Look Into It - Depopulation Agenda Part 2

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”

From 7 Billion People To 500 Million People – The Sick Population Control Agenda Of The Global Elite

Report entertains global catastrophe that kills 6 billion people as potential method of achieving "sustainability"

The National Academy of Sciences has published a shocking report which envisages a Chinese-style global one child policy as the only means of reversing climate change and reducing global population to a “sustainable” number of 1-2 billion people.

The white paper, entitled Human population reduction is not a quick fix for environmental problems and authored by the University of Adelaide’s Corey Bradshaw and Barry Brook, even entertains the impact of world wars and global pandemics that wipe out 6 billion people as potential methods of combating the threat posed to the environment by overpopulation.

Crucially, the paper is edited by Stanford University’s Paul R. Ehrlich, a perennial advocate of population reduction whose dire proclamations about environmental catastrophes as a result of overpopulation have been proven wildly inaccurate time and time again.

In his 1968 book The Population Bomb, Ehrlich infamously predicted that, “In the 1970s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death,” as a result of overpopulation, just one of many ludicrous forecasts that Ehrlich has got spectacularly wrong on a routine basis.

Ehrlich has also expressed his support for mandatory population control, arguing that such methods must be imposed “by compulsion if voluntary methods fail,” while the biologist co-authored Ecoscience with White House Science Czar John P. Holdren, the textbook that advocates putting drugs in the water supply to sterilize people, mandatory forced abortions, and a tyrannical eco-fascist dictatorship run by a “planetary regime.”

Given that connection, it’s unsurprising that the white paper struggles to disguise its advocacy for draconian methods of population reduction in the name of saving mother Earth.

The report presents a selection of scenarios to achieve “reductions in human fertility” in order to prevent “climate change,” threats to biodiversity and to help “plan for a healthy future society.”

The authors admit that global fertility rates are already dropping but that “rising affluence-linked population and consumption rates” (in other words – higher standards of living) are contributing to worsening environmental conditions.

Under one scenario, a global pandemic wipes out 6 billion people from 2041 onwards, resulting in the planet’s population being reduced to 5.1 billion by 2100. However, this reduction of 2 billion people compared to current figures is not sufficient to accomplish the level of human culling desired by the authors, who note that “even future events that rival or plausibly exceed past societal cataclysms cannot guarantee small future population sizes without additional measures, such as fertility control.”

Graph: Global pandemic events which reduce population by 2 billion and 6 billion denoted by skull and crossbone image.

While the paper admits that the notion of global pandemics and wars as tools to reduce population is an “amoral” consideration, its tone almost laments the fact that these “stressors” would not significantly reduce population down to the desired “sustainable” figure of 1-2 billion people.

“It has been suggested that a total world population between 1 and 2 billion might ensure that all individuals lived prosperous lives, assuming limited change in per capita consumption and land/materials use,” states the report. The sober academic tone of the paper only partially obscures the fact that the authors are advocating that 5 billion people be eradicated from the Earth, a notion they acknowledge is “politically sensitive.”

In two other scenarios, a combination of deaths from a massive world war and a Spanish flu-style event combined, as well as a pandemic that kills 2 billion people, both fail to achieve the desired level of population reduction by 2100.

The only method to truly achieve anywhere near the kind of population reduction desired to achieve sustainability and prosperity, according to the report, is a global Chinese-style one child policy, which if imposed by 2045 would reduce global population to 3.45 billion, less than half current levels, by 2100. Models show that this would take at least 140 years to achieve if females were restricted by law to having just one child.

The report notes that one of the main obstacles to imposing stricter family planning measures and a global one child policy is “conservative religious and political opposition.” What is not discussed is the fact that China’s barbaric one child policy is imposed by means of crippling economic coercion and via a system of state terror where pregnant women are kidnapped off the street by government goons, drugged and made to undergo forced abortions before being sterilized.

Graph: According to the report, the only way to reduce global population anywhere near to “sustainable” levels of 1-2 billion would be a global one child policy.

Acknowledging that the imposition of such measures would be “challenging to achieve,” the authors assert that such draconian methods offer, “great potential to reduce the size of the human population and alleviate pressure on resource availability over the long term.”

“There are clearly many environmental and societal benefits to ongoing fertility reduction in the human population,” conclude the authors, arguing that such measures represent a “solution long in the making.”

In reality, when one studies models of human demographics produced by other entities, including the United Nations’ own figures, overpopulation ceases to be an issue past 2050 and in fact the real problem becomes underpopulation.

As the Economist reported, “Fertility is falling and families are shrinking in places— such as Brazil, Indonesia, and even parts of India—that people think of as teeming with children. As our briefing shows, the fertility rate of half the world is now 2.1 or less—the magic number that is consistent with a stable population and is usually called “the replacement rate of fertility”. Sometime between 2020 and 2050 the world’s fertility rate will fall below the global replacement rate.”

In addition, Professor Hans Rosling’s study of global demographics, expertly summarized in his presentation Don’t Panic – The Truth About Population (embedded below), illustrates how “in a few generations’ time, world population growth will level off completely.”

Given the fact that the white paper published by the National Academy of Sciences has debunked alarmist Paul R. Ehrlich’s fingerprints all over it, its value lies not in providing us with accurate statistics about population growth, but in offering a shocking glimpse into the eugenics-driven madness and environmental radicalism that still pervades the halls of academia worldwide in the context of hysteria about overpopulation.

Elite Plan To Kill 6 Billion Discovered
Government envisions nightmare policies to reduce population

The elite's cryptic monument to depopulation and world government just became more mysterious (and creepier) – somebody has officially updated it with an engraved cube marking the year 2014 inserted into the English/Spanish slab of the 'new 10 commandments' for the 'Age of Reason' desired by its creators.

Website: TruthstreamMedia.com
Twitter: @TruthstreamNews
FB: Facebook.com/TruthstreamMedia

Under the eugenics world government system, individual human beings are literally considered to be “human resources” to be planned and manipulated under a planned economy with total control over your health care, employment, housing, food and reproduction… yet somehow government officials tell us that this is “freedom.”

In the 1984 sense of the matter, this kind of “freedom” really is slavery to a system where the State believes it is God.

This is coming to America in a number of ways, but certainly through Obamacare, where technocrats try to sell us on the argument of rationed health care, where cost-benefit analysis determine the value of individual human lives. Kurt Nimmo points this out in his article today, “Democrats Crank Up Death Panel Talk Following Obama Win.”

Fabian Socialist, eugenicist and playwright George Bernard Shaw famously stated:
“I also made it quite clear that Socialism means equality of income or nothing, and that under socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly feed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live you would have to live well.”

Nearly every day, the mainstream media dispenses new articles reinforcing the idea that humans are infesting the earth, overpopulating it like parasites and sucking it dry of resources. The magic number — 7 billion — is thrown at us like an accusation and a curse, as if the mere fact this many people are now living on the planet is an automatic death sentence for the world and everything on it.

TIME ‘s Bryan Walsh declared the environment would be the real victim of overpopulation. In his article “Zero Population Growth = Healthier Planet?,” Tim Wall of Discovery News wrote, “A stable number of humans on the planet doesn’t necessarily mean less impact on the environment. But it helps.” Climate change author Ma ry Ellen Harte and Anne Erhlich, policy coordinator for Stanford’s Center for Conservation Biology, asked the question, “The world’s biggest problem?” then answered with “too many people” in the LA Times. Reuters Nina Chestney recently reported that 100 million people will die by 2030 due to anthropogenic climate change wreaking havoc on the planet, while at the same time, U.S. carbon emissions are at a 20-year low.

One Washington Post reader even wrote, “Living within our global means will require a radical drop in the Earth’s population, starting now,” in an op-ed the organization saw fit to publish.

These articles never admit it, but the point is not to educate people on the environment and population growth. The real design is programming us to accept population control. The real meaning behind it?

The mainstream media always tosses out a lot of broad, vague concepts about how the world is overpopulated to the total detriment of the environment, as if it is just an accepted, incontrovertible fact.

Are we in dire straights? Is the Earth becoming so overburdened by the burgeoning human population that it’s about to plummet out of space?

No. Not even close. In fact, when the actual data is considered, the only thing dropping, and fast, are human birth rates.

Many countries’ have zero or even negative population growth, with birth rates below national replacement rates — the degree upon which a population replaces itself.

As it stands, the Western European countries of Germany, Holland, Belgium, Spain, Italy, and Sweden have total fertility rates below the replacement rate. Denmark saw 4,400 fewer children born in 2011 than in 2010, with projections in 2012 on track for the nation having its lowest birth rate on record since 1988.

Canada’s birth rate fell to 10.5 per 1,000 people in 2002, the lowest it had been since 1921. New figures in 2011 showed it had dipped even further to 10.28. Australia’s birth rate decline over the past two decades is so worrisome to its government that it introduced “extensive changes” to taxes and benefits that would assist families and encourage growth.

China, a nation typically (but incorrectly) called out as experiencing a continuous population boon comparative to rabbits, has seen its birth rates decline from 16.12 per 1,000 people in 2000 to 12.31 in 2012. Mexico’s population explosion is now a myth similar to China’s; in 2010, The Economist declared the country’s birth rate to be in “free fall.”

Russia’s 2012 birth rate was lower at 10.94 per 1,000 people than its death rate at 16.03 per 1,000 people. Russia has the second highest death rate of any country in the world.

In 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared South Korea to have the world’s lowest birth rate for the second year in a row; North Korea’s birth rates were also in steep decline, from 20.43 per 1,000 people in 2000 to 14.51 per 1,000 people in 2012. Japan’s government is now estimating that if birth rates in the country continue to decline on the same trend as seen in the past few decades, the nation’s population will shrink 30 percent by 2060.

Morocco, Syria, and Saudi Arabia’s fertility rates have all declined nearly 60 percent overall. Singapore’s birth rates dropped so low in 2012 (1.2 per 1,000 people), the nation’s Prime Minister’s office released a paper to combat the “serious” issue entitled, “Our Population Our Future.”

While birth rates for both boys and girls are dropping in India, baby girl births are showing a much sharper decline than baby boys. Poland officially has one of the lowest birth rates in the world as well.

The highest birth rates in 2012 were reported in the African nations of Niger and Uganda, but these two countries also have some of the lowest overall life expectancy rates at 54 and 53 years respectively as when compared with the U.S. or the U.K., where life expectancy rates are nearly 30 years higher.

According to a population growth study conducted by University of Minnesota Ecology Professor Clarence Lehman, “Human population growth has turned ‘a very sharp corner’ and is now slowing, on its way to leveling off in the next century.”

While birth and fertility rates are dropping en masse, other figures are rising just as quickly.

WHO has estimated that Alzheimer’s and other debilitating dementias effect 24.3 million people and are rising in developing countries; WHO has announced this number is now expected to double every 20 years. Childhood Leukemia and brain cancers are on the rise as well, with figures jumping about one percent every year for each of the last 20 years. Autoimmune diseases are rocketing off the charts. Celiac disease — an autoimmune disorder that causes the body to attack the small intestine which has the primary function of nutrient absorption — now afflicts five times as many Americans than it did in the 1950s. According to the American Diabetes Association, the incidence of type 1 diabetes in American youth increased 23 percent just between 2001 and 2009. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) admitted in a study released earlier this year that autism now afflicts one in every 88 children.

“It clearly suggests that environmental factors are at play due to the significant increase in these diseases,” explained Virginia Ladd, President and Executive Director of the American Autoimmune Related Diseases Association (AARDA). “Genes do not change in such a short period of time.”

What environmental factors could be making people so abundantly ill? There are so many lovely options to choose from.

Could it be the vaccines laced with heavy metals and formaldehyde? Isn’t it ironic that public service announcements constantly tell us smoking is bad because cigarettes contain formaldehyde and formaldehyde causes cancer, something even the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) warns us about, but shooting a baby up with formaldehyde in a vaccine is somehow supposed to be perfectly acceptable? Administering a two month old one shot for diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, and hepatitis B, and one shot for polio would mean shooting 200 micrograms of formaldehyde straight into the infant’s bloodstream; that’s just one set of vaccines. The average American child is set to receive 36 inoculations by the time he or she is five years old.

Perhaps it is the genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in our food which have been shown in studies (the ones not funded by Monsanto) to cause everything from infertility and liver disease, to tumor s and death, all courtesy of Big Agra, the same companies to bring us DDT and Agent Orange.

Or is it geoengineering otherwise known by some as “chemtrails,” science’s “answer” to the man-made global warming hoax that involves planes spraying a chemical mixture of strontium, barium salts and aluminum particles into our atmosphere? Michael Murphy of the chemtrail documentary “What in the World Are They Spraying?” notes that the effect of having these toxic chemicals sprayed on us without our consent “has been devastating to crops, wildlife and human health.” The latest proposal to geoengineer our planet will only cost us a mere $5 billion dollars per year, and although there is evidence these programs have been going on since at least the ’90s, officials still will not fully admit it. The mainstream media has to sell it to us first.

As if our air and food being poisoned isn’t enough, artificial fluoride, a chemical waste byproduct of aluminum and phosphate fertilizer manufacturing, is being dumped into municipal water across the U.S. and all over the world. The water in Nazi concentration camps was purposefully fluoridated, and it’s not likely Adolf Hitler was worried about the inmates’ dental health. Studies on fluoride’s detrimental health effects are numerous; fluoride has been shown to negatively impact every soft tissue in the body. Fluoride has been tied to kidney damage, arthritis, thyroid disease, pineal gland calcification, endocrine disruption, infertility, bone cancer, cardiovascular disease, joint damage, gastrointestinal issues, and lowered IQ. What’s even more twisted? If Americans want artificial fluoride removed from our public water sources, we actually have to fight our city councils in many cases.

This depopulation agenda is foisted on people through the “green” movement, something that can make people feel all warm and squishy inside because they’re doing something “good” for the environment; the flipside to that coin is the elites’ ultimate agenda for mass death under the guise of saving the Earth.

According to the Population Research Institute (PRI), the myth of overpopulation has been brought up again and again over the past few centuries for to scare people into accepting a eugenics agenda:

Multiple sources from PRI to National Geographic’s Robert Kunzig claim that, when the math is done properly, every family on the planet could have a house with a yard and reside in a land mass the size of Texas.

Texas is just under 269,000 square miles of the entire Earth’s 57.5 million square miles of land. Perhaps the state would not readily have the resources to support that many people, but that is not the point. The point is that it could be done.

British Scholar Thomas Malthus (1766-1838) is credited with the original theory of population “growth” which was, really, just an argument for population control. Malthus argued that population increases would eventually lead to starvation and poverty, thus he felt the lower classes should have their family sizes regulated. Darwin admitted in his autobiography that his theory of natural selection was based in part on Malthus’ work.

Fast forward to today, when we have eugenicist billionaires with enough money to affect global change like former Vice President Al Gore claiming population stabilization is the only way to combat global warming; Bill Gates lecturing on how we could save ten teachers’ jobs if we cut end-of-life care for grandma; and CNN-founder Ted Turner (who has five children of his own) talking about how everyone else should be forced to adhere to a one-child policy for 100 years to reduce the world down to 2 billion people.

Fearmongerer Gore stands to make billions off his global warming carbon tax initiatives should they pass; while Gore flies around in private jets and spends $30,000 a year in utility bills for his 20-room mansion, he basically wants to tax breathing for everyone else. Gates’ “charitable” foundation has a mission to “vaccinate the planet” — vaccination that he admitted will reduce the world’s population by 15 percent. Gates’ valiant mission recently left nearly 48,000 children paralyzed in India. Turner recently announced in a television appearance he thinks it’s “good” that record numbers of U.S. soldiers are committing suicide.

Notice all of these people are advocating population reduction, but none of them are personally volunteering to go first.

Al Gore, Bill Gates, Ted Turner, and others like them, are using their power, wealth, and influence to play God, but they are not gods; they are mere men who, because of their wealth and power, believe themselves to be above the rest of us. They believe they alone can make decisions on who is worthy to live and die. The eugenics agenda lives on, and the bought and controlled media continues to churn out propaganda telling us we have to die so that the Earth (and the elite) may live.

Every day we are being poisoned, robbed and lied to on a massive scale. We have to wake people up to what’s really going on here, before it’s too late.

Airborne Ebola is "Solution to Earth's Overpopulation Problem" Says Biologist Dr. Eric Pianka, who has a pet bison named Lucifer.

Alex Covers The Full Spectrum Biological/Eugenics Program Against Humanity 1/2

On tonights Infowars Nightly News, Alex Jones covered the full spectrum biological warfare carried out against the worlds population, through BPA, vaccines, chemicals, drugs, eugenics and sterilization. Alex made specific reference to a particular document, a memo from Planned Parenthood and the Population Council titled "Activities Relevent to the Study of Population Policy In The US". A chart outlines the master plan of destroying the family, mariage and society through eugenics, chemicals, drugs and social control.

Memorandum to Bernard Berelson (President, Population Council) found in "Activities Relevant to the Study of Population Policy for the U.S." 3/11/69 by Frederick S. Jaffe (Vice president of Planned Parenthood - World Population).

TABLE 1. Examples of Proposed Measures to Reduce U.S. Fertility, by Universality or Selectivity of Impact

Alex Covers The Full Spectrum Biological/Eugenics Program Against Humanity 2/2

TABLE 1. Examples of Proposed Measures to Reduce U.S. Fertility, by Universality or Selectivity of Impact

Aaron takes on the 1972 United Nations propaganda film that has the captains of the planet take control over the world’s growing population, using Malthusian rhetoric to demand that “less people be invited to be born” and that every trick in the book be used for control. This shameless parade features such regular eugenicists as John D. Rockefeller III, Obama Science Czar John P. Holdren, Agenda 21 chief Maurice Strong and numerous other psuedo-scientists using their clout to demand development taxes from the rich countries lest a “population bomb” be dropped on the world… and that’s just a preview of things to come under carbon taxes, environmental laws and “microliving” under the austerity of a world where humans must be the “solution to the disease they created.”

7 Quotes that prove Eugenics is alive, profitable, and the source of all “chronic disease”

1) Charles Darwin, 1871: “Changed conditions induce an almost indefinite amount of fluctuating variability.” [i]

Insomuch as people are human, we are all alike- but the similarity ends there. Inside, veins run along paths as unique as fingerprints, like Darwin described. Genetics and individuality dictates each human identity and how one will respond to a ‘changed condition.’

Every chronic disease responsible for the top causes of death was rare or did not yet exist in the 1800’s, but each abounds now at epidemic levels. From autism to Alzheimer’s, cancer, heart disease and diabetes, all result from damage to the nervous system. The ‘rare genetic disorders,’ many syndromes, and these widespread killers are not diseases at all, but the “fluctuating variability” of a unique human response to a “changed condition.” [ii] Because pets have these ‘diseases’ too, what was the change that was new in the 1800’s, grew throughout the 1900’s, and damages the nervous system of mammals?

2) Francis Galton, the inventor of Eugenics, 1883: “The object of statistical science is to discover methods of condensing information concerning large groups of allied facts.” [iii]

The vast majority of medical information today is statistical. Hence when ‘studies show’ facts, they almost always point to people’s lifestyle choices that lead to a ‘greater risk’ of developing chronic diseases- but provide no data whatsoever about the underlying biological causes. From Galton’s original statement, it seems that was the goal from the beginning: to let people die and do nothing to stop it, but merely describe what kind of people suffer from which conditions.

From what we, the people, are continually told, the major ‘risk factors’ for chronic diseases are smoking, drinking, doing illegal drugs, and eating too much. Yet, alcohol, tobacco, drugs in their plant form, sugar, fat, and salt all existed for thousands of years, so there is no way that they alone can be responsible for the sudden appearance of health conditions, nor their rapid increase since WW2. Since animals and infants also ‘get’ them, lifestyle choices cannot explain the biological mechanism for cause, but more likely, they can amplify the conditions already present from another source.

Statistical studies are the easiest to manipulate, based on the size of the study and what type of people compose it. They also distract from the issue of causation completely- the autism controversy is one such successful example. Highlighting various ‘bad’ behaviors is nothing more than a classic tactic of ‘blaming the victim.’ Thus, the people who die are judged for what they did, rather than what was done to them, and the primary cause of chronic disease appears to be a lack of obedience to eugenic ideals. As to actual causation, what do animals, infants and adult humans all have in common?

3) Francis Galton, 1883: “The investigation of human eugenics” calls for “family histories, both medical and general,” which would “require no more than zeal and persuasiveness.” [iv]

When Galton wrote those words he was frustrated, because at that time it was not yet possible for a man and his children to get “weighed, measured, and rightly photographed, and have their bodily facilities tested.” Such growth records, from youth to maturity were “required before it can be possible to rightly appraise the effect of external conditions upon development,” and advance eugenic goals. [v]

Now, oddly enough, all public school children are weighed and measured every year, just as their vision and hearing is tested. Although the photography program began with a few salesmen and a dream, as Lifetouch Portraits tells it, the measuring most certainly did not. Is there any way that could be an accident- especially if the policy was established at the highest levels of government?

Another modern standard is the complete exposition of family medical history, by every patient, at every doctor’s visit- that seemed to “require no more than zeal or persuasiveness” by the American Medical Association, which governs medicine. Because the AMA existed before the eugenics movement, and providing family history is so common now that it is unquestioned, it is not only suspicious, or likely, but certain, that the leaders directly followed Galton’s order: “no time ought to be lost in encouraging and directing a habit of compiling” them. [vi] Public schools require children to get vaccinated, and infants, adults, and animals all receive them from doctors- whether MD or Vet- do they not?

4) Francis Galton, 1883: “Terror at any object is quickly taught if it is taught consistently, whether the terror be reasonable or not” and “aversion is taught as easily as terror.” [vii]

We were taught to avoid questioning doctors, but above all, to fear germs. There is no such infection that will kill you immediately, although movies like Contagion instruct otherwise. We have an immune system, but so many people died during the infectious disease era because they were crammed into shacks, malnourished, and living in filth. The sanitation movement changed that, not vaccines. [viii]

Doctors are not gods. In fact, they were responsible for millions of deaths in the puerperal fever epidemic that lasted 300 years. It is now called “the doctor’s plague” because the entire time, they went from shoving their hands into women’s vaginas who had just died from the infection, straight into birth canals of those in labor- without washing their hands, because they did not believe in germs. They were not punished, only forced to sanitize their hands once germs were discovered in the late-1800’s. [ix] Now, we irrationally fear them and specifically ‘believe’ in vaccines, because their effectiveness is not factual.

While many doctors exist who want to save people’s lives, most do what the AMA tells them to do- because it comes with God-like power. All are taught with a ‘reward and punishment’ psychological tactic as well, the “law of effect,” that was developed by an American eugenic scientist from 1927-33. Edward Thorndike trained people by rewarding one “right” behavior and punishing everything else, which was defined as “wrong.” [x] Are vaccines and legal drugs the “right” choice for doctors?

5) Joshua Lederberg, 1946: “A simple analogy for cancer is evident—the newly found capacity of a cell to synthesize an essential metabolite otherwise available only in limiting and regulatory amounts.” [xi]

Cancer is ‘cell proliferation,’ which in normal terms, means that a group of cells grows in excess until they take over the host body and kill it. Like any other living entity cancer requires food to grow, the only difference is it gets energy differently than other cells. The strange method of acquiring it was discovered in 1930, but according to medical studies, no one thought to uncover what cancer eats until only a few years ago. [xii] Another eugenic scientist did, however, in 1946.

Joshua Lederberg used experiments with fungus to search for “a nutritional concept of cancer,” but his language clearly indicated that he did not want to stop it, but cause it, in “higher forms” like us. He discovered that when cells mutate, some develop a “newly found capacity” to eat food that normally exists in small amounts. The more abundant that food became, the more the cells proliferated, until the host was consumed. Hence, all that was left to discover, was how to cause cells to mutate in people, and then give them something to eat.

Twelve years later, Lederberg won the Nobel Prize for mutation. [xiii] That exact same year, congress passed the Food Additives Amendment. Several chemicals were legally put into the food supply with no limits or safety testing whatsoever. They were called GRAS substances, because someone decided that they were “generally regarded as safe.” [xiv] Does one feed cancer in some people, depending on genetics, but cause nervous system damage in others- and it is also an ingredient in vaccines? YES.

6) Francis Galton, 1883: “In any scheme of eugenics,” “energy is the most important quality to favour.” [xv] Energy is “the capacity for labour.” [xvi]

Galton defined eugenics as “the science of improving stock.” By that, he meant to give “more suitable races or strains of blood a better chance of prevailing speedily over the less suitable than they otherwise would have had.” [xvii] Since many white people were sterilized by eugenic policies in the 20^th century, and get just as many chronic diseases now as other races, he obviously did not refer to color. [xviii]

Because “the capacity for labour” was the goal of his eugenic scheme, then by “improving” and “suitable,” he must have meant the ability to work for wages. During the 1880’s and 90’s, hundreds of monopolies sprung up, in which large corporations owned all the raw materials necessary for life- from food to fuel, to everything else. [xix] Hence, the only ‘jobs created’ from then on were usually low-paying subservient careers that reduced the people at large to a fiscal type of slavery. The wages were set by the same enormously wealthy corporate owners who also set the price of necessities.

Overpopulation was always a concern, as Darwin stated in 1871: “civilized populations have been known under favorable conditions, as in the United States, to double their numbers in twenty-five years,” or as little as twelve. [xx] Therefore, he wrote that Western societies needed to be controlled, just like the various natives, who “would no doubt increase if their numbers were not by some means rigidly kept down.” [xxi] Population control applied only to the 99%, not the corporate aristocracy.

The horrific reality that these quotes reveal is that for over one hundred years, we, the people, were bred like dogs, for slave labor. When an infant ‘fails to thrive’ or dies from SIDS, that means his or her soul was so precious, so sensitive, they were not ‘fit to survive.’ Only the ‘strong’ can make it through the chemical onslaught of youth, enough to work like slaves for a few decades, until the slow nervous system excitation eventually kills them- which usually strikes right around retirement.

Despite what the Resident Evil franchise teaches, viral weaponry that kills people instantly is not profitable at all. Nervous system excitation serves another, more important purpose. Food corporations use the same chemicals to enhance flavor that the pharmaceutical companies put in vaccines, making them heat stable and increasing cell yield, and because they make people so sick, the medical industry is booming more than ever before. [xxii] THAT is why Medicare and Medicaid are bankrupt.

7) FDR, the president who created the short-lived middle class, 1933: “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror, which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.” [xxiii]

Perhaps only the words of that great man who cared more for the people than the corporations can help us now. “This is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly,” for surely, in more ways than one, “only a foolish optimist can deny the dark realities of the moment.” This time, “our common difficulties” do not concern “only material things,” but our lives.

Nationwide vaccination began after WW2; [xxiv] although Hitler was defeated, his policies lived on. Hunger Games is not a metaphor, but an accurate description of what only a few hundred CEO’s and shareholders (the Capital) do to the entire world (the Districts). Their hundreds of billions of dollars in profit come from one source alone: the suffering and death of everyone you have ever loved.

Remember, mass extermination events are not profitable. There is no coming cataclysm to fear other than what the Earth must do to stabilize the climate. Like Galton said, they are a little too hard to get away with, because “there exists a sentiment, for the most part unreasonable, against the gradual extinction of an inferior race,” but “it is nothing of the kind when the process of extinction works silently and slowly.” [xxv] Your extermination is already well underway, injected into your veins and served to you in every food source- by people who, like the Nazis, are just following orders.

There is no ‘bad gene’ responsible for any chronic disease- that is eugenics. No chromosome explains the sudden onset of nervous system damage, only how each person will respond to excitation. Either no cure will ever exist, or it already does- but they are available only to billionaires, the 1% of the 1%. That makes us, the 99.99% masses of workers, the inferior race to be exploited, then exterminated.

We are not just barcodes, but numerical values- and we are worth far less in terms of lifetime earnings, than what we will pay in healthcare costs. Only we can save ourselves from this hell on Earth, and make the corporations answer for what they have done, in the only way they respond to: money. We can easily take the few cowards who profit from the suffering of billions, but we must get MAD!

Note: To anyone who says ‘those quotes were taken out of context.’ Actually, all quotes are taken out of context, unless one reprints the entire article or book. Problems only arise when the quotes are selected in a way that changes the original meaning intended by the author. I did not do that. Stop using or falling for rhetoric tactics, and check for yourself.

[i] Darwin, Charles. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. New York: D. Appleton and company, 1909, p. 46.

[ii] This is my personal discovery, built on the work of many brave researchers and doctors. To list the proof would require at least one hundred studies, and the explanation would be longer than this piece of writing. In the future, I will prove it all, step by step, disease by disease: stay tuned.

[iii] Galton, Francis. Inquiries into human faculty. London: J. M. Dent & co., 1908, p. 33.

[iv] Galton, Francis, p. 30-1.

[v] Galton, Francis, p. 28.

[vi] Galton, Francis, p. 30-1.

[vii] Galton, Francis, p. 152-3.

[viii] The decline in infectious diseases happened right after the sanitation movement, and decades BEFORE nationwide vaccination began: Susser, Mervin, et al. “Choosing a Future for Epidemiology: I. Eras and Paradigms.” The American Journal of Public Health 86, no. 5 (1996): 668-73. Common knowledge: procedures of the sanitation movement included removing fecal matter from public living areas (which spread disease) and forcing doctors to finally wash their hands after sticking them into diseased bodies.

[ix] Noakes, T.D., et al. “Semmelweis and the aetiology of puerperal sepsis 160 years on: an historical review.” Epidemiology and Infection 136, no. 1 (2008):1-9. Free online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2870773/

[x] Thorndike, Edward. “The Law of Effect.” The American Journal of Psychology 39, no. 1/4 (1927): 212-222. Thorndike, Edward. “A Proof of the Law of Effect.” Science 77, no. 1989 (1933): 173-5.

[xi] Lederberg, Joshua. “A Nutritional Concept of Cancer.” Science 104, No. 2705 (1946): 428.

[xii] Biswas, Swethajit, et al. “Non-glucose metabolism in cancer cells—is it all in the fat?” Cancer Metastasis Review 31 (2012): 689-698.

[xiii] Nobelprize.org. Joshua Lederberg – Facts. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1958/lederberg-facts.html (accessed June 27, 2013).

[xiv] FDA. How U.S. FDA’s GRAS Notification Program Works. http://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/GRAS/ucm083022.htm (accessed June 27, 2013).

[xv] Galton, Francis, p. 19.

[xvi] Galton, Francis, p. 16-7.

[xvii] Galton, Francis, p. 17, footnote.

[xviii] Ikemoto, Lisa C. “Infertile by Force and Federal Complicity: The Story of Relf v. Weinberger.” In Women and the Law Stories, edited by Elizabeth Schneider and Stephanie Wildman, 179-206. New York: Foundation Press, 2011.

[xix] Lloyd, Henry D. Wealth against commonwealth. New York: Harper & brothers, 1894.

[xx] Darwin, Charles, p. 59.

[xxi] Darwin, Charles, p. 61.

[xxii] Olney, J. W. “Excitotoxic food additives – relevance of animal studies to human safety.” Neurobehavioral toxicology and teratology 6, no. 6 (1984): 455-62. Olney, J. W. “Excitotoxins in foods.” Neurotoxicology 15, no. 3 (1994): 535-44. CDC. Ingredients of Vaccines – Fact Sheet. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/additives.htm (accessed June 27, 2013). MSG discovered to be “remarkably heat stable,” and thus removed the need to refrigerate vaccines: No authors listed. “A field trial of freeze-dried glutamate BCG vaccine.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 17, no. 2 (1957): 289-93. MSG discovered to increase cell yield, and thus create more raw product for use in vaccines: Lane, A. “Use of Glutamic Acid to Supplement Fluid Medium for Cultivation of Bordetella pertussis.” Applied Microbiology 19, no. 3 (1970): 512-20.

[xxiii] Roosevelt, Franklin Delano. “Only Thing We Have to Fear Is Fear Itself”: FDR’s First Inaugural Address. http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5057/ (accessed June 26, 2013).

[xxiv] The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. History of Vaccine Schedule. http://www.chop.edu/service/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-schedule/history-of-vaccine-schedule.html (accessed June 27, 2013).

[xxv] Galton, Francis, p. 200-1.

Depopulation Agenda

From 7 Billion People To 500 Million People – The Sick Population Control Agenda Of The Global Elite

ENDGAME