Heading up the renewed
push for those controversial, clothes-penetrating scanners at airports is former homeland security
Chertoff...when Chertoff launched into his
pitch for full-body scanners onCampbell
Brown tonight, we learned that he is paid by the
very companies who make the penetrating devices
Mark Dice Challenges Michelle Obama To Prove Body
Scanners NoninvasiveAnd Safe
Heading up the renewed push
for those controversial, clothes-penetrating scanners at airports is former homeland security
Chertoff. His consulting firm represents companies who make the
scanners, but you wouldn't know it from reading the papers.
Bomber alerted the world to the possibility of terrorists putting
bombs in their underpants. So noweveryone is debating whether we should deploy
scanners which can see through clothes and show bombs nestled close to terrorists' nekkid bodies. Michael
Chertoff, who was Bush's homeland security secretary from 2005-2009, is a huge fan! Yesterday
A couple of years ago we began the process of testing them to see, first of
all, if they worked and second, if they could be deployed without unduly restricting the flow of traffic. And
the good news is that we were able to demonstrate that they were successful. We could use them without slowing
up traffic and we could also protect privacy.
But when Chertoff launched into his pitch for full-body scanners
Brown tonight, we learned that he is paid by the very companies
who make the penetrating devices:
Chertoff is a former homeland security secretary and the founder of the Chertoff Group, a
security consulting firm whose clients include manufacturers of full-body scanners.
In 2009, Chertoff founded
Group, a security consulting agency. The Chertoff Group's client list is
unknown—Chertoffrefused to talk about it in an interview—but he
admits in the clip above that some of his clients manufacture full-body scanners.
Yet when he appears inThe New York
The Washington Post, and onNPR to advocate for full-body scanning, Chertoff is
identified only as a former secretary of homeland security. No mention is made of the Chertoff Group. ("If they'd
been deployed, this would pick up this kind of device," he tells theTimes.) Did Chertoff 'forget' to tell reporters about
his connection to the industry he's pimping in their stories? It didn't look like he was about to volunteer the
information on Campbell Brown tonight. (Good catch, though, Campbell. We always knew there had to be some reason
you had your own show!)
So, here is a service to all you journalists working on upcoming articles about
full-body scanners, which will inevitably feature Chertoff playing the cheerleader. Feel free to copy this sentence
and paste it after Chertoff's name:
Big Sis Caught Lying To The American
Homeland Security head Janet Napolitano, now
forever known as Big Sis -- a reference to George Orwell's 1984 -- has been caught telling some big lies in an
attempt to quell an enormous public backlash against the full body scanning technology and invasive pat-down
procedures that have been implemented by the TSA in airports nationwide. In a blatant propaganda piece published by
USA Today, Napolitano describes the scanning machines as safe and the pat-downs as "discreet", in the face of a
flood of complaints from scientists, pilots, flight attendants, privacy groups, parents, Muslim groups and everyday
passengers, all rebelling against over the top security. "AIT machines are safe, efficient, and protect passenger
privacy." Napolitano writes in an article in which every single claim she makes can be easily disproved and
revealed to be outright lies. Lie: The scanners are safe "They have been independently evaluated by the Food and
Drug Administration, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the Johns Hopkins University Applied
Physics Laboratory, who have all affirmed their safety." Napolitano claims, expecting the public to simply swallow
the claim that NIST and the FDA are somehow "independent" of the federal government. As for Johns Hopkins
University declaring the scanners safe, tell it to Dr Michael Love, who runs an X-ray lab at the department of
biophysics and biophysical chemistry at the Johns Hopkins school of medicine. Love told AFP two days ago that
"statistically someone is going to get skin cancer from these X-rays". "...we have a situation at the airports
where people are so eager to fly that they will risk their lives in this manner," he added. So, unless you count
skin cancer as safe, Napolitano is lying to you.
Shock Security Report: TSA Has a 95%
Failure Rate Finding Weapons and Explosives
June 1st, 2015
With an annual budget of over $7 billion Transportation Security
Administration officials claim that they set the standard for excellence in transportation security and
But a recent investigation reveals that when undercover operatives attempted to smuggle banned weapons and even
explosives through checkpoints nationwide the TSA failed to stop them 95% of the time.
The shocking security report shows that despite the
billions of dollars spent and the millions of American citizens being inconvenienced, and often humiliated,
America’s airports are no safer today than they were before the attacks of September 11th, 2001:
An internal investigation of the Transportation Security Administration revealed security failures at dozens
of the nation’s busiest airports, where undercover investigators were able to smuggle mock explosives or banned
weapons through checkpoints in 95 percent of trials, ABC News has learned.
The series of tests were conducted by Homeland Security Red Teams who pose as passengers, setting
out to beat the system.
According to officials briefed on the results of a recent Homeland Security Inspector General’s
report, TSA agents failed 67 out of 70 tests, with Red Team members repeatedly able to get potential weapons
In one test an undercover agent was stopped after setting off an alarm at a magnetometer, but TSA screeners
failed to detect a fake explosive device that was taped to his back during a follow-on pat down.
Officials would not divulge the exact time period of the testing other than to say it concluded
The government claims that because undercover “Red Teams”
are familiar with TSA protocols and vulnerabilities the security investigation results are not reflective of real
world results. According to former TSA administrator John Pistole that because these “super terrorists” have access
to TSA procedures “they can create and devise and conceal items that … not even the
best terrorists would be able to do.”
In effect the government is telling us that even though TSA failed to catch 95% of the explosives and weapons
being smuggled onto planes, Americans have nothing to worry about because an actual terrorist would never know how
to compromise the system. A real terrorist, whose sole purpose in life is to kill as many Americans as possible,
would not have the time, resources, commitment or brains to identify weak points and gather intelligence about the
vulnerabilities within the TSA’s security protocols.
And as for those highly secretive protocols, perhaps if the TSA focused on searching potential terrorists before
they board public transportation, as opposed to pat-downs of moms and their children after they disembark from their travels, they’d be a bit more successful in stopping people
who were trying to smuggle weapons aboard.
But no matter how wasteful or ineffective the Transportation Security Administration may be with respect to
their actual duties, there are still those, fully one-third actually, who have succumbed to the years of propaganda
and would gladly and without protest accept a full body cavity search for the privilege of flying.
The TSA has quietly admitted there is no actual
“threat-addressing” basis for employing nude body scanners or invasive pat down procedures at airports, a notion
many travelers who are weary of the federal agency’s borderline sexual molestation have long suspected but were
hard-pressed to prove.
The TSA understands body scanners and pat downs are ineffective at addressing a threat
for which they admit “there is no evidence.”
The evidence was found in
sealed court documents, available through the PACER.gov website, regarding engineer and blogger Jon Corbett’s ongoing litigation over
the constitutionality of the agency’s loathsome security practices.
In a redacted version of the appellant’s brief, filed by Corbett on October 7 with the United States Court of
Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, several portions of the Summary of Facts section were blacked out,
raising questions as to the nature of the censored information.
But in a sealed version of the same documents obtained through PACER.gov (and available here), the redacted sections appear with incriminating clarity.
Through Redactions, TSA Admits Terror Threats are Slim to Nonexistent
Redaction shows TSA is aware explosives on airplanes “are extremely rare.’ (click to
A section detailing how “The TSA Has Misled The Public As to the Likelihood of the Threat
‘Addressed’ By Nude Body Scanners and Pat Downs,” includes a blacked out portion concerning the TSA’s knowledge
that “explosives on airplanes are extremely rare.”
“For example, the TSA analyzed hijackings in 2007 and found 7 hijacking incidents across the globe, but none of
them involved actual explosive devices,” Corbett explains in the brief, adding that the last attempt to bring an
explosive onboard an airplane through a U.S. airport occurred 35 years ago.
Another redacted section highlights the government’s concession that, “due to hardened cockpit doors and the
willingness of passengers to challenge hijackers,” it would be difficult to have a repeat of 9/11.
“The government also credits updated pre-flight security for that difficulty assessment,” the brief states, “but
the assessment was written before the en masse deployment of body scanners and before the update to the
pat down procedure. Further, the government admits that there have been no attempted domestic hijackings of any
kind in the 12 years since 9/11.”
The TSA also had the following section completely censored:
This begs the question, then, of what evidence the government possesses to rationalize that we should be so
afraid of non-metallic explosives being brought aboard flights departing from the U.S. that we must sacrifice
our civil liberties. The answer: there is none. “As of mid-2011, terrorist threat groups present in the
Homeland are not known to be actively plotting against civil aviation targets or airports; instead, their focus
is on fundraising, recruiting, and propagandizing.”
In the brief’s Summary of Argument, another redacted portion concerns the
TSA’s understanding that body scanners and pat downs are ineffective at addressing a threat for which they admit
“there is no evidence.”
By redacting certain parts of the brief, the TSA also inadvertently admits “it is aware of no
one who is currently plotting a terror attack against our aviation system using explosives (non-metallic
or otherwise),” and that, in addition to a cabin of empowered passengers who would make short work of a hijacker,
the Federal Flight Deck Officer program, which arms pilots with firearms, makes targeting an airplane “to be the
definition of insanity.”
Get the TSA Out of Our Pants
The redactions in Corbett’s court
documents are a damning indictment of the TSA’s procedures, and only serve to bolster his claims’
The 28-year-old entrepreneur arrived at his conclusions after admittedly “pawing through several thousand pages
of the TSA’s ‘administrative record,’” which he says the TSA uses as the “alleged rationale behind why they must
photograph us naked and literally put their hands in our pants to search us.”
The information contained within the redacted portions support what Infowars and others have long suspected:
that the sprawling agency – which is in the process of extending beyond the airport and onto highways, train stations and public buses – was never meant to thwart terrorists, but was instead set up to
purposely obstruct, annoy, harass and train the American public.
In other words, the court documents go a long way in proving the TSA is pure contrived security theater
custom-made solely to indoctrinate Americans, through prisoner training, into blindly accepting obedience to
authority as a normal way of life, not to mention a huge waste of about $7.91 billion in taxpayer money a year.
A man is attempting to file a lawsuit against the TSA after
claiming his baby ended up face down on the floor bleeding as a result of TSA workers breaking his son's cradle
carrier at Newark Liberty Airport.
Document reveals delegation was allowed to skip secondary
Paul Joseph Watson
January 20, 2014
A newly released document obtained via a
Freedom of Information Act request confirms that the State Department ordered the Department of Homeland Security
to spare members of the Muslim Brotherhood traveling to the US in 2012 a TSA pat down or any kind of secondary
The one page document (PDF), obtained by the Investigative Project
on Terrorism, shows that members of a Muslim Brotherhood delegation traveling through Minneapolis Airport, New
York’s John F. Kennedy Airport and Dulles Airport were handed expedited entry known as “port courtesy,” which is
normally reserved for high ranking government officials and dignitaries. At the time, the Muslim Brotherhood’s
candidate Mohamed Morsi, later deposed, had not been elected president.
The document contains four separate entries which include a directive that Muslim Brotherhood
members, “not be pulled into secondary upon arrival at a point of entry.” As well as a TSA pat down, secondary
screening involves carry on luggage being inspected by hand and the use of puffer explosive detectors.
Two following entries confirm that Muslim Brotherhood members traveled through both JFK and Dulles
Airports “smoothly” and “without incident” after the DHS had been alerted about “port courtesies”.
Another entry reads; “MB delegate departure: In response to a request from the MB, the desk worked
with the office of Foreign Missions to arrange for TSA to escort the last member of the visiting MB delegation,
Abdul Mawgoud Dardery, through security at Minneapolis Airport and JFK Airport on April 15. We did not hear
anything further from the MB, so we assume the departure went smoothly. In the coming days, we’re going to write
down a list of procedures for dealing with MB visits to the United States.”
The IPT also highlights the fact that individuals traveling from Syria to give speaking tours in
the United States, people like Sheik Osama al-Rifai, that have openly endorsed Al-Qaeda militant groups under the
banner of the the Islamic Front, are being handed visas by the State Department with no questions asked.
While completely innocent Americans continue to be subjected to invasive TSA grope down procedures
and placed on no fly lists for no reason whatsoever, members of a group with direct links to terrorism were given
VIP treatment by the State Department, the TSA and the Department of Homeland Security.
The U.S. State Department is refusing to
comment days after it emerged that they ordered the Department of Homeland Security to give members of a Muslim
Brotherhood delegation traveling to the United States VIP treatment so they could bypass airport security.
The story first emerged first appeared on Friday last week after the
Project on Terrorism obtained a document (PDF) as a result of a FOIA request proving
that Muslim Brotherhood members traveling through Minneapolis Airport, New York’s John F. Kennedy Airport and
Dulles Airport were handed “port courtesies,” with the State Department telling the DHS to ensure the men “not
be pulled into secondary upon arrival at a point of entry.”
After the influential Drudge Report picked up an
the story went viral, but no explanation has been offered by the State Department as to why it afforded members of
a group with links to terrorism special treatment allowing them to bypass airport security.
Although such treatment is commonplace when applied to visiting dignitaries affiliated with elected
officials, the Muslim Brotherhood candidate Mohamed Morsi had not been elected president at the time of the visit
in April 2012. One of the delegation had also been involved in a previous child pornography investigation in the
Following its involvement in bombing police headquarters, the Muslim Brotherhood was declared a
terrorist organization by the Egyptian government last month.
Could America’s security have been put at risk by people working inside the State Department?
Earlier this month, retired U.S. Air Force Gen. Tom McInerney made the explosive
claim that there were “at least 10 or 15″ Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers working for the State
Whether that’s true or not, the story has prompted fury amongst Americans sick of being treated
like terrorists by the TSA while the federal government rolls out the red carpet for people involved with a group
that has actual links to terrorism.
Numerous news organizations, including Infowars as well as
the Blaze and the New
York Post, have contacted the State Department over the last 48 hours asking for clarification but no response
has been forthcoming. According to the Post, “The State Department had no comment.”
Given the State Department’s disastrous public relations campaign in connection with the Benghazi
scandal, we’re not holding our breath.
James O’Keefe Crosses The US-Mexico
Border Dressed As Osama Bin Laden O’Keefe: “I see no border patrol. I see no security."
by Patrick Howley | Daily Caller | August 11, 2014
Investigative filmmaker James O’Keefe exposes
the U.S.-Mexico border’s vulnerability to terrorism in his latest undercover project, obtained exclusively by
The Daily Caller.
O’Keefe’s Project Veritas video reminds viewers of recent statements by the president and Obama
administration officials that the southern border is secure. O’Keefe then proceeds to Hudspeth County, Texas, to
easily cross back and forth cross the Rio Grande wearing the costume of modern history’s most recognizable
“I see no border patrol. I see no
security,” O’Keefe said in the video before donning a bin Laden mask. “Thousands of people have stood in my
footsteps right now. They’ve come from South America, Honduras, Guatemala, and they’ve all crossed the border.
And if they can cross, anybody can cross.” (RELATED: The Time Fidel Castro Snuck Into America From Mexico)
O’Keefe’s work often distinguishes itself for proving taboo but accurate premises – in this case,
that Islamic extremists are able to gain entry to the United States from Mexico, where drug cartels are linked
to numerous terrorist organizations including Hezbollah and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS), the
strongest al-Qaida-like organization in the heart of the Middle East.
This summer has seen a whirlwind of terrorist activity on the southern border, with dire anecdotes
pouring out of local news stations but ignored by the mainstream press. Security contractors found a Muslim
prayer rug on the Arizona border, where 300 extremists affiliated with al-Qaida’s Somalia syndicate al-Shabab
recently entered the United States unaccounted for. Terrorist watch-list suspects were also detained trying to
get into the country through California. Country music legend Charlie Daniels revealed that, “I personally spoke
with an Arizona law enforcement officer who had taken four what he called ‘Taliban’ out of the back of an 18
Relevant on the contemporary merits, O’Keefe’s video also makes an important symbolic point
thirteen confusing years after the attacks of 9/11. The terrorists we’re fighting today are more technologically
savvy than their idol Osama bin Laden, the self-designed political figure who tried to fire history’s loudest
shot. But their motives have not changed. And they have access to the United States.
How could there be aWar on Terror and actually say that we're having
awar against terrorism, and leave the
borders wide open? If you were the President of the United States, or I were the President of the United States,
and9/11 really happened the way they
want us to believe it happened, the first thing you would do is shut down the borders, so people couldn't get in
the country to harm you. But they left the borders wide open. Becausethe bankers want the borders open, because they want
aone-world government. They
want a North American Union. They don't want borders
here.9/11 was only a manifestation.
It was done to create afear in the
American public, so that we willobey what they want us to do.
An independent agency of the United States government responsible for
collecting and coordinating intelligence and counterintelligence activities abroad in the national
interest; headed by the Director of Central Intelligence under the supervision of the President and
National Security Council...There has been considerable criticism of the CIA relating to security
and counterintelligence failures, failures in intelligence analysis, human rights concerns,
external investigations and document releases, influencing public opinion and law enforcement, drug
trafficking, and lying to Congress. In 1987, the former CIA Station Chief in Angola in 1976, John
Stockwell, said the CIA is responsible for tens of thousands of covert actions and destablization
programs since it was created by Congress with the passage of the National Security Act of
1947.At the time, Stockwell estimated that over 6
million people had died in CIA covert actions.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is a governmental agency
belonging to the United StatesDepartment of Justice that serves as both a federal criminal
investigative body and an internal intelligence agency (counterintelligence). Also, it is the
government agency responsible for investigating crimes on Indian reservations in the United States
under the Major Crimes Act. The branch has investigative jurisdiction over violations of more than
200 categories of federal crime. The agency was established in 1908 as the Bureau of Investigation
(BOI). Its name was changed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 1935. The agency
headquarters is the J. Edgar Hoover Building, located in Washington, D.C. The agency has fifty-six
field offices located in major cities throughout the United States, and more than 400 resident
agencies in lesser cities and areas across the nation. More than 50 international offices called
"legal attachés" exist in U.S. embassies and consulates general worldwide.
'Federal Bureau of Investigation organizes almost
all terror plots in the US' ...The report reveals that the FBI regularly infiltrates communities
where they suspect terrorist-minded individuals to be engaging with others. Regardless of their
intentions, agents are sent in to converse within the community, find suspects that could
potentially carry out “lone wolf” attacks and then, more or less, encourage them to do so. By
providing weaponry, funds and a plan, FBI-directed agents will encourage otherwise-unwilling
participants to plot out terrorist attacks, only to bust them before any events fully
Every victim of a crime in Michigan is entitled to make a statement in
open court regarding the impact of the crime on their life. The statement is limited to the victim's physical,
emotional and financial well being as it relates to the crime. Keep that in mind as you read my statement. Below is
a copy of the victim impact statement I gave today at the Underwear Bomber sentencing hearing. When reading my
statement, keep in mind that I am a practicing attorney in the State of Michigan. In addition, I regularly practice
in the Court the hearings are taking place at and therefore, I am somewhat limited as to what I can say. We were
limited to 5 minutes each.
I wish to thank the Court for allowing me these 5 minutes to make my statement. My
references to the government in this statement refer to the Federal Government excluding this Court and the
prosecution. On Christmas Day 2009, my wife and I were returning from an African safari and had a connecting flight
through Amsterdam. As we waited for our flight, we sat on the floor next to the boarding gate. What I witnessed
while sitting there and subsequent events have changed my life forever. While I sat there, I witnessed Umar dressed
in jeans and a white t-shirt, being escorted around security by a man in a tan suit who spoke perfect American
English and who aided Umar in boarding without a passport. The airline gate worker initially refused Umar boarding
until the man in the tan suit intervened. The event meant nothing to me at the time. Little did I know that Umar
would try to kill me a few hours later as our flight approached Detroit. The final 10 minutes of our flight after
the attack were the worst minutes of my life. During those 10 minutes I sat paralyzed in fear. Unfortunately, what
happened next has had an even greater impact on my life and has saddened me further.
Umar Farouk Abdulmatallab aka
The Underwear Bomber
This story is particularly important because it is the event that ushered in the
naked body scanners that are now in place in many U.S. airports. If you research
deeper into this topic you will find that many of these scanners were ordered before the
supposed terrorist event (UNDERWEAR BOMBER) took place.
Kurt Haskell Witness to Government False Flag Part
Kurt Haskell Witness to Government False Flag Part 2
Kurt Haskell Witness to
Government False Flag Part 3
Kurt Haskell Witness to
Government False Flag Part 4
Kurt Haskell Witness to Government False Flag Part
Kurt Haskell Witness to
Government False Flag Part 6
Kurt Haskell Witness to
Government False Flag Part 7
A former Marine Corps Colonel who was stationed
in Fallujah and trained Iraqi soldiers warns that the Department of Homeland Security is working with law
enforcement to build a “domestic army,” because the federal government is afraid of its own citizens.
In this exclusive in studio interview Ret. Col Martino covers the DHS buildup and solutions our overreaching
corrupt government officials.
It remains to
be seen how many Americans will keep buying the proven lies from their government (note the links
below). Time will soon tell if the people of this nation have the good sense to face that they are
being lied to, or succumb to government propaganda and
Ex-propagandist for the
KGB,Yuri Bezmenov, had this to say
about demoralizing a people :
"As I mentioned
before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to
assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic
proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it.... That's the tragedy of the situation of
In addition to images of President Obama’s address
to the American public on Sunday night, it has emerged that the dramatic photos of Obama, Biden, Hillary
Clinton and members of the White House security team watching the assassination of Bin Laden “live” were in
fact completely staged, casting further doubt on the ever-changing official account of the
The staging of the Obama speech photo is
embarrassing, but the staging of the situation room photos, which were heavily promoted by the establishment
media, falsely presented as evidence that Obama, Biden and Clinton saw the assassination of Osama live, and
used by the White House to lend credence to the fairytale they were busily scripting, are
DHS Gave Muslim Brotherhood VIP Treatment,
NO TSA PAT DOWNS
A newly released document obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request confirms that
the State Department ordered the Department of Homeland Security to spare members of the Muslim Brotherhood
traveling to the US in 2012 a TSA pat down or any kind of secondary screening.
The one page document (PDF), obtained by the Investigative Project on Terrorism, shows
that members of a Muslim Brotherhood delegation traveling through Minneapolis Airport, New York’s John F. Kennedy
Airport and Dulles Airport were handed expedited entry known as “port courtesy,” which is normally reserved for
high ranking government officials and dignitaries. At the time, the Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate Mohamed Morsi,
later deposed, had not been elected president.
Bin Laden was a strawman-villain concocted by the Western
intelligence apparatus to take the blame for the orchestrated terror that is scripted and carried out by the
globalist-allied factions. The Phantom Osama bin Laden was a skeleton key opening the door to foreign intervention
in the middle east or anywhere al Qaeda might be. The motive is simple-- ever-expanding wars for the military
industrial complex, and the often more lucrative periods of reconstruction (i.e. you break it, you buy it). The
occupation continues here at home with the creation of a police state supposedly meant to combat
Infowars is set to commission a poll by a professional polling agency that will ask Americans if
they are willing to submit to a TSA anal cavity search in order to fly. We reckon a solid 10-20 per cent would say
yes. What other questions should be asked in order to illustrate how much indignity travelers will tolerate?
Poll: One Third of Americans Want to be
The logical conclusion of a new Harris poll is that one third of Americans actually want to be
slaves. We are in a lot of trouble and we're running out of time
In 1991, the Club published The First Global
Revolution. It analyses the problems of humanity, calling these collectively or in essence the 'problematique'. It
notes (laments) that, historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by enemies in common:
"The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome domestic failure
and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself - when things
become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face
an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the
traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those
whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so used to classifying its
neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and
public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new
THE GLOBALISTSMOVE FROM THEIRALQAEDA
CREATION,TO FABRICATING HOMEGROWN DOMESTIC
A failed attempt to recruit Aaron Russo resulted in recent
light being shed on the CFR...And The Fake War On Terror!
ago, after his popular video “Mad As Hell” was released and Aaron Russo began his campaign to become
Governor of Nevada, Russo was noticed by Nicholas Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney. Seeing
Russo’s passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the
elite’s CFR. Watch the full interview here: Reflections and
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And
The Fake War On Terror!
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And The Fake War On
"I freed a thousand slaves; I
could have freed a thousand more, if only they knew they were slaves."
Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who
are constantly and intelligently on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic
"A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time,
not on the spot, not here and now and in their calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other
worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the
encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it.”