials, and perhaps also Mr. Snow, entered into a literal, intentional conspiracy to deprive the Hages not only of their permits but also of their vested water rights.”

“This behavior shocks the conscience of the Court and provides a sufficient basis for a finding of irreparable harm to support the injunction described at the end of this Order.”

So in other words, the BLM willfully attempted to destroy the Hage family’s livelihood because Hage dared to assert his existing rights to the land which his family has held since the late 19th century.

And unfortunately the BLM is attempting to do the exact same thing to Cliven Bundy.

“Has Attorney General Eric Holder prosecuted any federal officials for criminal activity and violation of the Hage family’s constitutionally protected rights? No,” William F. Jasper, senior editor of The New American, wrote on the subject. “Has Sen. Harry Reid denounced this lawlessness and criminal activity by government officials and call upon President Obama and Attorney General Holder to protect the citizens of his state from the depredations of federal officials under their command? No.”

“With attitudes such as those expressed above by Sen. Harry Reid, it is almost a certainty that the recently defused Bundy Ranch standoff will be replayed again — and in the not-too-distant future. And the outcome could be much less amicable for all concerned.”

This article was posted: Thursday, April 17, 2014 at 2:26 pm





 AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

Harry Reid Calls Cliven Bundy Supporters “Domestic Terrorists”

“I repeat: what happened there was domestic terrorism”






AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

 Alex Jones breaks down the bigger picture behind the move to turn the war on terror against American citizens



I have told you this was coming. Under the new homeland we are all the enemy in the eyes of the occupiers.



Leaked Memo Warns Anti-Government Terrorists Will Attack Because of Bundy Ranch Standoff 

Leaked Memo Warns Anti-Government Terrorists Will Attack Because of Bundy Ranch Standoff



You Are Being Targeted


Terrorism Big Dirty Secret

Police Trained That Informed Americans Are Terrorists

Assassination Program

Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns

Posse Comitatus Act

Police State 1

Police State 2

Police State 3

Police State 4


In 1991, the Club published The First Global Revolution. It analyses the problems of humanity, calling these collectively or in essence the 'problematique'. It notes (laments) that, historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by enemies in common: "The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome domestic failure and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself - when things become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so used to classifying its neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new weapons devised."



AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example






AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

The State Run CIA Media Has Been Propagandizing This Domestic Terrorism Narrative To Keep The American People Divided And Unable To Unite Against Real Terrorism Like Agenda 21




False Flag Event







 AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

LA Times Announces: White Men are Terrorists


Kurt Nimmo
March 13, 2013

The establishment media wasted little time after the Southern Poverty Law Center sent a letter to the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security demanding the mailed fist of the state crack down on Americans expressing opposition to an increasingly tyrannical federal government.

“There are, in increasingly frightening numbers, cells of angry men in the United States preparing for combat with the U.S. government. They are usually heavily armed, blinded by an intractable hatred, often motivated by religious zeal,” a Los Angeles Times op-ed claimed on March 8, a couple days after the SPLC letter went out warning of another Oklahoma City terrorist bombing.


MSNBC did its part on March 6 by ramping up the paranoia of another Oklahoma City bombing.



The rant published in the second-largest metropolitan newspaper in the country – following up on the heels of the grand lady of Mockingbird propaganda, the New York Times – doesn’t mince words:

“They’re not jihadists. They are white, right-wing Americans, nearly all with an obsessive attachment to guns, who may represent a greater danger to the lives of American civilians than international terrorists.”

AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case ExampleDespite the ethnic diversity of the patriot movement, the LA Times engages in brazen racism and deliberately singles out white people. This feeds into the SPLC’s absurdist propaganda arguing folks actively resisting constitutional violations perpetuated by the federal government – from the trashing the Second Amendment to the Fourth and beyond – are intimately linked to a minuscule and entirely marginalized white supremacist movement. By raising a fantasy specter of Klansman armed with AR-15s gunning for black and Latino people, the SPLC and the establishment media are actively colluding in an attempt to demonize and eventually destroy an increasingly effective political opposition.

As we noted in our response to the SPLC letter, posted on the same day the LA Times op-ed piece appeared, it is “hardly surprising the SPLC has decided to exploit the growing and diverse movement opposed to a raft of recently proposed unconstitutional firearms laws and label the movement extremist and akin to domestic terrorism.”

Nothing petrifies urban liberals more than defenders of the Second Amendment, especially when they demonstrate with brandished firearms. “Patriot groups are motivated by a host of anti-government attitudes, but their primary focus is guns,” the Times argues. “They are convinced that the government is out to seize their weapons, even though most legislation is focused on keeping guns out of the hands of criminals or restricting the types of weapons that can be sold.”

The LA Times sheepishly decries the fact government is unable to do much “to reverse this tide of belligerent ignorance” on the part of “like-minded Neanderthals” who shelter and encourage “the Timothy McVeighs of the world.”

Instead of a direct police state crack down and mass internment of white people in concentration camps, the editorial staff of the Los Angeles Times suggests a new COINTELPRO-like program designed to monitor Americans upset by continual government usurpations and attacks on the libertarian principles enshrined in the Constitution.

“These groups should be closely monitored, with resources adequate to the task, even if it means shifting some homeland security money from the hunt for foreign terrorists,” they write. As we noted, the groups and individuals singled out by the SPLC include Alex Jones, We Are Change, Oath Keepers, the Constitution Party, the Tyranny Response Team and thousands of other Americans.

Left unmentioned here is the obvious fact the real enemy of government all along has not been a largely fantastical al-Qaeda and a comical Saudi hooked up to a dialysis machine in an Afghan cave, but a considerable and growing domestic patriot movement determined to prevent the incremental move toward authoritarianism and tyranny.

In 2011, we pointed out the government’s attempt to reconstitute its elaborately fashioned Arab and Islamic terror meme into a “white al-Qaeda” threat. “Prior to the events in Norway [Anders Breivik's murderous terror attacks], the Department of Homeland Security released a propaganda video characterizing white middle class Americans as terrorists and members of white al-Qaeda, a term designed to conflate the image of the CIA-created Islamic terror group and ‘rightwing extremists’ in America,” we wrote.

The overriding absurdity of the LA Times editorial is the obvious fact that it is not merely white people who are determined to restore America’s constitutional heritage.

It is people of all ethnic persuasions.

Alex Jones breaks down the “white al-Qaeda” meme during the terror attacks in Norway:


Oslo Bombings and Mass Shooting: Establishment Seeks to Manufacture "White Al-Qaeda" Myth

See part 2, part 3

Links :

911 The Road to Tyranny







"Terror is being used as a weapon to destroy the cherished freedoms of democratic societies"
The recent attack on Libya laid bare the iron fist behind the velvet glove of slogans like "human rights" and "international community." This latest aggression, like the destruction of Yugoslavia and the rape of Afghanistan, proceeds under the cover of NATO. And what is NATO? Author Richard Cottrell tells the story of mayhem, murder and subversion behind the "alliance for peace."





AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

Bombing of government building and mass shooting arrive as establishment seeks to manufacture "white Al-Qaeda" myth

Paul Joseph Watson
Friday, July 22, 2011

UPDATE: Oslo Police Conducted Bombing Exercise Days Before Terrorist Blast

Today's bombing in Oslo and a related mass shooting that occurred just outside the Norwegian capital are already replete with inconsistencies and questions that demand further inquiry into whose agenda this deadly attack serves.

Authorities have already said that the man who carried out the shootings at a youth camp in a nearby resort has direct ties to the earlier bombing in Oslo of a government building.

- An eyewitness to the blast who was just 200 feet away from the explosion called into the Alex Jones show and stated that there was a "bomb sweep" of the area the day before the attack. Norwegian television also reported this story.

- According to a Norwegian who emailed us, his father who is an explosives expert has analyzed the bombing scene and states that due to the pattern of the damage and debris, the blast was clearly underground. There are also reports that the road was closed off in recent days for underground sewer works. This is inconsistent with the official story that the blast was caused by a car bomb.

- Friday was a public holiday in Norway and the building that was bombed was largely empty, which is why only seven people died. The Daily Mail reports, "Fortunately, it is a public holiday in Norway and the offices are less busy than a normal weekday." Why would "terrorists," who presumably want to kill as many people as possible, choose to bomb the building on a day when they know it will be almost empty?

- Reports that the culprit of the mass shooting at a Labour youth camp outside Oslo, who early indications show killed at least 25 people, was a blonde-haired Norwegian man, fit perfectly into the recent propaganda campaign to hype the "white Al-Qaeda" as the most deadly terror threat. Self-proclaimed security experts quoted by Reuters are already predicting the blame will "fall on both Islamists and right-wing extremists," in some form of alliance that led to a "hybrid assault," which in an of itself is a ludicrous notion but does serve to link anti-government sentiment amongst the host population with Muslim terrorism, which has been the goal all along.

- As Kurt Nimmo reports, the man accused of leading the group blamed by some for the bombing, Mullah Krekar, has had dealings with the CIA previously, having been approached to work with them in 2005. Members of Krekar's group, Ansar al-Islam, are veterans of the CIA-ISI collaborative war against the Soviets in Afghanistan.

- Is the attack a slap on the wrist for Norwegian meddling in the globalist agenda? Norway is not a member of the European Union and its recent actions will have undoubtedly angered many of the power players amongst the global elite within that inner circle. Specifically, Norway's support for full Palestinian statehood, set to be voted on at the UN in September, Norway's decision to reverse its support for the bombardment of Libya and withdraw completely from the NATO operation on August 1, and Norway's move to freeze a $42 million dollar payment to Greece, an obvious hindrance to recent efforts to prop up the country's dire debt crisis, are all massive issues that could have caused a fall out between Norway and the Anglo-American establishment.


This article was posted: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 at 12:49 pm

Related Articles






AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example 

Judas Goat Glenn Beck Colludes With CIA and CFR to Take Down Patriot Movement

The pedigree of Beck’s circle reveals he is not a libertarian and does not believe in the Constitution


Kurt Nimmo
April 25, 2014

Glenn Beck, who fancies himself a libertarian, is working with corporate media insiders and a former CIA employee who flaunts his membership in the globalist Council on Foreign Relations. The objective of this group at the very heart of Beck’s operation, now readily apparent following the Cliven Bundy standoff, is to portray the Nevada rancher as a racist zealot, a member of a dangerous and outlaw sovereign citizen movement, and inseparable from violent and conspiracy crazed “militia” domestic terrorists. Beck’s campaign mirrors that of the Obama administration, Eric Holder’s Justice Department and the liberal media intelligentsia.



Beck and company are exploiting a carefully crafted meme manufactured in the intervening years since the Oklahoma City bombing by the Southern Poverty Law Center in partnership with the Department of Homeland Security, the Justice Department and the establishment media. They are using this government created and SPLC disseminated mythology to foment discord within the patriot movement and also set the stage for a false flag event that will serve as a coup de grâce that will destroy the movement.

The correlation between the Obama administration, the Justice Department and Beck became obvious as the standoff progressed, most notably when Beck began to repeat government talking points to attack Bundy and his supporters.


Establishment Talking Points


On April 13, as the Bundy standoff was in full swing, Becket Adams, writing for Beck’s The Blaze, openly echoed the government narrative. He attempted to disprove Senator Harry Reid’s connection to a Chinese energy firm and plans to build a solar plant on public land, an effort documented on April 11 by Infowars.com journalist Kit Daniels.

Beck and Adams also cited the debunked claim that the federal government owns and manages “public land” in Nevada (in direct violation of the Constitution) and insisted Bundy is breaking the law. This claim conforms to the narrative established by the federal government and its propaganda media.

In addition, Adams supported the claim pushed by the government and the establishment media that Bundy’s cattle grazing endangered a tortoise (in fact, as Adan Salazar demonstrates, the tortoise has benefited from cattle grazing).

Finally, Adams tried to argue the Bundy family was a threat to heavily armed BLM agents because they cited Ruby Ridge and Waco and, like millions of ranchers, farmers and other rural Americans, keep and use firearms. Adams’ commentary is nearly indistinguishable from rhetoric put out by Democrats (and, to a lesser degree, Republicans, including the Koch Brothers) and the establishment media. In fact, the establishment media dutifully ignored the story until it went viral in the alternative media and they were required to engage in damage control.

bewareOn his nationally syndicated radio show, Beck accused Alex Jones and Infowars of exploiting the Bundy affair as a catalyst to launch a violent revolution. “Quite honestly, some of the people from… uh, what’s that stupid website’s name? Infowars,” Beck said. “Because these guys were so deeply embedded with the Bundys, we thought there’s something wrong… if you don’t see these guys a mile away, that’s a red flag and it’s not a false flag (laughter). These guys are dangerous. They are looking for revolution, they’re looking for a fight, and keep those guys a million miles away. Anybody with any spiritual radar can see that one coming.”

Beck’s accusation appeared several days before Senate majority leader Harry Reid made similar remarks. Reid characterized Cliven Bundy and his supporters as armed “domestic terrorists.” In addition, Reid called for a “united front” against Bundy, a call that paralleled Beck’s remark Americans should reject Bundy’s stand against the federal government and should distance themselves from his supporters who Beck slandered as crazed followers of Alex Jones.

Finally, sounding like a spokesman for FEMA and the government, Beck advocated non-resistance to government tyranny during the standoff.

“This morning I got up and I saw some more news reports, and more people in America that are standing up now and crying for revolution, insurrection, arming yourself, and a call to arms,” Beck said on his radio program on April 15. “I will tell you I believe in the Second Amendment, and I will defend myself. I believe in the rights that we have. But I will tell you more than I believe in my rights, I believe in the responsibilities that we have to God. And God does not call anyone to anger. God does not call anyone to vengeance ever, ever, ever.”


Glenn Beck and Company: CIA, CFR and Establishment Media Insiders


Beck’s coterie is indisputably linked not only to the establishment media and its endless diversionary game of false left-right politics, but also the intelligence community. If this does not reveal the true nature of Beck’s operation, nothing does.

Buck Sexton. A Blazetv host, Sexton is Beck’s direct link to the CIA and the CFR. His LinkedIn profile states he worked for the agency from 2005 until 2010. He also spent time with the Council on Foreign Relations, the premier globalist organization operating as the shadow government, a fact revealed by Hillary Clinton.

Betsy Morgan. According to LinkedIn, she is the president of The Blaze and has a background serving the corporate media, from CEO of AOL’s Huffington Post to Senior Vice President of CBS Interactive. She has an MBA from Harvard Business School.

S. E. Cupp. She is one The Blaze’s program hosts.  She has an extensive background in establishment media circles, including The New York Times, MSNBC (where she was a talk show co-host), CNN, Fox News, and The New York Daily News. Describing herself as a “mainstream [establishment] conservative,” Cupp has criticized Ron Paul’s foreign policy views and his views on the Federal Reserve.

Laurie Dhue. She hosts The Blaze’s For the Record and is the channel’s primary news anchor. She also sports a background in establishment media. Dhue was a Fox News anchor and worked at MSNBC, a fact demonstrating how effortless the crossover is between so-called conservative and liberal circles in the establishment.

Dana Loesch. Another The Blaze media host demonstrating the linkage between corporate and faux alternative media. Loesch has appeared as a political commentator on Fox News, CNN, CBS, ABC and HBO. She left the St. Louis Tea Party after a failed attempt to get the organization to back an establishment candidate during a congressional race. In December, 2012 she sued Breitbart.com, claiming she endured a hostile work environment.

Considering the pedigree of Beck’s circle, it is obvious he is not a libertarian and he does not believe in the primacy of the Constitution. It is accurate to say Beck is working in concert with the government to sabotage patriotic Americans who believe the Bundy standoff and the armed and menacing reaction by the federal government represent a mortal danger. It is one worth drawing a line in the sand in response as Beck’s former colleague at Fox News, Andrew P. Napolitano, rightly said.

This article was posted: Saturday, April 26, 2014 at 7:44 am








This Contrived Narrative Of Domestic Terrorism Is Rampantly Propagandized Through Movies, TV Shows, and Even Video Games...



AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

Video Game Casts Tea Party and Patriot Groups as Enemy Terrorists

Magazine article literally asks, “Do you have what it takes to pull the trigger on a fellow citizen?”

Adan Salazar
June 13, 2013

The latest installment of the popular Rainbow Six video game franchise casts Americans fed up with government corruption and banker domination as domestic terrorists intent on carrying out killings and bombings, yet another startling indication of how media is influencing the public to accept protesters and people generally upset with the way their government is being run as the new terrorist threat.

“In Tom Clancy’s Rainbow 6 Patriots, Team Rainbow faces a new and very real threat called the ‘True Patriots,’ a highly-trained, well-organized revolutionary group that claim the American government is irrevocably corrupted by greedy politicians and corporate special interests. The True Patriots will do whatever it takes to reclaim their country,” Ubisoft’s description of the game states.

The description goes on to label members of the fictitious movement as the “new breed of terrorists,” stating, “…players will face critical scenarios that will require them to make tough ethical decisions in order to stop this new breed of terrorists.”

Game Informer Magazine, national retail video game chain Game Stop’s exclusive magazine, claimed a tumultuous political atmosphere was the motivation for Ubisoft to pit American citizens against federal agents.

From the December 2011 issue of Game Informer:

“Americans are angry and why shouldn’t they be? With an exponentially expanding national debt, crippling foreclosures, corporate bailouts, degrading infrastructure, dwindling job market and widening income gap between the haves and have-nots, it’s getting harder to believe politicians when they speak of American exceptionalism as if it were a fundamental truth.

“In response to gradual erosion of our beloved nation, resentful citizens of all kinds of political backgrounds are rising up in the form of new political movements like the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street.”

Reading further in the magazine’s short intro for the game, we find the real motivation behind the game’s inception.

“In 2009, the Southern Poverty Law Center reported a massive resurgence in anti-government paramilitary groups, which have jumped from 43 militias in 2007 to nearly 300 in 2010. The sudden surge has captured the attention of the Department of Homeland Security, NSA, CIA, and FBI, who all view these groups as a real threat to the stability of the nation. Moreover, many of these disenfranchised groups frequently put their members through intense military training exercises – for what, no one knows.”

In their final introductory paragraph, the Game Informer writers ask, “Do you have what it takes to pull the trigger on a fellow citizen?”

Rainbow 6: Patriots was announced in 2011, but its actual release has been held back. When GameStop pulled pre-sales from its database without explanation, some speculated the game had been shelved entirely.

However, in a June 2013 interview with IGN, Ubisoft senior vice president of sales and marketing Tony Key confirmed that Rainbow 6: Patriots would likely be held over for next-gen systems like Playstation 4 and Xbox One.

A look at the game’s trailers shows players that play as members of the Rainbow Six squadron will have no choice but to shoot innocent people (and even police officers) in certain situations. According to Game Informer, players will also have the opportunity to play as the terrorists.

This is just the latest example of an ongoing media campaign to demonize Constitutionalists and those seeking to uphold the principles of the Founding Fathers of the nation, as terrorists.

Earlier this year, we reported on how the cable TV network AMC was producing a show titled, “We Hate Paul Revere,” following two brothers that hate the famous patriot activist who became a hero during the American Revolutionary War when he went on his “midnight ride” to warn patriots and patriot militias that the British were coming.

In March, we also discussed how the Fox TV series “The Following” attempted to portray Constitutionalists and militia members as serial killers and terrorists.

Add these “coincidences” to a July 2012 report we wrote covering a DHS study that characterized Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists, and you begin to see a pattern.

Recently, the Internal Revenue Service was also forced to apologize for targeting patriot and Tea Party groups with extra scrutiny and audits when they applied for tax exempt status.

As the federal government further embroils itself in scandal after scandal, and as it takes huge strides to implement a hellish vision of a free society, using an unchecked police state as its muscle – now police in New York can arrest you for merely annoying them, and recently the Supreme Court ruled that police can take DNA swabs from citizens as a “legitimate police booking procedure” – the desperation to stifle opposition has become readily apparent.



Watch the propaganda slickly disguised as a video game in the preview below:





Watch the Infowars Nightly News report on Rainbow Six: Patriots:


This article was posted: Thursday, June 13, 2013 at 2:24 pm





[Rainbow Six video game] ...In their final introductory paragraph, the Game Informer writers ask, “Do you have what it takes to pull the trigger on a fellow citizen?”


 Propagandizing Through Games

SEAL Veteran: Military Leaders Being Asked if They Will Disarm Americans

AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example


Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns





...And It Appears To Be Working



AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example



 AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

Statists Call For Drone Strike on Bundy Supporters 

Stench of hypocrisy runs rampant


Paul Joseph Watson
April 21, 2014

As a federal appeals court rules that the Obama administration must divulge its legal basis for launching drone strikes against American citizens, many statists opposed to Nevada cattle rancher Cliven Bundy’s stand against the government are calling for him and his supporters to be the victims of what would be America’s first domestic drone attack.


 AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

Of course, it’s virtually inconceivable that the White House would launch a Predator drone strike against U.S. citizens, Harry Reid’s “domestic terrorist” slur not withstanding, but the mere fact that self-proclaimed liberals are openly calling for Bundy supporters to be massacred provides us with yet another chilling insight into the warped minds of statists.

The most egregious offense committed by Bundy supporters in the eyes of such people is the fact that a minority of Bunkerville protesters were carrying guns during last weekend’s standoff with heavily armed Bureau of Land Management agents.

This again underscores the rampant hypocrisy of leftists who grandstand as gun control advocates yet fully support the state having a monopoly on firearms. Hundreds of armed BLM agents seizing Bundy’s property while aiming sniper rifles at his family members and tasing them for exercising free speech is not only tolerated by liberals but enthusiastically supported. Indeed, it seems that many were disappointed that BLM agents didn’t follow through on the slaughter they promised during the standoff at Bunkerville.

Virtually every point of resentment directed against Bundy by leftists is borne out of repugnant duplicity and double standards, most notably the charge that Bundy is both engaging in lawlessness and is a “freeloader” for not paying grazing fees, a criticism liberals are perfectly willing to dispense with when it comes to the 12 million illegal immigrants living in the United States.

When a group of Occupy Wall Street demonstrators were brutally pepper sprayed during the infamous incident at UC Davis in 2011 (prompted by students flouting a law they saw as unjust), liberals were rightly outraged and their fury was shared by libertarians who have been speaking out against America’s burgeoning police state for years.

However, now that the shoe is on the other foot, liberals have chosen to either ignore the federal government’s targeting of the Bundy family and their supporters, or in some cases have adopted the role of cheerleaders in unashamedly urging actual bloodshed.



AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

 AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example 

 AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example


Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

This article was posted: Monday, April 21, 2014 at 3:30 pm




 AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

More Here :

Divide And Conquer

Subverting The Public

Media Controllers

 Propaganda History

The Deliberate Dumbing Down Of America







AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

Flash Points of Tyranny: It Doesn’t End With The Bundy Standoff

Daniel Taylor
April 15, 2014

To the discerning eye they are everywhere; Flashpoints of tyranny threatening to push the nation into open revolt. The standoff between the Bundy ranch and the BLM feds is a visceral example of growing discontent over an expanding federal government.

These abuses have occurred over many decades, with a focused intent. Centralization of power and a steady erosion of personal wealth and liberty have been the result. As these abuses and usurpations continue, Americans will face a choice between submitting or standing firm like the Bundy family did.




The tax foundation recently reported that Americans pay more in taxes than they do for food and housing expenses combined. Adding insult to injury, the IRS has been caught in open political persecution of Tea party organizations opposed to big government.

The average American citizen is more than $70,000 in debt. Now the IRS is seizing tax refunds of individuals who’s parents had outstanding debt.

President Obama, since taking office in 2009, has proposed 442 new taxes. Obamacare, with all of its penalties, is effectively another tax. Small business owners on average now lose about a week of business preparing taxes.

Meanwhile, wealthy elites like the Rockefeller Family and Bill Gates are able to hide their wealth in tax exempt foundations, which are in turn used to shape the cultural, political and financial spheres of our world.


“George Washington Would Not Be Welcome”


The Federal government is fully aware that it is acting in an aggressive manner; and that it’s actions are stirring widespread resentment. The documents leaked from the DoD and other government organizations reveal this fact. Homeland Security is admittedly arming itself with billions of rounds of ammunition while training against “Free Americans Against Socialist Tyranny”. The U.S. Postal Service is also buying ammo.

A Department of Defense training manual leaked last year revealed that servicemen and women were told that the founding fathers would not be welcome in today’s military. The document demonizes “extremists” who “…will talk of individual liberties, states’ rights, and how to make the world a better place.”

In 2009 a document leaked from the Missouri Information Analysis Center painted libertarians and Ron Paul supporters as terrorists.

An entire fake town has been built in Virginia, complete with Christian churches and subways, for the military to train for urban occupation.

4th Amendment Eviscerated

Despite its obvious unconstitutional nature, the Supreme Court has yet to decide on the legality of NSA surveillance. As the Business Insider recently reported, Justice Antonin Scalia hinted that he would back the NSA spy program. ”The Supreme Court doesn’t know diddly about the nature and extent of the threat,” Scalia said. “It’s truly stupid that my court is going to be the last word on it.”

The American people can no longer claim ignorance on the NSA surveillance grid. A detailed multi-dimensional image of our daily lives is being built with this system. Individuals to entire group dynamics are being tracked. As it continues to grow, it will be unparalleled in history. Everything from daily travel routes to eating habits will be traceable. Every day objects will be transmitting data 24/7.

According to former CIA Director David Patraeus, smart grid technologies will have a monumental impact on “clandestine tradecraft.” Patraeus states, “Items of interest will be located, identified, monitored, and remotely controlled through technologies such as radio-frequency identification, sensor networks, tiny embedded servers, and energy harvesters…”

The system – in its mechanized, wicked desire to perpetuate itself – has convinced many of us that we will be protected and rewarded for following its directives and turning our neighbors in to the authorities, but the truth is that we all lose when this happens.


“Mr. And Mrs. America, Turn Them All In”

The Bill of Rights has been under attack through multiple administrations and political parties. The 2nd amendment right to bear arms has endured a sustained attack in recent years. White house pundit Piers Morgan learned that his anti-Constitutional views weren’t as popular as he thought when his CNN show was canceled.

The Federal government, despite its attempt to seize the moral high ground, falls flat on its face when we learn of operation Fast and Furious and the U.S. government providing arms to Al-qaeda fighters in Syria. CBS news reported in 2011 that the ATF wanted to use Fast and Furious to “make the case for gun regulations.”

In another demonstration of the morally bankrupt government, Democrat Senator of California Leland Yee, a gun control advocate, was recently charged with arms trafficking.

Government runs the guns, we the people are to be disarmed.

“A Long Train of Abuses”

The United States Declaration of Independence states:

“Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

The above outstanding examples are just a few of an innumerable list of such abuses. As power continues to centralize in a corrupt, morally bankrupt federal government, the necessity to re-assert or even create a new declaration of independence is becoming more evident. In this process Americans resisting this expansion must hold the moral high ground. We are not the aggressors, nor do we intend to be. We do recognize, however that Tyranny will tighten its grip, and as our forefathers wisely knew, the people will tolerate it for a long time. At a certain critical point that tolerance ceases and the people stand up.

When we do stand up we will stand with the spirit of our ancestors at our back. Police, military, government employees; You are all invited to join us with open arms in this fight. When this critical point arrives in all its fury we must hold guiding principles in our hearts. Love of goodness, honor, justice and truth need to give us strength to cut through the chains.

Daniel Taylor’s post first appeared on Old-thinker News.

This article was posted: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 at 10:23 am




"...Americans resisting this expansion must hold the moral high ground. We are not the aggressors, nor do we intend to be. We do recognize, however that Tyranny will tighten its grip, and as our forefathers wisely knew, the people will tolerate it for a long time. At a certain critical point that tolerance ceases and the people stand up."






AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example






AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example 




Stewart Rhodes: The Importantce of April 19th

Oath Keeper, Stewart Rhodes, sends a message to Oath Keepers in his home state of Montana







Oath Keepers Bundy Ranch Debrief


This is the official statement from the Oath Keepers regarding the Bundy Ranch Situation.







The Video The Feds Don't Want You To See

Published on Apr 13, 2015

Although no gunshots were fired, what happened at the Bundy Ranch was a shot fired across the bow using the most powerful weapon in the infowar, the camera. It captured the iconic moment of the people taking on an aggressive government tyranny, a snapshot that still reverberates one year later. We look at the lies, the spin and the reality of a federal government openly defying The Posse Comitatus Act as it threatened and brutalized citizens of the community. Although the sheriff did nothing to protect the community, neighbor stood with neighbor in true posse comitatus, the “power of the community”, to expel the federal army from the community.







AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example






[Help Educate Family And Friends With This Page And The Links Below]




AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example




The United Nations

Gov Wants Growing Food Illegal


What Can We Do?


Ambush / Undercover Journalism










look into it videos 


invisible empire



hollerith dvd


obama deception


fall of the republic


Aaron Russo 


Terror Storm final cut 



police state 4


blueprint of madmen