" Look Into It - NDAA

 

 

 

 
  
                                               

welcome

 

 

NDAA

NDAA

National Defense Authorization Act:

Americans can legally be kidnapped and held without trial

 

 





 

The NDAA Explained in 3 Minutes


Published on Jul 4, 2014

Script and sources; http://stormcloudsgathering.com/the-n...

Follow us on Facebook: http://facebook.com/StormCloudsGathering
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/SCGupdates
Donate: http://StormCloudsGathering.com/donate
Get email updates of new content: http://stormcloudsgathering.com/scg_u...


 

 

 

The Road to Manzanar:
The Story of an American Internment Camp (documentary)

Please help support us on Patreon, read our goals here: https://www.patreon.com/truthstreammedia
(We're also getting a Subscribe Star going here: https://www.subscribestar.com/truthstreammedia)

First published at 22:45 UTC on March 8th, 2022.

Truthstream Can Be Found Here:

Our First Film: TheMindsofMen.net

Our First Limited Series: Vimeo.com/ondemand/trustgame

Site: http://TruthstreamMedia.com

Twitter: @TruthstreamNews
Insta: @Truthstream_Media

Backup Vimeo: Vimeo.com/truthstreammedia

Donate: http://bit.ly/2aTBeeF

Newsletter: http://eepurl.com/bbxcWX

 

 


 


WARNING:

Alex Jones & Mike Adams Are Pushing a Faux "Revolution"

The Conscious Resistance
Published on Sep 24, 2018

Derrick Broze examines recent videos from Alex Jones and Mike Adams claiming that Trump will declare martial law. These men and infowars are not to be trusted. They are going to help create the perfect conditions for a civil war that the ruling class will use to enact complete control.

Sources:

https://www.infowars.com/emergency-re...

https://www.infowars.com/alex-jones-i...

https://www.infowars.com/world-exclus...

Don't Fall for Alex Jones' Civil War Deception

The Conscious Resistance
Premiered Dec 27, 2018

Derrick Broze breaks down the ongoing efforts of Alex Jones, InfoWars, and Trump supporters to push for a civil war.

Is a Second Civil War Really Coming?
https://youtu.be/M_e4BrUwQlM

The Conscious Resistance Network is an independent media organization focused on empowering individuals through education, philosophy, health, and community organizing. We work to create a world where corporate and state power does not rule over the lives of free human beings.

Find more videos like this at: www.theconsciousresistance.com

Our work is supported by SmartCash, the business focused, user-friendly & decentralized crypto-currency. www.smartcash.cc

Support our work: Patreon.com/DerrickBroze


Alex Jones Does 180 on Police State


Advocates Military Be Used to Arrest US Citizens to Resolve Contrived Left-Right Tensions



"...They're going to guillotine everybody and have a communist utopia and they're all nodding 'we're going to kill the conservatives and the christians, we're going to kill them'. And these are marches with hundreds of thousands of people nodding their head, 'We are going to kill you.' As far as I'm concerned, the safest thing to do would just to be, have Trump, just go ahead and have the Army go ahead and arrest these people. We are in a red alert right now; we need to have the Army just arrest these people. And I guarantee you George Washington, if stuff like this was going on, would go arrest the people that were doing it."

-- Alex Jones, vid: Is The Civil War Here NOW?, WeAreChange Jul 2, 2018 --

"...And this comes from a man who made four, not one, not two, not three, four movies called The Police State and even another one called Martial Law 911 warning the general public about the use of the US Army domestically inside The United States. This is a man who is most well known for warning the American public about the rise of the police state, who has now completely turned 180 degrees and is ultimately calling for martial law in the streets to arrest people who are protesting the government!"

-- Luke Rudkowski, vid: Is The Civil War Here NOW?, WeAreChange Jul 2, 2018 --


** For more information go to the False Left-Right Paradigm page and look at the section: Alex Jones Paradigm Pivot **



...ALL OTHER INFOWARS CONTENT BELOW
IS BEFORE 2016 WHEN THEY SOLD OUT!
 

 Infowars Employees Expose Alex Jones

 Know More News
Published on Oct 4, 2017


Former Alex Jones employees and guests speak out about the big problems going on at Infowars


Featuring:



Rob Jacobson




Kurt Nimmo




Anthony Gucciardi




Aaron and Melissa Dykes




Luke Ridkowski




Jason Bermas




David Icke




Wayne Madsen




and Jack Blood

 

Beware of both MSM & ALT-Media

 

 

 

 

"The globalists create confusion by design so that people see a smokescreen and can't figure out what's going on and that they hope would just roll over and give up."

-- Alex Jones, vid: Trump Puppeted By Pro-War Left To Attack Syria --

Adaptation and Conformity
The Selling Out of Alex Jones/Infowars

Link:
Psywars

  

 

 



In 2009, less than two months after Barack Obama was inaugurated as president, Alex Jones/Infowars released a documentary (The Obama Deception) exposing him as a mask used by the corrupt power elite to instigate and provide cover to their machinations. Central to this presentation was the “real” executive power structure. “…The president serves the military industrial complex, itself owned by the international bankers.” However, in 2017, though Donald Trump was a puppet like his predecessor, Alex Jones promoted him as a maverick outside of this systemic corruption that has plagued America since Dwight D. Eisenhower coined the phrase, “Military Industrial Complex.” Using the war in Yemen—which has produced the greatest humanitarian crisis on earth—as a case example, The Trump Jones Deception shows how both men were yet another mask of deceit worn by the corrupt establishment.

WATCH HERE:

https://war.lookintoit.org/home/

 



Psywars - The Selling Out of Alex Jones/Infowars

 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

LEARN HOW THE REAL POLITICAL SYSTEM WORKS HERE: TRAGEDY & HOPE 101

 

 

Is "democracy" just a carefully managed con game? Professor Quigley not only spent decades researching and writing about those who secretly control the machinery of our “representative governments,” he was permitted to examine their secret papers. He was invited in, but he ultimately betrayed their trust when he exposed their plans and their methods.

- Joe Plummer -

 

 

 




 

 

 

GOP House Affirms Military Detention, As Thai Military
Shows How It Will Go Down For Politicians

The same day US Special Forces were practicing Urban Warfare in America with foreign troops from 16 nations, in one of those nations, Thailand, a military coup was rounding up politicians. Ironically, the GOP controlled House reaffirmed yet again, its approval of indefinite detention by the military. And on the same day, the Democrat controlled Senate approved a lawyer who wrote secret memos making secret arguments supporting drone assassinations of Americans, for a lifetime appointment to a court one level below the Supreme Court.

A General Writes the First After-Action Report on the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq: Why We Lost
U.S. SPECIAL FORCES, FOREIGN TROOPS PRACTICE INVADING TAMPA
Thai military detains politicians and activists
House Passes NDAA; Critical Amendments Fail, Others Succeed
WYDEN: "EVERY AMERICAN HAS THE RIGHT TO KNOW WHEN THEIR GOVT. BELIEVES IT IS ALLOWED TO KILL THEM!"
Barron Narrowly Confirmed by Senate Despite Drone Memo

 

LINKS:

Foreign Troops Training To Confiscate Guns of Americans | Posse Comitatus Act | Police State 1 | Police State 2 | Police State 3 | Police State 4 | Martial Law Rise of The Police State 

 

 

 


 

Federal Court Overturns Block on NDAA Indefinite Detention

Americans can legally be kidnapped and held without trial

 

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
July 17, 2013

NDAAThe Second Circuit court has overturned a temporary injunction which had blocked the indefinite detention provision of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) – meaning Americans can now once again be kidnapped and held without trial.

Image: Indefinite Detention

In September 2012, United States District Court Judge Katherine B. Forrest ruled that the indefinite detention provision of the NDAA was unconstitutional and blocked it permanently. However, within 24 hours of the ruling the Obama administration lodged an appeal and the law has been under temporary injunction until now.

Americans can once again “legally” be snatched off the street and detained without trial based on the mere claim that they provided aid or support to terrorists, despite this being a total violation of habeas corpus.

The Tenth Amendment Center has a detailed breakdown of the ruling;

“In layman’s terms, Forrest put a stop to indefinite detention, and the Second Circuit overturned that. It also permanently prohibited Forrest from attempting to do so again, ordering her to proceed with the case consistent with their opinion. NDAA “indefinite detention” powers are alive and well.”

The group points out that the new Second Circuit ruling is completely incorrect because it claims that Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA says nothing about the government’s ability to detain citizens.

In reality, section 1021 states, “Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force . . . includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons . . . pending disposition under the law of war.”

The ruling stems out of Hedges v. Obama, a lawsuit filed in January 2012. Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Chris Hedges and several other high profile figures brought the case in order to protest against the potential that the law could be used to harass outspoken journalists and political activists.

“Sadly, the “victory” lasted about 10 months. Today, US totalitarianism wins again,” laments Zero Hedge.

 

 

 

 

Woman Leaves Room Speechless: "I'm just a mom!"
- One Of The Most Powerful Speeches Ever Made

[vid]

 On Tuesday Nov 5th, 2013 after making her wait 8 hours, the Clark County Commission in Las Vegas decided to hear Daphne Lee speak against the NDAA. What followed was one of the most powerful public comments in history.

 

 

 

 

 

BIG NEWS: Defeating the NDAA & Tyranny - Dan Johnson

 

Dan Johnson, the young Libertarian founder of PANDA [People Against the NDAA] joins us to give an update on cities, counties and states that are standing up to tyranny by agreeing to interpose between the FEDS and the tyrannical measures of indefinite detention of American citizens called for in a provision of the 2012 NDAA. As you will recall, "President" Barack Hussein Obama signed the NDAA into law on New Year's Eve 2011, despite his promises that he would never sign it. Thankfully, that tyrannical act inspired Dan Johnson to form PANDA - and now Dan is making a difference in our country, every day. And YOU can join the effort to return LIBERTY to our nation and make a difference too.

Dan's sites:
http://pandaunite.org/ 
http://takebacktour.com/ 

For REAL News & Information:
http://sgtreport.com/ 
http://thelibertymill.com/ 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Medical Martial Law 2020 | The Corbett Report | First published at 20:59 UTC on March 21st, 2020.

SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=35444

As the lockdowns go into place and the military takes to the streets in country after country, the decades of preparation for medical martial law are finally paying off forthe pandemic planners. Today on this emergency edition of The Corbett Report podcast, James lays out the steps that have led us to the brink of martial law and the steps that are being taken to implement it now. Please help to spread this important information and to raise awareness of the crisis that we are facing.

"Here’s the bottom line. You are not supposed to wait 2 or 4 years for some new politicians to get in office and give your permission to be free. You are not supposed to wait 2 or 4 or 6 years for some federal court to tell you, “ok, you be free now.” You are supposed to stand up resist, refuse to comply and nullify unconstitutional federal acts – as soon as they happen. All the money and time you throw at firing congress or winning in federal court will never, ever work – unless you start resisting right here in your state. And, that resistance needs to be your first response, not your last."  - Michael Boldin, Article: James Madison: How to Stop the Federal Government

 

James Madison Refuse To Cooperate
James Madison:
How to Stop the Federal Government
https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2014/12/15/james-madison-how-to-stop-the-federal-government/

 

By: Michael Boldin|Published on: Dec 15, 2014

In response to federal overreach, most people tend to focus on three types of actions to stop them: elections, conventions, and lawsuits. While they all have their place in an overall strategy to defend the Constitution, none of them should be the first step forward. That is, if you follow the advice of the “Father of the Constitution.”

Here’s what James Madison had to say in Federalist #46. The Influence of the State and Federal Governments Compared:

“Should an unwarrantable measure of the federal government be unpopular in particular States, which would seldom fail to be the case, or even a warrantable measure be so, which may sometimes be the case, the means of opposition to it are powerful and at hand. The disquietude of the people; their repugnance and, perhaps refusal to cooperate with officers of the Union, the frowns of the executive magistracy of the State; the embarrassment created by legislative devices, which would often be added on such occasions, would oppose, in any State, very serious impediments; and were the sentiments of several adjoining States happen to be in Union, would present obstructions which the federal government would hardly be willing to encounter.”

Let me translate. Madison said that when the federal government passes an unconstitutional measure there are powerful methods to oppose it – amongst the people and in the states. He also pointed out that those methods were available even for warrantable, that is constitutional, measures.

Madison told us of four things that should be done to resist federal powers, whether merely unpopular, or unconstitutional.

1. Disquietude of the people – Madison expected the people would throw a fit when the feds usurped power – even using the word “repugnance” to describe their displeasure. That leads to the next step.

2. Repugnance and Refusal to co-operate with the officers of the Union – Noncompliance. The #1 dictionary of the time defined repugnance as “disobedient; not obsequious” (compliant). If you want to stop the federal government, you have to disobey them. Madison also suggested that people would perhaps directly refuse to cooperate with federal agents. This is an approach we preach here every day at the Tenth Amendment Center. James Madison apparently knew what we know today. The feds rely on cooperation from state and local governments, as well as individuals. When enough people refuse to comply, they simply can’t enforce their so-called laws.

3, The frowns of the executive magistracy of the State – Here Madison envisions governors formally protesting federal actions. This not only raises public awareness; executive leadership will also lead to the next step – legislative action.

4. Legislative devices, which would often be added on such occasions – Madison keeps this open-ended, and in the years soon after, which I’ll cover shortly, we learn how both he and Thomas Jefferson applied this step.

Madison also told us that if several adjoining States would do the same it would be an effective tool to stop federal acts. To repeat, he said that doing this “would present obstructions which the federal government would hardly be willing to encounter.”

Judge Andrew Napolitano agreed recently and said that people need to stop enforcing unconstitutional federal laws. He also said that if you could get an entire state doing this, it would make federal laws “nearly impossible to enforce.”

What’s important to note here, are some glaring omissions. The powerful means that Madison told us would be used to oppose federal power successfully did NOT include federal lawsuits in federal courts. He also did NOT include “voting the bums out” as a strategy, either.

FIRST RESPONSE

Compare that with how people generally respond to what they consider unconstitutional or unpopular federal acts today.

The first thing I tend to hear from people who are opposed to a federal act is the “vote the bums out” mantra. We’ll fire congress, right?

Or some people tell us we have to sue and let the courts decide.

I’ve got some news for you. There’s nothing from the founders – anywhere – in which they tell us that our first response to extreme, repeated violations of the constitution and liberty is to vote the bums out, or sue the feds in federal court. Nothing.

LEGISLATIVE DEVICES

Thomas Jefferson followed up on this in 1798 with the same kind of advice. That year, the Adams administration passed a wildly unconstitutional attack on the freedom of speech with the Alien and Sedition Acts. In response, while sitting as vice-president, Jefferson secretly drafted the Kentucky Resolutions, and here’s a little of what he wrote:

“The several states composing the united states of america are not united on a principle of unlimited submission to their general government.”

“where powers are assumed which have not been delegated, a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy”

“that every State has a natural right in cases not within the compact to nullify of their own authority all assumptions of power by others within their limits: that without this right, they would be under the dominion, absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them”

Madison was consistent in his views on this. In 1798, he also drafted and help pass something known as the Virginia Resolutions, a state-level “legislative device” in response to the Alien and Sedition Acts. Here’s a key part:

in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the states who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them.

Like Madison advised in Federalist #46, both he and Thomas Jefferson advised a state-level response to dangerous federal acts. In 1798, neither of them even mentioned voting or lawsuits.

Jefferson told us that a “nullification is the rightful remedy.” And Madison told us that states are “duty-bound to interpose.”

When Daniel Webster called on these same principles in response to military conscription plans during the war of 1812, he said:

“The operation of measures thus unconstitutional and illegal ought to be prevented by a resort to other measures which are both constitutional and legal. It will be the solemn duty of the State governments to protect their own authority over their own militia, and to interpose between their citizens and arbitrary power. These are among the objects for which the State governments exist; and their highest obligations bind them to the preservation of their own rights and the liberties of their people”

Here’s the bottom line. You are not supposed to wait 2 or 4 years for some new politicians to get in office and give your permission to be free. You are not supposed to wait 2 or 4 or 6 years for some federal court to tell you, “ok, you be free now.”

You are supposed to stand up resist, refuse to comply and nullify unconstitutional federal acts – as soon as they happen.

All the money and time you throw at firing congress or winning in federal court will never, ever work – unless you start resisting right here in your state. And, that resistance needs to be your first response, not your last.

 

 

 

The War on Terror
Has Always Been a War on You

TenthAmendmentCenter
First published at 17:54 UTC on September 1st, 2021.

From day one, they’ve attacked your liberty in big ways - and they’re not even close to being done yet.

Path to Liberty: September 1, 2021

JOIN TAC: https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/members/ | Show Archives: https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/pathtoliberty/

Subscribe and Review on Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/path-to-liberty/id1440549211 

https://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2021/09/the-war-on-terror-has-always-been-a-war-on-you/

 

SHOW LINKS:
JOIN TAC

Show Archives

James Madison to Thomas Jefferson (13 May 1798)

John Adams – Fear – Thoughts on Government (April 1776) 

Samuel Adams – Letter to James Warren (12 Feb 1779) 

Patriot Act on Steroids: Surveillance State Beyond Section 215

Permanent But Problematic Patriot Act Sections

Aviation and Transportation Security Act

Terrorist “screening” – 2003

No Fly Lists

NCTC – National Counter Terrorism Center

The Biggest New Spying Program You’ve Probably Never Heard Of

Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004

Cost of War Project

John Taylor of Caroline – Tyranny Unmasked 

James Madison – Political Observations (20 Apr 1795) 

 

 

 

 






 

UPDATE 2013

[vid]

David Knight breaks down anti NDAA legislation and "head fakes" being used by our national leaders.

 

 

 

 

MAVERICK LAWYER TAKES NDAA HEAD ON

[vid]

The New York Times calls Carl Mayer: "A populist crusader and maverick lawyer." (New York Times, October 15, 2004).

Mr. Mayer's biggest impact was when he was profiled by Mike Wallace and Morley Safer on the CBS News Program "Sixty Minutes". Mayer -- then an elected Independent town councilman in Princeton, N.J. -- went undercover and wore a wire to expose the rampant corruption and criminality endemic to New Jersey and, increasingly, American, politics.

On that program, the CEO of United Gunite Corporation (a construction company) was caught offering a cash bribe to a "Sixty Minutes" cameraman to stop his filming: a first in "Sixty Minutes" history.

The same CEO was subsequently indicted by the U.S. Attorney for New Jersey and cooperated in indicting corporate lobbyists and the mayors of several New Jersey cities, including Patterson and Irvington. The fallout continues as over ninty elected officials and corporate lobbyists have been sent to jail for bribery, extortion and other corruption charges.

Mr. Mayer dedicates his law practice, writing and electoral efforts to ending the tyranny of corporate power over American citizens.

He has written in law journals opposing efforts by corporations to use the Bill of Rights intended only for American citizens to shield corporations from accountability and legal sanction.

Mr. Mayer worked on the Nike v. Kasky case in the United States Supreme Court that successfully prevented Nike from using the First Amendment to continue deceiving consumers about sweat-shop labor used in Nike plants. http://www.carlmayer.com/
http://www.untouchablesgroup.blogspot...
http://www.newjerseyuntouchables.blog...

 

 


 

 

Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Alexander Solzhenitsyn was born in Russia, DECEMBER 11, 1918. He was arrested for writing a letter criticizing Stalin and spent 11 years in labor camps. He began writing and eventually received the Nobel Prize for Literature.

 Alexander Solzhenitsyn

 

 


 

NDAA Floor Speech

RON PAUL

http://www.ronpaul.com/ 

 

 

 

 

Obama Legalizing Tyranny - More Americans to be Killed 

Alex covers Obama's signing of the National Defense Authorization Act, a draconian bill that will allow the military to arrest American citizens and disappear them into a secret labyrinth tribunal system where victims may be kept for years without access to due process and the protection of the Fourth Amendment.
 

 

 

 

 

 

We Will Defend Our
Liberties to The Death!!

Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers 1/3

Alex talks with constitutional expert Stewart Rhodes, founder and Director of Oath Keepers. Rhodes served as a U.S. Army paratrooper until disabled in a rough terrain parachuting accident during a night jump and is a former firearms instructor and former member of Rep. Ron Paul's DC staff. Rhodes will discuss how the NDAA bill attempts to legalize tyranny, as well as Ron Paul's success in New Hampshire.
 

 

 

We Will Defend Our Liberties to The Death!!  2/3

 

Alex talks with constitutional expert Stewart Rhodes, founder and Director of Oath Keepers. Rhodes served as a U.S. Army paratrooper until disabled in a rough terrain parachuting accident during a night jump and is a former firearms instructor and former member of Rep. Ron Paul's DC staff. Rhodes will discuss how the NDAA bill attempts to legalize tyranny, as well as Ron Paul's success in New Hampshire.
 

 

 

We Will Defend Our Liberties to The Death!!  3/3

Alex talks with constitutional expert Stewart Rhodes, founder and Director of Oath Keepers. Rhodes served as a U.S. Army paratrooper until disabled in a rough terrain parachuting accident during a night jump and is a former firearms instructor and former member of Rep. Ron Paul's DC staff. Rhodes will discuss how the NDAA bill attempts to legalize tyranny, as well as Ron Paul's success in New Hampshire.
 

 

 

 

 

Indefinite Detention: The NDAA and the Enemy Expatriation Act

TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=3719

With the signing of the National Defense Authorization Act into law, more Americans than ever before are wondering how the country could have descended so quickly into a police state. Far from a unique or isolated act, however, the NDAA is just the latest entry in a long list of steps toward the codification of outright martial law. Find out more about the history of this agenda in this week's GRTV Backgrounder

 

 

 

 

 

 U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Shaffer On:

NDAA, TREASON, ASSASSINATION, ILLEGAL WAR

 

 

 

Pulitzer Prize Journalist Warns of Physical Roundups

Alex talks with Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and war correspondent Chris Hedges.
"Revolt is all we have left. It is our only hope," Hedges recently wrote.
http://www.truthdig.com/ 

 

 

 

 

Fema Camps 2

MLK ON NDAA

"Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson

National Defense Authorization Act 

 

 

 

 

National Defense Authorization Act

Federal Judge Reinstates Unconstitutional NDAA

 

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
September 18, 2012

National Defense Authorization ActLate Monday night a federal judge in New York, Raymond Lohier, granted the Obama administration an “emergency” stay that temporarily blocks a ruling by U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest last week blocking the NDAA.

“Lohier offered no explanation or rationale for the temporary stay. However, the Justice Department has asked the appeals court to block the injunction,” Politico reported late last night.

The Obama administration characterized the ruling by Forrest as unconstitutional.

The Justice Department said the ruling was “unprecedented” and argued that the executive has the right under the Constitution to detain anyone indefinitely without due process. The Fifth Amendment specifically mentions due process of law.

The NDAA also violates the “equal protection” clause of the 14th Amendment stating that all people be treated the same under the law.

The federal government argues that the National Defense Authorization Act did not expand its authority beyond what already existed under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) , as interpreted by judges in Guantánamo Bay habeas corpus cases.

“This pernicious law poses one of the greatest threats to civil liberties in our nation’s history,” writes Brian J. Trautman. Under AUMF, “this law can be used by authorities to detain (forever) anyone the government considers a threat to national security and stability – potentially even demonstrators and protesters exercising their First Amendment rights.”

Documents produced by the Department of Homeland Security and fusion centers and subsequently leaked to the media target numerous organizations and individuals as threats to national security — including supporters of Ron Paul, returning veterans, and other “rightwing extremists.”

In the months ahead, the NDAA will likely become an invaluable tool for the government as the economy finally topples over a cliff and a violent conflagration engulfs the Middle East. Iran has promised to shut down the flow of oil out of the region if the United States and Israel invade. This would undoubtedly have a devastating effect on the world economy and would result in massive protests against the government.

 

 

 

NDAA

Obama wins right to indefinitely detain Americans under NDAA

 

rt.com
September 18, 2012

A lone appeals judge bowed down to the Obama administration late Monday and reauthorized the White House’s ability to indefinitely detain American citizens without charge or due process.

Last week, a federal judge ruled that an temporary injunction on section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 must be made permanent, essentially barring the White House from ever enforcing a clause in the NDAA that can let them put any US citizen behind bars indefinitely over mere allegations of terrorist associations. On Monday, the US Justice Department asked for an emergency stay on that order, and hours later US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Judge Raymond Lohier agreed to intervene and place a hold on the injunction.

The stay will remain in effect until at least September 28, when a three-judge appeals court panel is expected to begin addressing the issue.

On December 31, 2011, US President Barack Obama signed the NDAA into law, even though he insisted on accompanying that authorization with a statement explaining his hesitance to essentially eliminate habeas corpus for the American people.

“The fact that I support this bill as a whole does not mean I agree with everything in it,” President Obama wrote. “In particular, I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation, and prosecution of suspected terrorists.”

A lawsuit against the administration was filed shortly thereafter on behalf of Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Chris Hedges and others, and Judge Forrest agreed with them in district court last week after months of debate. With the stay issued on Monday night, however, that justice’s decision has been destroyed.

With only Judge Lohier’s single ruling on Monday, the federal government has been once again granted the go ahead to imprison any person “who was part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners” until a poorly defined deadline described as merely “the end of the hostilities.” The ruling comes despite Judge Forrest’s earlier decision that the NDAA fails to “pass constitutional muster” and that the legislation contained elements that had a “chilling impact on First Amendment rights”

Because alleged terrorists are so broadly defined as to include anyone with simple associations with enemy forces, some members of the press have feared that simply speaking with adversaries of the state can land them behind bars.

“First Amendment rights are guaranteed by the Constitution and cannot be legislated away,” Judge Forrest wrote last week. “This Court rejects the Government’s suggestion that American citizens can be placed in military detention indefinitely, for acts they could not predict might subject them to detention.”

Bruce Afran, a co-counsel representing the plaintiffs in the case Hedges v Obama, said Monday that he suspects the White House has been relentless in this case because they are already employing the NDAA to imprison Americans, or plan to shortly.

“A Department of Homeland Security bulletin was issued Friday claiming that the riots [in the Middle East] are likely to come to the US and saying that DHS is looking for the Islamic leaders of these likely riots,” Afran told Hedges for a blogpost published this week. “It is my view that this is why the government wants to reopen the NDAA — so it has a tool to round up would-be Islamic protesters before they can launch any protest, violent or otherwise. Right now there are no legal tools to arrest would-be protesters. The NDAA would give the government such power. Since the request to vacate the injunction only comes about on the day of the riots, and following the DHS bulletin, it seems to me that the two are connected. The government wants to reopen the NDAA injunction so that they can use it to block protests.”

Within only hours of Afran’s statement being made public, demonstrators in New York City waged a day of protests in order to commemorate the one-year anniversary of the Occupy Wall Street movement. Although it is not believed that the NDAA was used to justify any arrests, more than 180 political protesters were detained by the NYPD over the course of the day’s actions. One week earlier, the results of a Freedom of Information Act request filed by the American Civil Liberties Union confirmed that the FBI has been monitoring Occupy protests in at least one instance, but the bureau would not give further details, citing that decision is “in the interest of national defense or foreign policy.”

Josh Gerstein, a reporter with Politico, reported on the stay late Monday and acknowledged that both Forrest and Lohier were appointed to the court by President Obama.

  1. Obama says he doesn’t even need NDAA to indefinitely detain Americans 
  2. Federal Judge Reinstates Unconstitutional NDAA 
  3. Obama fights ban on indefinite detention of Americans 
  4. Obama Administration Demanded Power To Indefinitely Detain U.S. Citizens 
  5. Obama’s Signing Statement on NDAA: I have the power to detain Americans… but I won’t 
  6. Judge Blocks Portion of NDAA 
  7. Judge Blocks Controversial NDAA 
  8. Govt. Says It Can Assassinate or Indefinitely Detain Americans on American Soil Without Any Due Process 
  9. White House Says It’s Unconstitutional To Strike Down The NDAA 
  10. Obama uses NDAA to halt Iranian assets 
  11. Congress still okay with indefinite detention and torture of Americans 
  12. How Does a ‘Common Citizen’ Know If They Can Be Target of NDAA? 

 

 


 


 

 NDAA

 

On September 12, 2012 we had one of the biggest victories for civil liberties and against government overreach in a decade. Judge Forrest granted a permanent injunction against Section 1021(b)(2), the government promptly filed an appeal, and then went further: they requested a stay of execution on the injunction from Judge Forrest, once again proving no evidence and failing to answer all of her questions and concerns, while again claiming that the detention powers of the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) of 2001, (the law that allows the president to detain those who were involved in the 9/11 attacks and/or are members of Al Qaeda or the Taliban) and the NDAA's Section 1021 powers are precisely the same.

This is disingenuous. Section 1021 provides sweeping powers of detention through incredibly vague and undefined terms, that are missing in the AUMF. The government is completely contradicting itself. Judge Forrest made it clear that her ruling did not touch the AUMF. And in their request for an emergency stay, the government claimed "irreparable harm" would be incurred if they do not have the powers of Section 1021.

Next up: A longer-term stay will be decided by a three judge court on or near September 28. The appeal of the permanent injunction date is not yet set.

Thank you for your interest in our case. Please continue to support us in any way you can!

 

 

 

 

Attorney Risk All with Lawsuit Against
Obama's NDAA Aimed at U.S. Citizens

Alex also welcomes guest Carl Mayer, the attorney representing American Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Chris Hedges in his legal battle to keep President Obama's power to send US citizens to military prisons without right to trial or attorney, or NDAA privilege, at bay.
https://www.stopndaa.org/

 

 

 

 

 

Americans already
detained under NDAA?

Published: 28 September, 2012, 02:01

NDAAU.S. Army Military Police escort a detainee to his cell during in-processing to the temporary detention facility at Camp X-Ray in Naval Base Guantanamo Bay.(Reuters / Stringer) 

The plaintiffs that are suing US President Barack Obama over his insistence on keeping the National Defense Authorization Act on the books said Thursday that they fear Americans are already being held indefinitely and without trial under the NDAA.

US President Barack Obama refrained from even once commenting on his efforts to keep his power to indefinitely detain Americans without charge when he appeared on Reddit.com recently and urged users to “Ask Me Anything.” His opponents in the matter aren’t shying away from speaking up online, though.

The plaintiffs in the case to ban the White House from imprisoning Americans indefinitely without trial or due justice took to Reddit on Thursday to answer questions involving the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012, or the NDAA, and blamed corrupt media and a broken governmental establishment for letting the Obama administration maintain its to book Americans in military prisons without charge.

On December 31, 2011, President Obama authorized the NDAA, and with it he approved a controversial provision that permits the government to indefinitely detain US citizens without trial for mere allegations of ties to suspected terrorists. Journalists and activists filed a lawsuit against the president earlier this year over the provision, Section 1021, which US Federal Judge Katherine Forrest in turn agreed was unconstitutional. Last month Judge Forrest decided that an earlier, temporary injunction on the clause should be made permanent, but the Obama Justice Department pleaded for an emergency stay only hours later. A lone federal appeals judge has since heard that plea and has momentarily blocked Judge Forrest’s injunction. Now pending the results of an appeals panel’s formal investigation, the NDAA’s indefinite detention provision remains on the books.

On Thursday, the plaintiffs in the case — journalist Chris Hedges, activist Tangerine Bolen, Pentagon Papers leaker Dan Ellsberg, their attorneys and others — told users of Reddit to ask them anything.

“The Obama DOJ has vigorously opposed these efforts, and immediately appealed her ruling and requested an emergency stay on the injunction – claiming the US would incur ‘irreparable harm’ if the president lost the power to use Section 1021 – and detain anyone, anywhere until the end of hostilities on a whim. This case will probably make its way to the Supreme Court,” the plaintiffs acknowledged in their introduction.

From there, President Obama’s opponents in federal court combed through hundreds of posts to answer questions regarding the NDAA over the course of several hours. And although the plaintiffs have not exactly been silent with the status of their fight since suing the White House earlier this year, the insight they offered on Reddit provided a fresh update on the case against the NDAA amid some of the government’s most unusual legal maneuvers yet.

Offering his take on the case, Hedges said that he even believes the NDAA’s indefinite detention clause is already being used to imprison Americans, “because they filed an emergency appeal.”

“If the Obama administration simply appealed it, as we expected, it would have raised this red flag,” Hedges added. “But since they were so aggressive it means that once Judge Forrest declared the law invalid, if they were using it, as we expect, they could be held in contempt of court. This was quite disturbing, for it means, I suspect, that US citizens, probably dual nationals, are being held in military detention facilities almost certainly overseas and maybe at home.”

“The signing statement is the most ridiculous part to this for me. He writes this statement saying he's not happy about the power existing, but then his administration fights so hard to keep that specific power in place,” Reddit user devilrobotjesus responded.

“If Obama didn't want it to happen, he would not have signed it, especially after stating that he would veto it,” co-counsel Carl Mayer explained. Mayer has represented the plaintiffs in the case of Hedges v. Obama and said that he plans on continuing his pursuit to take indefinite detention off the books.

“We will do whatever it takes,” Mayers added. “We are prepared for a Supreme Court battle.”

Activist and journalist Tangerine Bolen is also insistent on prevailing over the Obama administration, but says “The biggest obstruction to our winning this case . . . is our broken systems.” Bolen blames a lack of media coverage, insufficient public awareness “and the government behaving very badly, even in court, on the record,” for the difficulties the plaintiffs have had to endure, adding that the Obama administration’s constant missteps have been noticed by no one except “seven plaintiffs, four attorneys, one federal judge and the activists who have been following this case.”

“Amazing,” she added.

Journalist Chris Hedges extrapolated on Bolen’s opinion, singling out “a corporate-owned system of information” for not informing Americans that they can be imprisoned without trial at this very moment.

“MSNBC, which is a propaganda arm of the Democratic establishment, just as Fox is a propaganda arm of the Republican establishment, is not going to raise this as Obama is as guilty as Romney. If we had a healthy press this would have gotten more coverage, although the print media, and in particular my old paper the NY Times, finally did good coverage,” Hedges wrote.

Daniel Ellsberg, the former Defense Department employee who achieved notoriety a generation earlier by leaking what became known as the Pentagon Papers, agreed that the system is severely in fault in this instance.

“Virtually every public institution has failed us gravely. Not only the executive, but the courts, congress, most of the media and most of the churches,” Ellsberg wrote on Reddit. “Radical reform is needed, even to the point of non-violent revolution. “

Elsewhere, the panel touched on why they believe the Obama administration is so adamantly fighting to keep the NDAA legal.

“It is quite possible that the NDAA is . . . a way to get Julian Assange and WikiLeaks,” Bolen claimed. “While the USG has tried to paint us as irrational, delusional and ridiculous, you see the slippery slope here.”

On his part, Hedges said that emails hacked by Anonymous and released by Wikileaks show that the US government has attempted to "tie a legitimate dissident group to terrorism and strip them of their right of dissent,” to which Bolen follows up with an explanation that supports the ramped up attempts from the White House to persecute whistleblowers and leakers under President Obama

“Yes, of course, if [Assange] is an enemy of the state, then yes, [The New York Times] could be considered to have communicated with the enemy. And perhaps the NDAA is a way to finally nail him,” Bolen said.

A three-judge appeals panel is expected to soon weigh in on the stay placed on Judge Forrest’s injunction, in the meantime keeping Section 1021 and the rest of the NDAA applicable to every American.

 

 

 NDAA

Fed Judge Rules In Favor of
NDAA Indefinite Detention

 

 [vid]

A federal appeals court has ruled that the US government can still indefinitely detain citizens should it wish to do so, under the Obama Administration's National Defense Authorization Act.

The ruling came in the form of an extension of an "emergency" stay of a district court judge's order that had previously struck down the defence bill's provisions altogether.

Last month District Judge Katherine Forrest permanently blocked the NDAA provision, saying that "First Amendment rights have already been harmed and will be harmed by the prospect of (the law) being enforced."

However, the very next day the Obama administration moved to appeal the decision in an attempt to reinstate the indefinite detention provisions. The administration characterized the ruling by Forrest as unconstitutional.

Federal judge in New York, Raymond Lohier, then granted the Obama administration an "emergency" stay that temporarily blocks Forrest's ruling.

Late yesterday, a three-judge motions panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit extended that stay, supporting the administration's appeal and intimating that Forrest's ruling is flawed.

"We conclude that the public interest weighs in favor of granting the government's motion for a stay," Appeals Court Judges Denny Chin, Raymond Lohier and Christopher Droney wrote in a three-page order that also expedited the appeal.
http://www.infowars.com/federal-court-rules-in-favour-of-indefinite-detention...

 

 

 

 

 

LINK:

FALSE LEFT RIGHT PARADIGM

 

 

 

 

 

Indefinite Detention of U.S. Citizens
without Trial is Treason

[vid]

 

 

 

 

 

In the video below, Alex Jones highlights how the Guardian Centers video is yet another startling indication that authorities in the United States are preparing for civil unrest as America increasingly begins to resemble a militarized police state.

 

U.S. Army Training to Fight Black Americans

LINKS:

Posse Comitatus Act | Posse Comitatus2 | REX 84 | Fema Camps | Fema Camps 2 | Re-education Camps

 

 

 

 

 

ASSASSINATION PROGRAM

Assassination Program

My topic for this evening is “now, it’s assassinations”. What have we allowed ourselves to become? Are we no longer a nation of laws? Have we become instead a nation of men who make secret arrests? Are secret prisons now simply another tool of the federal government law enforcement? Is secret rendition of individuals now permitted out of misplaced fear? Have we decided that the writ of habeas corpus is not worth defending? Is torture now an acceptable tool for making us safe?

Unfortunately, the single answer to all these questions from the leaders of our country to many of our citizens appears to be yes. And now we are told that assassination of foreigners as well as American citizens is legitimate and necessary to provide security for our people. It is my firm opinion that nothing could be further from the truth.

Secret arrests, secret renditions, torture and assassinations are illegal under both domestic and international law. These activities should be anathema to the citizens of a constitutional republic. The real threat doesn’t arise from our failure to torture, rather desensitizing our nation to the willful neglect and sacrifice of our civil liberties fought and died for over the centuries, is the threat.

-- Ron Paul --

 

LINK: Assassination Program

 

 

 

 

 

 

A former Marine Corps Colonel who was stationed in Fallujah and trained Iraqi soldiers warns that the Department of Homeland Security is working with law enforcement to build a “domestic army,” because the federal government is afraid of its own citizens.In this exclusive in studio interview Ret. Col Martino covers the DHS buildup and solutions our overreaching corrupt government officials. 

 

Ret. Marine Col:

DHS Is Prepping For War With Americans

LINKS :

You Are Being Targeted

Assassination Program

Police Trained That Informed Americans Are Terrorists

Doomsday Preppers Will Be Treated As Terrorists

False Flag Event

BORDER CRISIS

WAR IS A RACKET

Posse Comitatus Act

Clergy Response Teams

U.S. Military Killing Its Own Troops!

The NSA (National Security Agency)

Tattle-Tell Squads and Surveillance

Total Despotism in America

NDAA

 

 

 

 

PSYOPS

-- Psychological Operations --

“People in general just will NOT, take their heads out of the sand!”


Psyops, or psychological operations, is a term used to describe the techniques of psychological manipulation used in warfare. These operations are used to deceive, confuse, disrupt and demoralize the enemy, with an aim toward weakening enemy resistance or even causing enemy forces to surrender and enemy populations to capitulate.

NOTES :

http://www.corbettreport.com/psyops-101-an-introduction-to-psychological-operations/
http://www.corbettreport.com/psyops-101-a-brief-history-of-fake-news/
http://www.corbettreport.com/psyops-101-psyops-on-the-homefront/
http://www.corbettreport.com/psyops-101-the-technology-of-psych-warfare/
http://www.corbettreport.com/new-world-next-week-2012111/

 

LINKS:

Police State 1 | Police State 2 | Police State 3 | Police State 4 | Military Illegally on American Streets | Military Training to Take on Americans | DHS Preparing For 7-Year War Against American People | Foreign Troops Training To Confiscate Guns of Americans | Subverting The Public | Propaganda History | Bread and Circus

 

 

 

 

The Future of Fake News
in the Digital Matrix



Truthstream Media | First published at 04:10 UTC on October 20th, 2019. | Our second Bitchute-only vid. Please, if you can, help support us on Patreon.
We're working on our second feature-length film now. Anything and everything helps.
 https://www.patreon.com/truthstreammedia


Lifting of US Propaganda Ban Gives New Meaning to Old Song
 

By Whitney Webb Whitney Webb | February 12th, 2018

Though its ostensible purpose is to fund the U.S. military over a one year period, the National Defense Authorization Act, better known as the NDAA, has had numerous provisions tucked into it over the years that have targeted American civil liberties. The most well-known of these include allowing the government to wiretap American citizens without a warrant and, even more disturbingly, indefinitely imprison an American citizen without charge in the name of “national security.”

One of the lesser-known provisions that have snuck their way into the NDAA over the years was a small piece of legislation tacked onto the NDAA for fiscal year 2013, signed into law in that same year by then-President Barack Obama. Named “The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012,” it completely lifted the long-existing ban on the domestic dissemination of U.S. government-produced propaganda.

For decades, the U.S. government had been allowed to produce and disseminate propaganda abroad in order to drum up support for its foreign wars but had been banned from distributing it domestically after the passage of the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948. However, the Modernization Act’s co-authors, Reps. Mac Thornberry (R-TX) and Adam Smith (D-WA, no relation to the Smith of the 1948 act),  asserted that removing the domestic ban was necessary in order to combat “al-Qaeda’s and other violent extremists’ influence among populations.”

FULL ARTICLE HERE


Links:
 Propaganda History | NDAA | C.I.A. | Media Controllers |  SUBVERSION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Video Shows Troops Training to Intern Citizens in Fort Lauderdale

Martial law-style drill caught on camera


 

by Paul Joseph Watson | March 29, 2015 

Footage out of Fort Lauderdale, Florida shot earlier this week shows military and law enforcement practicing the internment of citizens during martial-law style training.

The clip shows armed troops arresting role players on the street before a column of prisoners are marched towards a mock internment facility. Black Hawk choppers are also seen whizzing between buildings.

 

 

The exercise was accompanied by very little media coverage. A Sun-Sentinel report said that Broward County police would be “assisting members of the U.S. Special Operations Forces who are undergoing urban warfare training.”

The drill, which was held in locations the military refused to disclose beforehand, began on March 17 and ended on Friday. 200 military personnel from all four branches, Air Force, Army, Marines and Navy, took part in the exercise.

“The goal is to prepare participants in realistic, unfamiliar training conditions before they deploy for combat overseas,” states the report. Residents were advised “not to be alarmed by the Black Hawk helicopters in the sky.”

Broward County also saw similar drills back in March 2014, when Navy SEALS practicing storming a university building from a helicopter.

 

Concerns continue to circulate that such drills are designed for dual purpose and are part of a plan to acclimate Americans to accept martial law in a time of national emergency. As we have exhaustively documented, the fact that preparations are being made to use the military during domestic unrest is manifestly provable.

Jade Helm, an upcoming military drill that will involve nine states, caused controversy after Texas and Utah were labeled “hostile” territory in documents related to the exercise.

As we reported earlier this week, the exercise will involve soldiers operating “undetected amongst civilian populations,” to see if they can infiltrate without being noticed.

Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet 

 

 

Mastering The Human Domain

  • Who You Are – Collected information includes names, addresses, biometrics, social media accounts . 
  • What You Do – Travel history, communications, financial transactions and movement of physical assets. 
  • Who You Know – Relational information including family, friends, associates and organizations. 
  • Context – Contextual data such as demographics, politics, cultural norms and religion. 

 

A closer look at the upcoming Jade Helm military exercise, specifically its “master the human domain” motto, reveals a larger agenda in regards to domestic policy.

...“They’re building an infrastructure of tyranny,” stated Infowars David Knight. “There’s a legal infrastructure with things like the NDAA, there’s a technical infrastructure with things like the capability to do dragnet surveillance, and then of course there is going to be a military and law enforcement infrastructure, and those are merging.”

 

Synopsis

 

Full Presentation

 

LINK: TOTAL POPULATION CONTROL

 

 

 

 

LINK : Posse Comitatus Act

 

 

 

 

LINK: Fort A.P. Hill Training Center

 

 

 

 

THE CIA

An independent agency of the United States government responsible for collecting and coordinating intelligence and counterintelligence activities abroad in the national interest; headed by the Director of Central Intelligence under the supervision of the President and National Security Council...There has been considerable criticism of the CIA relating to security and counterintelligence failures, failures in intelligence analysis, human rights concerns, external investigations and document releases, influencing public opinion and law enforcement, drug trafficking, and lying to Congress. In 1987, the former CIA Station Chief in Angola in 1976, John Stockwell, said the CIA is responsible for tens of thousands of covert actions and destablization programs since it was created by Congress with the passage of the National Security Act of 1947. At the time, Stockwell estimated that over 6 million people had died in CIA covert actions.

 

LINK: C.I.A.


 

 

THE FBI

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is a governmental agency belonging to the United StatesDepartment of Justice that serves as both a federal criminal investigative body and an internal intelligence agency (counterintelligence). Also, it is the government agency responsible for investigating crimes on Indian reservations in the United States under the Major Crimes Act. The branch has investigative jurisdiction over violations of more than 200 categories of federal crime. The agency was established in 1908 as the Bureau of Investigation (BOI). Its name was changed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 1935. The agency headquarters is the J. Edgar Hoover Building, located in Washington, D.C. The agency has fifty-six field offices located in major cities throughout the United States, and more than 400 resident agencies in lesser cities and areas across the nation. More than 50 international offices called "legal attachés" exist in U.S. embassies and consulates general worldwide. 

'Federal Bureau of Investigation organizes almost all terror plots in the US' ...The report reveals that the FBI regularly infiltrates communities where they suspect terrorist-minded individuals to be engaging with others. Regardless of their intentions, agents are sent in to converse within the community, find suspects that could potentially carry out “lone wolf” attacks and then, more or less, encourage them to do so. By providing weaponry, funds and a plan, FBI-directed agents will encourage otherwise-unwilling participants to plot out terrorist attacks, only to bust them before any events fully materialize.

 

LINK: F.B.I.

 

 

 

 

 

 

LINK: American Border Debacle

How could there be a War on Terror and actually say that we're having a war against terrorism, and leave the borders wide open? If you were the President of the United States, or I were the President of the United States, and 9/11 really happened the way they want us to believe it happened, the first thing you would do is shut down the borders, so people couldn't get in the country to harm you. But they left the borders wide open. Because the bankers want the borders open, because they want a one-world government. They want a North American Union. They don't want borders here. 9/11 was only a manifestation. It was done to create a fear in the American public, so that we will obey what they want us to do.

LINKS:

THE FAKE WAR ON TERROR | INFAMOUS 9/11 | False Flag Event | ISIS/ALQAEDA | America Armed ISIS!! | Naked Body Scanners | American Border Debacle | Feds Radiating Americans | Illegal Checkpoints In America | Mobile Van Radiating the Public | Police Trained That Informed Americans Are Terrorists | The NSA (National Security Agency) | The Federal Reserve | Fusion Centers | TSA | N.W.O.

It’s no longer Al-Qaeda, it’s now supposedly
your friends and neighbors.  This is the prevailing
meme of every tyrannical fascist regime in history
.

Attorney General Holder: American People Are Terrorists

 

 

 

THE WAR ON TERROR IS AN ABSOLUTE FRAUD

 

 

[OBAMA RELEASES MAJOR TERRORIST ORGANIZERS OF THE TALIBAN]

Could Obama Face Impeachment For Bergdahl release


Total Despotism in America 

What happened in the last few weeks to change the Bergdahal situation? Was he a CIA operative, or was this a failed attempt to take the heat off the VA scandal?

Impeachment now very valid argument
http://www.infowars.com/judge-napolit...

Jay Carney 2013: we won't transfer detainess without consulting congress
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/j...

Obama clearly broke the law
http://www.infowars.com/pro-obama-har...

Is this a ramp up to "White al Qaeda"
http://www.infowars.com/holder-to-cre...

LINK: THE FAKE WAR ON TERROR!

 

 

 

 

 

 

AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

Alex Jones breaks down the bigger picture behind the move to turn the war on terror against American citizens

EVERYONE IS A TERRORIST

White House Tells Parents: Children Could Be Terrorists!

I have told you this was coming. Under the new homeland we are all the enemy in the eyes of the occupiers.

LINKS:

You Are Being Targeted | Assassination Program | [ AL-QAEDA EXPOSED!! ] | Terrorism Big Dirty Secret | AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example | Police Trained That Informed Americans Are Terrorists | Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns | Posse Comitatus Act | Posse Comitatus2 | Police State 1 | Police State 2 | Police State 3 | Police State 4 | The Fake War On Terror

 

In 1991, the Club published The First Global Revolution. It analyses the problems of humanity, calling these collectively or in essence the 'problematique'. It notes (laments) that, historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by enemies in common: "The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome domestic failure and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself - when things become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so used to classifying its neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new weapons devised."

THE GLOBALISTS MOVE FROM THEIR ALQAEDA CREATION, TO FABRICATING HOMEGROWN DOMESTIC TERROR

 

AGENDA 21 Cliven Bundy Case Example

 

C.F.R.

Several years ago, after his popular video “Mad As Hell” was released and Aaron Russo began his campaign to become Governor of Nevada, Russo was noticed by Nicholas Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney. Seeing Russo’s passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the elite’s CFR.  Watch the full interview here: Reflections and Warnings.

 

 

Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And The Fake War On Terror!

Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And The Fake War On Terrorism!

 

LINKS:

Reflections and Warnings | Road to World Government | CASHLESS TRACKABLE SOCIETY | The Fake War On Terror | 911 The Road to Tyranny | INFAMOUS 9/11 | N.W.O. | C.F.R.

 

 

 

 

REACH OUT TO OTHERS

[Help Educate Family And Friends With This Page And The Links Below]

 

 


 

Fema Camps 2

MORE:

Law Enforcement Requested Shooting Targets of Pregnant Women | Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns | DHS Preparing For 7-Year War Against American People | Police Trained That Informed Americans Are Terrorists | Federal Government Moves to Disarm Veterans | Prisons for American Veterans | Assassination Program | NDAA | REX 84 | Police State 1 | Police State 2 | Police State 3 | Police State 4 movie | Fema Camps | Fema Camps 2 | Re-education Camps |

Psywars - The Selling Out of Alex Jones/Infowars

 

 

 

 

  

 

look into it videos


 

 

 

 







  

 

invisible empire

 

 

hollerith dvd

 

 

obama deception

  

Aaron Russo 

 

Terror Storm final cut 

 

  

police state 4

    

blueprint of madmen

 

endgame

 

documentaries