Chuck
Baldwin Exposes
Donald Trump's Tyrannical
Executive Order
LibertyFellowshipMT | Dec 16, 2019
Donald Trump's so-called "antisemitism" Executive Order Is abominable, reprehensible &
downright tyrannical. It is a blatant attack against the First Amendment protection of free speech and for all
intents and purposes elevates all things Jewish to royalty status in America--being granted official government
protection against any kind of criticism.
In this video, Chuck Baldwin exposes the fact that not only is Donald Trump a hack for
Zionism;
he is also a wanna-be tyrant--and this Executive Order proves it.
Examining Trump’s Executive Order
With Chuck Baldwin
Israeli News Live | Dec 14, 2019
Chuck Baldwin explains how President Trump sold out the constitution and also American people.
Trumps latest executive order is an assault on our free speech and Defies logic. Judaism can not be declared a
nation. It is a religion not a nation!
The Truth About Trump's Executive
Order on Antisemitism
morphonios
First published at 02:48 UTC on December 14th, 2019.
Why are thousands and thousands of Jews standing up in strong opposition to President Trump's new
executive order that defines criticism of Israel with "antisemitism"? Watch this video to find out!
Act NOW to Stop the Zionist
Anti-Free-Speech Plot - HR 336 - #BDS -
Blackstone Intelligence Network
Premiered April 26, 2019
HR 336 is a terrible set of proposed laws being considered by the House of Representatives. This
bill increases US tax funding for Israeli weapons, further obligates US troops to die for Israel & crushes free
speech by those who choose to boycott Israeli goods over their mistreatment of native Palestinians. #BDS #Israel
#HR336
Israel Anti-Boycott Act - An Attack
On Free Speech?
Streamed live on Jul 25, 2017
House Members and Senators have rushed to co-sponsor a bill
that would make boycotting Israel a felony, punishable by up to a million dollar fine and 20 years in prison. Faced
with the fact that such a bill is clearly an attack on the First Amendment, some are now claiming that they didn't
know what the bill was about when they sponsored it. What's going on here?
N A T I O N A L D E B T ! ! ! ! !
!
How Zionist Israel is Robbing America
Blind!
First published at 01:15 UTC on September 6th, 2019.
It doesn't matter if you are a hard-working American. YOU are not
entitled to keep your own income. YOU are a cash cow for the Zionist state of Israel. America's labor force is
Israel's Golden Goose. And I am going
to show you the financial statistics to prove it.
In this video, we give you the latest breaking news on the speech Apple CEO Tim Cook recently
gave regarding censorship and free speech. The bottom line is Tim Cook hates free speech.
The Censorship Problem, The
Regulation “Solution” & A 'DeepFake' End Game - James Corbett Interview -
The Last American Vagabond
Premiered Jun 12, 2019
In a previous interview entitled "The Social Media Regulation Psyop," (link in the show notes)
James Corbett and I discussed the orchestrated suppression and censorship of independent voices online, the
reaction we all saw that followed, and the potentially pre-planned government "solution" to this manufactured
problem; and if correct, what that would mean for the future of social media, independent news, and just freedom of
speech & press in general.
Well In recent weeks we have seen massive purges on social media, initiation of anti-trust
investigations, efforts to break up big tech companies, and of course interestingly timed massive internet outages.
So what's really going on, and what's about to happen? Just as before, there is no better person in my opinion to
have on to discuss these developments than James Corbett.
The 1933 Boycott of Germany vs the BDS Boycott of Israel
Blackstone Intelligence Network
In 1933, Jews outside of Germany organized a global boycott of that nation's goods, despite pleas by Jews within
Germany not to do so. This video discusses that historic boycott and how it relates the current #BDS boycott
movement against apartheid.
What good are constitutional rights if they are violated when Americans get sick?
By Andrew P. Napolitano - Wednesday, March 25, 2020
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither
Liberty nor Safety.” — Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
One of my Fox colleagues recently sent me an email attachment of a painting of the framers signing
the Constitution of the United States. Except in this version, George Washington — who presided at the
Constitutional Convention — looks at James Madison — who was the scrivener at the Convention — and says, “None of
this counts if people get sick, right?”
In these days of state governors issuing daily decrees purporting to criminalize the exercise of
our personal freedoms, the words put into Washington’s mouth are only mildly amusing. Had Washington actually asked
such a question, Madison, of all people, would likely have responded: “No. This document protects our natural
rights at all times and under all circumstances.”
----------------------
Excerpts Read by Chuck Baldwin: Sermon Titled: "The Plague Of His Own Heart"
Nonstop propaganda
from national media continues to frighten people into mental paralysis and submission to health
authorities. This Technocrat-led tsunami can only be resisted by individuals who refuse to play their assigned role in the Great Panic of
2020.
Alex jones describes the attack by Facebook
on the Infowars.com Facebook page for posting a picture of an ISIS fighter with a quote from Stalin. Please spread
the video virally!
Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the
free live video feed link with your friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show
Journalist Who Covered Stratfor Hack Sentenced to 63 Months
in Prison
Barrett Brown reported on Anonymous' hack of CIA
firm
by Kit Daniels | Infowars.com | January 22, 2015
Barrett Brown, the independent journalist who covered the 2011 Stratfor hack by Anonymous,
was sentenced to 63 months in prison Thursday.
The journalist was sentenced after pleading guilty to
charges of “accessory to hacking,” “transmitting threats,” and “interfering with the execution of a search warrant”
as part of a plea deal he made with prosecutors in April.
“This breaks down to uploading YouTube videos that contained unfortunate statements, efforts to redact sensitive
e-mails that had been procured by hackers, and hiding laptops in a kitchen cabinet,” Brown’s legal team said about
the charges prior to sentencing.
Brown closely followed Anonymous as it leaked internal e-mails from the global intelligence firm Stratfor, which
has close ties to the CIA.
He drew the attention of law enforcement after he revealed an Internet Relay Chat channel where members of
Anonymous were distributing e-mails and other documents from the hack.
The Department of Justice claimed that by sharing a hyperlink to the IRC channel, “Brown caused the data to be
made available to other persons online, without the knowledge and authorization of Stratfor and the card
holders.”
Critics, however, argued that sharing a link to an IRC channel was not identity theft and called the case
“prosecutorial overreach.”
“Brown’s prosecution is yet another transgression against media freedom in the land of the First Amendment,”
WikiLeaks said in a statement. “It chills investigative reporting of national security issues and provides cover
for the unholy alliance between government agencies and the security industry.”
Brown said the “novel, and sometimes even radical” claims the government made during his sentencing threatens
“every journalist in the United States.”
“The government asserts that I am not a journalist and thus unable to claim the First Amendment protections
guaranteed to those engaged in information-gathering activities,” he said in a statement to the court. “Your Honor, I’ve been employed as a journalist for much
of my adult life, I’ve written for dozens of magazines and newspapers, and I’m the author of two published and
critically-acclaimed books of expository non-fiction.”
“If I am not a journalist, then there are many, many people out there who are also not journalists, without
being aware of it, and who are thus as much at risk as I am.”
Political party leader Paul Weston was arrested by police and faces up to two years in jail for
criticizing the religion of Islam during a public speech in the United Kingdom.Weston's "racially aggravated" hate
crime consisted of him quoting Winston Churchill. Weston's arrest reveals the chilling implementation of thought
crime in Britain and how political correctness is being used as a weapon with which to destroy the edifice of
freedom of speech across the western world.
Social media giant working with gun grabbers to censor
support for the Second Amendment
Kit Daniels
Infowars.com
March 4, 2014
Facebook is currently working with two anti-gun groups to
further restrict firearm discussions on its various pages in a move that will likely lead to the outright
censorship of gun topics throughout the social media site.
After Mayors Against Illegal Guns and Moms Demand Action spent the past month pressuring Facebook to censor
gun-themed fan pages, the company finally agreed to reconsider its current policies, according to the anti-gun
publication Venture Beat.
An insider told the publication that the ongoing talks between the gun control groups and Facebook were
“progressing” and that they have already made agreements yet to be disclosed.
But the group’s attack on gun rights won’t stop there.
Last month, a New York mayor exposed that the true goal of these organizations is a nationwide gun
ban.
“It did not take long to realize that MAIG’s agenda was much more than ridding felons of illegal guns,”
Poughkeepsie, N.Y. Mayor John C. Tkazyik wrote. “Under the guise of helping mayors facing a crime and drug
epidemic, MAIG intended to promote confiscation of guns from law-abiding citizens.”
Likewise, the pressure from these groups to force Facebook to censor legal gun sales will only lead to an
outright ban on firearm discussions on the social media site.
And unfortunately, Facebook already has a long history of censoring pro-liberty statements and banning users who
promote basic human freedoms.
The company also banned an image which contained a quote by Mahatma Gandhi explaining how the British disarmed
the population during their rule in India.
These aren’t isolated incidents; Facebook routinely censors political
posts by claiming that they violated its “Statement of Rights and Responsibilities.”
But by also pushing a gun control agenda, Facebook will only accelerate its current decline as millions of gun
owners abandon the social media site.
This article was posted: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 at 1:24 pm
The treatment of Duck Dynasty’s Phil
Robertson is being exploited by the establishment as part of a wider chilling effect on the First Amendment.
In an effort to crush free speech, control freaks have exploited the controversy as a means of
greasing the skids for the censorship of all controversial comment.
Whether you agree with what Robertson said or not, many are now using the issue to claim that
so-called “hate speech” should not be allowed in the public arena.
Today that hate speech takes the form of criticizing homosexual lifestyles, tomorrow “hate speech”
could be designated as criticism of the state.
We must protect ALL free speech whether it is popular or unpopular.
“I do not agree with what you have to say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say
it.” – Voltaire.
Please ‘like’ this new Facebook page to show your support for free speech and boycott A&E for
abandoning the principles of the First Amendment. Find the page here.
“In a democratic country, people have the right to be homophobic as well as they have the right to
support homosexuality — as I one hundred percent do. If people are basing their views against gays on the Bible,
again they have a right of religious freedom there.”
Feminist and gay social critic Camille Paglia.
This article was posted: Friday, December 20, 2013 at 11:27 am
Dallas Sheriff’s Deputies Assault
Free Speech Activists, Punch Alex Jones
Cops incite violence during peaceful
demonstration
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
November 22, 2013
Dallas Sheriff’s deputies violently assaulted free speech
activists during the JFK 50th anniversary event, punching peaceful protesters including radio host Alex Jones in
shocking scenes caught on live streaming video.
Protesters were peacefully assembled outside
a barricade in downtown Dallas near the site of the official commemoration of JFK.
The barricades were opened and almost out of nowhere, Sheriff’s deputies marched through and
forcefully pushed protesters back, with several being violently assaulted, including radio host Alex Jones who was
punched in the stomach.
One of the victims of the violence was a father with his young daughter on his shoulders. The girl
began crying, but was pulled to safety by her mother.
The police were working on behalf of the Sheriff’s department and also appeared to have been
coordinated by the Department of Homeland Security.
Protesters chanted “shame on you” and began to push back against the police who then held their line.
The activists had been assured, under threat of lawsuit, that they would be given access to the area beyond the
barricades after the official ceremony was over.
Regular Dallas police who appeared largely friendly before the incident began seemed surprised when
the black-clad Sheriff’s cops arrived to instigate the violence.
Alex Jones immediately vowed to file lawsuits against both Dallas authorities and individual police
officers who took part in the assault.
Protesters had gathered at the site to peacefully demonstrate against an order by Mayor Mike
Rawlings to target individuals who handed out fliers or displayed signs in the area.
More videos and images will be added to this story soon.
The Watson Report: The Real Agenda Behind
Cybersecurity
Paul Joseph Watson explains why the real agenda behind cybersecurity is political oppression and
the death of free speech on the Internet, and how the entire globe is now implementing Chinese style censorship
policies to change the nature of the world wide web as we know it forever.
The model Senator Joe Lieberman has identified as the goal of cybersecurity for America is centered around keeping
people oppressed by eliminating any means of widespread dissent and preventing people from organizing politically.
It has nothing to do with providing security against foreign hackers and terrorists and everything to do with
strangling free speech critical of the state.
Matt Drudge Warns of Internet Takeover In New
Video!
The Alex Jones Show: Matt Drudge talks about internet censorship while the secretive
Bilderberg Group is set to discuss plans to implement an Internet ID to eviscerate anonymity on the
web.
New Interview: Smashing Pumpkins Founder Billy Corgan
Speaks Out
Published on May 11, 2016
In this exclusive new interview, Billy Corgan founder of the multi-platinum band Smashing
Pumpkins provides an in depth interview on the current social justice warrior movement. Where is going right,
should we listen to what they are saying, and how it will eventually end.
Tom Mullen discussed natural
rights and A Return to Common Sense with the Judge
Ben Swann: The First Amendment, Speech, Religion and
Press
Ben Swann talks about the role of the first amendment as much more than just a recognition
of your right to speech, or just the press.. it is the recognition of your right to believe, say and tell others
whatever you like
SEND YOUR LINKS TO contest@infowars.com
Upload your video to YOUTUBE and Two Other Online Video Websites
Read more here http://www.infowars.com/inf...
With an imperious hatred for the Bill of Rights, both the NSA and the TSA are
moving quickly to destroy our republic and our country. It is time for you to reassert
your right to free speech and our new contest will allow you to do just that.
One entry will receive a cash prize of $10,000 for the best video that mocks or scorns suppression
of free speech by either the TSA, the NSA or both.
NSA Parody Shirt Creator Speaks Out
Dan McCall, who created several t-shirts on the website Zazzle that featured parodies of the
NSA's logo, has filed for declaratory relief, following the NSA's admission that it sent cease and desist
letters on the grounds that "misusing" the logo constituted copyright infringement. McCall, with the help of the
Public Citizen Litigation Group, is also suing the DHS for sending similar letters claiming it is against the
law to modify any seal of the US government.
U.S. Copies China, Restricts
Press
When Sky News reporter Mark Stone was
detained by Chinese police during a live broadcast, the communist superpower essentially got caught red-handed
while trying to stifle coverage of one of their most embarrassing authoritarian moments — namely Tiananmen
Square.
What the world already knows about China's heavy-handed censorship was put on display after the British journalist
made passing mention of the 1989 incident and was dragged away to a police van, with officials apparently unaware
that the signal was still going out. This kind of behavior, while shameful, is perhaps expected in a place like
China.
But the United States, renowned for its freedoms, has routinely intimidated its citizens for daring to film in
public too, particularly when confronting controversial topics, establishing chilling blows to the First Amendment
which guarantees free speech and a free press.
Since 9/11, these freedoms have been openly trashed as law enforcement and security guards have been trained to
treat journalists as criminals and anyone with a camera as a potential terrorist. Despite Homeland Security's
repeated attempts to profile journalists, and prosecute those who take pictures of federal buildings or record
police or TSA encounters, recent court cases have upheld the fact that photography is NOT a crime, and free speech
remains a protected civil right.
This special report details how Infowars reporters have repeatedly been harassed for filming in public places, a
problem that is compounded by widespread ignorance on the part of police, TSA and security on location
False Flag Legislation to Turn Free Speech Into a
Privilege
As the Senate pushes through the new media Shield Law, ironically named the "Free Flow of
Information Act", will Americans be duped once again into giving up their fundamental rights in the name of
safety.
Journalists, this is no "protection", but prior constraint.
President Obama’s Supreme
Court nominee Elena Kagan is perfect in every way – perfect that is if you think the role of the highest judicial
body in the United States is to ban free speech, indefinitely detain Americans without trial, resurrect command and
control socialism, while urinating on everything the Constitution stands for.
We already discovered Kagan’s penchant for treating Americans as guilty until
proven innocent, or in fact just plain guilty without even the chance to be proven innocent,
whenshe was quoted as saying, “That someone suspected of
helping finance Al Qaeda should be subject to battlefield law — indefinite detention without a trial — even if he
were captured in a place like the Philippines rather than a physical battle zone.”
So under that definition, if you send money to a charity later linked with some
nebulous terrorist group then you are financing Al-Qaeda and could be thrown in Gitmo or some other CIA black site
never to be seen again. And this is the woman being forwarded to sit on a body that is supposed
tosafeguard civil
liberties? That would be like hiring Charles Manson to coach the high school basketball team.
But it gets worse. Now we learn that Kagan thinks certain expressions of free
speech should be ‘disappeared’ if the government deems them to be offensive. On the surface that’s any opinion on
racial, sexuality or gender issues, but sincecriticizing Obama is now deemed racist, where will it
all end?
In a 1993 University of Chicago Law review article, Kagan wrote, “I take it as a
given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and
promote this inequality, and that the uncoerceddisappearance of such speech would be
cause for great elation.” (emphasis mine).
“In a 1996 paper, “Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive
in First Amendment Doctrine,” Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society
or to the government,”reports World Net
Daily.
Kagan also argued as recently as September that corporations shouldn’t be allowed
to engage in free speech, and that the government can censor things like newspaper editorials, as well as the
political opinions of radio talk show hosts or television reporters.
Chief Justice John Roberts blasted Kagan’s argument at the
time,reports Newsmax.
“The government urges us in this case to uphold a direct prohibition on political
speech. It asks us to embrace a theory of the First Amendment that would allow censorship not only of television
and radio broadcasts, but of pamphlets, posters, the Internet, and virtually any other medium that corporations and
unions might find useful in expressing their views on matters of public concern,” he wrote.
Kagan’s standpoint on free speech, that it is subject to regulation and definition
by the government, has no place in America, completely violates the fundamental premise of the First Amendment,
that even unpopular speech should be protected, and would be better suited for countries like Iran, Zimbabwe or
North Korea.
Little surprise therefore when we learn that in her undergraduate thesis at
Princeton,Kagan lamented the decline of socialism in the U.S.
as “sad” for those who still hope to “change America.”
If Kagan is approved she is going to find an eager ally in White House information
czar Cass Sunstein,who in a January 2008 white paper entitled “Conspiracy Theories,” called for the government to tax and outright censor
political viewpoints itdeemed unsavory.
Who needs free speech? That's apparently the level of ignorance of over a
third of Americans.
Information deemed “maliciously harmful to
government”
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Tuesday, June 26, 2012
A political website that
contained stinging criticism of the Obama administration and its handling of the Fast and Furious scandal was
ordered to be shut down by the Obama campaign’s ‘Truth Team’, according to private investigator Douglas Hagmann,
who was told by ISP GoDaddy his site contained information that was “maliciously harmful to individuals in the
government.”
Obama Truth Team Orders
GoDaddy To Shut Down Website
Hagmann, CEO of
Hagmann Investigative Services, Inc., a private investigative agency serving a roster of Fortune 500 clients, was
given 48 hours by GoDaddy to find a new home for his website before it was deleted.
Hagmann was told the reason for the shut down was because the website
featured “morally objectionable” material. After GoDaddy refused to identify the complainant, only saying that it
was not “any official government agency,” further investigation by Hagmann revealed that the order came from a
group tied to Obama campaign headquarters.
Speaking with the chief investigator in the GoDaddy Abuse division,
Hagmann discovered, “Ultimately it was found that the complaint originated ostensibly with a group associated with
the campaign to re-elect Barack Hussein Obama.”
Turning to his contacts within government, Hagmann then spoke with
another source who confirmed that the ‘Obama Truth Team’ was responsible for the shut down order.
“I’m laying this right on the doorstep of the Obama Truth Team,” said
Hagmann.
The same methods of intimidation were also very much in force during
the 2008 campaign season. Under the guise of the ‘Obama Truth Squad’, influential public figures in Missouri
including St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, and
Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, promised to “respond quickly, forcefully, and aggressively” to “lies” about
Obama.
As ABC News highlighted, this helped to create a
chilling atmosphere in which “Missourians might be afraid of being prosecuted for criticizing Sen. Barack Obama,
D-Ill.”
This is by no means the first time political websites have been shut
down on a whim with no due process after official pressure is brought to bear on ISPs.
GoDaddy itself is not renowned for its support for free
speech. The company lost 37,000 accounts last year over its
initial failure to oppose the controversial Stop Online Privacy Act (SOPA).
Despite the fact that his son was getting married on the same
weekend, Hagmann was eventually able to move his website - HomelandSecurityus.com - to another server before it was deleted by GoDaddy.
“It took an incredible number of man hours and it was a tedious (and
costly) process, but I have successfully moved my site out of reach,” Hagmann told us.
Hagmann is now warning that any independent website which forcefully
dissents against the Obama administration could be targeted next.
“I respectfully ask that you spread the word – that the Obama “Truth
Team” is out in full force, scouring any U.S. based web sites of any size or influence (yet small enough to be
pushed around) that contains any information deemed “objectionable” to the Obama re-election campaign. Perhaps it’s
already too late. Regardless, people need to wake up now and listen to what we’ve been saying. There might not be a
tomorrow,” Hagmann told us in an email.
Watch a video about the Obama Truth Squads below.
Obama Missouri Truth
Squads
Obama sends the Truth Squad goons out to intimidate, harass and arrest Missouri
citizens exercising their First Amendment Right to free speech. Is this what Obama was talking about when he
discussed the need for a Civilian Security Force that should be as well funded and as powerful as our
military?
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer
for Prison
Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a
regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
Cass Sunstein’s white paper, entitled“Conspiracy Theories,” is an exclamation point in the latest chapter of a long history of government tyranny
against citizens who organize in opposition to the government. Sunstein argues that individuals and groups
deviating from the official government narrative on a number of political issues and events are a national
security threat. The administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs formulates “a
plan for the government to infiltrate conspiracy groups in order to undermine them via postings on chat rooms
and social networks, as well as real meetings, according to a recently uncovered article Sunstein wrote for the
Journal of Political Philosophy,” writesPaul Joseph Watson.
(Article Continues Below)
Obama Information Czar Cass Sunstein Confronted
on Cognitive Infiltration of Conspiracy Groups
In a rare public appearance, The Obama
Administration's Information Czar Cass Sunstein gave a lecture at the NYU Law School in NYC yesterday, prompting
Luke Rudkowski of WeAreChange to attend. Watch as Luke confronts Sunstein multiple times on an academic paper he
co-authored back in 2008 entitled "Conspiracy Theories" in which he called for cognitive infiltration of conspiracy
groups by the government.
FDR, an icon for many liberals, sent the FBI
after citizens who opposed his war policies.
Sunstein’s plan is a
reformulation of a long-standing effort to subvert the First Amendment and the Bill of Rights. Concerted government
attacks against organized political opposition began soon after the founding of the republic — specifically with
the passage of theAlien and Sedition Acts in 1798 by the Federalists — but have gained critical momentum in the modern
era.
During the First World War, the government created the Bureau of Investigation,
predecessor to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and appointed J. Edgar Hoover as its head. Hoover’s Bureau of
Investigation, with the assistance of police and the military — described as a “citizens auxiliary” — conducted
mass raids against the anti-war movement of the time, according to documents released by the Church Committee in
the 1970s. The Bureau, specifically designed as a national political police force, “rounded up
some50,000 men without warrants of sufficient probable cause for arrest” for the crime of opposing the First World
War.
In 1920, Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer conducted a massive program in 33
cities and rounded up over 10,000 people. TheChurch Committee report (p.384) talks of “the abuses of due process of law incident to the raids.” According to
Robert Preston (Aliens And Dissenters),
the Palmer Raids involved “indiscriminate arrests of the innocent with the guilty, unlawful seizures by federal
detectives” and other violations of constitutional rights. The Church Committee (p.385) “found federal agents guilty of using third-degree tortures,
making illegal searches and arrests, using agents provocateurs.” Palmer and Hoover found no evidence of a
proposed Bolshevik revolution as they claimed but a large number of the rounded up suspects continued to be held
without trial.
The Second World War brought a new wave of government terrorism against political
opponents. PresidentFranklin D. Roosevelt in a 1940 issued a memorandum giving the FBI
the powerto use warrantless wiretaps against suspected
subversives, that is to say activists opposed to U.S. involvement in
the war. FDR not only unleashed the FBI on activists, but concerned citizens as well. After giving a speech on
national defense in 1940, FDR had his press secretary, Stephen Early, send Hoover the names of 128 people who
had sent telegrams to the White House criticizing the address. “The President thought you might like to look
them over,”Early’s note instructed Hoover.
Following the Second World War, the government engineered the immensely profitable
(for the military-industrial complex) Cold War and the attendant Red Scare. In 1956, the FBI established
COINTELPRO, short for Counter Intelligence Program. COINTELPRO was ostensibly manufactured to counter communist
subversion, but as a numerous documents reveal the program focused almost exclusively on domestic opposition to
government policies.
The Church Committeeexplains that
COINTELPRO “had no conceivable rational relationship to either national security or violent activity. The
unexpressed major premise of much of COINTELPRO is that the Bureau has a role in maintaining the existing social
order, and that its efforts should be aimed toward combating those who threaten that order.”
“This is a rough, tough, dirty business, and dangerous,” former
Assistant to Director Hoover,William C. Sullivan, told
the Church Committee. “No holds were barred.”
This “rough, tough, dirty business” included infiltration of political groups,
psychological warfare, legal harassment, and extralegal force and violence. “The FBI and police threatened,
instigated and conducted break-ins, vandalism, assaults, and beatings. The object was to frighten dissidents and
disrupt their movements,” writeMike Cassidy and Will Miller. “They used secret and systematic methods of fraud and force, far beyond mere surveillance,
to sabotage constitutionally protected political activity. The purpose of the program was, in FBI Director J.
Edgar Hoover’s own words, to ‘expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit and otherwise neutralize’ specific groups
and individuals.”
After the Church Committee exposed COINTELPRO, the government claimed it had
dismantled the program. However, in the 1980s, the Reagan administration legalized the tactics by
signingExecutive Order 12333.
“There is every reason to believe that even what was not
legalized is still going on as well. Lest we forget, Lt. Col. Oliver North funded and orchestrated from the
White House basement break-ins and other ‘dirty tricks’ to defeat congressional critics of U.S. policy in
Central America and to neutralize grassroots protest. Special Prosecutor Walsh found evidence that North and
Richard Secord (architect of the 1960s covert actions in Cambodia) used Iran-Contra funds to harass the
Christic Institute, a church-funded public interest group specializing in exposing government misconduct,”
Cassidy and Miller continue.
In addition,North worked with FEMA to develop contingency plans for suspending the Constitution, establishing martial law,
and holding political dissidents in concentration camps. Since the false flag attacks of September 11, 2001, the
government has worked incessantly to fine tune plans to impose martial law. It has also worked to federalize and
militarized law enforcement around the country.
Brian Glick (War at
Home) argues that COINTELPRO is a permanent feature of the government. “The record of the past 50 years reveals
a pattern of continuous domestic covert action,” Glick wrote in the 1990s. “Its use has been documented in each
of the last nine administrations, Democratic as well as Republican. FBI testimony shows ‘COINTELPRO tactics’
already in full swing during the presidencies of Democrats Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Harry Truman.
COINTELPRO itself, while initiated under Eisenhower, grew from one program to six under the Democratic
administrations of Kennedy and Johnson… After COINTELPRO was exposed [by the Church Committee], similar programs
continued under other names during the Carter years as well as under Nixon, Ford, and Reagan. They have outlived
J. Edgar Hoover and remained in place under all of his successors.”
Sunstein’s call for authoritarian action against government critics — including
outright censorship in addition to the established tactics mentioned above — reveals that COINTELPRO has indeed
outlived Hoover.
“Some conspiracy theories create serious risks. They do not merely undermine
democratic debate; in extreme cases, they create or fuel violence,” writes Sunstein. “Even if only a small fraction
of adherents to a particular conspiracy theory act on the basis of their beliefs, that small fraction may be enough
to cause serious harms.”
Sunstein’s analysis dovetails with that of the Department of Homeland Security. In
its now infamous report on“rightwing extremism,” the DHS insists members of the constitutionalist movement (including Libertarians and
advocates of the Second Amendment) are not only violent but also virulent racists (a conclusion provided
pre-packaged by theADL and the SPLC).
If realized, Cass Sunstein’s call for outright censorship and the absurd proposal
to impose fines and taxes on people who hold political views contrary to those of our rulers will naturally result
in a redoubling of political activity on the part of the truth movement (specifically mentioned as “kooks” by
Sunstein) and Libertarians and Constitutionalists.
As history repeatedly demonstrates, when faced with a strong and determined
political opposition government invariably turns to more brutal and violent methods to enforce its will. Our rulers
understand this and that is why they are hurriedly finishing their high-tech police and surveillance
grid.
Ben Swann: NSA Using Copyright Claims to Stop
Criticism?
Ben Swann breaks the exclusive story of how the NSA is reportedly attempting to silence a
t-shirt maker who criticized the agency by claiming copyright infringement.
Where Do You Draw The Line On Tyranny?
After returning from the annual reenactment of the battle
of the Alamo in San Antonio, I learned of some heavy handed, illegal intimidation of people on the streets of
Austin, instigated by SXSW.
In response, Alex Jones initiated a flash protest.
Any tyranny tolerated is another cut to liberty. Will we allow liberty to die
incrementally — by a thousand cuts?
LEARN HOW TRADE AGREEMENTS (EXCERPT BELOW) CAN DEMOLISH YOUR RIGHTS [free speech] AND
SOVEREIGNTY HERE:World Trade Organization
Wikileaks has released a 95 page, 30,000 word document spelling out details
on the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP). The secret globalist agreement will have a significant effect on a
wide range of issues including internet freedom, medicine, patents, and civil liberties. The cabal will meet
in Salt Lake, Utah, between November 19 and 24.
The draft text for the TPP Intellectual Property Rights Chapter spells out provisions for implementing a
transnational “enforcement regime” designed to supplant national laws and sovereignty with a globalist
construct. The TPP is by far the largest and most oppressive economic treaty devised thus far. It will have an
impact on a staggering 40 percent of worldwide GDP. The TPP is the forerunner to the equally secret US-EU
Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TPP). Both treaties combined will cover 60 percent of world GDP
and exclude China.
Enforcement will be accomplished by “supranational litigation tribunals to which sovereign national courts are
expected to defer.” According to the document, the globalist courts can conduct hearings with secret evidence.
In addition, aspects of the treaty resemble SOPA and ACTA treaties with draconian surveillance mechanisms. In
early 2013, thousands of websites “went black” to show solidarity in opposition to SOPA, or the Stop Online Piracy
Act, legislation that seriously threatened the functionality of the internet. “SOPA was an attempt to put the power
of information back in the hands of an elite few who are rapidly losing the ability to control what the masses are
reading, hearing and seeing,”
Mac Slavo wrote in January, 2012.
“Since the beginning of the TPP negotiations, the process of drafting and negotiating the treaty’s chapters has
been shrouded in an unprecedented level of secrecy,” Wikileaks notes in a statement on the release of the TPP draft. “Access to drafts of the TPP chapters is
shielded from the general public. Members of the US Congress are only able to view selected portions of
treaty-related documents in highly restrictive conditions and under strict supervision. It has been previously
revealed that only three individuals in each TPP nation have access to the full text of the agreement, while 600
’trade advisers’ – lobbyists guarding the interests of large US corporations such as Chevron, Halliburton,
Monsanto and Walmart – are granted privileged access to crucial sections of the treaty text.”
Obama is poised to fast-track the secret agreement. “The US administration is aggressively pushing the TPP
through the US legislative process on the sly,” said Wikileaks editor Julian Assange.
“If instituted, the TPP’s IP regime would trample over individual rights and free expression, as well as ride
roughshod over the intellectual and creative commons. If you read, write, publish, think, listen, dance, sing or
invent; if you farm or consume food; if you’re ill now or might one day be ill, the TPP has you in its crosshairs,”
Assange added.
This article was posted: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 at 10:23 am
For over 50 years, the
Bilderberg group constructed the European Union by stealth, under the guise of
trade deals. Now the Elite are using the same secretive approach to complete the
North American Union (NAU)— but this time, superstate integration is on the extreme fast track. International
agreements like NAFTA, GATT and APEC are just stepping stones in the formation of the NAU.
This video clip from the Alex Jones film “Endgame”
explains specifically how the Bilderberg Group has been using stealth for strategically paving the way toward full
consolidation of the North American countries, for merging the populations, monetary systems, militaries, and
highways of the United States, Canada and Mexico.
LEARN HOW TRADE AGREEMENTS (EXCERPT ABOVE) CAN DEMOLISH YOUR RIGHTS AND SOVEREIGNTY
HERE:World Trade Organization
Dr. Benjamin
Rush
"Education is favorable to
Liberty. Freedom can only exist in a society of knowledge.Without learning, men are
incapable of knowing their rights, and where learning is confined to a few people, Liberty can neither be equal nor
universal."
C
“There is every reason to believe that even what was not
legalized is still going on as well. Lest we forget, Lt. Col. Oliver North funded and orchestrated from the
White House basement break-ins and other ‘dirty tricks’ to defeat congressional critics of U.S. policy in
Central America and to neutralize grassroots protest. Special Prosecutor Walsh found evidence that North and
Richard Secord (architect of the 1960s covert actions in Cambodia) used Iran-Contra funds to harass the
Christic Institute, a church-funded public interest group specializing in exposing government misconduct,”
Cassidy and Miller continue.
Wikileaks has released a 95 page, 30,000 word document spelling out details
on the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP). The secret globalist agreement will have a significant effect on a
wide range of issues including internet freedom, medicine, patents, and civil liberties. The cabal will meet
in Salt Lake, Utah, between November 19 and 24.
