Former CFR member, Rear Admiral Chester Ward, stated regarding the group, "The most
powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common – they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United
States. A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall
Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily,
they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global
Council On Foreign Relations Propaganda
May 12, 2010
The Official CFR Commercial of
the"Think Tank" in
Official Video: About The Council on Foreign Relations
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an invitation
only membershipgroup made up of about 4000 people that comprise what many observers consider to bethe shadow
government of America. The CFR is more than a ‘think tank’, it is a network of elitists that control America by
creating policies, laws, financial alliances and monopolies. This new video, starring such diverse personalities as
Angelina Jolie and Zbigniew Brzezinski, promotes the CFR as a wonderful place where people meet to discuss policy,
thus giving the impression that all points of view are represented and implemented with the public’s best interests
Some of its members include bankers
(Timothy Geithner, Henry Paulson, Alan Greenspan, Paul Volcker, and World Bank President Robert Zoellick),
Secretaries of State (Henry Kissinger, Condoleeza Rice, Hillary Clinton), Supreme Court Justices (Bader-Ginsberg
and Stephen Breyer), corporate titans (George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Dick Cheney), mainstream media (mainstream
media is manipulated by the CFR- Katie Couric, Bill Moyers, Diane Sawyer, Tom Brokaw), foreign heads of state
(Mikhail Gorbachev, Benyamin Netanyahu and Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe), religious leader (the Dalai Lama)and
entertainers (Shirley Temple, Angelina Jolie, Fred Thompson).
Some of the more notable corporations that enjoy CFR membership include AIG, BP, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs,
Google, Merck, NASDAQ, Pfizer and VISA.
The truth about the CFR is that it is a global agenda organizationfilled with collectivists who
advocatedepopulation and covert controlover America and the world. An example of this is the quote by Zbigniew Brzezinski (co-founder of the Trilateral
Commission and former US National Security Advisor):
“I once put it rather pungently, and I was flattered that the British Foreign Secretary repeated this, as
follows: … namely, in early times, it was easier to to control a million people, literally it was easier to control
a million people than physically to kill a million people. Today, it is infinitely easier to to kill a million
people than to control a million people. It is easier to kill than to control….”
Brzezinski’s statement does not advocate killing, but that he and his compatriots have given serious thought to
both options. The average auto mechanic does not ponder these things. Who does? Only those who have a self image of
being empowered to do either and, therefore, must make a choice.
David Rockefeller, honorary chairman of the CFR, he
is also the founder of the Trilateral Commission (a secretive members-only group with designs to remove the borders
between Canada, U.S. and Mexico in the pursuit of eventual world governance),his family founded the Population
Council (with its roots in eugenics, which is the philosophy of improving the human gene pool through selective
breeding, historically, it has sometimes been accomplished through brutal means such as forced sterilization and
genocide)and he is a banker, famous for this quote:
“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon
well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate
influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a
secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as
“internationalists” and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and
economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
This video is pure propaganda; it would seem incredible that some CFR members do not understand its true nature,
but may have been used for marketing and public relations purposes in this video.
G. Edward Griffin , who revealed the character
of the CFR in “The Capitalist Conspiracy” in 1971, said that due to the growing awareness of the CFR’s role in
leading America into global collectivist government, the CFR is attempting to brighten their tarnished image with
this public relations video. And it uses the same production style seen on TV ads selling pharmaceutical drugs. The
message is about learning, discussion and solutions, but omits commentary on their goals and methods.
A failed attempt to recruit Aaron Russo resulted in recent
light being shed on the CFR.
ago, after his popular video “Mad As Hell” was released and Aaron Russo began his campaign to become
Governor of Nevada, Russo was noticed by Nicholas Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney. Seeing
Russo’s passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the
elite’s CFR. Watch the full interview here: Reflections and Warnings.
The Council on Foreign Relations, often described as the
"real state department", has launched an initiative to promote and implement a system of effective world
Henry Kissinger, a CFR member, anticipates that President Obama will, "…give
new impetus to American foreign policy partly because the reception of him is so extraordinary around
the world. I think his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when,
really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis."
The program, titled "The International Institutions
and Global Governance Program," utilizes the resources of the "…David Rockefeller Studies Program to
assess existing regional and global governance mechanisms…" The initial funding for the program came with a $6
million grant from the Robina Foundation,
which claims that the grant is "…one of the largest operating grants ever received in Council history."
The IIGG program, launched on May 1st,
2008, is the latest manifestation of an agenda that has existed since and before the founding of the
Council on Foreign Relations. Former CFR member, Rear Admiral Chester Ward, stated regarding the group,
"The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common – they want to bring about
the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States. A second clique of
international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents.
Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global
The International Institutions and Global Governance Program identifies several "global issues"
that require a system of world governance. Environmental issues, terrorism, the global economy and energy are all
mentioned. The project then states that a system of "universal membership" could be pursued, or alternatively a
regional organization, such as the European Union model.
"In each of these spheres, the program will consider whether the most promising framework for governance is
a formal organization with universal membership (e.g., the United Nations); a regional or sub-regional
organization; a narrower, informal coalition of like-minded countries; or some combination of all three."
The programcalls for the "Re-conceptualizing" of national sovereignty, citing the European Union’s "pooling" of
sovereignty as a model. The CFR project recognizes that historically, the United States has been resistant to the
ideals of global governance. The project states, "Among the most important factors determining the future of global
governance will be the attitude of the United States…"
The IIGG program continues, "…few countries have been as sensitive as the United States to restrictions on their
freedom of action or as jealous in guarding their sovereign prerogatives." The program then states that the
separation of powers as stated in the Constitution, along with the U.S. Congress, stand in the way of the United
States assuming "new international obligations."
"…the country’s longstanding tradition of liberal “exceptionalism” inspires U.S. vigilance in protecting the
domestic sovereignty and institutions from the perceived incursions of international bodies. Finally, the
separation of powers enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress a critical voice in the
ratification of treaties and endorsement of global institutions, complicates U.S. assumptions of new
The actions of the Military Industrial Complex under the Bush Administration have
served globalist interests well. "Global structures" are now presented as the mechanism to prevent
such atrocities. America’s demonization is central to building a system of world governance. Patrick M. Stewart,
who is currently the director of the CFR IIGG program, is anticipating the Obama administration "…to seek to turn
the page on what many perceived to be ‘cowboy unilateralism’ of the Bush years, by embracing multilateral
cooperation, re-kindling U.S. alliances and partnerships, and engaging in sustained diplomacy within the UN
framework," as reported
byXinhua. The IIGG
project itself stated in May of 2008 that, "Regardless of whether the administration that takes office in January
2009 is Democratic or Republican, the thrust of U.S. foreign policy is likely to be multilateral to a significant
Globalist forces are hard at work in the economic and political realms in an attempt to shape the future of the
world, furthering the dominance of the global elite. Calls for a global currency in response to the economic crisis
are regularly occurring, drawing the tacit support of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, speaking to the
Henry Kissinger, a CFR member, anticipates that President Obama will, "…give new impetus to American foreign
policy partly because the reception of him is so extraordinary around the world. I think his task will be to
develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great
opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis."
The Council on Foreign Relations global governance program will undoubtedly be pursued under the Obama
administration, which is filled with CFR
members. President of the CFR, Richard Haass, is serving as
a top adviser to the Obama administration. As the IIGG program admits, regardless of who sits in the White House,
the globalist agenda moves forward full speed ahead.
This article was posted: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 at 11:54 am
The Trial Of Henry Kissinger
Part contemporary investigation and part
historical inquiry, documentary follows the quest of one journalist in search of justice. The film focuses on
Christopher Hitchens' charges against Henry Kissinger as a war criminal - allegations documented in Hitchens' book
of the same title - based on his role in countries such as Cambodia, Chile, and Indonesia. Kissinger's story raises
profound questions about American foreign policy and highlights a new era of human rights. Increasing evidence
about one man's role in a long history of human rights abuses leads to a critical examination of American diplomacy
through the lens of international standards of justice. Written by Sujit R. Varma. The film focuses on Henry
Kissinger and his role in America's secret bombing of Cambodia in 1969, the approval of Indonesia's genocidal
assault on East Timor in 1975, the assassination of a Chilean general in 1970, and his involvement in the 1969
Paris peace talks concerning the Vietnam Conflict.
Top New World Order
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other
great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for
almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been
subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and
prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world
bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." David Rockefeller
Infowars Nightly News reporter Aaron Dykes visits the birthplace of
the world's most notorious secret society, the Illuminati, in the heart of Bavaria, Germany. Professor Adam
Weishaupt began his pursuit of world government by deception at the University of Ingolstadt on May 1, 1776, while
preserved historical documents make clear that the Illuminati is not a myth but proven fact. Moreover, their 18th
Century model for covert conquest continues today in new forms, under different names, in pursuit of a New World
Albert Pike served as a Brigadier-General in the Confederate Army. Following the War, Pike was
jailed for treason, He was quickly pardoned by fellow Freemason President Andrew Johnson. Among eventually becoming
a 33rd degree mason and a top leader of the Ku Klux Klan, Pike was also believed to be a Luciferian. He claimed he
was able to summon Lucifer at will as the Grand Master of the Order of the Palladium. Palladism or
TRADITIONAL SATANISM, an ancient Luciferian cult was then introduced to the inner circle of the Masonic
lodges. This influence has flourished into modern day freemasonry in the hidden rites of the upper degrees. Leaders
of Industry, Entertainment,The CIA, Congress, and our military leaders are inundated with freemasonic Palladism or
a Luciferian New World Order. It’s everywhere you look in Washington DC if you have eyes that see. What follows are
the chilling predictions or instructions of Albert Pike’s Three World Wars, funded in great part by the House of
Rothschild, from a letter that he wrote to 33 degree Italian Illuminati head and Mafia founder Giuseppe Mazzini,
dated August 15, 1871.
John Birch Society on the Illuminati and the New World
Invisible Empire Sneak Peek #1
- The Council on Foreign Relations -
Here is a sneak peek into the powerful new documentary Invisible Empire, directed by Jason
Bermas. Researcher G. Edward Griffin examines the roots of the New World Order through the Council on Foreign
Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, and other key branches of the Cecil Rhodes' Secret
Societies that aim to steer the world towards global government.
Invisible Empire - Sneak Peek #2
- The Dumbed-Down Public -
In this sneak peek, director Jason Bermas demonstrates the mindset of the elite, who have flooded the public's
attention span with gladiatorial events, spectator sports and mind-numbing entertainment. This deluge of
distractions effectively hides the truth of political information and world events from the public
Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who
are constantly and intelligently on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic
"A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time,
not on the spot, not here and now and in their calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other
worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the
encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it.”
For the first time ever, the secret agenda of the planet’s ruthless Super-class is exposed in
stark detail. This documentary film chronicles how men of power and influence have worked in
stealth for centuries to establish an oppressive world government. Learn how this global
oligarchy controls the populace through drug trafficking, money laundering, staged terror
attacks, media propaganda and debt. The criminal controllers have successfully dominated
the globe and are now in the final phase of consolidating
power. Invisible Empire: A New World Order
Definedis a damning
indictment of the globalists through their own words and documents. Worldwide tyranny isn’t
coming — it’s here.
This isn’t conspiracy theory, it’s conspiracy fact. The New World Order is out in the open, all
documented in stunning living color. Unelected bureaucrats are establishing regional
unions under one superstate. Witness their plan for a global tax and a cashless
surveillance society in which every man, woman and child is micro-chipped at
Invisible Empire will be more than just a film — it is the culmination of years of
research by Jason Bermas into the inner-workings and most revealing public statements by the
New World Order and the most trusted stewards of their dark vision. Invisible Empire promises to unveil the long-term
agenda for world control, just as Fabled
Enemies and Loose Change Final
Cut forever stripped away the facade of the official story of 9/11 and exposed the dark
truth that lies behind.
Support The Film Makers & Spread The Word : HQ
Does America have a hidden oligarchy? Is U.S. foreign policy run by a closed shop? What is the
CFR (Council on Foreign Relations)? It began in 1921 as a front organization for J.P. Morgan and Company. By World
War II it had acquired unrivaled influence on American foreign policy. Hundreds of U.S. government administrators
and diplomats have been drawn from its ranks - regardless of which party has occupied the White House. But what
does the Council on Foreign Relations stand for? Why do the major media avoid discussing it? What has been its
impact on America's past - and what is it planning for the future?
Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University Professor and mentor to former president Bill
Clinton, explained in his books Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment, how the elite
maintained a silent dictatorship while fooling people into thinking they had political freedom, by creating
squabbles between the two parties in terms of slogans and leadership, while all the time controlling both from
the top down and pursuing the same agenda.
Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Timeby Carroll Quigley is the ultimate insider
admission of a secret global elite that has impacted nearly every modern historical event.
Learn how the Anglo-American banking elite were able to secretly establish and maintain their
global power. This massive hardcover book of 1348 pages provides a detailed world history
beginning with the industrial revolution and imperialism through two world wars, a global
depression and the rise of communism.Tragedy & Hopeis the definitive work on the world's power
structure and an essential source material for understanding the history, goals and actions of
the New World Order.
Author Carroll Quigley was an esteemed professor of
history at the Foreign Service School of Georgetown University and also taught at Princeton and at
Harvard. President Bill Clinton was a student of Quigley and named him as an important
influence. As a trusted and well respected insider, Professor Quigley had access to a variety of
secret papers and sources from which he did his research forTragedy & Hope.
One of the key revelations Quigley reveals is a
secret organization created by Englishman Cecil Rhodes. Rhodes was the founder of diamond company
De Beers, ardent supporter of British colonialism and creator of the prestigious Rhodes Scholarship
that has since educated so many global elite leaders. Funded by Rhodes' estate,
goal of this organization was to consolidate world control into the hands of the English speaking
elites. This book ties together how this secret organization of global elites has quietly steered
the world towards a goal of global government using collectivism.
As an insider with access to many secret documents,
Quigley was proud of the achievements of this secret organization and wrote this book from that
viewpoint. The book was intended to only be read by fellow academics and other insider
intellectuals that shared a similar world view. The book was quickly taken out of print when it
became more widely circulated and opponents latched onto it as a confession of the global elite.
As pressure mounted, the publishers relented and authorized this identical reissue edition.
This book continues to provide one of the most revealing looks into the goals and methodology of the
global elite. This book is printed in limited quantities and not readily available at most
mainstream bookstores. Infowars is proud to have secured a batch of Tragedy & Hope and to help spread this valuable
history and information.
Quotes from Tragedy & Hope:
"The powers of financial
capitalism had [a] far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in
private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a
whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting
in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and
conferences." -- Carroll Quigley, Chapter
exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile
network.I know of the operations
of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in
the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most
of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I
have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies ... but in general my
chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in
history is significant enough to be known." --Carroll
Quigley, Chapter 65.
The Quigley Formula
- G. Edward Griffin lecture -
Uploaded on Jan 11, 2012
An excellent lecture by G. Edward Griffin
entitled "The Quigley Formula: A conspiratorial view of history as taught by the conspirators themselves"
"Quigley" is the late Carroll Quigley, a Council on Foreign Relations member and historian, as well
as mentor to CFR & Trilateral Commission member Bill Clinton.
The lecture is based around the following quote from his book Tragedy & Hope, pp.
"The National parties and their presidential candidates, with the Eastern Establishment assiduously
fostering the process behind the scenes, moved closer together and nearly met in the center with almost identical
candidates and platforms, although the process was concealed as much as possible, by the revival of obsolescent or
meaningless war cries and slogans (often going back to the Civil War)....The argument that the two parties should
represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea
acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so
that the American people can "throw the rascals out" at any election without leading to any profound or extreme
shifts in policy. ... Either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it
should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these
things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies."
The Anglo-American Establishment (paperback, 354 page) is the follow-up
to author Carroll Quigley's major tome Tragedy & Hope. In the
book he specifically discusses a secret society created by the great imperialist Cecil Rhodes and how
it was administered after Rhodes' death by Lord Alfred Milner. This group operated behind the
scenes and gained massive influence over the world. Learn how the New World Order and global
government's roots stem directly from the British Empire.
Author Carroll Quigley (1910-1977) was a highly esteemed professor at Georgetown University. The
evidence he presents here is credible, the analysis brilliant. His scholarly approach and
presentation of facts will appeal to both the academically-oriented person as well as the truth seeker
who aspires to understand the world around us.
This quote from the book best describes what is discussed:
"No country that values its safety should allow what the Milner group
accomplished--that is, that a small number of men would be able to wield such power in administration
and politics, shoud be given almost complete control over the publication of documents relating to
their actions, should be able to exercise such influence over the avenues of information that create
public opinion, and should be able to monopolize so completely the writing and the teaching of the
history of their own period." --Carroll Quigley, The
Clocking in at 1300 pages of small print text, Carroll Quigley's seminal work, Tragedy and Hope,
is an intimidating and weighty tome. Today we talk to Joe Plummer of JoePlummer.com about his guide to Quigley's
massive book. Available as a free e-book or as a paperback or kindle purchase and dubbed Tragedy and Hope 101,
Plummer's guide condenses, summarizes, explains and footnotes the highlights and lowlights of the text so you can
understand the nature of the conspiratorial network that Quigley exposed and why this information is so
--Perhaps most disturbing to those who still believe in things like representative government,
Quigley reveals that real power operates behind the scenes, in secrecy, and with little to fear from so-called
elections. We learn that conspiracies, secret societies, and small, powerful "networks" of individuals are not only
real; they're extremely effective at creating or destroying entire nations and shaping the world as a whole.
These disturbing truths contradict nearly everything we've been taught to believe about our
system of government and social organization. As such, many people will simply dismiss them out of hand. "Only
wild-eyed conspiracy theorists believe such nonsense," they will say. And the social engineers, who encourage
public ignorance and shape public opinion, will assure them that they're right. But there is one problem: Carroll
Quigley was no wild-eyed conspiracy theorist.
Elite group calls for blatant violation of Posse Comitatus
June 4, 2012
The Council On Foreign Relations, the elite think tank
long associated with globalist policy making and subversion of the principles of the US Constitution, has published
an article that proposes using the army to plan and carry out domestic law enforcement missions in the US.
An article in the May/June issue of the CFR official journal, Foreign Affairs, calls
for the army to address “challenges in the United States itself” with the justification being to protect
Americans from terrorist attacks.
The article, written by Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, General Raymond T. Odierno states:
“Where appropriate we will also dedicate active-duty
forces, especially those with niche skills and equipment, to provide civilian officials with a robust set of
reliable and rapid response options.”
Odierno suggests that major changes within the US now deem it necessary to use the military in such a way. The
General points to “declining budgets due to the country’s worsened fiscal situation”; “a shift in emphasis to the
Asia-Pacific region”; and a “broadening of focus from counterinsurgency, counterterrorism, and training of partners
to shaping the strategic environment, preventing the outbreak of dangerous regional conflicts, and improving the
army’s readiness to respond in force to a range of complex contingencies worldwide.”
Odierno suggests that the army be “transitioned” into a more “flexible force” by deploying in situations
normally reserved for domestic law enforcement officials. He argues that by doing so, troops will be better
equipped to deal with conflict elsewhere.
Odierno also specifically singles out The Army National Guard and the Army Reserve, noting “Today’s army also
has an unprecedented level of integration between its active and its reserve components… Our reserve component
soldiers are better than they have ever been, and we will dedicate resources to ensure that some of them will be
either deployed or ready to deploy around the globe.”
The article presents a red flag to anyone who has followed the consistent push by the federal government to
militarize the police and further integrate the armed forces into domestic law enforcement.
Of course, the use of U.S. troops in law enforcement duties is a complete violation of the Posse Comitatus Act
and the Insurrection Act, which substantially limit the powers of the federal government to use the military for
law enforcement unless under precise and extreme circumstances.
Section 1385 of the Posse Comitatus Act states,
“Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress,
willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”
However, despite the constitutional protections outlined in these laws, there has been and is an ongoing push to
blur the divisions between military and domestic law enforcement officials.
Such “invasions” are often reported on as nothing to worry about and even
Indeed, back in 2008 the Washington
Post reported how 20,000 U.S. troops returning from Iraq would be stationed inside America under Northcom
for purposes of “domestic security” from September 2011 onwards.
As Alex Jones exposed back in the late 1990’s, U.S. troops have been training to impose martial law for a
considerable amount of time. During numerous urban warfare drills that Jones attended and reported on, troops were
trained to raid, arrest, and imprison U.S. citizens in detention camps as well as taking over public buildings and
running checkpoints. During role playing exercises, actors playing prisoners would scream “I’m an American citizen,
I have rights” as they were being dragged away by troops.
Federal authorities in the United States have clearly been preparing for domestic civil unrest for a number of
Department of Homeland Security recently purchased a staggering 450 million rounds of hollow point bullets
as well as bullet-proof checkpoint booths that include ‘stop and go’ lights.
Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.net, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of
Politics at The University of Nottingham in England.
The more impoverished the
nation gets, the more society will break down, and then Americans will welcome a militarized police
Detroit Appeals To UN For
Several groups appealed to the UN on Wednesday to assist in
providing affordable water to the residents of Detroit.In March, the bankrupt city sent 45,000 shutoff notices to residents with overdue
bills. So far, nearly 3,000 have had their water service terminated,
and many more fear they are next. RTs Manila Chan has more details on the circumstances
The History of NAFTA and the Council on Foreign
“People in general just will NOT,
take their heads out of the sand!”
Psyops, or psychological operations, is a term used to describe the
techniques of psychological manipulation used in warfare. These operations are used to deceive, confuse, disrupt
and demoralize the enemy, with an aim toward weakening enemy resistance or even causing enemy forces to surrender
and enemy populations to capitulate.
In this premier episode of The Geopolitical Report with Kurt Nimmo, we examine Google’s Jigsaw,
an emerging technology that will be used on the internet to counter speech and ideas considered “extremist” by the
global elite. Initially beta tested on radical Islamists, we demonstrate how Google and its partners plan to
leverage the technology to marginalize and ultimately eliminate opposition to the establishment.
When the first edition of The Media Monopoly was published in 1983, critics called Ben
Bagdikian's warnings about the chilling effects of corporate ownership and mass advertising on the nation's news
"alarmist." Since then, the number of corporations controlling most of America's daily newspapers, magazines, radio
and television stations, book publishers, and movie companies has dwindled from fifty to ten
Published on Apr 22, 2015
After the CIA recruits a 15 year old girl to lie to congress about baby killers from
Iraq, celebrities across the U.S. rally for war. Meanwhile CNN launches a collection of fake news broadcasts and
Whitney Houston wows the nation with her Super Bowl performance of the National Anthem.
An independent agency of the United States government responsible
for collecting and coordinating intelligence and counterintelligence activities abroad in the national interest;
headed by the Director of Central Intelligence under the supervision of the President and National Security
Council...There has been considerable criticism of the CIA relating to security and counterintelligence failures,
failures in intelligence analysis, human rights concerns, external investigations and document releases,
influencing public opinion and law enforcement, drug trafficking, and lying to Congress. In 1987, the former CIA
Station Chief in Angola in 1976, John Stockwell, said the CIA is responsible for tens of thousands of covert
actions and destablization programs since it was created by Congress with the passage of the National Security Act
of 1947.At the time, Stockwell estimated that over 6 million people
had died in CIA covert actions.
This investigation comes to the conclusion that the war has, directly or indirectly, killed around 1 million
people in Iraq, 220,000 in Afghanistan and 80,000 in Pakistan, i.e. a total of around 1.3 million. Not included
in this figure are further war zones such as Yemen. The figure is approximately 10 times greater than that of
which the public, experts and decision makers are aware of and propagated by the media and major NGOs. And this
is only a conservative estimate. The total number of deaths in the three countries named above could also be in
excess of 2 million, whereas a figure below 1 million is extremely unlikely.
The average American, the report notes, is a victim of a
massive propaganda campaign designed to propagate lies about these undeclared an illegal wars.
“A poll carried out by the Associated Press (AP) two years ago found that, on average, US citizens believe that
only 9,900 Iraqis were killed during the occupation,” the reports reads.
Physicians for Social Responsibility places the blame for this on the corporate media. The NGO, however, does
not indicate why the government and the establishment media deliberately downplay the death and destruction
inflicted by the Bush and Obama administrations, although they say the current “state of affairs could be very
different if the public were made aware that the actual number is likely to be more than a hundred times higher”
than the numbers reported by The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, Fox, et al.
“The report is sure to fuel outrage over one of the most controversial wars in US history, one in which ‘the
original pretexts for going to war quickly turned out to be spurious, and from then on only the ‘liberation of the
country from a violent dictatorship’ and the “democratization” and “stabilization” of Iraq remained as
justification for the war and occupation,’” reports Sputnik, a news agency owned by the Russian government.
It may fuel outrage in Europe and Russia, where the media covers studies indicting the U.S. government and its
foreign policy, but is unlikely to do likewise in the United States.
Growing Support in U.S. For Unlimited War
In February the Pew Research Center reported growing support for the ISIS war. “The public has grown
more supportive of the U.S. fight against ISIS, as about twice as many approve (63%) as disapprove (30%) of the
military campaign against the Islamic militant group in Iraq and Syria. Last October, 57% approved and 33%
disapproved,” Pew reported.
Earlier this month a Quinnipiac poll showed American voters strongly in support of sending ground troops to
battle ISIS by more than a 2-to-1 margin.
In February a proposed a new Authorization for the Use of Military Force was left deliberately undefined
“because we believe it’s important that there aren’t overly burdensome constraints that are placed on the commander
in chief,” White House spokesman Josh
Critics interpret this to mean the executive branch of the government wants to expand the reach of the imperial
presidency and allow it to wage war against ill-defined enemies anywhere in the world.
Additionally, the administration believes the deliberately ambiguous AUMF will bring lawmakers together in a
bipartisan coalition calling for a war against the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq without restraint, including the
use of ground troops.
Only 6 corporations control what most of you see, hear and read every single day.
Darrin McBreen looks at the history of the CIA propaganda machine and the latest release from WikiLeaks that
reveals the Obama Administrations' cozy relationship with Sony Pictures. Are you being manipulated by the
During his presidential campaign, Barack
Obama consistently promised Americans “change.” Such promises aren’t new to the voting public.
When Jimmy Carter ran for president, he said: “The people of this country know from bitter
experience that we are not going to get … changes merely by shifting around the same group of insiders.” And top
Carter aide Hamilton Jordan promised: “If, after the inauguration, you find a Cy Vance as Secretary of State and
Zbigniew Brzezinski as head of National Security, then I would say we failed. And I’d quit.” Yet Carter selected
Vance as Secretary of State and Brzezinski as National Security Adviser; the “same group of insiders” had been
shifted around; and Jordan did not quit.
Carter’s administration was dominated by members of the Trilateral Commission, which had been
founded by Brzezinski and David Rockefeller. In 1980, when Ronald Reagan was campaigning against Carter, he
I don’t believe that the Trilateral Commission is a conspiratorial group,
but I do think its interests are devoted to international banking, multinational corporations, and so forth. I
don’t think that any Administration of the U.S. Government should have the top nineteen positions filled by
people from any one group or organization representing one viewpoint. No, I would go in a different
Yet after his election, President Reagan picked 10 Trilateralists for his transition team, and
included in his administration such Trilateralists as Vice President George Bush, Defense Secretary Caspar
Weinberger, U.S. Trade Representative William Brock, and Fed Chairman Paul Volcker. Yet the entire North American
membership of the Trilateral Commission has never numbered much over 100.
The reason that presidential candidates’ promises of “change” go largely unfulfilled once in
office: they draw their top personnel from the same establishment groups — of which the Trilateral Commission is
Chief among these groups is the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the most visible manifestation
of what some have called the American establishment. Members of the council have dominated the administrations of
every president since Franklin D. Roosevelt, at the cabinet and sub-cabinet level. It does not matter whether the
president is a Democrat or Republican. As we will later see, Barack Obama is no exception to CFR influence.
Power Behind the Throne
In theory, America’s government is supposed to be “of the people, by the people, for the people.”
While this concept rang true in early America, and many individuals still trust in it, the last century has seen
the reality of power increasingly shift from the people to an establishment rooted in banking, Wall Street, and
powerful multinational corporations. Syndicated columnist Edith Kermit Roosevelt, granddaughter of Teddy Roosevelt,
The word “Establishment” is a general term for the power elite in international finance, business,
the professions and government, largely from the northeast, who wield most of the power regardless of who is in the
White House. Most people are unaware of the existence of this “legitimate Mafia.” Yet the power of the
Establishment makes itself felt from the professor who seeks a foundation grant, to the candidate for a cabinet
post or State Department job. It affects the nation’s policies in almost every area.
Roosevelt added that this group’s goal is “a One World Socialist state governed by ‘experts’ like
David Rockefeller, the longtime chairman (and now chairman
emeritus) of the CFR, acknowledged the role of the establishment in trying to lead America in the one-world
direction in his 2002 book Memoirs:
For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have
seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the
inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we
are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me
as “internationalists” and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political
and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of
Two major means the establishment employs for controlling government
policy: (1) through its influence within the two major parties and the mass media, it can usually assure that both
the Republican and Democratic presidential candidates will be its own hand-picked men; (2) by stacking presidential
cabinets with CFR members at key positions — especially those involving defense, finance, foreign policy, and
national security — it can assure that America will move in the direction it wants. Since the council’s founding in
1921, 21 secretaries of defense or war, 19 secretaries of the treasury, 17 secretaries of state, and 15 CIA
directors have hailed from the Council on Foreign Relations.
Prior to the CFR’s founding, what Congressman Charles Lindbergh, Sr. (the father of the famous
aviator) called the “Money Trust” — a cabal of international bankers including the houses of Rockefeller, Morgan,
and Rothschild — conspired to create the Federal Reserve System. Their agents, such as Paul Warburg and Benjamin
Strong, who had secretly planned the Fed at a nine-day meeting on Jekyll Island, were then put in charge of the
system itself. This gave them control of American interest rates, and, by virtue of this, control of the stock
market, as well as the capacity to have the U.S. government spend without limit by having the Fed create money from
nothing. The result has been decades of inflation and skyrocketing national debt. (For full details, see the April
13, 2009 New American or Our Monetary Mayhem Began With the Fed.)
Not just an accumulation of wealth, but a consolidation of political power
was involved. The Money Trust had backed Woodrow Wilson in the presidential elections, and then controlled him
through their front man, Edward Mandell House, who lived in the White House. The trust recognized how the
power of government could be used to advance their own interests.
Wilson, surrounded by the bankers, traveled to the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which was
settling the aftermath of World War I. His chief proposal there, of course, was the League of Nations — a first
step toward world government. However, although the League was established by the Versailles Treaty, the United
States did not join because the Senate refused to ratify the treaty.
In response to this rejection, the bankers’ circle, still in Paris, held a series of meetings and
proposed to establish a new organization in the United States, whose purpose would be to lead America into the
League. This organization was incorporated in New York City two years later as the Council on Foreign
Architects of a New World Order
The CFR’s goal was formation of an incrementally stronger world government. Admiral Chester Ward,
former Judge Advocate of the U.S. Navy, was a CFR member for 16 years before resigning in disgust. He stated: “The
main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national
independence, and submergence into an all-powerful one-world government.”
After World War II, the League’s successor, the United Nations, was born. Contrary to what the
public is commonly told, the UN was not founded by nations who had tired of war. The UN was conceived by a group of
CFR members in the State Department calling themselves the Informal Agenda Group. They drafted the original
proposal for the UN, and secured the approval of President Roosevelt, who then made establishing the UN his highest
postwar priority. When the UN held its founding meeting in San Francisco in 1945, 47 of the American delegates were
Though the UN was not initially set up as a world government, the intent
was that it would develop into one over time. John Foster Dulles (CFR), an American delegate to the UN
founding meeting who later became Secretary of State under Eisenhower, acknowledged as much in his book War or
Peace: “The United Nations represents not a final stage in the development of world order, but only a
primitive stage. Therefore its primary task is to create the conditions which will make possible a more highly
Two other postwar institutions, the World Bank and
International Monetary Fund, were technically created at the 1944 Bretton
Woods Conference. But the initial planning was done by the CFR’s Economic and Finance Group, part of their
wartime War and Peace Studies Project. The World Bank and IMF act as a loan-guarantee scheme for multinational
banks. When a loan to a foreign country goes awry, the World Bank and IMF step in with taxpayer money, ensuring
that the private banks continue to receive interest payments. Furthermore, the World Bank and IMF dictate
conditions to the countries receiving bailouts, thus giving the bankers a measure of political control over
Despite what Americans were told, the postwar Marshall Plan was not invented by General George
Marshall, though he did announce it in a 1947 Harvard commencement speech. The Marshall Plan was dreamed up at a
CFR study group with David Rockefeller as its secretary. Marshall was simply selected to announce the plan because, as a general, he
would be perceived as politically neutral and help garner bipartisan congressional support for the plan.
Unknown to the public, Marshall Plan funds were circuitously rerouted by John J. McCloy — appointed U.S. High
Commissioner to Germany — to Jean Monnet, founder of the Common Market, which evolved into today’s European
Union, a microcosm of world government. McCloy returned home to become chairman of the Council on Foreign
Relations in 1953.
The tragic Vietnam War was run almost entirely by CFR members. William P. Bundy (CFR) drafted the
Tonkin Gulf Resolution before the now-discredited Tonkin Gulf Incident even took place. Bundy’s father-in-law, Dean
Acheson (CFR), as leader of a senior team of advisers nicknamed “the Wise Men,” persuaded Lyndon Baines Johnson to
dramatically escalate the war beginning in 1965. And Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara (CFR) helped develop the
“rules of engagement” (e.g., preventing the Air Force from attacking critical targets) that guaranteed the war’s
disastrous prolongation. This generated a huge slide to the left among American college students. When Bundy left
the State Department, David Rockefeller appointed him editor of the CFR’s journal Foreign Affairs. And McNamara,
one of the leading architects of the Vietnam War debacle, became president of the World Bank.
Broadening the Scheme
The CFR is not a uniquely American phenomenon. It has counterpart organizations throughout the
world — e.g., the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England, the French Institute of International
To help coordinate policy on an international scale, CFR chairman David Rockefeller and Zbigniew
Brzezinski founded the Trilateral Commission in 1973. “Trilateral” refers to the coordination of three global
regions: North America, Europe, and Asia. The commission’s meetings allow the gathering together of heads of state,
banks, multinational corporations, and media. Republican Senator Barry Goldwater called the commission “David
Rockefeller’s newest cabal,” and said, “It is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the
commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States.” The
commission, like the annual secretive meetings of the Bilderbergers and the notorious Bohemian Grove, enables the
international power elite to privately assemble and plan our destiny.
Jimmy Carter was a member of the commission, hand-picked to be president after meeting with
Brzezinski and Rockefeller at the latter’s Tarrytown, New York, estate. Carter filled his administration with CFR
members and Trilateralists. Indeed, Brzezinski noted in his memoirs that “all the key foreign policy decision
makers of the Carter Administration had previously served in the Trilateral Commission.” Carter then embarked on a
destructive course of foreign policy that included betraying the Shah of Iran, leading to the installment of
Ayatollah Khomeini and the U.S. hostage crisis; betraying President Anastasio Somoza of Nicaragua, resulting in a
Marxist dictatorship under the Sandinistas; and betraying Taiwan in order to recognize Communist China — a move
previously set up by Richard Nixon’s overtures to China, dictated by his own CFR advisers.
Under Bill Clinton (a CFR member who selected 12 CFR members for his
cabinet), the United States enacted NAFTA, an economic alliance with
Mexico and Canada. This arrangement was created by the establishment, not by the American people, who
did not suspect the game being played on them. Not only did NAFTA swamp us with cheap, job-destroying imports,
but it was designed to be the foundation for a continental economic union leading to political union. Robert
Pastor (CFR), a key architect of North American integration, acknowledged in the January/February 2004 issue
of Foreign Affairs: “NAFTA was merely the first draft of an economic constitution for North America.” And
Andrew Reding of the World Policy Institute said: “NAFTA will signal the formation, however tentatively, of a
new political unit — North America. With economic integration will come political integration. By whatever
name, this is an incipient form of international government. Following the lead of the Europeans, North
Americans should begin considering formation of a continental parliament.” [Emphasis added.]
A similar stratagem had been used against the peoples of Europe — by first deceptively hooking them
into an “economic” alliance called the Common Market, which then, requiring common laws to regulate trade,
transformed via a series of steps into the European Union, the super-national government of Europe that is
swallowing up national sovereignty.
Following the initial step enacted under Clinton, President George W. Bush, whose father was a CFR
director, moved toward politicizing the NAFTA alliance. On March 23, 2005, he met Mexican President Vicente Fox and
Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin to launch the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), the rudiments of a
North American Union. CNN’s Lou Dobbs said of it: “President Bush signed a formal agreement that will end the
United States as we know it.”
Furthermore, regional alliances such as the European Union and proposed North American Union are
not ends, but only steppingstones to world government. As CFR/Trilateralist Zbigniew Brzezinski stated: “We cannot
leap into world government in one quick step. The precondition for genuine globalization is progressive
In furtherance of this, on April 30, 2007, President Bush stood at the White House beside Angela
Merkel, president of the European Council, and José Manuel Barroso, president of the European Commission, and
announced the signing of a new agreement to “strengthen transatlantic economic integration.” It called for “joint
work in the areas of regulatory cooperation, financial markets, trade and transport security, innovation and
technological development, intellectual property rights, energy, investment, competition, services, and government
procurement,” and various other steps toward economic integration. But as usual, “economic integration” is the
predecessor of political integration. CFR members have dreamed of a political union between the United States and
Europe since the 1950s, when the CFR-dominated Atlantic Union Committee promoted a merger they called
Candidate Barack Obama revealed he would proceed with the Bush initiatives. In a speech in Berlin
on July 24, 2008, he stated:
That is why the greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us from one another. The
walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries with the most
and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and
Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down.... Yes, there have been differences between
America and Europe. No doubt, there will be differences in the future. But the burdens of global citizenship
continue to bind us together.... In this new century, Americans and Europeans alike will be required to do more —
not less. Partnership and cooperation among nations is not a choice; it is the one way, the only way, to protect
our common security and advance our common humanity.
Obama had only been president for a little over two months when he traveled to Europe for a series
of meetings with European leaders. He attended the G20 Summit, which ended with a tentative agreement to launch a
new global financial system, using as the rationale for this major step toward global government the recent Fed-
and government-spawned financial meltdown.
Henry Kissinger — foreign policy mouthpiece of the establishment for four decades — wrote an
article for the January 12, 2009 issue of the International Herald Tribune entitled “The Chance for a New World
Order.” He stated:
As the new U.S. administration prepares to take office amid grave financial and international
crises, it may seem counterintuitive to argue that the very unsettled nature of the international system generates
a unique opportunity for creative diplomacy....
Even the most affluent countries will confront shrinking resources. Each will have to redefine its
national priorities. An international order will emerge if a system of compatible priorities comes into
The alternative to a new international order is chaos.
Kissinger also stated on CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street”: “The president-elect is coming into office
at a moment when there is upheaval in many parts of the world simultaneously.... His task will be to develop an
overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great
opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.”
Past statements reveal that the establishment wants a single currency for the world, just as the EU
has consolidated its currencies into the “euro.” As far back as the 1944 Bretton Woods Conference, John Maynard Keynes
proposed a world currency he dubbed bancor. Richard L. Gardner (CFR) wrote in the Fall 1984 Foreign Affairs:
“I suggest a radical alternative scheme for the next century: the creation of common currency for all the
industrial democracies and a joint Bank of Issue to determine that Monetary Policy.”
In March of this year, Obama and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown met with reporters at the
White House. Brown announced that “there is the possibility in the next few months of a global new deal that will
involve all the countries of the world in sorting out and cleaning up the banking system.” Obama added that
Globalization can be an enormous force for good.... But what is also true is … we still have a
1930s regulatory system in place in most countries designed from the last great crisis, that we’ve got to update
our institutions, our regulatory frameworks, so that the power of globalization is channeled for the benefit of
ordinary men and women.
During his campaign, Obama selected the ubiquitous Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR),
promoter of the “regional” approach to world government, as one of his top foreign policy advisors. Obama called
Brzezinski “one of our more outstanding thinkers” and “somebody I have learned an immense amount from.” Presumably
Brzezinski’s teachings included the world government he advocates.
For Treasury Secretary, Obama chose Timothy Geithner: Senior Fellow in International Economics at
the CFR, Bilderberger, former head of the New York Federal Reserve, and former employee of both the IMF and
Kissinger Associates. One doesn’t get more establishment than that! It is Geithner who is managing the bailout of
Wall Street with taxpayer dollars. Assisting Geithner at Treasury in overseeing the auto industry bailout is fellow
CFR member Stephen Rattner.
For Director of the National Economic Council — a U.S. government agency
created by a Bill Clinton executive order — Obama selected Lawrence Summers (CFR, Bilderberger). Former Chief
Economist at the World Bank, his last position was at the investment firm of D. E. Shaw & Co, where he
earned $5.2 million in one year while working one day per week. Henry Kissinger had said Summers should “be
given a White House post in which he was charged with shooting down or fixing bad ideas.”
For Defense Secretary, Obama elected to continue with Bush pick Robert Gates (CFR, Bilderberger).
During the Carter administration, Gates served as a special assistant to Zbigniew Brzezinski. In 2004, he
co-chaired a CFR Task Force on Iran with Brzezinski, who lauded Gates in Time in 2008. Joining Gates in the Defense
Department are fellow CFR members Michele Flournoy (Under Secretary of Defense for Policy), Jeh C. Johnson (Defense
Department General Counsel), and Kathleen Hicks (Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Strategy, Plans and
For Secretary of State, Obama chose Hillary Clinton, who has attended the top-secret Bilderberger
meetings. Hillary is not a CFR member, but husband Bill is, and her State Department is laden with CFR members,
including James B. Steinberg (Deputy Secretary of State), William J. Burns (Under Secretary for Political Affairs),
Susan Rice (U.S. Ambassador to the UN), Jacob J. Lew (Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources), Todd
Stern (Special Envoy for Climate Change), and many others.
The Department of Homeland Security, which many Americans fear may turn our country into an
Orwellian surveillance society, was conceived before 9/11 by a task force called the U.S. Commission on National
Security, nine of whose 12 members belonged to the CFR. The administration of the department under Obama is
particularly heavy with CFR members, including Janet Napolitano (Secretary), Jane Holl Lute (Deputy Secretary),
Juliette Kayyem (Assistant Secretary, Office of Intergovernmental Programs), and Alan Bersin (Assistant Secretary,
Office of International Affairs).
Thus the CFR continues to dominate our government’s key areas: finance, defense, foreign policy,
and security. To this may be added various other Obama CFR appointees, such as Mona Sutphen (White House Deputy
Chief of Staff), Paul Volcker (Chairman, Economic Recovery Advisory Board), Peter Cowhey, (Senior Counsel, Office
of U.S. Trade Representative), and Eric Shinseki (Secretary of Veterans Affairs).
The idea that Barack Obama became president from a “grass-roots” movement is illusory. American
government policy continues to be largely dictated by the rich and the few. This is generally unknown to the public
— not because it is a bizarre conspiracy theory, but because the same power elite who run our government,
mega-banks, and multinational corporations also run the major media, as an inspection of the CFR membership roster
Membership in the CFR, of course, is not an automatic condemnation. A few people are added as
“window dressing” to give the group distinction and a veneer of diversity. An example is movie star Angelina Jolie.
No one suspects Jolie knows much about foreign affairs or is a conspirator for world government. But within the CFR
are hardcore globalists who, linked with their foreign counterparts through the Bilderbergers and Trilateral
Commission, head the drive for one-world government.
Though numerically small (less than 1,000 members during the Kennedy years, less than 4,500 today),
this organization has dominated every administration for over seven decades.
As long as the CFR controls our government, we can anticipate more of the same: diminishing
national sovereignty; free flow of immigration (which confuses national identity and weakens national loyalties);
increasing jobs losses through multinational trade agreements; further internationalization of law (Law of the Sea
Treaty, Kyoto Protocol, World Court, global taxation, etc.); increasing loss of freedoms in a “surveillance
society”; progressive organization of the United States, Mexico, and Canada into a North American Union; and
ultimately, broader merger into a world government where all power will be concentrated in the hands of the
Eternal vigilance continues to be the price of freedom
"THE GRAND CHESSBOARD"
Meet: Zbigniew Brzezinski Obama's
Foreign Policy Advisor
*James Corbett Interview Follows Documentary*
Brzezinski knew very
well what he was writing about. As National Security Advisor under President Carter, he had
Cyclone, the US government’s since-declassified
plan to arm, train and fund Islamic radicals in Pakistan and Afghanistan to draw the Soviet Union into a
protracted war in the region. This, famously, led to the foundation of what became known as Al Qaeda in the
1980s, a point that Brzezinski has sinceadmitted and even bragged about, claiming that the creation of a “few stirred up Muslims” helped to bring
down the Soviet Union.
WAR CRIMINAL SUPREME : Zbigniew
Infinitely easier to kill a million
people then to control a million people
1. To divide (a country, territory, etc.) into small,
quarrelsome, ineffectual states.
2. To divide (groups, areas, etc.) into
contending and usually ineffectual faction: a movement to balkanize minority
A divide and conquer strategy, also
known as “divide and rule strategy” is often applied in the arenas of politics
and sociology. In this strategy, one power breaks another power into smaller, more manageable pieces, and then
takes control of those pieces one by one. It generally takes a very strong power to implement such a strategy. In
order to successfully break up another power or government, the conqueror must have access to strong political,
military, and economic machines.
Furthermore, in order to maintain power
and influence, large governments will often work to keep smaller powers and governments from uniting. In fact,
this use of the principles within the divide and conquer strategy is most common. It is much easier to prevent
small powers from linking forces than to break them apart once they have aligned.
Leaders who use a divide and conquer
strategy may encourage or foster feuds between smaller powers. This kind of political maneuvering requires a
great understanding of the people who are being manipulated. In order to foster feuds, for example, one must
understand the political and social histories of the parties intended to take part in the
Free Mind Films' follow-up to the multiple
award winning documentary exposé 'A Noble Lie: Oklahoma City 1995' . Free Mind Films has decided to work with
international best-selling author - James Perloff to tell the virtually unknown story of the Council On Foreign
Relations (CFR) and how that organization is the key to understanding how our world has become what we see today.
Mr. Perloff literally wrote the book on the CFRs existence more than 20 years ago and now he's back with a new book
titled "Truth is a Lonely Warrior" which he is used as the research platform to write the script for 'ShadowRing'.
ShadowRing will entertainingly unfold the events that led to the creation of the CFR, the important players who
were instrumental in the council's success within American politics, and how the CFR wields unimaginable influence
over the geo-political agenda of the United States and consequently the events that have shaped our world for the
last 100 years. Expert witnesses and testimony will be weaved together with a historical visual landscape designed
to present the inherent complexity of this subject in a way that is palatable for someone who has no prior
knowledge of the CFR or what power it has over our lives. Source documents will give credibility to these
incredible and life shattering revelations. By providing the audience with the facts and avoiding opinions or
conjecture, ShadowRing will break down the dis-information and unlock the secrets of the CFR providing fertile
ground to encourage a new public debate on the ethical and moral implications of allowing such a small group of
individuals to command such power and influence over our lives.
“If you ask me how the world functions, then
you have to understand one thing plain and simple – the head of the snake, the system of power is headed by the
financial system. The bankers rule the Earth, through the private control of the issuance of money, debt-based
money, which we all are supposed to pay. Ultimately with all of these things that they call “austerity” and
whatnot, the bankers, basically, through the control of issuance of money which allows them to provide themselves
with an infinite supply of money, means that they can buy anything and anyone that can be bought – so if we look at
it, the vast majority of governments around the world, they are nothing more than puppets carrying out an agenda
for the bankers, and the bankers at the top of this pyramid are, as I’ve said, plain and simple psychopaths,
they’re drunk on their own power, they are used to getting everything they want, they can buy anything and anyone
that can be bought. This explains the corruption of virtually every government we can look at, and the policies do
not reflect the interests of the people. They reflect, pure and simple, the interests of the bankers.”
The Freedom Index: A Congressional Scorecard Based on the U.S. Constitution rates
congressmen based on their adherence to constitutional principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility,
national sovereignty, and a traditional foreign policy of avoiding foreign entanglements. The percentages below are
cumulative scores are based on key votes from 1999 through 2013. Click on a senator's or representative's name to
get a detailed breakdown of his or her voting record.
AN AUDIO INTRODUCTION TO THE FREEDOM INDEX SCORECARD