Forcible blood draws began in Tennessee in
2009, being used only for cases of vehicular assault. In all other circumstances, the blood draws were not
forcible. They could be declined, with the understanding the DUI suspect’s driver’s license would be suspended.
Tennessee calls it the Implied Consent Statute.
That changed January 1, 2012, with the enactment of a new
law that took away that choice for suspects to decline with a license suspension. Ever since the law took
effect, police can obtain rubber-stamped warrants to forcibly extract blood from any driver they decide is a DUI
suspect.
Must-See Videos And Articles Below
ALL OF THIS 'CHECKING' AND OUR BORDERS ARE
WIDE-OPEN
D.C. Homeland paramilitary forces killed a dental hygienist in front of her small child because
the woman drove past a new checkpoint. They chanced her down and killed her. D.C. Is a very dangerous place to
visit and Infowars is issuing a travel alert. Infowars has never been to a city even in 3rd world hell holes as
bad.. Infowars.com for more news. http://www.infowars.com/d-c-cops-runn...
Labor Day: another holiday, another excuse to push the
limits of the police power over citizens. All across the state, Tennessee police will be performing another
round of highly-publicized “no refusal” blood-draw DUI checkpoints this weekend. With police armed with a 2012
law that allows them to forcibly extract blood from drivers, it's a bad time to be a citizen who does not
consent to searches.
Forcible blood draws began in Tennessee in
2009, being used only for cases of vehicular assault. In all other circumstances, the blood draws were not
forcible. They could be declined, with the understanding the DUI suspect’s driver’s license would be suspended.
Tennessee calls it the Implied Consent Statute.
That changed January 1, 2012, with the enactment of a
new law that took away that choice for suspects to decline with a license suspension. Ever since the
law took effect, police can obtain rubber-stamped warrants to forcibly extract blood from any driver they
decide is a DUI suspect.
Additionally, the new law now mandates blood be drawn from citizens in a variety of
circumstances. No longer limited to vehicular assault cases, police are not required to take the blood of any
DUI suspect who has ever had a DUI conviction in their life, according to WBIR.
The other requirement is that blood be drawn from any suspect who has a person under the age of 16 in the car.
The rest of the blood-draw cases are done upon seeking a readily available warrant.
In light of these new powers, the latest fad in Tennessee law enforcement is setting up “no refusal”
checkpoints, having a judge or a judicial commissioner on call to churn out blood warrants on demand. Rather
than spread out across a town, looking for probable cause to stop vehicles, police stop everyone, lacking any
tangible reason to initiate each stop.
Tennessee police to perform "no
refusal" blood-draw DUI checkpoints this Labor Day
TENNESSEE — Labor Day: another holiday,
another excuse to push the limits of the police power over citizens. All across the state, Tennessee police will be
performing another round of highly-publicized "no refusal" blood-draw DUI checkpoints this weekend. With police
armed with a 2012 law that allows them to forcibly extract blood from drivers, its a bad time to be a citizen who
does not consent to searches.
These so-called "no refusal" checkpoints involve police blocking a public road, sometimes forcing drivers into a
parking lot, where they will be forced to prove their innocence to police officers. The lucky ones will be
"allowed" to continue their journey down the public street after brief questioning and harassment. Drivers who draw
police interest, say, for being less than thrilled about being subjected to police checkpoints on American streets,
may be put through field sobriety tests and may ultimately told that they will either voluntarily submit to a
search, or they will be forcibly be subjected to a search. I am referring to breath and blood searches.
This Labor Day weekend, at least a dozen counties in Tennessee will be launching the "no refusal" checkpoints,
according to NewsChannel5.com. The state has been rolling out the checkpoints en masse on holiday weekends, getting
the public acclimated to the idea of mandatory blood draws in the land of the free.
Every driver who refuses to blow is
strapped to a table, put in a headlock, blood forcibly taken
GEORGIA -- In some Georgia counties, as
well as all over the USA, drivers are getting their blood forcibly stolen from them. As shown in this video, every
driver who refuses to give the police a blow, even for misdemeanor offenses, is strapped to a table, put into a
headlock by a police officer, and their blood forcibly taken.
In this exclusive Infowars Nightly News report, Alex Jones, while at Big Bend national park
on the Texas-Mexico border proves how porous the border really is by personally video-taping illegal immigrants
crossing the Rio Grande river. This footage was shot just days before Barack Obama during his 2013 presidential
State of the Union address said, "We can build on the progress my Administration has already made -- putting more
boots on the southern border than at any time in our history, and reducing illegal crossings to their lowest levels
in 40 years."
The border report continues after Alex and his crew pull into a Border Patrol checkpoint roughly 75 miles inland
from the Texas-Mexican border. Armed with information about the realities of immigration and border control, Alex
skillfully uses the correct words to end his interrogation and quickly send him on his way.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer
for Prison
Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a
regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
How could there be aWar on Terror and actually say that we're having
awar against terrorism, and leave the
borders wide open? If you were the President of the United States, or I were the President of the United States,
and9/11 really happened the way they
want us to believe it happened, the first thing you would do is shut down the borders, so people couldn't get in
the country to harm you. But they left the borders wide open. Becausethe bankers want the borders open, because they want
aone-world government. They
want a North American Union. They don't want borders
here.9/11 was only a manifestation.
It was done to create afear in the
American public, so that we willobey what they want us to do.
"As we saw during the Boston bombings manhunt, in complete violation of law, police seem to believe that
so long as they are hunting a potentially dangerous suspect, the Constitution is null and void, and that martial
law is in effect."
After a gang member shot and injured several
law enforcement officials before going into hiding in a Sacramento suburb on Friday, police responded by setting up
a checkpoint and aiming guns at innocent people’s heads, an AP photo shows.
The photo, (credited to AP Photo/The Sacramento Bee, Randall Benton) is captioned, “A
California Highway Patrol officer and another emergency responder stop a vehicle at a checkpoint near the
neighborhood where a federal immigration officer was shot and three local police officers were wounded during a
violent confrontation with a suspect in the Sacramento suburb of Roseville on Friday, Oct. 25, 2013.”
After an hours-long standoff, the suspect, 32-year-old gang member Samuel Nathan Duran, eventually
surrendered after leaving a nearby house in which he had been holed up.
The felon responsible for the shootings was a wanted parolee and was already known to police having
been seen riding a bike earlier in the day. His description would have been well circulated and known intimately by
those tasked with hunting him down.
So why were Americans innocently driving their cars through the suburb of Roseville subjected to
treatment that wouldn’t have looked out of place in Stalinist Russia, or more recently in Iraq or Afghanistan?
As we saw during the Boston bombings manhunt, in complete violation of law, police seem to believe
that so long as they are hunting a potentially dangerous suspect, the Constitution is null and void, and that
martial law is in effect.
The militarized lockdown of Watertown, Mass., during which heavily armed officers went door to door
without search warrants terrorizing families at gunpoint and ransacking homes, led Ron Paul to
observe that the manhunt was more frightening than the attack itself, saying it resembled “scenes from a
military coup in a far off banana republic.”
Is this America’s future? Cops pointing guns at innocent people’s heads in the name of security?
Like residents of Fallujah and Kabul, are Americans a conquered people who are presumed guilty until proven
innocent? To be treated as potential murderers and terrorists by having guns aimed at their head at armed
checkpoints? To be asked to show their papers?
As the photo below illustrates, even in Iraq the standard operating procedure at checkpoints is not
to point guns at vehicles unless they are known to be suspect. Apparently, Americans now have even less rights than
the citizens whom their empire occupies.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is
the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
This article was posted: Monday, October 28, 2013 at 7:04 am
A video shows the Department of Homeland Security
conducting warrantless searches of vehicles at a ferry crossing in Galveston, Texas, in yet another example of how
the agency is setting up checkpoints across the country.
The clip shows drivers being forced to exit
their vehicle to allow the DHS officials to inspect both their trunk and hood before being permitted to pass the
checkpoint.
“I’ve never seen this kind of deal,” remarks the driver in the clip, who takes the ferry regularly,
“We were just randomly pulled over here.”
“What’s going on here man, this is America! I don’t want them searching my truck,” he adds as the
driver in front is made to exit his car.
When asked what they were doing, the DHS official responds, “It’s a screening process, Homeland
Security,” before asking the man to pop the hood.
The footage was shot at the ferry crossing between Galveston Island and Bolivar Peninsula,
emphasizing how the federal agency is now setting up checkpoints between internal waterways that have no relation
to immigration.
As you can see from the map below, the ferry crossing is just 2.7 miles in length and takes only 18
minutes to complete the journey.
There is no other option for motorists than using the ferry because it is the only way to cross the
waterway between the two locations.
The Department of Homeland Security continues to expand the number of checkpoints it operates
throughout the country, primarily via the VIPR program, under which TSA agents have been deployed to shake down
Americans at everywhere from bus depots, to highways, to ferry terminals, to train stations, in one instance
conducting pat downs of passengers, including children, who
had already completed their journey when arriving in Savannah.
In an end run around the 4th Amendment, which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures,
the DHS has declared that everywhere within a 100 mile radius of any border, including waterways, is a “Constitution free zone.”
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is
the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
This article was posted: Friday, December 6, 2013 at 10:33 am
Alex is joined by Pennsylvania resident Ricardo Nieves,
who went before the Reading city council to complain about the constitutional abuse conducted by local cops in
collaboration with a private firm financed by a number of federal agencies stopping motorists and attempting to
intimidate them into surrendering a DNA swab.
Police State DNA Collection Victim Speaks
Out
This article was posted: Thursday, December 19, 2013 at 6:05 am
Instead of searching for actual criminals, Kentucky State
Police will be on the lookout for people who eat while they drive as part of Operation RAID, despite the fact that
eating while driving is not banned in Kentucky.
This article was posted: Sunday, February 9, 2014 at 6:35 am
Instead of searching for actual criminals, Kentucky State
Police will be on the lookout for people who eat while they drive as part of Operation RAID, which will include
checkpoints targeting “distracted drivers,” despite the fact that eating while driving is not banned in
Kentucky.
Operation R.A.I.D. (Remove Aggressive,
Impaired and Distracted drivers from Kentucky Roadways), which starts this month, will remain active for one
year.
“Law enforcement will be more visible and the number of check points will increase,” reports
WBKO.
“Not only just texting, but any distracting drivers. This includes eating and drinking. We are
going to be out looking for those people. You’re going to see a major force when it comes time for St. Patrick’s
Day weekend and holiday weekends,” said Trooper Biven of the Kentucky State Police.
Although Kentucky has banned text messaging while driving, there is no state law that bans eating
while driving, according to
Distraction.gov. Police will be pulling people over and subjecting them to checkpoints over a supposed
violation (eating while driving) that doesn’t exist.
Reports concerning the program also made no mention whatsoever of the fact that such checkpoints
are clearly a violation of the 4th Amendment.
“Roving patrols and an increase in safety checkpoints” will characterize a “blanket campaign” that
“may not work well in certain areas,”
acknowledged Captain Nathan Kent, KSP Post One Commander.
Despite claims to the contrary, this is also another example of how the main duty of an increasing
number of police officers in America is not catching criminals or serving communities, but
revenue generation.
Back in November we highlighted how police
in Knoxville, Tennessee are swapping patrol cars for big rigs in a bid to catch texters.
Police response times are getting
slower every year, but instead of concentrating on “protect and serve,” cops are increasingly being deployed by
state and local governments simply to shake down the public for money.
The cost of traffic tickets is also soaring as governments vampirically suck off the public in a
desperate bid to replenish their bankrupt coffers. Speeding tickets raise some $6 billion dollars in the U.S. every
single year.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is
the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
This article was posted: Friday, February 7, 2014 at 2:12 pm
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable
cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or
things to be seized.
-The Fourth Amendment to the
United States Constitution
With local, state and DHS
checkpoints randomly popping up all over America many of our citizens believe that we must comply with what more
often than not amounts to unlawful requests and orders from law enforcement officials.
While driving through
California,Steven
Anderson came upon three such checkpoints and he chose not to play ball with officers who asked
him, among other things, to prove his citizenship, prove his identity and pull over for further inspection and
questioning.
When asked whether he was a
citizen Anderson’s immediate response was, “that’s my business.” When advised that it was the officer’s job to ask
the question, Anderson calmly responds by saying, “I don’t have to answer you, because I have rights as an
American.” The law enforcement official courteously asks Mr. Anderson to do him a favor and pull over for further
questioning, no doubt expecting Anderson to comply. But not today, as Anderson patently refuses to do so per his
Fourth Amendment Constitutional protections. He subsequently makes his own request, saying to the officer, “no
thanks, I’d like to just go on my way.”
All of it was recorded on a
digital camera in Anderson’s car and out of view of officers.
What you’ll see below is a crash
course in exercising your Constitutional rights when faced with the threat of detention, interrogation and random
searches by Federal or local law enforcement officials. You won’t see this one in mainstream media, and it’s
something they certainly don’t teach in college:
Anderson: Is this
Nazi Germany now, that I have to show my papers?
Officer: It’s a
simple yes or no. I need an answer or we can detain you until we figure out whether you’re a U.S.
citizen.
Anderson: Well, you
know what’s more simple is the fact that my freedom is a little more important than you seem to think. Setting
up checkpoints where people have to prove that they’re a citizen is not something that America is supposed to
be about. So, I’m not sure if you understand that.
Supervisor enters
scene:Grunt
Anderson:Grunt
Supervisor: Just pull up over
there(points to line of detained
cars)
Anderson: No, thank
you… I want to go free on my way. Here I am just going about my own business and I don’t need to stop at a
checkpoint to prove who I am because this is America. Correct me if I’m wrong – did I stumble into Mexico or is
this still the United States?
Supervisor: This is
the United States.
Anderson: Therefore,
I should have the freedom to travel unmolested, because I’m in America here.
(pause)
Supervisor: Ok, go
ahead and go.
How Many Checkpoints in One Morning?! Welcome
to the Police State!
Westbound I-8 in Southern California (an East-West highway that NEVER intersects the
international border).
In 2010, Anderson refused a search by U.S. Customs Agents and
subsequently had his car windows shattered, was pulled out of his car, and tasered. Anderson appeared on the Alex
Jones Show shortly after his incident.
Pastor Anderson: Grand Jury Rules in Favor of Beaten,
Tasered Pastor - Alex Jones Tv 1/2
Pastor Steven Anderson also joins the show to discuss an incident on U.S. soil with border patrol
agents that left him requiring stitches. The officers broke out his car windows and the pastor was Tasered and
beaten before being arrested. Alex also covers the latest news and takes your calls
Pastor Anderson: Grand Jury Rules in Favor of Beaten,
Tasered Pastor - Alex Jones Tv 2/2
Pastor Steven Anderson also joins the show to discuss an incident on U.S. soil with border patrol
agents that left him requiring stitches. The officers broke out his car windows and the pastor was Tasered and
beaten before being arrested. Alex also covers the latest news and takes your calls
Alex Exposes Unconstitutional Internal Checkpoint
Round 2
Alex also features his latest video recorded earlier in the week at an internal checkpoint in
southern Texas. He informed Border Patrol agents that they risked being sued if they violated his Fourth Amendment
right by demanding he allow them to search his vehicle without probable cause or a warrant.
Kurt Nimmo on Alex Jones Tv 1/2:California Checkpoints
& Domestic Terrorism
Kurt Nimmo on Alex Jones Tv 2/2:California Checkpoints
& Domestic Terrorism
Terry Bressi on Alex Jones Tv 1/2:Checkpoints in
America
Americans are re-asserting
their 4th Amendment rights
Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com October 22, 2012
A truck driver who passed
through an unconstitutional checkpoint 30 miles from the Mexican border stood up for his 4th Amendment rights by
refusing to answer questions in another example of how Americans are re-asserting their liberties.
Am I Free to
Go?
Video that a truck driver took at a suspicionless checkpoint in TX about an hour from the
border. Hope more drivers learn to stand up to this bullying. Ask yourself, are YOU free to go?
A You Tube
video shows the truck driver approaching a checkpoint manned by U.S. Border Patrol agents. The checkpoint is
situated in Texas at least 30 miles from the border with Mexico.
After a Border Patrol agent asks the man if he is has any passengers
and is a U.S. citizen, the truck driver refuses to answer any questions, only asking, “Am I free to go?”
The truck driver asks if he crossed the border, who which the Border
Patrol agent responds, “No, sir.”
The agent repeats his questions and subsequently calls over his
superior who starts to become visibly annoyed with the truck driver after he refuses to answer any more questions
and pleads the 5th amendment.
“Do you have anything to hide, are you breaking the law right now?,”
asks the Border Patrol agent, adding, “Are you hiding anything in there – tell me.”
The Border Patrol agent is forced to back down, telling the man to be
“more co-operative” next time he passes through the checkpoint.
“Is being co-operative giving up my rights?,” asks the truck driver
as he drives away.
This is just the latest in a series of confrontations caught on video
showing Americans standing up to 4th Amendment-violating checkpoints that are creeping further and further inside
America, in some cases as much as 100 miles from the border.
Back
in July, we reported on the case of Steven Anderson, who refused to
show his papers at another Border Patrol checkpoint while traveling through California.
Since the checkpoints are situated far away from the Mexican border,
they are clearly a violation of the 4th Amendment, which protects, “The right of the people to be secure in their
persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no
Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the
place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
Although the U.S. Supreme Court, which once
ruled that black people were slaves, has upheld these “interior checkpoints” as
constitutional, the ACLU has dubbed the 100-mile area the
“Constitution-free Zone,” noting that 2 out of 3 Americans live within this buffer zone – around 190 million
people in total.
Not all Americans who refuse to have their rights violated have been
as successful as the truck driver in the video clip. In 2008, retired San Diego social worker Vince Peppard and his
wife had
their car ransacked after refusing to consent to being
searched.
Alex Jones has also encountered similar “interior checkpoints” on
numerous occasions, including the incident documented in the video below.
Editor’s note: Infowars.com believes all of the
checkpoints listed below are de facto violations of the Fourth Amendment and as such illegal.
There are four general types of checkpoints you might encounter: DUI checkpoints, US border checkpoints, drug
checkpoints, and TSA checkpoints. In a legal sense, they are not all created equal. So depending on which one you
encounter, you’ll want to be prepared to flex your rights appropriately.
DUI Checkpoints
Sobriety checkpoints — also known as DUI checkpoints — are the most common roadblocks you might encounter. They
function as a general purpose investigatory tactic where police can get a close look at passing motorists by
detaining them briefly. A roadblock stop is quick, but it gives police a chance to check tags and licenses, while
also giving officers a quick whiff of the driver’s breath and a chance to peer into the vehicle for a moment.
Remember that your constitutional rights still apply in a roadblock situation. Though police are permitted to
stop you briefly, they may not search you or your car unless they have probable cause that you’re under the influence or you
agree to the search. As such, you are not required to answer their questions or admit to breaking the law.
What to do if pulled over for DUI? Arizona Criminal
Lawyer
http://cantorduilawyers.com/dui-dwi-e... Arizona DUI Lawyer,
what to do if pulled over for a DUI? Call 602-307-0808. Most important is to remain calm and ask to speak with
your lawyer.
If convicted of DUI, DWI or Extreme DWI in Arizona you are facing Mandatory Jail Time, Substantial Fines and
Surcharges plus Loss of Driving Privileges. These charges are nothing to take lightly and will have lifelong
consequences.
Free Consultation Call 24/7: 602-307-0808
Since the Supreme Court’s ruling in Illinois v. Caballes police
have more leeway to use drug-sniffing dogs in roadblock situations. There’s no need to waive your rights simply
because dogs are present. But be advised that your legal options are limited if you’re arrested as a result of a
dog sniff during a roadblock.
Also keep in mind that police closely monitor cars approaching the roadblock. So you’re not likely to have any
success trying to evade it.
Sobriety checkpoints are generally permitted by the courts, but only if conducted properly. If you’re arrested
at a police roadblock always consult an attorney before confessing or agreeing to a plea bargain.
There might be some legal options that your lawyer can pursue.
US Border Checkpoints
Be aware that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents — which are part of the Dept. of Homeland Security
(DHS) — are permitted to search you and your belongings at the U.S. border withoutprobable cause or asearch warrant. So anytime you cross the border, you consent to a
search.
CBP may generally stop and search the property of anyone entering or exiting the U.S. If agents have reasonable suspicion to believe you’re
concealing contraband, they may search your body using pat-down, strip, body cavity, or involuntary x-ray
searches.
Checkpoints Near the Border
Be aware that DHS agents have recently set up constitutionally-questionable “security checkpoints” up to 100
miles inside U.S. territory. If you should drive into one of these roadblocks, you are not required
to answer the agent’s questions (usually starting with “Are you a United States citizen?”). Nor are you required to
consent to any searches.
Visit www.checkpointusa.org/blog to learn more about this
program and check out the video below. By actively “flexing” their rights, these brave citizens expose the
techniques DHS agents (and police in general) use to trick and intimidate citizens into compliance. Also take note
of the practical necessity of flexing your rights repeatedly.
Top DHS checkpoint refusals
Checkpoints (some would say illegal checkpoints) have been popping up quite
frequently in the USA. As you see in this video, you DO NOT have to comply with their question's or demands. Don't
forget, you have rights. For more checkpoint refusals search: "CheckpointUSA"
Also,
Check out this great example of a checkpoint refusal from youtube user donhector87 below.. (he was the 2nd clip in
this video) I did not include the ending of his video; but click the link below to see the ending.. and to see how
it's done. And don't forget to subsribe to him.
It's citizens like donhector87 who get 100% credit for this video. Much respect.
Drug Checkpoints (it’s a trap!)
The Supreme Court has ruled that random checkpoints for the purpose of finding illegal
drugs are unconstitutional. However, police sometimes put up signs warning drivers of up-coming drug
checkpoints and instead pull over people who make illegal u-turns or discard contraband out the window. If you see
a sign saying “Drug Checkpoint Ahead”, just keep driving and don’t panic. If there’s a rest area following the
sign, DO NOT pull into it. If you do, you’ll find yourself surrounded by drug-sniffing dogs.
Police departments, especially in the Mid-west, have been pushing their luck with this tactic, so if you
encounter anything resembling an actual drug checkpoint, please contact that state’s ACLU Chapter. Similarly, if you’re arrested as a result of a real or fake “drug checkpoint”,
you must contact an attorney to explore your legal options.
TSA Checkpoints
Be aware that Transportation Security Agency (TSA) agents — which are part of the Dept. of Homeland Security
(DHS) — are permitted to search you and your belongings withoutprobable cause or a search warrant anytime you pass through a TSA security
zone.
The ACLU also keeps a Know
Your Rights When Traveling page. It’s got handy tips for deaing with “spot interviews” and opting out of
nude body scanners.
What are my rights with airline security & at the U.S.
border?
A young man in Murfreesboro, Tenn. attempted to
uphold his constitutional rights to enraged officers this Independence Day, at a DUI checkpoint.
4th of July DUI Checkpoint - Drug Dogs, Searched without
Consent, while Innocent
Police won't let me know if I'm being detained (I broke no laws), they use their K-9 to
false alert on my car giving themselves permission to search my stuff, and lie about me having illegal drugs in my
car. They eventually let me go with no charges.
Here are the numbers from the checkpoint that night:
» 250 vehicles passed through the checkpoint
» 20 vehicles were detained that required further investigation
» Three vehicles were searched
» One misdemeanor arrest was made
» 32 citations were issued: Two child restraint device citations, one DUI, 10 citations for violations of the
registration law, four citations for violation of the light law, one revoked/suspended driver's license, six
financial responsibility (no insurance), six other driver's license law violations, and two safety belt law
violations.
Only one DUI arrest was made. One out of 250. That's less than one percent. It seems to me that these police
checkpoints are nothing more than just fund raisers for themselves.http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/10/1... At a DUI stop, the
police are only supposed to stop people for a short period of time to see if they are driving impaired. They are
NOT supposed to be issuing citations to people.
Another reason why I disagree with checkpoints: In America, you are innocent until proven guilty. At checkpoints,
that is pretty much reversed. In the future, I recommend that all motorists record their encounters with law
enforcement.
As the man in the video pulls up, officers immediately
demand he roll down his window further, to which the man refuses, a right he is entitled to.
The officer then demands to know the man’s age, to which the driver also refuses. The officer then lies to the
driver, telling him that he is required to give his age despite there being no law stating you must give an officer
your date of birth if not being legally detained.
The officer then orders the driver to pull over to a secondary area for further investigation despite no
concrete probable cause or reasonable suspicion.
“Am I being detained?” the driver asks.
The officer becomes enraged almost instantly, refusing to answer the man’s question, knowing full well he has to
legally let the man go.
After the driver’s car is surrounded by officers, who are now attempting to intimidate the driver into
complying, the driver decides to pull up to the secondary checkpoint.
The officer then orders the driver out of the car, continuing the illegal detainment.
“Are you an attorney or something? You know what the law is?” the officer asks.
The officer, knowing he can’t search the car without the driver’s permission, demands access to the vehicle,
which the driver refuses.
Officers then unleash the K9 Unit, now searching for drugs at the DUI checkpoint despite no questions regarding
alcohol ever being brought up to the driver.
At 3:56 in the video, the officer appears to make the dog give a “false positive,” making
it seem as if the dog found drugs despite the fact that there were none in the vehicle.
As officers enter the man’s car illegally, they notice the man’s video camera on the seat and instantly become
silent. The officer searching the vehicle then grabs the man’s camera and turns it the opposite direction, so the
officers’ actions can not be seen.
Despite the officer’s admission that the driver is well within his rights, he continues to ignore them at every
possible moment.
“He’s perfectly innocent and he knows his rights. He knows what the constitution says,” the officer says as he
searches the man’s vehicle illegally.
While most everyone agrees on the importance of keeping drunk drivers off the streets, it cannot be done while
defying and ignoring the Constitution.
As social media and the internet continues to educate citizens on their rights at government checkpoints, officers are now beginning to engage a growing and
informed public.
An independent agency of the United States government responsible for
collecting and coordinating intelligence and counterintelligence activities abroad in the national
interest; headed by the Director of Central Intelligence under the supervision of the President and
National Security Council...There has been considerable criticism of the CIA relating to security
and counterintelligence failures, failures in intelligence analysis, human rights concerns,
external investigations and document releases, influencing public opinion and law enforcement, drug
trafficking, and lying to Congress. In 1987, the former CIA Station Chief in Angola in 1976, John
Stockwell, said the CIA is responsible for tens of thousands of covert actions and destablization
programs since it was created by Congress with the passage of the National Security Act of
1947.At the time, Stockwell estimated that over 6
million people had died in CIA covert actions.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is a governmental agency
belonging to the United StatesDepartment of Justice that serves as both a federal criminal
investigative body and an internal intelligence agency (counterintelligence). Also, it is the
government agency responsible for investigating crimes on Indian reservations in the United States
under the Major Crimes Act. The branch has investigative jurisdiction over violations of more than
200 categories of federal crime. The agency was established in 1908 as the Bureau of Investigation
(BOI). Its name was changed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 1935. The agency
headquarters is the J. Edgar Hoover Building, located in Washington, D.C. The agency has fifty-six
field offices located in major cities throughout the United States, and more than 400 resident
agencies in lesser cities and areas across the nation. More than 50 international offices called
"legal attachés" exist in U.S. embassies and consulates general worldwide.
'Federal Bureau of Investigation organizes almost
all terror plots in the US' ...The report reveals that the FBI regularly infiltrates communities
where they suspect terrorist-minded individuals to be engaging with others. Regardless of their
intentions, agents are sent in to converse within the community, find suspects that could
potentially carry out “lone wolf” attacks and then, more or less, encourage them to do so. By
providing weaponry, funds and a plan, FBI-directed agents will encourage otherwise-unwilling
participants to plot out terrorist attacks, only to bust them before any events fully
materialize.
It’s no longer Al-Qaeda,
it’s now supposedly your friends and neighbors. This is the
prevailing meme of every tyrannical fascist regime in history.
Attorney General Holder:
American People Are Terrorists
THE WAR ON TERROR IS AN ABSOLUTE
FRAUD
[OBAMA RELEASES MAJOR TERRORIST
ORGANIZERS OF THE TALIBAN]
Could Obama Face Impeachment For Bergdahl
release
What happened in the last few weeks to change
the Bergdahal situation? Was he a CIA operative, or was this a failed attempt to take the heat off the VA
scandal?
In 1991, the Club published The First Global
Revolution. It analyses the problems of humanity, calling these collectively or in essence the 'problematique'. It
notes (laments) that, historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by enemies in common:
"The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome domestic failure
and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself - when things
become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face
an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the
traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those
whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so used to classifying its
neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and
public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new
weapons devised."
THE GLOBALISTSMOVE FROM THEIRALQAEDA
CREATION,TO FABRICATING HOMEGROWN DOMESTIC
TERROR
A failed attempt to recruit Aaron Russo resulted in recent
light being shed on the CFR...And The Fake War On Terror!
Several years
ago, after his popular video “Mad As Hell” was released and Aaron Russo began his campaign to become
Governor of Nevada, Russo was noticed by Nicholas Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney. Seeing
Russo’s passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the
elite’s CFR. Watch the full interview here: Reflections and
Warnings.
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And
The Fake War On Terror!
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And The Fake War On
Terrorism!
enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself - when things
become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face
an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the
traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those
whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so used to classifying its
neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and
public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new
weapons devised."
