The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) was
created in the wake of 9/11 to strengthen the security of the nation’s transportation systems while ensuring the
freedom of movement for people and commerce. Within a year, TSA assumed responsibility for security at the nation’s
airports and deployed a Federal workforce to meet Congressional deadlines for screening all commercial airline
passengers and baggage. In March 2003, TSA transferred from the Department of Transportation to the Department of
The TSA has quietly admitted there is no actual “threat-addressing”
basis for employing nude body scanners or invasive pat down procedures at airports, a notion many travelers who are
weary of the federal agency’s borderline sexual molestation have long suspected but were hard-pressed to
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither
liberty nor safety."
TSA Out Of Control!
Father: TSA Left My Baby
A man is attempting to file a lawsuit against the TSA after
claiming his baby ended up face down on the floor bleeding as a result of TSA workers breaking his son's cradle
carrier at Newark Liberty Airport.
Document reveals delegation was allowed to skip secondary
Paul Joseph Watson
January 20, 2014
A newly released document obtained via a
Freedom of Information Act request confirms that the State Department ordered the Department of Homeland Security
to spare members of the Muslim Brotherhood traveling to the US in 2012 a TSA pat down or any kind of secondary
The one page document (PDF), obtained by the Investigative Project
on Terrorism, shows that members of a Muslim Brotherhood delegation traveling through Minneapolis Airport, New
York’s John F. Kennedy Airport and Dulles Airport were handed expedited entry known as “port courtesy,” which is
normally reserved for high ranking government officials and dignitaries. At the time, the Muslim Brotherhood’s
candidate Mohamed Morsi, later deposed, had not been elected president.
The document contains four separate entries which include a directive that Muslim Brotherhood
members, “not be pulled into secondary upon arrival at a point of entry.” As well as a TSA pat down, secondary
screening involves carry on luggage being inspected by hand and the use of puffer explosive detectors.
Two following entries confirm that Muslim Brotherhood members traveled through both JFK and Dulles
Airports “smoothly” and “without incident” after the DHS had been alerted about “port courtesies”.
Another entry reads; “MB delegate departure: In response to a request from the MB, the desk worked
with the office of Foreign Missions to arrange for TSA to escort the last member of the visiting MB delegation,
Abdul Mawgoud Dardery, through security at Minneapolis Airport and JFK Airport on April 15. We did not hear
anything further from the MB, so we assume the departure went smoothly. In the coming days, we’re going to write
down a list of procedures for dealing with MB visits to the United States.”
The IPT also highlights the fact that individuals traveling from Syria to give speaking tours in
the United States, people like Sheik Osama al-Rifai, that have openly endorsed Al-Qaeda militant groups under the
banner of the the Islamic Front, are being handed visas by the State Department with no questions asked.
While completely innocent Americans continue to be subjected to invasive TSA grope down procedures
and placed on no fly lists for no reason whatsoever, members of a group with direct links to terrorism were given
VIP treatment by the State Department, the TSA and the Department of Homeland Security.
The U.S. State Department is refusing to
comment days after it emerged that they ordered the Department of Homeland Security to give members of a Muslim
Brotherhood delegation traveling to the United States VIP treatment so they could bypass airport security.
The story first emerged first appeared on Friday last week after the
Project on Terrorism obtained a document (PDF) as a result of a FOIA request proving
that Muslim Brotherhood members traveling through Minneapolis Airport, New York’s John F. Kennedy Airport and
Dulles Airport were handed “port courtesies,” with the State Department telling the DHS to ensure the men “not
be pulled into secondary upon arrival at a point of entry.”
After the influential Drudge Report picked up an
the story went viral, but no explanation has been offered by the State Department as to why it afforded members of
a group with links to terrorism special treatment allowing them to bypass airport security.
Although such treatment is commonplace when applied to visiting dignitaries affiliated with elected
officials, the Muslim Brotherhood candidate Mohamed Morsi had not been elected president at the time of the visit
in April 2012. One of the delegation had also been involved in a previous child pornography investigation in the
Following its involvement in bombing police headquarters, the Muslim Brotherhood was declared a
terrorist organization by the Egyptian government last month.
Could America’s security have been put at risk by people working inside the State Department?
Earlier this month, retired U.S. Air Force Gen. Tom McInerney made the explosive
claim that there were “at least 10 or 15″ Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers working for the State
Whether that’s true or not, the story has prompted fury amongst Americans sick of being treated
like terrorists by the TSA while the federal government rolls out the red carpet for people involved with a group
that has actual links to terrorism.
Numerous news organizations, including Infowars as well as
the Blaze and the New
York Post, have contacted the State Department over the last 48 hours asking for clarification but no response
has been forthcoming. According to the Post, “The State Department had no comment.”
Given the State Department’s disastrous public relations campaign in connection with the Benghazi
scandal, we’re not holding our breath.
Shock Security Report: TSA Has a 95%
Failure Rate Finding Weapons and Explosives
June 1st, 2015
With an annual budget of over $7 billion Transportation Security
Administration officials claim that they set the standard for excellence in transportation security and
But a recent investigation reveals that when undercover operatives attempted to smuggle banned weapons and even
explosives through checkpoints nationwide the TSA failed to stop them 95% of the time.
The shocking security report shows that despite the
billions of dollars spent and the millions of American citizens being inconvenienced, and often humiliated,
America’s airports are no safer today than they were before the attacks of September 11th, 2001:
An internal investigation of the Transportation Security Administration revealed security failures at dozens
of the nation’s busiest airports, where undercover investigators were able to smuggle mock explosives or banned
weapons through checkpoints in 95 percent of trials, ABC News has learned.
The series of tests were conducted by Homeland Security Red Teams who pose as passengers, setting
out to beat the system.
According to officials briefed on the results of a recent Homeland Security Inspector General’s
report, TSA agents failed 67 out of 70 tests, with Red Team members repeatedly able to get potential weapons
In one test an undercover agent was stopped after setting off an alarm at a magnetometer, but TSA screeners
failed to detect a fake explosive device that was taped to his back during a follow-on pat down.
Officials would not divulge the exact time period of the testing other than to say it concluded
The government claims that because undercover “Red Teams”
are familiar with TSA protocols and vulnerabilities the security investigation results are not reflective of real
world results. According to former TSA administrator John Pistole that because these “super terrorists” have access
to TSA procedures “they can create and devise and conceal items that … not even the
best terrorists would be able to do.”
In effect the government is telling us that even though TSA failed to catch 95% of the explosives and weapons
being smuggled onto planes, Americans have nothing to worry about because an actual terrorist would never know how
to compromise the system. A real terrorist, whose sole purpose in life is to kill as many Americans as possible,
would not have the time, resources, commitment or brains to identify weak points and gather intelligence about the
vulnerabilities within the TSA’s security protocols.
And as for those highly secretive protocols, perhaps if the TSA focused on searching potential terrorists before
they board public transportation, as opposed to pat-downs of moms and their children after they disembark from their travels, they’d be a bit more successful in stopping people
who were trying to smuggle weapons aboard.
But no matter how wasteful or ineffective the Transportation Security Administration may be with respect to
their actual duties, there are still those, fully one-third actually, who have succumbed to the years of propaganda
and would gladly and without protest accept a full body cavity search for the privilege of flying.
First Class TSA Perks For A Legendary
Published on Mar 27, 2015
A legendary domestic terrorist was
allowed to go through the TSA’s ultra secure expedited Precheck system last year. A TSA supervisor failed to reject
the quintessential example of a domestic terrorist as defined by the highest standards of the Department of
Homeland Security. As a member of the notorious Symbionese Liberation Army Sara Jane Olson, formerly Kathleen Ann
Soliah. Was partly responsible for the death of Myrna Opsahl, the 42-year-old mother of four children, who was in
the bank to deposit receipts from her church during a bank robbery near Sacramento, California On April 21, 1975.
Patty Hearst who was acting as the getaway driver gave information that led the police to implicate the SLA in the
robbery and murder. Hearst also stated that Soliah was one of the actual robbers. According to Hearst, Soliah also
kicked a pregnant teller in the abdomen, leading to a miscarriage.
Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions
more. we all want liberty. Find the free live feed at http://www.infowars.com/watch-alex-jo...
Posse Comitatus Act Abolished, Troops on the streets of America!
U.S. Army admits troops conducting law enforcement is illegal yet
it continues to happen across the country on a routine basis
Acclimating The Public To Accept
Troops On The Street!
(...AND YET OUR AMERICAN
BORDERS ARE WIDE-OPEN?! WAKEUP!!)
Choose an image to begin
How could there be aWar on Terror and actually say that we're having
awar against terrorism, and leave the
borders wide open? If you were the President of the United States, or I were the President of the United States,
and9/11 really happened the way they
want us to believe it happened, the first thing you would do is shut down the borders, so people couldn't get in
the country to harm you. But they left the borders wide open. Becausethe bankers want the borders open, because they want
aone-world government. They
want a North American Union. They don't want borders
here.9/11 was only a manifestation.
It was done to create afear in the
American public, so that we willobey what they want us to do.
She was forced to remove and show her prosthetic breast to
Flight attendant and cancer survivor Cathy Bossi of Charlotte, N.C., said she was forced to
remove and show her prosthetic breast to a TSA agent during a security pat-down at Charlotte Douglas International
TSA Humiliates Tom Sawyer of Romulus, Mich, a 61-year-old
bladder cancer survivor
Child Forced To Remove His Shirt And Is
Like ‘Being Raped’: Elderly Woman Describes TSA Pat Down in
TSA Pull Pants Off 71 Year Old Man with Knee
An ABC News employee said she was subject to a
"demeaning" search at Newark Liberty
International Airport Sunday morning.
"The woman who checked mereached her hands inside my underwear and felt her way
around," she said. "It was basically worse than going to
the gynecologist. It was embarrassing. It was demeaning. It was inappropriate."
TSA Laughs at you Naked
Alex discusses how the TSA are a bunch of degenerates who just do what they want and lie to the
public.A report talks about how the nude scans are being catalogued and ridiculed at our expense.
Prisoner training: Don’t complain about your grope
Paul Joseph Watson
October 11, 2013
Travelers who crack jokes about the TSA’s ludicrous
security procedures could face arrest, according to a new loudspeaker warning being broadcast at airports in the
While traveling through George Bush
Intercontinental Airport in Houston, Matt Miller heard a security announcement repeatedly aired on the airport
intercom that left him disturbed.
“You are also reminded that any inappropriate remarks or jokes concerning security may result in
your arrest,” the loudspeaker message states.
These new loudspeaker warnings remind us that the TSA continues to excel at indoctrinating
Americans to be well-behaved prisoners via obedience training – reminding them that they can be disappeared if they
dare speak out of turn, even in a humorous way.
This is a totally unlawful and illegitimate violation of the First Amendment and is obviously
designed to intimidate travelers and stop them from complaining about aggressive grope downs which in some cases
involve TSA workers
touching travelers’ genitals.
The message is clear – grovel and enjoy your genitals being groped or face arrest.
The prospect of travelers cracking jokes about airport security procedures is by no means unlikely
given the increasing absurdity of the policies being enforced by the TSA.
As we reported last year, perhaps the
mose ludicrous example is the TSA’s “freeze” policy, where travelers are ordered to stand in place like statues
while TSA agents resolve some unexplained security threat.
The TSA has also provoked controversy by implementing other preposterous policies which have a
tenuous security justification, most notably a procedure where TSA
agents test travelers’ drinks for explosives after they have already passed through security and purchased
beverages inside the secure area of the airport.
TSA 'Detention Pods' Coming to an Airport Near
Travelers are forced to be bottlenecked through the pods as they leave the airport terminal. A
robotic voice gives instructions to wait inside the pod until a green light is shown and the door opens.
The pods have already been installed at Syracuse International Airport as part of a $60 million dollar renovation
and are likely to make their way into other major airports soon. Once travelers exit the pods, they are unable to
re-enter the terminal.
Some of the passengers exiting through the pods at Syracuse thought the machines were performing x-ray body scans,
according to CNY Central.
If you don’t want to pass through an airport scanner that allows
security agents to see an image of your naked body or to undergo the alternative, a thorough manual search, you may
have to find another way to travel this holiday season.
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is warning
thatany would-be commercial airline passenger who enters an
airport checkpoint and then refuses to undergo the method of inspection designated by TSA will not be allowed to
fly and also will not be permitted to simply leave the airport.
That person will have to remain on the premises to be questioned by
the TSA and possibly by local law enforcement.Anyone refusing
faces fines up to $11,000 and possible arrest.
“Once a person submits to the screening process, they can not just
decide to leave that process,” says Sari Koshetz, regional TSA spokesperson, based in Miami.
Koshetz said such passengers would be questioned “until it is
determined that they don’t pose a threat” to the public.
Palm Beach Sheriff’s Office spokesperson Teri Barbera said PBSO
deputies stationed at the airport would become involved when requested by the TSA.
“We will handle each incident on a case-by-case basis,” she
No one will be forcibly searched or arrested “just because they
refuse to go through the security procedures,” Barbera said. “That may rise to the level of suspicious behavior for
the TSA, but it wouldn’t rise to the level of suspicious behavior for a deputy,” she said.
But Barbera said that if a person is judged to be a possible threat,
deputies are legally permitted to detain and search that individual. “The deputies will do it at the airport just
as they would do it anywhere else,” she said.
HANDS IN YOUR PANTS TO DRIVE YOU FROM MOLESTATION TO THE
Owen J.J. Stone: TSA put their hands down my pants - PT 1
Owen J.J. Stone: TSA put their hands down my pants -
PT 2 of 2
Fitting X-Ray Device
HOWEVER, WHEN IT COMES TO RADIATION, LET'S NOT FORGET THE SHOE-FITING
FLUOROSCOPE...HISTORY IS INDEED BEING REPEATED, NEVERTHELESS, HOW MANY WILL HAVE TO SUFFER BEFORE THE EFFECTS ON
THE BODY ARE TRULY KNOWN? THE FLOUROSCOPE IS NOW ARCHIVED IN A BOOK TITLED: QUACK, TALES OF MEDICAL
Shoe Fitting X-Ray
In the late 1940's and early
1950's, the shoe-fitting x-ray unit was a common shoe store sales promotion device and nearly all
stores had one. It was estimated that there were 10,000 of these devices in use. This particular shoe-fitting x-ray
unit was produced by the dominant company in the field, the Adrian X-Ray Company of Milwaukee WI, now
defunct.Brooks Stevens, a noted industrial designer whose works
included the the Milwaukee Road Olympian and an Oscar MeyerWienermobile, designed this
The primary component of a
shoe-fitting x-ray unit wasthe
fluoroscope which consisted essentially of an x-ray tube
mounted near the floor and wholly or partially enclosed in a shielded box and a fluorescent screen. The
x-rays penetrated the shoes and feet and then struck the fluorescent light. This resulted in an image of the
feet within the shoes. The fluorescent image was reflected to three viewing ports at the top of the cabinet,
where the customer, the salesperson, and a third person (your mother?) could view the image at the
The radiation hazards associated with shoe fitting x-ray units were
recognized as early as 1950. The machines were often out of adjustment and were constructed so radiation leaked
into the surrounding area.
By 1970, shoe fitting x-ray units had been banned in 33 states including Minnesota
and strict regulation in the remaining 17 states made their operation impractical. Believe it or not, this
particular shoe-fitting x-ray unit was found in 1981 in a department store in Madison, West Virginia. It was still
being used in the store's shoe department! When it was pointed out to the store managers that it was against West
Virginia law to operate a shoe-fitting x-ray unit, they donated it to theThe U.S. Food and Drug
Safety Concerns and the
In 1946, the American Standards Association established a “safe
standard or tolerance dose,” that the feet receive no more than 2 R per 5 second exposure. Children were not to
receive more than 12 such exposures in a single year. The State ofNew
York adopted similar requirements in 1948, and other states and major cities began to follow
suit. As a result, the manufacturers of shoe fitting fluoroscopes became
concerned that their products would have to meet a myriad of standards that varied from location to location, and
they asked the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) to recommend a uniform set of
standards. The ACGIH did so and issued their guidance in 1950, an event that allowed the manufacturers to advertise
that they met the ACGIH standards.
By the early 1950s, a number of professional organizations had
issued warnings about the continued use of shoe-fitting fluoroscopes, e.g., the ACGIH, American College of Surgeons, New York Academy of Medicine and the American College of
Radiology. At the same time, the District of Columbia issued regulations that shoe fitting fluoroscopes could only
be operated by a licensed physiotherapist. A few years later, Massachusetts passed regulations requiring that the
machines be operated by a licensed physician. In 1957 the State of
Pennsylvania became the first jurisdiction to ban the use of shoe fitting fluoroscopes. By 1960, these events, plus
pressure from insurance companies, had led to the demise of the shoe-fitting fluoroscope, at least in the U.S. In
the end, the shoe stores were probably just as glad to be rid of the things - at least one survey had indicated that the machines were perceived by shoe salesmen a
sales gimmick rather than a useful tool.
Attempts to impose regulatory restrictions on the use of shoe
fitting fluoroscopes seem to have been limited to the United States . Despite considerable effort, Jacalyn Duffin
and Charles Hayter, authors of the aforementioned “Baring the Sole: The Rise and Fall of the Shoe Fitting
Fluoroscope,” could not find any Canadian or British legislative action pertaining to these devices. In fact,
Duffin and Hayter noted that these machines continued to be used in Canada and the UK , albeit to a limited extent,
at least until 1970.
While the exposure rates associated with these machines varied
considerably, the measurements reported by various authors are reasonably consistent.
According to Moeller (1996), measurements performed during the
late 1940s indicated that the doses to the feet ranged from 7 to 14 R for a 20 second
exposure. Doses to the pelvis ranged from 30 to 170 mrem. He also
noted that surveys at the time indicated that more than 60 percent of inspected machines exceeded the
American Standards Association recommendation of 2 R to the feet per five second exposure.
According to Duffin and Hayter (2000), a 1948 survey of x-ray
machines in Detroit indicated that the exposure rates at the position of the feet ranged from 16 to 75
Measurements performed by Williams (1949) ranged from 0.5 to 5.8
R/second to the feet. He also reported exposure rates that were above 100 mR/hr at a distance of ten feet from the
front of the unit.
Bavley (1950) reported measurements
of1 to 175 mR/hr (60 mR/hr average) at a height of 18 inches above
the floor and 9 inches away from the sides of the machine. The exposure rates 5 feet in front of the machine
and 18 inches above the floor were as high as 65 to 160 mR/hr (average: 114 mR/hr)
Despite these relatively high exposures, there were no reported
injuries to shoe store customers. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for the operators of these machines. Many
shoe salespersons put their hands into the x-ray beam to squeeze the shoe during the fitting. As a result, one
saleswoman who had operated a shoe fitting fluoroscope 10 to 20 times each day over a ten year period developed
dermatitis of the hands. One of the more serious injuries linked to the operation of these machines involved a shoe
model who received such a serious radiation burn that her leg had to be amputated (Bavley
"A stunning testament to the myriad of
ways people have tried to make money off the eternal ills of humankind." -New York
Times"Snake oil salesmen, beware!" -
Time Magazine"An assortment of
medical devices that will at once amaze, entertain, and inform you!"
Tales of Medical Fraud from the Museum of Questionable Medical Devices
by Bob McCoy, Curator
The curator of the Museum of Questionable Medical Devices shares his
collection of the hilarious, horrifying, and preposterous medical devices that have been foisted upon the public in
their quest for good health. Includes the Prostate Gland Warmer, Phrenology Machine, Recto Rotor, Nose
Straightener, Wonder Electro Marvel, and hundreds of other quack devices. With period advertisements, promotional
literature, and gadget instructions, this book offers a wealth of past-and-present medical fraud.
MONEY BEING MADE OFF OF YOUR FEAR
TSA Revolt : Naked Screening Lobby Pushes For Profit, Not
Heading up the renewed push
for those controversial, clothes-penetrating scanners at airports is former homeland security
Chertoff. His consulting firm represents companies who make the
scanners, but you wouldn't know it from reading the papers.
Bomber alerted the world to the possibility of terrorists putting
bombs in their underpants. So noweveryone is debating whether we should deploy
scanners which can see through clothes and show bombs nestled close to terrorists' nekkid bodies. Michael
Chertoff, who was Bush's homeland security secretary from 2005-2009, is a huge fan! Yesterday
A couple of years ago we began the process of testing them to see, first of all,
if they worked and second, if they could be deployed without unduly restricting the flow of traffic. And the good
news is that we were able to demonstrate that they were successful. We could use them without slowing up traffic
and we could also protect privacy.
But when Chertoff launched into his pitch for full-body scanners
Brown tonight, we learned that he is paid by the very companies
who make the penetrating devices:
In 2009, Chertoff founded theChertoff Group, a security consulting agency. The Chertoff Group's client list is
unknown—Chertoffrefused to talk about it in an interview—but he
admits in the clip above that some of his clients manufacture full-body scanners.
Yet when he appears inThe New York
The Washington Post, and onNPR to advocate for full-body scanning, Chertoff is
identified only as a former secretary of homeland security. No mention is made of the Chertoff Group. ("If they'd
been deployed, this would pick up this kind of device," he tells theTimes.) Did Chertoff 'forget' to tell reporters about
his connection to the industry he's pimping in their stories? It didn't look like he was about to volunteer the
information on Campbell Brown tonight. (Good catch, though, Campbell. We always knew there had to be some reason
you had your own show!)
So, here is a service to all you journalists working on upcoming articles about
full-body scanners, which will inevitably feature Chertoff playing the cheerleader. Feel free to copy this sentence
and paste it after Chertoff's name:
Chertoff is a former homeland security secretary and the founder of the Chertoff Group, a
security consulting firm whose clients include manufacturers of full-body scanners.
The TSA has quietly admitted there is no actual
“threat-addressing” basis for employing nude body scanners or invasive pat down procedures at airports, a notion
many travelers who are weary of the federal agency’s borderline sexual molestation have long suspected but were
hard-pressed to prove.
The TSA understands body scanners and pat downs are ineffective at addressing a threat
for which they admit “there is no evidence.”
The evidence was found in sealed court documents,
available through the PACER.gov website, regarding engineer and blogger Jon Corbett’s ongoing litigation over
the constitutionality of the agency’s loathsome security practices.
In a redacted version of the appellant’s brief, filed by Corbett on October 7 with the United States Court of
Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, several portions of the Summary of Facts section were blacked out,
raising questions as to the nature of the censored information.
But in a sealed version of the same documents obtained through PACER.gov (and available here), the redacted sections appear with incriminating clarity.
Through Redactions, TSA Admits Terror Threats are Slim to Nonexistent
Redaction shows TSA is aware explosives on airplanes “are extremely rare.’ (click to
A section detailing how “The TSA Has Misled The Public As to the Likelihood of the Threat
‘Addressed’ By Nude Body Scanners and Pat Downs,” includes a blacked out portion concerning the TSA’s knowledge
that “explosives on airplanes are extremely rare.”
“For example, the TSA analyzed hijackings in 2007 and found 7 hijacking incidents across the globe, but none of
them involved actual explosive devices,” Corbett explains in the brief, adding that the last attempt to bring an
explosive onboard an airplane through a U.S. airport occurred 35 years ago.
Another redacted section highlights the government’s concession that, “due to hardened cockpit doors and the
willingness of passengers to challenge hijackers,” it would be difficult to have a repeat of 9/11.
“The government also credits updated pre-flight security for that difficulty assessment,” the brief states, “but
the assessment was written before the en masse deployment of body scanners and before the update to the
pat down procedure. Further, the government admits that there have been no attempted domestic hijackings of any
kind in the 12 years since 9/11.”
The TSA also had the following section completely censored:
This begs the question, then, of what evidence the government possesses to rationalize that we should be so
afraid of non-metallic explosives being brought aboard flights departing from the U.S. that we must sacrifice our
civil liberties. The answer: there is none. “As of mid-2011, terrorist threat groups present in the Homeland are
not known to be actively plotting against civil aviation targets or airports; instead, their focus is on
fundraising, recruiting, and propagandizing.”
In the brief’s Summary of Argument, another redacted portion concerns the
TSA’s understanding that body scanners and pat downs are ineffective at addressing a threat for which they admit
“there is no evidence.”
By redacting certain parts of the brief, the TSA also inadvertently admits “it is aware of no
one who is currently plotting a terror attack against our aviation system using explosives (non-metallic
or otherwise),” and that, in addition to a cabin of empowered passengers who would make short work of a hijacker,
the Federal Flight Deck Officer program, which arms pilots with firearms, makes targeting an airplane “to be the
definition of insanity.”
Get the TSA Out of Our Pants
The redactions in Corbett’s court
documents are a damning indictment of the TSA’s procedures, and only serve to bolster his claims’
The 28-year-old entrepreneur arrived at his conclusions after admittedly “pawing through several thousand pages
of the TSA’s ‘administrative record,’” which he says the TSA uses as the “alleged rationale behind why they must
photograph us naked and literally put their hands in our pants to search us.”
The information contained within the redacted portions support what Infowars and others have long suspected:
that the sprawling agency – which is in the process of extending beyond the airport and onto highways, train stations and public buses – was never meant to thwart terrorists, but was instead set up to
purposely obstruct, annoy, harass and train the American public.
In other words, the court documents go a long way in proving the TSA is pure contrived security theater
custom-made solely to indoctrinate Americans, through prisoner training, into blindly accepting obedience to
authority as a normal way of life, not to mention a huge waste of about $7.91 billion in taxpayer money a year.
Sign says vehicles “will be searched by uniformed
Paul Joseph Watson
December 3, 2013
TSA-approved warrantless searches of vehicles
parked outside airports are being expanded, with a photograph taken at Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International
Airport informing Thanksgiving travelers that all vehicles belonging to AmeriPark customers “will be searched by
The policy, which first came to light earlier this summer after complaints from people who found
notes inside their car which read, “your vehicle has been inspected under TSA regulations,” continues to cause
confusion and stoke concern amongst privacy advocates.
When the story first broke, the TSA was keen to deflect
responsibility by explaining that although, “the plan is approved by the TSA, it is up to each airport
authority and its state and local law enforcement partners to follow the plan that has been implemented.”
The sign above, originally posted by Young Americans For Liberty, suggests that
airport uniformed security guards are responsible for carrying out the searches at Birmingham International, not
valet parking staff. The image was taken on November 27, the day after Thanksgiving and one of the busiest travel
days of the year.
At some airports the searches are also being conducted with customers receiving no notification
“I was inside paying my bill. I looked through the window and saw this gentleman looking through my
trunk,” said Michelle Zevola, who used the Curbside Valet Service at Charlotte Douglas Airport. “He was moving
things around, shining a flashlight, going through the compartments. I am so fine being searched at the airport.
It’s about safety. But I am not fine with my personal property being searched without permission or notification,”
“There is no posted signage at the valet stand or around the airport that indicates cars left with
curbside service will be searched. There is also no warning on the back of the valet ticket,” reported
NBC Charlotte. Deputy Aviation Director Jack Christine admitted that the searches had been taking place for a
year and half without any signage or notification.
Under the guidelines, the person performing the search, whether that be a valet parking employee or
a “unformed security” guard, is instructed to check the trunk, the engine as well as scan inside the car.
Critics have lambasted the TSA and airports who enforce the policy for entrusting searches of
vehicles to valet parking attendants, who wouldn’t normally be considered to be highly trained in bomb detection
“Take note of that, America. Your safety can only be guaranteed by a search of valet-parked
vehicles, but not by a trained agent,” wrote TechDirt’s Tim Cushing. “Instead, your valet will do a
brief search of your vehicle to ensure there’s nothing inside the cabin, trunk or under the hood that looks like a
bomb. (Like, for instance, a bundle of wires and some other stuff with a post-it attached saying, “NOT A
Another traveler who complained that her car had been searched with zero notice was Laurie Iacuzza,
who said she was “furious” that airport personnel rifled through her vehicle without permission.
Infowars is set to commission a poll by a professional polling agency that will ask Americans if
they are willing to submit to a TSA anal cavity search in order to fly. We reckon a solid 10-20 per cent would say
yes. What other questions should be asked in order to illustrate how much indignity travelers will tolerate?
Sheeple Bleat About Loss of “Security Rituals They Have
Come to Trust
Published on Nov 15, 2014
We’ve been calling it "Security Theatre" for
a long time, but when NYC’s Channel 2 complained about loss of “Security Ritual” in the TSA Pre-Check Program, they
unintentionally hit the nail on the head. "Security Ritual" best describes the fraud because it's a kind of state
religion that requires the adherents to have child-like faith in the omnipotence of the state and it's benign
intentions. But TSA has admitted there was no threat in its own internal documents.
It remains to
be seen how many Americans will keep buying the proven lies from their government (note the links
below). Time will soon tell if the people of this nation have the good sense to face that they are being
lied to, or succumb to government propaganda and demoralization.
Ex-propagandist for the
KGB,Yuri Bezmenov, had this to say
about demoralizing a people :
"As I mentioned
before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to
assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic
proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it.... That's the tragedy of the situation of
In addition to images of President Obama’s address
to the American public on Sunday night, it has emerged that the dramatic photos of Obama, Biden, Hillary
Clinton and members of the White House security team watching the assassination of Bin Laden “live” were in
fact completely staged, casting further doubt on the ever-changing official account of the
The staging of the Obama speech photo is
embarrassing, but the staging of the situation room photos, which were heavily promoted by the establishment
media, falsely presented as evidence that Obama, Biden and Clinton saw the assassination of Osama live, and
used by the White House to lend credence to the fairytale they were busily scripting, are
DHS Gave Muslim Brotherhood VIP Treatment,
NO TSA PAT DOWNS
A newly released document obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request confirms that
the State Department ordered the Department of Homeland Security to spare members of the Muslim Brotherhood
traveling to the US in 2012 a TSA pat down or any kind of secondary screening.
The one page document (PDF), obtained by the Investigative Project on Terrorism, shows
that members of a Muslim Brotherhood delegation traveling through Minneapolis Airport, New York’s John F. Kennedy
Airport and Dulles Airport were handed expedited entry known as “port courtesy,” which is normally reserved for
high ranking government officials and dignitaries. At the time, the Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate Mohamed Morsi,
later deposed, had not been elected president.
Bin Laden was a strawman-villain concocted by the Western
intelligence apparatus to take the blame for the orchestrated terror that is scripted and carried out by the
globalist-allied factions. The Phantom Osama bin Laden was a skeleton key opening the door to foreign intervention
in the middle east or anywhere al Qaeda might be. The motive is simple-- ever-expanding wars for the military
industrial complex, and the often more lucrative periods of reconstruction (i.e. you break it, you buy it). The
occupation continues here at home with the creation of a police state supposedly meant to combat
In 1991, the Club published The First Global
Revolution. It analyses the problems of humanity, calling these collectively or in essence the 'problematique'. It
notes (laments) that, historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by enemies in common:
"The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome domestic failure
and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself - when things
become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face
an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the
traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those
whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so used to classifying its
neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and
public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new
THE GLOBALISTSMOVE FROM THEIRALQAEDA
CREATION,TO FABRICATING HOMEGROWN DOMESTIC
A failed attempt to recruit Aaron Russo resulted in recent
light being shed on the CFR...And The Fake War On Terror!
ago, after his popular video “Mad As Hell” was released and Aaron Russo began his campaign to become
Governor of Nevada, Russo was noticed by Nicholas Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney. Seeing
Russo’s passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the
elite’s CFR. Watch the full interview here: Reflections and
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And
The Fake War On Terror!
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And The Fake War On
"I freed a thousand slaves; I
could have freed a thousand more, if only they knew they were slaves."
Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who
are constantly and intelligently on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic
"A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time,
not on the spot, not here and now and in their calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other
worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the
encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it.”