"
|
|||||||||||||||
welcome |
|||||||||||||||
Medical Martial Law 2020 | The Corbett Report | First published at 20:59 UTC on March 21st, 2020. SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=35444 As the lockdowns go into place and the military takes to the streets in country after country, the decades of preparation for medical martial law are finally paying off forthe pandemic planners. Today on this emergency edition of The Corbett Report podcast, James lays out the steps that have led us to the brink of martial law and the steps that are being taken to implement it now. Please help to spread this important information and to raise awareness of the crisis that we are facing.
"Here’s the bottom line. You are not supposed to wait 2 or 4 years for some new politicians to get in office and give your permission to be free. You are not supposed to wait 2 or 4 or 6 years for some federal court to tell you, “ok, you be free now.” You are supposed to stand up resist, refuse to comply and nullify unconstitutional federal acts – as soon as they happen. All the money and time you throw at firing congress or winning in federal court will never, ever work – unless you start resisting right here in your state. And, that resistance needs to be your first response, not your last." - Michael Boldin, Article: James Madison: How to Stop the Federal Government
By: Michael Boldin|Published on: Dec 15, 2014 In response to federal overreach, most people tend to focus on three types of actions to stop them: elections, conventions, and lawsuits. While they all have their place in an overall strategy to defend the Constitution, none of them should be the first step forward. That is, if you follow the advice of the “Father of the Constitution.” Here’s what James Madison had to say in Federalist #46. The Influence of the State and Federal Governments Compared:
Let me translate. Madison said that when the federal government passes an unconstitutional measure there are powerful methods to oppose it – amongst the people and in the states. He also pointed out that those methods were available even for warrantable, that is constitutional, measures. Madison told us of four things that should be done to resist federal powers, whether merely unpopular, or unconstitutional. 1. Disquietude of the people – Madison expected the people would throw a fit when the feds usurped power – even using the word “repugnance” to describe their displeasure. That leads to the next step. 2. Repugnance and Refusal to co-operate with the officers of the Union – Noncompliance. The #1 dictionary of the time defined repugnance as “disobedient; not obsequious” (compliant). If you want to stop the federal government, you have to disobey them. Madison also suggested that people would perhaps directly refuse to cooperate with federal agents. This is an approach we preach here every day at the Tenth Amendment Center. James Madison apparently knew what we know today. The feds rely on cooperation from state and local governments, as well as individuals. When enough people refuse to comply, they simply can’t enforce their so-called laws. 3, The frowns of the executive magistracy of the State – Here Madison envisions governors formally protesting federal actions. This not only raises public awareness; executive leadership will also lead to the next step – legislative action. 4. Legislative devices, which would often be added on such occasions – Madison keeps this open-ended, and in the years soon after, which I’ll cover shortly, we learn how both he and Thomas Jefferson applied this step. Madison also told us that if several adjoining States would do the same it would be an effective tool to stop federal acts. To repeat, he said that doing this “would present obstructions which the federal government would hardly be willing to encounter.” Judge Andrew Napolitano agreed recently and said that people need to stop enforcing unconstitutional federal laws. He also said that if you could get an entire state doing this, it would make federal laws “nearly impossible to enforce.” What’s important to note here, are some glaring omissions. The powerful means that Madison told us would be used to oppose federal power successfully did NOT include federal lawsuits in federal courts. He also did NOT include “voting the bums out” as a strategy, either. FIRST RESPONSE Compare that with how people generally respond to what they consider unconstitutional or unpopular federal acts today. The first thing I tend to hear from people who are opposed to a federal act is the “vote the bums out” mantra. We’ll fire congress, right? Or some people tell us we have to sue and let the courts decide. I’ve got some news for you. There’s nothing from the founders – anywhere – in which they tell us that our first response to extreme, repeated violations of the constitution and liberty is to vote the bums out, or sue the feds in federal court. Nothing. LEGISLATIVE DEVICES Thomas Jefferson followed up on this in 1798 with the same kind of advice. That year, the Adams administration passed a wildly unconstitutional attack on the freedom of speech with the Alien and Sedition Acts. In response, while sitting as vice-president, Jefferson secretly drafted the Kentucky Resolutions, and here’s a little of what he wrote:
Madison was consistent in his views on this. In 1798, he also drafted and help pass something known as the Virginia Resolutions, a state-level “legislative device” in response to the Alien and Sedition Acts. Here’s a key part:
Like Madison advised in Federalist #46, both he and Thomas Jefferson advised a state-level response to dangerous federal acts. In 1798, neither of them even mentioned voting or lawsuits. Jefferson told us that a “nullification is the rightful remedy.” And Madison told us that states are “duty-bound to interpose.” When Daniel Webster called on these same principles in response to military conscription plans during the war of 1812, he said:
Here’s the bottom line. You are not supposed to wait 2 or 4 years for some new politicians to get in office and give your permission to be free. You are not supposed to wait 2 or 4 or 6 years for some federal court to tell you, “ok, you be free now.” You are supposed to stand up resist, refuse to comply and nullify unconstitutional federal acts – as soon as they happen. All the money and time you throw at firing congress or winning in federal court will never, ever work – unless you start resisting right here in your state. And, that resistance needs to be your first response, not your last.
How could there be a War on Terror and actually say that we're having a war against terrorism, and leave the borders wide open? If you were the President of the United States, or I were the President of the United States, and 9/11 really happened the way they want us to believe it happened, the first thing you would do is shut down the borders, so people couldn't get in the country to harm you. But they left the borders wide open. Because the bankers want the borders open, because they want a one-world government. They want a North American Union. They don't want borders here. 9/11 was only a manifestation. It was done to create a fear in the American public, so that we will obey what they want us to do.
LINKS: THE FAKE WAR ON TERROR | INFAMOUS 9/11 | False Flag Event | ISIS/ALQAEDA | America Armed ISIS!! | Naked Body Scanners | American Border Debacle | Feds Radiating Americans | Illegal Checkpoints In America | Mobile Van Radiating the Public | Police Trained That Informed Americans Are Terrorists | The NSA (National Security Agency) | The Federal Reserve | Fusion Centers | TSA | N.W.O.
She was forced to remove and show her prosthetic breast to a TSA
Flight attendant and cancer survivor Cathy Bossi of Charlotte, N.C., said she was forced to remove and show her prosthetic breast to a TSA agent during a security pat-down at Charlotte Douglas International Airport. (WBTV)
TSA Humiliates Tom Sawyer of Romulus, Mich,
Child Forced To Remove His Shirt And Is Groped
Like ‘Being Raped’: Elderly Woman Describes TSA Pat Down in St. Louis
TSA Pull Pants Off 71 Year Old Man with Knee Implant
An ABC News employee said she was subject to a "demeaning" search at Newark Liberty International Airport Sunday morning. "The woman who checked me reached her hands inside my underwear and felt her way around," she said. "It was basically worse than going to the gynecologist. It was embarrassing. It was demeaning. It was inappropriate."
TSA Laughs at you Naked [vid] Alex discusses how the TSA are a bunch of degenerates who just do what they want and lie to the
public.
TSA Loudspeakers Threaten Travelers With Arrest For Joking About Security Prisoner training: Don’t complain about your grope down
Paul Joseph Watson Travelers who crack jokes about the TSA’s ludicrous security procedures could face arrest, according to a new loudspeaker warning being broadcast at airports in the U.S.
While traveling through George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston, Matt Miller heard a security announcement repeatedly aired on the airport intercom that left him disturbed. “You are also reminded that any inappropriate remarks or jokes concerning security may result in your arrest,” the loudspeaker message states. These new loudspeaker warnings remind us that the TSA continues to excel at indoctrinating Americans to be well-behaved prisoners via obedience training – reminding them that they can be disappeared if they dare speak out of turn, even in a humorous way. This is a totally unlawful and illegitimate violation of the First Amendment and is obviously designed to intimidate travelers and stop them from complaining about aggressive grope downs which in some cases involve TSA workers touching travelers’ genitals. The message is clear – grovel and enjoy your genitals being groped or face arrest. The prospect of travelers cracking jokes about airport security procedures is by no means unlikely given the increasing absurdity of the policies being enforced by the TSA. As we reported last year, perhaps the mose ludicrous example is the TSA’s “freeze” policy, where travelers are ordered to stand in place like statues while TSA agents resolve some unexplained security threat. The TSA has also provoked controversy by implementing other preposterous policies which have a tenuous security justification, most notably a procedure where TSA agents test travelers’ drinks for explosives after they have already passed through security and purchased beverages inside the secure area of the airport. H/T: Police State USA Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71 ********************* Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News. This article was posted: Friday, October 11, 2013 at 10:28 am Tags: police state, tsa
TSA Responds To Announcements Of Arresting Joking Passengers [vid] We've learned that in Houston, TX airline passengers were told that they could be arrested if
they mocked the TSA.
TSA 'Detention Pods' Coming to an Airport Near You Travelers are forced to be bottlenecked through the pods as they leave the airport terminal. A
robotic voice gives instructions to wait inside the pod until a green light is shown and the door opens.
FEAR PROPAGANDA: Get felt up or fined… The choice is
yours.
Any passenger
who refuse the new TSA gropings may face $11,000 fines and possible arrest If you don’t want to pass through an airport scanner that allows security agents to see an image of your naked body or to undergo the alternative, a thorough manual search, you may have to find another way to travel this holiday season. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is warning that any would-be commercial airline passenger who enters an airport checkpoint and then refuses to undergo the method of inspection designated by TSA will not be allowed to fly and also will not be permitted to simply leave the airport. That person will have to remain on the premises to be questioned by the TSA and possibly by local law enforcement. Anyone refusing faces fines up to $11,000 and possible arrest. “Once a person submits to the screening process, they can not just decide to leave that process,” says Sari Koshetz, regional TSA spokesperson, based in Miami. Koshetz said such passengers would be questioned “until it is determined that they don’t pose a threat” to the public. Palm Beach Sheriff’s Office spokesperson Teri Barbera said PBSO deputies stationed at the airport would become involved when requested by the TSA. “We will handle each incident on a case-by-case basis,” she said. No one will be forcibly searched or arrested “just because they refuse to go through the security procedures,” Barbera said. “That may rise to the level of suspicious behavior for the TSA, but it wouldn’t rise to the level of suspicious behavior for a deputy,” she said. But Barbera said that if a person is judged to be a possible threat, deputies are legally permitted to detain and search that individual. “The deputies will do it at the airport just as they would do it anywhere else,” she said.
HANDS IN YOUR PANTS TO DRIVE YOU
Shoe Fitting X-Ray Device HOWEVER, WHEN IT COMES TO RADIATION, LET'S NOT FORGET THE SHOE-FITING FLUOROSCOPE...HISTORY IS INDEED BEING REPEATED, NEVERTHELESS, HOW MANY WILL HAVE TO SUFFER BEFORE THE EFFECTS ON THE BODY ARE TRULY KNOWN? THE FLOUROSCOPE IS NOW ARCHIVED IN A BOOK TITLED: QUACK, TALES OF MEDICAL FRAUD.
Shoe Fitting X-Ray Device
In the late 1940's and early 1950's, the shoe-fitting x-ray unit was a common shoe store sales promotion device and nearly all stores had one. It was estimated that there were 10,000 of these devices in use. This particular shoe-fitting x-ray unit was produced by the dominant company in the field, the Adrian X-Ray Company of Milwaukee WI, now defunct. Brooks Stevens, a noted industrial designer whose works included the the Milwaukee Road Olympian and an Oscar Meyer Wienermobile, designed this machine. [Large image 27K]
The primary component of a shoe-fitting x-ray unit was the fluoroscope which consisted essentially of an x-ray tube mounted near the floor and wholly or partially enclosed in a shielded box and a fluorescent screen. The x-rays penetrated the shoes and feet and then struck the fluorescent light. This resulted in an image of the feet within the shoes. The fluorescent image was reflected to three viewing ports at the top of the cabinet, where the customer, the salesperson, and a third person (your mother?) could view the image at the same time. The radiation hazards associated with shoe fitting x-ray units were recognized as early as 1950. The machines were often out of adjustment and were constructed so radiation leaked into the surrounding area. By 1970, shoe fitting x-ray units had been banned in 33 states including Minnesota and strict regulation in the remaining 17 states made their operation impractical. Believe it or not, this particular shoe-fitting x-ray unit was found in 1981 in a department store in Madison, West Virginia. It was still being used in the store's shoe department! When it was pointed out to the store managers that it was against West Virginia law to operate a shoe-fitting x-ray unit, they donated it to the The U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Safety Concerns and the Legislative Response In 1946, the American Standards Association established a “safe standard or tolerance dose,” that the feet receive no more than 2 R per 5 second exposure. Children were not to receive more than 12 such exposures in a single year. The State of New York adopted similar requirements in 1948, and other states and major cities began to follow suit. As a result, the manufacturers of shoe fitting fluoroscopes became concerned that their products would have to meet a myriad of standards that varied from location to location, and they asked the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) to recommend a uniform set of standards. The ACGIH did so and issued their guidance in 1950, an event that allowed the manufacturers to advertise that they met the ACGIH standards. By the early 1950s, a number of professional organizations had issued warnings about the continued use of shoe-fitting fluoroscopes, e.g., the ACGIH, American College of Surgeons, New York Academy of Medicine and the American College of Radiology. At the same time, the District of Columbia issued regulations that shoe fitting fluoroscopes could only be operated by a licensed physiotherapist. A few years later, Massachusetts passed regulations requiring that the machines be operated by a licensed physician. In 1957 the State of Pennsylvania became the first jurisdiction to ban the use of shoe fitting fluoroscopes. By 1960, these events, plus pressure from insurance companies, had led to the demise of the shoe-fitting fluoroscope, at least in the U.S. In the end, the shoe stores were probably just as glad to be rid of the things - at least one survey had indicated that the machines were perceived by shoe salesmen a sales gimmick rather than a useful tool. Attempts to impose regulatory restrictions on the use of shoe fitting fluoroscopes seem to have been limited to the United States . Despite considerable effort, Jacalyn Duffin and Charles Hayter, authors of the aforementioned “Baring the Sole: The Rise and Fall of the Shoe Fitting Fluoroscope,” could not find any Canadian or British legislative action pertaining to these devices. In fact, Duffin and Hayter noted that these machines continued to be used in Canada and the UK , albeit to a limited extent, at least until 1970. Radiation Exposures While the exposure rates associated with these machines varied considerably, the measurements reported by various authors are reasonably consistent. According to Moeller (1996), measurements performed during the late 1940s indicated that the doses to the feet ranged from 7 to 14 R for a 20 second exposure. Doses to the pelvis ranged from 30 to 170 mrem. He also noted that surveys at the time indicated that more than 60 percent of inspected machines exceeded the American Standards Association recommendation of 2 R to the feet per five second exposure. According to Duffin and Hayter (2000), a 1948 survey of x-ray machines in Detroit indicated that the exposure rates at the position of the feet ranged from 16 to 75 R/min. Measurements performed by Williams (1949) ranged from 0.5 to 5.8 R/second to the feet. He also reported exposure rates that were above 100 mR/hr at a distance of ten feet from the front of the unit. Bavley (1950) reported measurements of 1 to 175 mR/hr (60 mR/hr average) at a height of 18 inches above the floor and 9 inches away from the sides of the machine. The exposure rates 5 feet in front of the machine and 18 inches above the floor were as high as 65 to 160 mR/hr (average: 114 mR/hr) Despite these relatively high exposures, there were no reported injuries to shoe store customers. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for the operators of these machines. Many shoe salespersons put their hands into the x-ray beam to squeeze the shoe during the fitting. As a result, one saleswoman who had operated a shoe fitting fluoroscope 10 to 20 times each day over a ten year period developed dermatitis of the hands. One of the more serious injuries linked to the operation of these machines involved a shoe model who received such a serious radiation burn that her leg had to be amputated (Bavley 1950). http://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/shoefittingfluor/shoe.htm
"A stunning testament to the myriad of ways
people have tried to make money off the eternal ills of humankind." -New York
Times "Snake oil salesmen, beware!" - Time
Magazine
Quack! Tales of Medical Fraud from
by Bob McCoy, Curator The curator of the Museum of Questionable Medical Devices shares his collection of the hilarious, horrifying, and preposterous medical devices that have been foisted upon the public in their quest for good health. Includes the Prostate Gland Warmer, Phrenology Machine, Recto Rotor, Nose Straightener, Wonder Electro Marvel, and hundreds of other quack devices. With period advertisements, promotional literature, and gadget instructions, this book offers a wealth of past-and-present medical fraud.
MONEY BEING MADE OFF OF YOUR FEAR TSA Revolt: Naked Screening Lobby Pushes For Profit, Not Privacy?
Why Is Michael Chertoff Heading up the renewed push for those controversial, clothes-penetrating scanners at airports is former homeland security secretary Michael Chertoff. His consulting firm represents companies who make the scanners, but you wouldn't know it from reading the papers.
A couple of years ago we began the process of testing them to see, first of all, if they worked and second, if they could be deployed without unduly restricting the flow of traffic. And the good news is that we were able to demonstrate that they were successful. We could use them without slowing up traffic and we could also protect privacy. But when Chertoff launched into his pitch for full-body scanners on Campbell Brown tonight, we learned that he is paid by the very companies who make the penetrating devices: In 2009, Chertoff founded the Chertoff Group, a security consulting agency. The Chertoff Group's client list is unknown—Chertoff refused to talk about it in an interview—but he admits in the clip above that some of his clients manufacture full-body scanners. Yet when he appears in The New York Times, The Washington Post, and on NPR to advocate for full-body scanning, Chertoff is identified only as a former secretary of homeland security. No mention is made of the Chertoff Group. ("If they'd been deployed, this would pick up this kind of device," he tells the Times.) Did Chertoff 'forget' to tell reporters about his connection to the industry he's pimping in their stories? It didn't look like he was about to volunteer the information on Campbell Brown tonight. (Good catch, though, Campbell. We always knew there had to be some reason you had your own show!) So, here is a service to all you journalists working on upcoming articles about full-body scanners, which will inevitably feature Chertoff playing the cheerleader. Feel free to copy this sentence and paste it after Chertoff's name: Chertoff is a former homeland security secretary and the founder of the Chertoff Group, a security consulting firm whose clients include manufacturers of full-body scanners.
Internal TSA Documents:
TSA’s ‘Administrative Record’ admits ineffective security theater Adan Salazar The TSA has quietly admitted there is no actual “threat-addressing” basis for employing nude body scanners or invasive pat down procedures at airports, a notion many travelers who are weary of the federal agency’s borderline sexual molestation have long suspected but were hard-pressed to prove.
The evidence was found in sealed court documents, available through the PACER.gov website, regarding engineer and blogger Jon Corbett’s ongoing litigation over the constitutionality of the agency’s loathsome security practices. In a redacted version of the appellant’s brief, filed by Corbett on October 7 with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, several portions of the Summary of Facts section were blacked out, raising questions as to the nature of the censored information. But in a sealed version of the same documents obtained through PACER.gov (and available here), the redacted sections appear with incriminating clarity. Through Redactions, TSA Admits Terror Threats are Slim to Nonexistent
Redaction shows TSA is aware explosives on airplanes “are extremely rare.’ (click to enlarge) A section detailing how “The TSA Has Misled The Public As to the Likelihood of the Threat ‘Addressed’ By Nude Body Scanners and Pat Downs,” includes a blacked out portion concerning the TSA’s knowledge that “explosives on airplanes are extremely rare.”
“For example, the TSA analyzed hijackings in 2007 and found 7 hijacking incidents across the globe, but none of them involved actual explosive devices,” Corbett explains in the brief, adding that the last attempt to bring an explosive onboard an airplane through a U.S. airport occurred 35 years ago. Another redacted section highlights the government’s concession that, “due to hardened cockpit doors and the willingness of passengers to challenge hijackers,” it would be difficult to have a repeat of 9/11. “The government also credits updated pre-flight security for that difficulty assessment,” the brief states, “but the assessment was written before the en masse deployment of body scanners and before the update to the pat down procedure. Further, the government admits that there have been no attempted domestic hijackings of any kind in the 12 years since 9/11.” The TSA also had the following section completely censored: This begs the question, then, of what evidence the government possesses to rationalize that we should be so afraid of non-metallic explosives being brought aboard flights departing from the U.S. that we must sacrifice our civil liberties. The answer: there is none. “As of mid-2011, terrorist threat groups present in the Homeland are not known to be actively plotting against civil aviation targets or airports; instead, their focus is on fundraising, recruiting, and propagandizing.” In the brief’s Summary of Argument, another redacted portion concerns the TSA’s understanding that body scanners and pat downs are ineffective at addressing a threat for which they admit “there is no evidence.” By redacting certain parts of the brief, the TSA also inadvertently admits “it is aware of no one who is currently plotting a terror attack against our aviation system using explosives (non-metallic or otherwise),” and that, in addition to a cabin of empowered passengers who would make short work of a hijacker, the Federal Flight Deck Officer program, which arms pilots with firearms, makes targeting an airplane “to be the definition of insanity.” Get the TSA Out of Our Pants
The 28-year-old entrepreneur arrived at his conclusions after admittedly “pawing through several thousand pages of the TSA’s ‘administrative record,’” which he says the TSA uses as the “alleged rationale behind why they must photograph us naked and literally put their hands in our pants to search us.” The information contained within the redacted portions support what Infowars and others have long suspected: that the sprawling agency – which is in the process of extending beyond the airport and onto highways, train stations and public buses – was never meant to thwart terrorists, but was instead set up to purposely obstruct, annoy, harass and train the American public. In other words, the court documents go a long way in proving the TSA is pure contrived security theater custom-made solely to indoctrinate Americans, through prisoner training, into blindly accepting obedience to authority as a normal way of life, not to mention a huge waste of about $7.91 billion in taxpayer money a year.
TSA trying to make a monkey out of you. Corbett has made quite the reputation of going after the agency. Last year, he made headlines when he demonstrated how to thwart TSA body scanners simply by sewing an object onto clothing. Corbett had also previously filed a lawsuit challenging the TSA after he was detained for an hour at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. He also regularly adds updates regarding his ongoing litigation on his activist blog TSA Out Of Our Pants!. Updates to Jon’s case can be found on PACER.gov, case #12-15893. Below are both the redacted and sealed versions of the Appellant’s brief in the case of Jonathan Corbett v. Transportation Security Administration. This article was posted: Thursday, October 17, 2013 at 1:24 pm Tags: activism, big brother, constitution, police state, terrorism, tsa
Blogger Who Thwarted TSA Body Scanners Now Harassed by DOJ [vid] Jon Corbett, the engineer and activist challenging the constitutionality of the TSA's body scanners and pat downs, has received a call from the Department of Justice stating he violated a court order sealing the documents that Infowars made public yesterday, even though the court had inexplicably published the documents on a public site.
TSA Expands Searches of Parked Cars at Airports Sign says vehicles “will be searched by uniformed security”
Paul Joseph Watson TSA-approved warrantless searches of vehicles parked outside airports are being expanded, with a photograph taken at Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport informing Thanksgiving travelers that all vehicles belonging to AmeriPark customers “will be searched by uniformed security.”
The policy, which first came to light earlier this summer after complaints from people who found notes inside their car which read, “your vehicle has been inspected under TSA regulations,” continues to cause confusion and stoke concern amongst privacy advocates. When the story first broke, the TSA was keen to deflect responsibility by explaining that although, “the plan is approved by the TSA, it is up to each airport authority and its state and local law enforcement partners to follow the plan that has been implemented.” The sign above, originally posted by Young Americans For Liberty, suggests that airport uniformed security guards are responsible for carrying out the searches at Birmingham International, not valet parking staff. The image was taken on November 27, the day after Thanksgiving and one of the busiest travel days of the year. At some airports the searches are also being conducted with customers receiving no notification whatsoever. “I was inside paying my bill. I looked through the window and saw this gentleman looking through my trunk,” said Michelle Zevola, who used the Curbside Valet Service at Charlotte Douglas Airport. “He was moving things around, shining a flashlight, going through the compartments. I am so fine being searched at the airport. It’s about safety. But I am not fine with my personal property being searched without permission or notification,” added Zevola.
“There is no posted signage at the valet stand or around the airport that indicates cars left with curbside service will be searched. There is also no warning on the back of the valet ticket,” reported NBC Charlotte. Deputy Aviation Director Jack Christine admitted that the searches had been taking place for a year and half without any signage or notification. Under the guidelines, the person performing the search, whether that be a valet parking employee or a “unformed security” guard, is instructed to check the trunk, the engine as well as scan inside the car. The policy represents a clear violation of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution, which protects Americans against “unreasonable searches and seizures,” although TSA officials have justified the measures as necessary “to keep you and your family safe at the airport.” Critics have lambasted the TSA and airports who enforce the policy for entrusting searches of vehicles to valet parking attendants, who wouldn’t normally be considered to be highly trained in bomb detection skills. “Take note of that, America. Your safety can only be guaranteed by a search of valet-parked vehicles, but not by a trained agent,” wrote TechDirt’s Tim Cushing. “Instead, your valet will do a brief search of your vehicle to ensure there’s nothing inside the cabin, trunk or under the hood that looks like a bomb. (Like, for instance, a bundle of wires and some other stuff with a post-it attached saying, “NOT A BOMB.”)” Another traveler who complained that her car had been searched with zero notice was Laurie Iacuzza, who said she was “furious” that airport personnel rifled through her vehicle without permission.
Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71 ********************* Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News. This article was posted: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 at 12:13 pm Tags: domestic news, police state
LINK: TSA Now Needs False Flag Event
SO, HOW MUCH ARE WE WILLING TO PUT-UP WITH?!!
On The Web: http://www.optoutday.com/ http://wewontfly.com/
NAKED BODY SCANNERS
Mark Dice Challenges Michelle Obama To Prove Body Scanners Noninvasive And Safe
LINK: Roadside Cavity Searches
Will Americans Submit To TSA Cavity Searches? Infowars is set to commission a poll by a professional polling agency that will ask Americans if
they are willing to submit to a TSA anal cavity search in order to fly. We reckon a solid 10-20 per cent would say
yes. What other questions should be asked in order to illustrate how much indignity travelers will tolerate?
LINK: Roadside Cavity Searches
Poll: One Third of Americans Want to be Slaves
The logical conclusion of a new Harris poll is that one third of Americans actually want to be
slaves. We are in a lot of trouble and we're running out of time.
Sheeple Bleat About Loss of “Security Rituals They Have Come to Trust [vid]
We’ve been calling it "Security Theatre" for a long time, but when NYC’s Channel 2 complained about loss of “Security Ritual” in the TSA Pre-Check Program, they unintentionally hit the nail on the head. "Security Ritual" best describes the fraud because it's a kind of state religion that requires the adherents to have child-like faith in the omnipotence of the state and it's benign intentions. But TSA has admitted there was no threat in its own internal documents. TSA SET TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST TEXAS GROPING BAN - http://www.infowars.com/tsa-set-to-ta... STATES REBELING AGAINST TSA: TEXAS THE LATEST TO LEGISLATE FOR BANNING GROPE-DOWNS, NAKED SCANNERS - http://www.infowars.com/states-rebeli... DOJ CENSORS BLOGGER FOR DOCUMENTS THEY RELEASED - http://www.infowars.com/doj-censors-b... PRESS DOESN’T COVER GAG ORDER ON TSA BLOGGER - http://www.infowars.com/press-doesnt-... TSA TURNS OFF NAKED BODY SCANNERS TO AVOID OPT-OUT DAY PROTESTS - http://www.infowars.com/tsa-turns-off... INTERNAL TSA DOCUMENTS: BODY SCANNERS, PAT DOWNS NOT FOR TERRORISTS - http://www.infowars.com/internal-tsa-...
It remains to be seen how many Americans will keep buying the proven lies from their government (note the links below). Time will soon tell if the people of this nation have the good sense to face that they are being lied to, or succumb to government propaganda and demoralization. Ex-propagandist for the KGB, Yuri Bezmenov, had this to say about demoralizing a people: "As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it.... That's the tragedy of the situation of demoralization." -- Yuri Bezmenov -- LINK: Subverting The Public
Bin Laden Death Another Gov't Lie |
|||||||||||||||
|
|

THE GLOBALISTS MOVE FROM THEIR ALQAEDA CREATION, TO FABRICATING HOMEGROWN DOMESTIC TERROR

Several years ago, after his popular video “Mad As Hell” was released and Aaron Russo began his campaign to become Governor of Nevada, Russo was noticed by Nicholas Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney. Seeing Russo’s passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the elite’s CFR. Watch the full interview here: Reflections and Warnings.
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And The Fake War On Terror!
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And The Fake War On Terrorism!
LINKS: Reflections And Warnings movie | Road to World Government | CASHLESS TRACKABLE SOCIETY | Educational System Dismantlement | The Fake War On Terror | 911 The Road to Tyranny | INFAMOUS 9/11 | N.W.O. | C.F.R.

-- Harriet Tubman --
"I freed a thousand slaves; I
could have freed a thousand more,
if only they knew they were slaves."
Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who
are constantly and intelligently
on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic procedures.
"A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time,
not on the spot, not here and now and in their calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other
worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the
encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it.”
- Aldous Huxley -
LINK: Bread and Circus
MORE:
[ AL-QAEDA EXPOSED!! ] | Naked Body Scanners | Feds Radiating Americans | Mobile Van Radiating the Public |
TSA Now Needs False Flag Event | Witness to Government False Flag : Kurt Haskell | War On Terror |
Asleep at the Switch | TSA Now Needs False Flag Event | TSA |
Police State 1 | Police State 2 | Police State 3 | Police State 4 | Martial Law Rise of The Police State |
Psywars - The Selling Out of Alex Jones/Infowars
| << Previous [1] 2 Next >> |