Alex Jones reveals the newly discovered Blacksite in Chicago were Americans rights are
being taken away.Some of the activities include off the books interrogation of political activists and suspected
criminals. Civilians are being held without access to the outside world or legal represintation.
Horrified! Locals Unaware of Chicago Torture
Published on Mar 2, 2015
Infowars reporter Joe Biggs takes to the streets of Chicago and is shocked to find out
that the majority of Chicagoans are completely unaware of the horrific torture site located right in their back
yard. Chicago locals also sound off on the upcoming run off of the mayoral election and how Rahm Emanuel should not
be re-elected if he had knowledge of this black site.
The only exceptional thing about the US is the extent of
the evil that resides in Washington, D.C
by Paul Craig Roberts | Infowars.com | December 12, 2014
Readers have asked for my take on the CIA torture
report. There is so much information and commentary available that it is unnecessary.
Igor Volsky http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article40428.htm provides a concise summary.
President George W. Bush signed off on torture and then told the gullible people that “this government does not
torture people.” The torture was horrific.
The CIA even tortured its own informers. Two American psychologists who designed the torture program were paid $81
Instead of apologizing for the CIA’s destruction of our country’s reputation, CIA director John Brennan defended
the policy and claimed it helped to protect us from terrorists. The CIA fought for months to block even the release
of the truncated and redacted report that made it to the public. Have a look at Brennan: http://rt.com/usa/213663-brennan-cia-torture-report/ He looks more dangerous than a
Just google CIA torture report and you will find much to read, including justifications of the torture program
by neoconservatives, Republican members of the House and Senate, Dick Cheney, the presstitute media, and a large
number of others.
Here’s my two cents:One purpose of the torture program was to produce
self-incriminated “terrorists” to justify and feed the hoax “war on terror.” The “war on terror” was public cover
for secret agendas that the American people would have rejected. This is disturbing enough. Even more disturbing,
the torture program shows that no one in the US and European governments who knew of the program and participated
in torture has an ounce of humanity, integrity, compassion, and morality. They are evil people, and the ones who
inflicted the torture enjoyed the pain and suffering that they inflicted on others.
The only exceptional thing about the US is the extent of the evil that resides in Washington,
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the
Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He
has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. His latest book,
The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is now
Naomi Wolf: "Obama can lock any US citizen up without
Naomi Wolf: "Obama can lock any US citizen up without
Barack Obamas indefinite detention claim, coupled with the enemy combatant right he inherited,
enables him to lock up any US citizen forever without a trial, author and political consultant Naomi Wolf told
GOP House Affirms Military Detention, As Thai
Military Shows How It Will Go Down For Politicians
The same day US Special Forces were
practicing Urban Warfare in America with foreign troops from 16 nations, in one of those nations, Thailand, a
military coup was rounding up politicians. Ironically, the GOP controlled House reaffirmed yet again, its approval
of indefinite detention by the military. And on the same day, the Democrat controlled Senate approved a lawyer who
wrote secret memos making secret arguments supporting drone assassinations of Americans, for a lifetime appointment
to a court one level below the Supreme Court.
A General Writes the First After-Action Report on the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq: Why We Lost
U.S. SPECIAL FORCES, FOREIGN TROOPS PRACTICE INVADING TAMPA
Thai military detains politicians and activists
House Passes NDAA; Critical Amendments Fail, Others Succeed
WYDEN: "EVERY AMERICAN HAS THE RIGHT TO KNOW WHEN THEIR GOVT. BELIEVES IT IS ALLOWED TO KILL THEM!"
Barron Narrowly Confirmed by Senate Despite Drone Memo
Americans can legally be kidnapped
and held without trial
David Knight breaks down anti NDAA legislation and "head fakes" being
used by our national leaders.
One of the Most Powerful Speeches Ever
- Daphne Lee on the NDAA -
Daphne Lee is "just a Mom", she says. But
this liberty-minded, passionate Constitutionalist gave one of the most powerful speeches about the NDAA that we
have ever seen. Daphne, who is the Nevada state Director of PANDA (People Against NDAA)
had to sit for more than 8 hours at a recent Clark County Commission meeting in Las Vegas before she was finally
allowed to speak, to a mostly empty room. It was the third meeting Daphne had attended in her attempt to share the
truth about the 2011 NDAA law with the Commission.
Barack Hussein Obama swore he wouldn't sign the NDAA because it contained two provisions inserted into the military
funding bill allowing for the military to snatch and detain any citizen the government labels as "a possible
terrorist'. These provisions were fought for by Lindsey Graham and John McCain who claim the United States is a
'battlefield' in the endless 'war on terror'. To the surprise of some, Obama LIED and he signed the NDAA on New
Year's Eve 2011.
"The laws of war DO NOT and CAN NOT coexist with our Bill of Rights. It's not possible. You cannot apply the laws
of war to this country and expect for the Bill of Rights to be respected and upheld. It's NOT possible." - Daphne
Lee, Nevada State Director, PANDA
Video clip: Public domain, Daphne's speech video used with her expressed consent and permission.
Mandatory Vaccine Threat
NDAA on Steroids: Ebola Death
Published on Oct 15, 2014
FOX news celebrities are floating trial balloons for Ebola camps — i.e., rebranded FEMA
camps. Is anyone on FOX or mainstream media about due process or review for those accused of potentially BECOMING
sick? And does our government’s response look more like Nigeria, where it was contained, or Liberia, where it is
In the video below, Alex Jones highlights how the
Guardian Centers video is yet another startling indication that authorities in the United States are preparing for
civil unrest as America increasingly begins to resemble a militarized police state.
My topic for this evening is “now, it’s assassinations”. What have
we allowed ourselves to become? Are we no longer a nation of laws? Have we become instead a nation of men who make
secret arrests? Are secret prisons now simply another tool of the federal government law enforcement? Is secret
rendition of individuals now permitted out of misplaced fear? Have we decided that the writ of habeas corpus is not
worth defending? Is torture now an acceptable tool for making us safe?
Unfortunately, the single answer to all these questions from the
leaders of our country to many of our citizens appears to be yes. And now we are told that assassination of
foreigners as well as American citizens is legitimate and necessary to provide security for our people. It is my
firm opinion that nothing could be further from the truth.
Secret arrests, secret renditions, torture and assassinations are
illegal under both domestic and international law. These activities should be anathema to the citizens of a
constitutional republic. The real threat doesn’t arise from our failure to torture, rather desensitizing our nation
to the willful neglect and sacrifice of our civil liberties fought and died for over the centuries, is the
establishment media is convinced that tea party members, 9/11 truthers, libertarians, Ron Paul supporters, and
basically anyone with a dissenting political opinion is a likely domestic terrorist, they should be celebrating the
fact that a new bill would allow the government to detain such people as “enemy belligerents” indefinitely and
without trial based on their “suspected activity”.
The “Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act
of 2010,” introduced by Senators John McCain and Joseph Lieberman on Thursday with little fanfare, “sets out a
comprehensive policy for the detention, interrogation and trial of suspected enemy belligerents who are believed to
have engaged in hostilities against the United States by requiring these individuals to be held in military
custody, interrogated for their intelligence value and not provided with a Miranda warning,”
writes the Atlantic’s Marc Ambinder.
The bill does not distinguish between U.S. citizens and non-citizens,
and states that “suspected belligerents” who are “considered a “high-value detainee” shall not be provided with a
A person is considered a “high value detainee” if they fulfil one of
the following criteria.
(1) poses a threat of an attack on civilians or civilian
facilities within the U.S. or U.S. facilities abroad; (2) poses a threat to U.S. military personnel or U.S.
military facilities; (3) potential intelligence value; (4) is a member of al Qaeda or a terrorist group
affiliated with al Qaeda or (5) such other matters as the President considers appropriate.
Now that theSouthern
Poverty Law Center and the federal government,via the MIAC report and innumerable
other leaked documents, now consider virtually anyone with a dissenting opinion against the state as “posing a
threat,” millions of peaceful American citizens could be swept up by this frightening dragnet of
However, according to the bill, an individual doesn’t even have to
pose a threat to be snatched, detained and interrogated – they can merely be deemed to be of “potential
intelligence value” or come under the vague and sweeping mandate of “such other matters as the President considers
This last designation hands Obama dictator powers to have any
American citizen kidnapped, detained, and interrogated on a whim.
The only proviso that even hints at some form of check or balance is
the measure that states, “The High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team must make a preliminary determination whether
the detainee is an unprivileged enemy belligerent within 48 hours of taking detainee into custody.”
“The High-Value Detainee Interrogation Team must submit its
determination to the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General after consultation with the Director of National
Intelligence, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency. The Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General make a final determination and report the determination
to the President and the appropriate committees of Congress. In the case of any disagreement between the Secretary
of Defense and the Attorney General, the President will make the determination,” states the bill.
“Indefinite detention flies in the face of American values and
violates this country’s commitment to the rule of law,” states Laura W. Murphy, Director of the ACLU Washington
Of course, such positions from the ACLU as well asAmnesty
International will only be used as grist for the neo-con propaganda
mill about how the bill ought to be passed in order to avoid being “soft on terrorists,” a piece of spin still
being swallowed whole by millions of conservatives who are blissfully unaware of the fact that the apparatus of the
war on terror is now being aimed squarely at politically active American citizens.
“Torture, indefinite imprisonment, secret trials and limited staged
hearings are the stuff of cheap dictatorships,” writes Ian McColgin. “They are the sort of idiocy we scorned in the
Soviets, the Koreans and the Vietnamese. It is astonishing that we have senators and citizens even discussing this
bill which is not a capitulation to terrorism – it’s the triumph of terrorism.”
Homeland Security is already implementing technology to be enforced at “security
events” which purportedly reads “malintent” on behalf of an individual who passes through a checkpoint. Perhaps the
video below explains just how “enemy belligerents” will be identified on American soil.
A rose is a rose a rose. And torture is torture is
Obama’s remarks, delivered at a White House press conference on August 1st, have already
passed through infamy to become part of the internet lexicon. But why? He did not tell us anything new, did not
impart any information that added to our understanding of the sexual assault, sleep deprivation, mock
executions, forced medications, temperature extremes, or waterboarding that the US military and CIA have
admittedly deployed on their captives in the years since 9/11.
No, we already knew that. This is not why Obama’s words are so remarkable.
Less than one week after this speech, New York Times Executive Editor Dean Baquet came out with a remarkable statement of his own.
“Over the past few months,” read the statement, “reporters and editors of The Times have debated a subject that
has come up regularly ever since the world learned of the C.I.A.’s brutal questioning of terrorism suspects:
whether to call the practices torture.”
“When the first revelations emerged a decade ago, the situation was murky. The details about what the Central
Intelligence Agency did in its interrogation rooms were vague. The word ‘torture’ had a specialized legal meaning
as well as a plain-English one. While the methods set off a national debate, the Justice Department insisted that
the techniques did not rise to the legal definition of ‘torture.’ The Times described what we knew of the program
but avoided a label that was still in dispute, instead using terms like harsh or brutal interrogation methods.”
The Times claims that its sudden abandonment of the English language over the past decade in favor of tortuous,
concocted phrases like “enhanced interrogation methods,” itself first coined by the Nazi Gestapo in 1937 to describe their own identical torture
techniques, was necessary to preserve the distinction between common usage of the word “torture” and its legal
definition. This is a lie. The new standard that the Times is using to employ the term—“incidents in which we
know for sure that interrogators inflicted pain on a prisoner in an effort to get information”—is almost
word-for-word identical to the definition under US law, specifically 18 USC 2340: “an act committed by a person acting under the color of law specifically
intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering.” The definition was always what the Times is
now claiming they have discovered it to be. That they are now going to call torture “torture” should not be
And yet these things are remarkable. Why? Because words, language, names have been used to obscure political
realities for so long that when facts are simply described in plain language, it is nearly unfathomable.
“In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible. Things like the
continuance of British rule in India, the Russian purges and deportations, the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan,
can indeed be defended, but only by arguments which are too brutal for most people to face, and which do not square
with the professed aims of the political parties. Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism,
question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness. Defenseless villages are bombarded from the air, the inhabitants
driven out into the countryside, the cattle machine-gunned, the huts set on fire with incendiary bullets: this is
called pacification. Millions of peasants are robbed of their farms and sent trudging along the roads with no more
than they can carry: this is called transfer of population or rectification of frontiers.”
In fact, historians tell us that this phenomenon occurs almost as far back in history as we are
prepared to look, back even to the 5th century B.C.
But in our current age, when virtually every act of the criminal and almost universally-reviled political class
requires this reality inversion, any speaking of the plain truth is a revolutionary act.
It is sometimes said that words are merely words, and that, carrying no weight, they have no relevance in the
real world. On the contrary, as the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein noted nearly a century ago, “The limits of my
language mean the limits of my world.” What is not expressible is not conceivable.
If the victims of US aggression are always and everywhere described as “terrorists” and “human shields” and “war
criminals,” let alone “gooks” or “nips” or “sand niggers,” then defenders of those populations are at a
disadvantage before they even begin their defense. Their opponents are defending “heroes” and “patriots” and
“freedom fighters,” so how can they lose the argument?
Merely putting a word in the form of a derogatory phrase creates in the mind of the listener the impression of
something unsavory. People who care about the truth are mere “truthers,” after all. Tenth amendment supporters are
“tenthers.” Those who prepare for the future are “preppers.” Want to demonize someone who does good things? Call
them a do-gooder!
Language is the great tool of the tyrants. It always has been, and always will be. Patriots are expected to
abide by a PATRIOT Act that destroys their Bill of Rights, support “surgical strikes” against “enemy combatants” by
the Department of “Defense,” and cheer the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to those who wage war.
Our language has been weaponized against us.
Taking our cue from Orwell, then, we might observe that telling the truth is a revolutionary act, and calling
things by their right name a revolutionary idea.
Yes, a rose is a rose is a rose. And torture by any other name is still torture. Down with Big Brother.
A former Marine Corps Colonel who was stationed
in Fallujah and trained Iraqi soldiers warns that the Department of Homeland Security is working with law
enforcement to build a “domestic army,” because the federal government is afraid of its own citizens.
In this exclusive in studio interview Ret. Col Martino covers the DHS buildup and solutions our overreaching
corrupt government officials.
“People in general just will NOT,
take their heads out of the sand!”
Psyops, or psychological operations, is a term used to describe the
techniques of psychological manipulation used in warfare. These operations are used to deceive, confuse, disrupt
and demoralize the enemy, with an aim toward weakening enemy resistance or even causing enemy forces to surrender
and enemy populations to capitulate.
An independent agency of the United States government responsible for
collecting and coordinating intelligence and counterintelligence activities abroad in the national
interest; headed by the Director of Central Intelligence under the supervision of the President and
National Security Council...There has been considerable criticism of the CIA relating to security
and counterintelligence failures, failures in intelligence analysis, human rights concerns,
external investigations and document releases, influencing public opinion and law enforcement, drug
trafficking, and lying to Congress. In 1987, the former CIA Station Chief in Angola in 1976, John
Stockwell, said the CIA is responsible for tens of thousands of covert actions and destablization
programs since it was created by Congress with the passage of the National Security Act of
1947.At the time, Stockwell estimated that over 6
million people had died in CIA covert actions.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is a governmental agency
belonging to the United StatesDepartment of Justice that serves as both a federal criminal
investigative body and an internal intelligence agency (counterintelligence). Also, it is the
government agency responsible for investigating crimes on Indian reservations in the United States
under the Major Crimes Act. The branch has investigative jurisdiction over violations of more than
200 categories of federal crime. The agency was established in 1908 as the Bureau of Investigation
(BOI). Its name was changed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 1935. The agency
headquarters is the J. Edgar Hoover Building, located in Washington, D.C. The agency has fifty-six
field offices located in major cities throughout the United States, and more than 400 resident
agencies in lesser cities and areas across the nation. More than 50 international offices called
"legal attachés" exist in U.S. embassies and consulates general worldwide.
'Federal Bureau of Investigation organizes almost
all terror plots in the US' ...The report reveals that the FBI regularly infiltrates communities
where they suspect terrorist-minded individuals to be engaging with others. Regardless of their
intentions, agents are sent in to converse within the community, find suspects that could
potentially carry out “lone wolf” attacks and then, more or less, encourage them to do so. By
providing weaponry, funds and a plan, FBI-directed agents will encourage otherwise-unwilling
participants to plot out terrorist attacks, only to bust them before any events fully
How could there be aWar on Terror and actually say that we're having
awar against terrorism, and leave the
borders wide open? If you were the President of the United States, or I were the President of the United States,
and9/11 really happened the way they
want us to believe it happened, the first thing you would do is shut down the borders, so people couldn't get in
the country to harm you. But they left the borders wide open. Becausethe bankers want the borders open, because they want
aone-world government. They
want a North American Union. They don't want borders
here.9/11 was only a manifestation.
It was done to create afear in the
American public, so that we willobey what they want us to do.
In 1991, the Club published The First Global
Revolution. It analyses the problems of humanity, calling these collectively or in essence the 'problematique'. It
notes (laments) that, historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by enemies in common:
"The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome domestic failure
and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself - when things
become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face
an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the
traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those
whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so used to classifying its
neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and
public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new
THE GLOBALISTSMOVE FROM THEIRALQAEDA
CREATION,TO FABRICATING HOMEGROWN DOMESTIC
A failed attempt to recruit Aaron Russo resulted in recent
light being shed on the CFR...And The Fake War On Terror!
ago, after his popular video “Mad As Hell” was released and Aaron Russo began his campaign to become
Governor of Nevada, Russo was noticed by Nicholas Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney. Seeing
Russo’s passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the
elite’s CFR. Watch the full interview here: Reflections and
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And
The Fake War On Terror!
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And The Fake War On
"It is the common fate of the indolent to see their rights become a prey
to the active.The condition upon which God hath given liberty
to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break,
servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt."
-- John Philpot Curran
WHY WE MUST FIGHT
Dan Johnson, Founder of PANDA - People
Against the NDAA (and indefinite detention of American citizens) on WHY we must fight & defeat tyranny in all
The content in my videos and on the SGTbull07 channel are provided for informational purposes only. Use the
information found in my videos as a starting point for conducting your own research and conduct your own due
diligence (DD) BEFORE making any significant investing decisions. SGTbull07 assumes all information to be truthful
and reliable; however, I cannot and do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of this information. Thank you.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn was born in Russia, DECEMBER 11, 1918. He was arrested for writing a
letter criticizing Stalin and spent 11 years in labor camps. He began writing and eventually received the Nobel
Prize for Literature.
REACH OUT TO OTHERS
[Help Educate Family And Friends With This Page And The Links Below]